Poll to condemn or condone "the violence and law breaking that took place inside the Capital on 1/6"

[BlindBoo]

I’m an Ultra-Conservative Authoritarian and I literally couldn’t support the events at the US Capitol Building any more if I tried. It is one of the greatest American political moments in my lifetime.

It was literally one the STUPIDEST things Trump ever did... hold a massive rally steps from the capitol on THAT DAY. He should have KNOWN, or someone around him, that the corrupts democrats and their human debris within the deep state would EXPLOIT IT.

Democrats had nothing to do with it. This is all on you kids.

Yes, Democrats supported the violence, looting and plunder in cities across America all last summer, not going into the Capital on January 6. True dat

Like the Capital assault, most support the right to protest, not to riot. You know it.

Rioters and insurrectionists are criminals.

Protesters aren't.

Good enough for me.

 

[Crepitus]

I’m an Ultra-Conservative Authoritarian and I literally couldn’t support the events at the US Capitol Building any more if I tried. It is one of the greatest American political moments in my lifetime.

It was literally one the STUPIDEST things Trump ever did... hold a massive rally steps from the capitol on THAT DAY. He should have KNOWN, or someone around him, that the corrupts democrats and their human debris within the deep state would EXPLOIT IT.

Democrats had nothing to do with it. This is all on you kids.

Yes, Democrats supported the violence, looting and plunder in cities across America all last summer, not going into the Capital on January 6. True dat

Like the Capital assault, most support the right to protest, not to riot. You know it.

I do not support riots. Never seen you condemn those involved in city riots from the Floyd violence.

Then you haven't been paying attention. Rioters are criminals.

Protesters aren't.

 

[kyzr]

As an example, Dr. Fauci's paying the Wuhan Lab for covid "gain of function" research bit him on the ass.

That's another lie. Fauci actually said “Senator Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely and completely incorrect, that the N.I.H. has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute.”

The Wuhan Lab documented that the funding came from NIH. Dr. Fauci paid the Wuhan Lab to do gain of function research, and it got out. Thank God it wasn't the deadliest virus they developed.
Point being, that we can't trust anything that the government says or does. You can drink their KoolAde, I'm not.

Funding for research did come from the N.I.H. but that funding wasn't for gain-of-function research. Nor had it been proven that was the origin of the virus. Senator Paul lied and Fauci called him on it.

Fauci is a liar. Rand is calling him a liar. The paper trail confirms that Fauci is lying. Do you support paying China to do "gain of function" research to make bat viruses more deadly? I don't.

Fauci claims US gave $600,000 to Wuhan lab research; documents show it was more

In a Senate hearing late last month, top doctor Anthony Fauci told lawmakers the U.S. granted $600,000 in funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology over a five year period, but documents provided by the Department of Health and Human Services Friday show otherwise.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Faun]

To prove a point, we need to clarify how many GOP posters support the "violence and law breaking that took place inside the Capital on 1/6/21".
As opposed to the many of us who supported the 1/6 protest, but NOT the attack on the Capital Building and the threats to Mike Pence and the injuries and deaths and property damage.

Please vote in the poll honestly.

You’re not asking the right question.

my vote….

Not a democrat. Oppose the attack

The right question is?

Something along the lines of, "I'm a GOP voter and I condemn the violence done by my fellow Republicans".

You'll get a 0.0 response rate to that question. A lot of the GOP voters really believe the Trump supporters were just on a Capitol Building tour and doing nothing wrong.

Look at the fucking poll before typing nonsense.
The vote is 16 to 4 of GOP voters opposed to the riot at the capital, not 0.0
Assuming the 4 votes are GOP and not dems.

Read the fucking post you're responding to.

Who committed the acts of violence at the capital?

OK, I re-read it. You said: "You'll get a 0.0 response rate to that question." I showed you that the response was 16-4 (not 0.0)

Prove that "a lot of GOP voters believe "the Trump supporters were just on a Capitol Building tour and doing nothing wrong." (you can't, the poll proves you wrong)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/05/18/clyde-tourist-capitol-riot-photos/

Lying Republican's try to rewrite history

Shortly after Liz Cheney was ousted from her leadership post for speaking the truth about Donald Trump and his roll in the January 6th attack on the US capital, Republican lawmakers, in a pathetic attempt to curry favor with Trump began trying to rewrite history. Rep. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., said...

www.usmessageboard.com

Here is my poll question, and your recommended poll question:
"I'm a GOP voter and I condemn the violence done by my fellow Republicans". (yours)

"I'm a GOP voter and NO I do NOT support the attack on the Capital Building" (mine)​

Call me illiterate, but I'm not seeing a major difference in those two questions, since the capital riot was obviously by Trump supporters, and FBI instigators.

Yeah shit brains; you didn't post the question I posited. Condemning the violence and explicitly listing the offenders as Trump supporters will get you nowhere with your fellow blobbers. You guys are not living in reality.

As for your illiteracy...you don't see the word "republican" in mine but not yours?

You must be the only idiot in the country who doesn't know as "fact" that the people who rioted at the capital building were Trump supporters, duh.

Proving my point about your illiteracy. Your last line:
"As for your illiteracy...you don't see the word "republican" in mine but not yours?" (look again, yes it is in yours, its assumed in mine)

I win. Give your mom her puter back.

Meanwhile back in reality, I gave you 2 links to folks who still insist it was not Trump supporters.

Oh, I'm 100% sure it was Trump supporters who rioted at the Capitol, did the Tiki Torch white power march in Charlottesville, shot up multiple places across the nation...ran over people in their car, routinely beat the crap out of people at their rallies.

Trump supporters crave violence...always have, always will.

PS: My mother died. Watch your step, boy.

1. Ok, but it was Trump supporters. There may have been a few others, such as FBI or antifa, but of the ~400 rioters obviously most were Trump supporters who were upset about the alleged voter fraud.

2. The tiki torch march was about confederate statues not voter fraud. Lets stick to debating one topic at a time. I'm not sure what got shot up except gang violence in urban plantations, like Chicago?! If antifa doesn't want to get beat up, don't have counter rallies, free speech, diversity, tolerance, and all.

3. Trump violence?!
View attachment 504719

View attachment 504720


4. Sorry about your mother, you sounded younger than that. My only point being that proof-reading posts is a good thing.

Great, let's see your evidence that there were members of the FBI and Antifa there....

The "evidence" is tough to come by being that the FBI doesn't like to admit they spy on Americans, and the MSM covers up for them.

Media hushes up report suggesting FBI involvement in Capitol riot, as White House turns anti-terrorism efforts on American people

Court filings suggest that FBI operatives were among the mob who stormed the US Capitol in January, and may have set up the riot. With the riot used as justification for new terrorism policy, the media is downplaying the story.

www.rt.com

Which means you made it up.

You freaks live in a fantasy world where you accept your hallucinations as real. Do you even know you’re psychotic?

Made what up? How stupid are you? Read the fucking articles, and google it.
You're just a partisan hack that can't face reality.

Were feds involved in facilitating the 1/6 siege? Number of unindicted co-conspirators raise questions.

The significant number of unindicted co-conspirators involved in the January 6 Capitol siege is strangely similar to those in Michigan plot to kidnap Gov. Whitmer, where it was discovered embedded FBI undercover/informants were intimately involved in facilitating the plot.

www.lawenforcementtoday.com

LOL

Why on Earth should I Google your bullshit just because you can't prove it? I already showed revolver.news is a fake news site. Your literally sourcing a known Russian propaganda site (RT) sourcing rightarded news (Fox) sourcing a fake news website (revolver.news) and then getting pissy with me for laughing at your ignorance.

Dumbfuck, Carlson is a moron. Want proof? He claims the FBI was involved because there are "unindicted co-conspirators" listed on the complaint against some Oath Keepers. Carlsson is such an imbecile, it doesn't even occur to him that those are otherwise known as -- informants. Those would be other Oath Keepers striking deals with the FBI to sing like a bird in exchange for reduced or eliminated charges.

You Qultists are out of your fucking minds. There is no tin foil hat conspiracy crazy enough to make you think, 'wait a second?'

So if the FBI "informants" were some of the most radical "conspirators" trying to entrap the goobers, that makes "white supremacists" the biggest threat facing the US? Hardly.
Keep covering up for the deep state moron. The FBI got away with illegally spying on Trump, falsifying evidence, and setting up General Flynn, so setting up a few hicks is no challenge. Yet they fail to investigate Hunter's laptop full of evidence as well as in in-person whistleblower. The Federal government is just a partisan extension of the DNC.
So I'm not giving the FBI a pass yet. If the "informants" were part of the planning, why wasn't the capital building fortified and reinforced? Maybe someone wanted an incident for political gain. We'll see what comes out of the woodwork over time.
As an example, Dr. Fauci's paying the Wuhan Lab for covid "gain of function" research bit him on the ass.

"So if the FBI "informants"..."

That's as far as I got to see you're lying again.

In reality, you possess zero evidence the informants are FBI.

And again, you posted links to a number of websites carrying this nonsense as though multiple sites carrying the story lends it credibility -- but you ignored the fact that EVERY site you linked referenced the same fake news website, revolover.news, which is an unabashedly fake website; which refuses to disclose who's behind it.

You're fucking crazy, con.

You don't know how many FBI informants, including "deal cutter rats" not just undercover FBI agents, there were. Given other surveillance capabilities of the government, I can't imagine that the FBI didn't know that the bullhorn guys would herd the crowd over to the capital building. Even if there were zero "informants" the security folks knew that up to 1m Trump supporters would be attending his rally. So why wasn't the Capital Building, that was in-session, protected better? just sayin'

LOL

Ummm, neither do you yet you're the one claiming the FBI may have been involved but you have no proof to back that up.

I'm the one pointing out you have no proof.

Saying that the "FBI MAY HAVE BEEN INVOLVED" is NOT claiming that the FBI was involved. Its a suspicion, not an indictment.
So don't get your panties in a bunch over a suspicion. Remember the furor over Trump's Russian Collusion that turned out to be a hoax? Yet Hillary's Steele Dossier written by Russians was somehow overlooked. Mueller had no clue who FusionGPS was?! A partisan hack investigation by any other name. So the FBI can sink or swim on the truth, we'll see.

You'll note, I said, "you're the one claiming the FBI may have been involved." I added that emphasis to remind you I didn't accuse you of saying anything you didn't actually claim. But the point is -- you have no evidence they were. So claiming the FBI may have been involved is a conspiracy rooted in dementia until, if it ever happens, some evidence of such surfaces.

If you want to play the "may have" game, I could easily argue Trump may have raped a 12 year old and a 13 year old. To be clear, I don't believe he did, but there's more evidence of that than there is of your hallucination that the FBI may have been involved in Insurrection Day.

 

[Crepitus]

I condemned the people who entered the capital repeatedly

But still can't call them what they are.

 

[jc456]

The point is, the Left starts fires in cities when they are angry.\

So we've gone from Burning down cities to 'well they start fires'.

you just claimed they did no such thing.

I said it was an illiberal thing to do.

What? That must be fake news. Ya'll told me all the riots were going to stop once Commander Joe was in charge. Or did you mean the anarchist in Portland are still anarchist? Shocked I'm sure.

Sorry dimbulb, that was you incompetent morons saying that. Portland is ALL yours side’s violence and crime. Own it. Or just keep trying to deflect and project. Still no condemnation of BLM rioters. No shock there.

I don't live anywhere near Portland. I condemn and have condemned the anarchists violence for decades. Now continue to piss up the flagpole.

Anarchists, but not leftists. Telling that you still refuse to condemn your side’s criminals. The flagpole thing must be a leftist thing. Seems to fit with their others perversions.

Still pissing up that pole I see. Anarchist, Antifa, Prayer boys, Proud Boys Bungholeboys Lefties, Righties or anyone else who instigates violence deserves the full punishment of the law for their crimes.

Violence is the last resort of the incompetent.

Notice what word I still didn't use?

You buried it, but FINALLY you even condemned your own leftists committing violence. Wow, that was hard

Finally my ass. Americans condemn the violence from both sides of the extremes like even this poll shows. You fucks tried to lie about what I said. So let me reiterate. Fuck you.

You can't be a liberal and do illiberal things like instigating political violence, or defacing public or private property.

and yet many claiming that title actually do JUST that.

So what? People lie. Trumpybear claimed to be a conservative too.

I dont recall him claiming any such thing

He was a con man joining the Republicans. Not only did he claim to be conservative, but he also redefined conservatism as well as redefined the GOP. Kudos to his ability as a Con Man.

"Invoking conservative icon Ronald Reagan, Trump recalled that the late president “was [once] a Democrat, and really a Democrat with a liberal leaning, or a liberal bent and became a Republican and a pretty conservative Repub—I wouldn’t say the most by any stretch, but a pretty conservative Republican.”

“When you get down to it, I am a conservative person. I am by nature a somewhat conservative person,” he added.

Trump defends himself: I'm a conservative

“When you get down to it, I am a conservative person. I am by nature a somewhat conservative person."

www.politico.com

That doesn’t say what you want it to say!

 

[kyzr]

Jan 6th was Xi and Nancy's Reichstag Fire. To our uneducated Progressive brothers and sistas, the Reichstag Fire was a false flag that brought Hitler to power same way the Stolen election put Xi's puppets in the American White House

"Hitler had been appointed Chancellor of Germany only four weeks previously, on 30 January 1933, when he was invited by President von Hindenburg to lead a coalition government. Hitler's government had urged von Hindenburg to dissolve the Reichstag and to call elections for 5 March."

On the evening of 27 February 1933—six days before the parliamentary election—fire broke out in the Reichstag chambers.
Reichstag Fire Decree - Wikipedia

"The Reichstag Fire Decree (German: Reichstagsbrandverordnung) is the common name of the Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of People and State (German: Verordnung des Reichspräsidenten zum Schutz von Volk und Staat) issued by German President Paul von Hindenburg on the advice of Chancellor Adolf Hitler on 28 February 1933 in immediate response to the Reichstag fire. The decree nullified many of the key civil liberties of German citizens. With Nazis in powerful positions in the German government, the decree was used as the legal basis for the imprisonment of anyone considered to be opponents of the Nazis, and to suppress publications not considered "friendly" to the Nazi cause. The decree is considered by historians as one of the key steps in the establishment of a one-party Nazi state in Germany."

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to support democrats

kyzr

See...your fellow blob supporters think it wasn't Trump supporters who stormed the capitol.

So your poll is useless unless you change it to condemning their fellow Trump supporters....which they never, ever will. When you're weak minded...you have to have a herd mentality because you're too dumb to exist on your own for long.

1. How do you know that the posters being referenced aren't just messing with you? T

There is no way of knowing if they really believe what they post. Trump is the most prolific liar to ever enter the public space. That his supporters would also lie their ass off is a very small jump in logic. Feel free to man up and call them out if you want. We all know you don't have the stones to do it.

2. My poll proves that at least 80% of GOP voters condemn the violence at the capital caused by Trump supporters. Until it can be proven that any other groups were involved. The rioters were herded to the capital by people with bullhorns.

Either you're being willfully aloof or you're just retarded. I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.

3. We'll see in 2022 and 2024 how Republicans and Trump supporters do. Buckle-up buttercup.

I know what the Trump supporters will do; they will vote for anyone with an R next to their name on the ballot.

Your poll is still useless.

1. Xiden is quite the liar too, as you well know. Just sayin'

How Many False Claims Did Biden Make In His First 100 Days Compared To Trump?

The Washington Post's fact checker tallied all the false and misleading claims Biden made in speeches, interviews and tweets since taking office.

www.huffpost.com

2. We don't know what we don't know about who all was involved in the 1/6 riot.

Media hushes up report suggesting FBI involvement in Capitol riot, as White House turns anti-terrorism efforts on American people

Court filings suggest that FBI operatives were among the mob who stormed the US Capitol in January, and may have set up the riot. With the riot used as justification for new terrorism policy, the media is downplaying the story.

www.rt.com

3. Dodge/non-response/willful ignorance. The poll results are clear assuming honest responses. Republicans condemn the 1/6 riot.

4. You are totally free to have any opinion you want about the poll results. This thread was to settle a disagreement "HappyJoy" and I were having on another thread. He seems okay with the poll results. The poll questions were as agreed to, not just mine.

RT is Russia Today, a propaganda tool of Putin/Russians....

OK, I googled it and that's what came up. Funny how google puts up RT and censors RWs. WTF?
OK, here's another link to Tucker.

Tucker Carlson accuses the FBI of being behind January 6 Capitol riot

Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Tuesday night pointed to the number of 'unindicted co-conspirators' from the Capitol riot, arguing they were FBI agents spurring on the insurrectionists.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Dumbfuck, Carlson is just another wackadoo like you. Want proof? His source is revolver.news. Revolver.news is a fake news website. It was just started last year and it conceals who started the site...

Whois revolver.news

Whois Lookup for revolver.news

www.whois.com

Real news agencies don't hide who they are.

There are MANY sites that are covering the potential FBI involvement, not just revolver.
Don't forget that the MSM covers up for the deep state. I'm not saying FBI involvement is proven, just being investigated.

Were feds involved in facilitating the 1/6 siege? Number of unindicted co-conspirators raise questions.

The significant number of unindicted co-conspirators involved in the January 6 Capitol siege is strangely similar to those in Michigan plot to kidnap Gov. Whitmer, where it was discovered embedded FBI undercover/informants were intimately involved in facilitating the plot.

www.lawenforcementtoday.com

NOW WE HAVE PROOF: FBI and DHS Attempted to Recruit Green Beret to Infiltrate Oath Keepers Before Jan. 6 Riot -- AND HE RECORDED IT | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Throughout 2020 the Black Lives Matter terrorist group was linked to conservatively 91% of the riots that resulted in the most expensive property damage in US insurance history There were zero Trump rallies that turned violent during that same time period.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

You are being redirected...

Evidence Surfaces That The FBI Planned And Executed January 6 Capitol Riot - The Tatum Report

Evidence is mounting that the FBI was involved in planning and executing the January 6 Capitol event after…

tatumreport.com

LOLOLOLOL

They're ALL sourcing fake news revolver.news, ya fucking moron.

All you're doing is posting fake news and pretending like it's real news because other non-news outlets are echoing that one fake news site.

You never answered my question... do you even know you’re psychotic?

You can't prove that 100% of revolver is fake news, anymore than you can prove that the MSM's fake news and propaganda is real.
Name-calling means you lose the debate. Thanks for playing.

Of course I can. Here's a real news website...

ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News and Videos

Your trusted source for breaking news, analysis, exclusive interviews, headlines, and videos at ABCNews.com

abcnews.go.com

You can see who owns the site, they don't hide it. You can see it's well established, being around for 23 years...

Whois go.com

Whois Lookup for go.com

www.whois.com

You can click on any abcnews.go article and it shows who the authors are, with links which show they're journalists.

That's what real news looks like. It doesn't hide from the public. It doesn't conceal who's behind the articles. That's what fake news does. That's what the source you're leaning on does. They've only been around 1 year and they hide who's behind it. They conceal who's site it is...

Whois revolver.news

Whois Lookup for revolver.news

www.whois.com

In the article you fall for, they don't disclose who wrote it...

Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver News

Unindicted co-conspirators could unravel the full story of what the FBI knew in advance about the January 6th Capitol Riots.

www.revolver.news

And you can't find that nonsense on real news.

Of course, I'm explaining this to a moron who actually claimed he's pro-choice after saying he's not pro-choice, so there's that.

1. OK, now we're getting somewhere, actual facts to debate. You like ABC news. Fine, I'm glad you didn't put up CNN or MSDNC as real news outlets. The only point I'm bringing up about ABC News is that they do have a bias as documented by the following Harvard Study:

Harvard Study reveals media bias

Every news outlet in the study was negative more often than positive.

www.studentnewsdaily.com

View attachment 505133

2. From the above chart you can see that FXN is the most "fair and balanced" news outlet. NBC is just below CNN in bias.

3. FXN generally has both parties represented in debates. CNN, MSDNC, and most MSM programs don't have Republican views presented. If I don't hear both sides presented fairly, I'm not watching their propaganda.

4. As I already explained ad nauseum, abortion is legal, therefore it is NOT murder, duh. Yet, as a Catholic, I am morally opposed to abortion. My position isn't really to complicated unless you're a low-IQ democrat.

5. Summarizing, we don't have any set of facts or any set of alternate facts that we can agree on, correct?

"The only point I'm bringing up about ABC News is that they do have a bias as documented by the following Harvard Study"

I can't believe I actually have to point this out to you ... but apparently, I do ...... ABC isn't in that study. Do you ever post anything based in reality??

"As I already explained ad nauseum, abortion is legal, therefore it is NOT murder"

You just can't stop lying, can ya? YOU called it murder before you said it's not murder...

Abortion is the murder of babies for convenience.

You're literally talking out of both sides of your mouth. When it's convenient for you for abortion to be murder, you call it murder. When that becomes inconvenient for you, you deny it's murder.

"Summarizing, we don't have any set of facts or any set of alternate facts that we can agree on, correct?"

Not if you're going to eschew reality and stick with fake news. I prefer to live in reality. You don't have to, mind you, it's your choice.

1. OK, ABC wasn't in the Harvard study, not sure why it was missed, but I'm sure that they are closer to NBC on bias than FXN.
2. You must have reading comprehension issues, and you just love to quote things out of context. I have no clue if that blue quote is real or not. Even if it is it means in the "moral context" and not in the "legal context". So stop mis-applying my prior quotes. The "both sides of my mouth are the "legal and moral" sides. They are very different sides.
3. LOL, keep drinking the state propaganda. I prefer to hear both sides of arguments, fake news only presents one side.

 

[jc456]

I’m an Ultra-Conservative Authoritarian and I literally couldn’t support the events at the US Capitol Building any more if I tried. It is one of the greatest American political moments in my lifetime.

It was literally one the STUPIDEST things Trump ever did... hold a massive rally steps from the capitol on THAT DAY. He should have KNOWN, or someone around him, that the corrupts democrats and their human debris within the deep state would EXPLOIT IT.

Democrats had nothing to do with it. This is all on you kids.

Yes, Democrats supported the violence, looting and plunder in cities across America all last summer, not going into the Capital on January 6. True dat

Like the Capital assault, most support the right to protest, not to riot. You know it.

I do not support riots. Never seen you condemn those involved in city riots from the Floyd violence.

Then you haven't been paying attention. Rioters are criminals.

Protesters aren't.

Protesters who riot sure the hell are .

not cute enough sweetheart

 

[Faun]

As an example, Dr. Fauci's paying the Wuhan Lab for covid "gain of function" research bit him on the ass.

That's another lie. Fauci actually said “Senator Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely and completely incorrect, that the N.I.H. has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute.”

The Wuhan Lab documented that the funding came from NIH. Dr. Fauci paid the Wuhan Lab to do gain of function research, and it got out. Thank God it wasn't the deadliest virus they developed.
Point being, that we can't trust anything that the government says or does. You can drink their KoolAde, I'm not.

Funding for research did come from the N.I.H. but that funding wasn't for gain-of-function research. Nor had it been proven that was the origin of the virus. Senator Paul lied and Fauci called him on it.

Fauci is a liar. Rand is calling him a liar. The paper trail confirms that Fauci is lying. Do you support paying China to do "gain of function" research to make bat viruses more deadly? I don't.

Fauci claims US gave $600,000 to Wuhan lab research; documents show it was more

In a Senate hearing late last month, top doctor Anthony Fauci told lawmakers the U.S. granted $600,000 in funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology over a five year period, but documents provided by the Department of Health and Human Services Friday show otherwise.

www.foxnews.com

True, that would be a lie if Fauci actually knew the figure was $826K, but I have no evidence of that either. And your question about support paying China to do "gain of function" research is based on your falsehood that we paid China for gain-of-function research. That's never been proven either.

But seeing as how you can't stop yourself from lying, I can't wholly state I expect anything different from you.

 

[Faun]

Jan 6th was Xi and Nancy's Reichstag Fire. To our uneducated Progressive brothers and sistas, the Reichstag Fire was a false flag that brought Hitler to power same way the Stolen election put Xi's puppets in the American White House

"Hitler had been appointed Chancellor of Germany only four weeks previously, on 30 January 1933, when he was invited by President von Hindenburg to lead a coalition government. Hitler's government had urged von Hindenburg to dissolve the Reichstag and to call elections for 5 March."

On the evening of 27 February 1933—six days before the parliamentary election—fire broke out in the Reichstag chambers.
Reichstag Fire Decree - Wikipedia

"The Reichstag Fire Decree (German: Reichstagsbrandverordnung) is the common name of the Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of People and State (German: Verordnung des Reichspräsidenten zum Schutz von Volk und Staat) issued by German President Paul von Hindenburg on the advice of Chancellor Adolf Hitler on 28 February 1933 in immediate response to the Reichstag fire. The decree nullified many of the key civil liberties of German citizens. With Nazis in powerful positions in the German government, the decree was used as the legal basis for the imprisonment of anyone considered to be opponents of the Nazis, and to suppress publications not considered "friendly" to the Nazi cause. The decree is considered by historians as one of the key steps in the establishment of a one-party Nazi state in Germany."

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to support democrats

kyzr

See...your fellow blob supporters think it wasn't Trump supporters who stormed the capitol.

So your poll is useless unless you change it to condemning their fellow Trump supporters....which they never, ever will. When you're weak minded...you have to have a herd mentality because you're too dumb to exist on your own for long.

1. How do you know that the posters being referenced aren't just messing with you? T

There is no way of knowing if they really believe what they post. Trump is the most prolific liar to ever enter the public space. That his supporters would also lie their ass off is a very small jump in logic. Feel free to man up and call them out if you want. We all know you don't have the stones to do it.

2. My poll proves that at least 80% of GOP voters condemn the violence at the capital caused by Trump supporters. Until it can be proven that any other groups were involved. The rioters were herded to the capital by people with bullhorns.

Either you're being willfully aloof or you're just retarded. I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.

3. We'll see in 2022 and 2024 how Republicans and Trump supporters do. Buckle-up buttercup.

I know what the Trump supporters will do; they will vote for anyone with an R next to their name on the ballot.

Your poll is still useless.

1. Xiden is quite the liar too, as you well know. Just sayin'

How Many False Claims Did Biden Make In His First 100 Days Compared To Trump?

The Washington Post's fact checker tallied all the false and misleading claims Biden made in speeches, interviews and tweets since taking office.

www.huffpost.com

2. We don't know what we don't know about who all was involved in the 1/6 riot.

Media hushes up report suggesting FBI involvement in Capitol riot, as White House turns anti-terrorism efforts on American people

Court filings suggest that FBI operatives were among the mob who stormed the US Capitol in January, and may have set up the riot. With the riot used as justification for new terrorism policy, the media is downplaying the story.

www.rt.com

3. Dodge/non-response/willful ignorance. The poll results are clear assuming honest responses. Republicans condemn the 1/6 riot.

4. You are totally free to have any opinion you want about the poll results. This thread was to settle a disagreement "HappyJoy" and I were having on another thread. He seems okay with the poll results. The poll questions were as agreed to, not just mine.

RT is Russia Today, a propaganda tool of Putin/Russians....

OK, I googled it and that's what came up. Funny how google puts up RT and censors RWs. WTF?
OK, here's another link to Tucker.

Tucker Carlson accuses the FBI of being behind January 6 Capitol riot

Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Tuesday night pointed to the number of 'unindicted co-conspirators' from the Capitol riot, arguing they were FBI agents spurring on the insurrectionists.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Dumbfuck, Carlson is just another wackadoo like you. Want proof? His source is revolver.news. Revolver.news is a fake news website. It was just started last year and it conceals who started the site...

Whois revolver.news

Whois Lookup for revolver.news

www.whois.com

Real news agencies don't hide who they are.

There are MANY sites that are covering the potential FBI involvement, not just revolver.
Don't forget that the MSM covers up for the deep state. I'm not saying FBI involvement is proven, just being investigated.

Were feds involved in facilitating the 1/6 siege? Number of unindicted co-conspirators raise questions.

The significant number of unindicted co-conspirators involved in the January 6 Capitol siege is strangely similar to those in Michigan plot to kidnap Gov. Whitmer, where it was discovered embedded FBI undercover/informants were intimately involved in facilitating the plot.

www.lawenforcementtoday.com

NOW WE HAVE PROOF: FBI and DHS Attempted to Recruit Green Beret to Infiltrate Oath Keepers Before Jan. 6 Riot -- AND HE RECORDED IT | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Throughout 2020 the Black Lives Matter terrorist group was linked to conservatively 91% of the riots that resulted in the most expensive property damage in US insurance history There were zero Trump rallies that turned violent during that same time period.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

You are being redirected...

Evidence Surfaces That The FBI Planned And Executed January 6 Capitol Riot - The Tatum Report

Evidence is mounting that the FBI was involved in planning and executing the January 6 Capitol event after…

tatumreport.com

LOLOLOLOL

They're ALL sourcing fake news revolver.news, ya fucking moron.

All you're doing is posting fake news and pretending like it's real news because other non-news outlets are echoing that one fake news site.

You never answered my question... do you even know you’re psychotic?

You can't prove that 100% of revolver is fake news, anymore than you can prove that the MSM's fake news and propaganda is real.
Name-calling means you lose the debate. Thanks for playing.

Of course I can. Here's a real news website...

ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News and Videos

Your trusted source for breaking news, analysis, exclusive interviews, headlines, and videos at ABCNews.com

abcnews.go.com

You can see who owns the site, they don't hide it. You can see it's well established, being around for 23 years...

Whois go.com

Whois Lookup for go.com

www.whois.com

You can click on any abcnews.go article and it shows who the authors are, with links which show they're journalists.

That's what real news looks like. It doesn't hide from the public. It doesn't conceal who's behind the articles. That's what fake news does. That's what the source you're leaning on does. They've only been around 1 year and they hide who's behind it. They conceal who's site it is...

Whois revolver.news

Whois Lookup for revolver.news

www.whois.com

In the article you fall for, they don't disclose who wrote it...

Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver News

Unindicted co-conspirators could unravel the full story of what the FBI knew in advance about the January 6th Capitol Riots.

www.revolver.news

And you can't find that nonsense on real news.

Of course, I'm explaining this to a moron who actually claimed he's pro-choice after saying he's not pro-choice, so there's that.

1. OK, now we're getting somewhere, actual facts to debate. You like ABC news. Fine, I'm glad you didn't put up CNN or MSDNC as real news outlets. The only point I'm bringing up about ABC News is that they do have a bias as documented by the following Harvard Study:

Harvard Study reveals media bias

Every news outlet in the study was negative more often than positive.

www.studentnewsdaily.com

View attachment 505133

2. From the above chart you can see that FXN is the most "fair and balanced" news outlet. NBC is just below CNN in bias.

3. FXN generally has both parties represented in debates. CNN, MSDNC, and most MSM programs don't have Republican views presented. If I don't hear both sides presented fairly, I'm not watching their propaganda.

4. As I already explained ad nauseum, abortion is legal, therefore it is NOT murder, duh. Yet, as a Catholic, I am morally opposed to abortion. My position isn't really to complicated unless you're a low-IQ democrat.

5. Summarizing, we don't have any set of facts or any set of alternate facts that we can agree on, correct?

"The only point I'm bringing up about ABC News is that they do have a bias as documented by the following Harvard Study"

I can't believe I actually have to point this out to you ... but apparently, I do ...... ABC isn't in that study. Do you ever post anything based in reality??

"As I already explained ad nauseum, abortion is legal, therefore it is NOT murder"

You just can't stop lying, can ya? YOU called it murder before you said it's not murder...

Abortion is the murder of babies for convenience.

You're literally talking out of both sides of your mouth. When it's convenient for you for abortion to be murder, you call it murder. When that becomes inconvenient for you, you deny it's murder.

"Summarizing, we don't have any set of facts or any set of alternate facts that we can agree on, correct?"

Not if you're going to eschew reality and stick with fake news. I prefer to live in reality. You don't have to, mind you, it's your choice.

1. OK, ABC wasn't in the Harvard study, not sure why it was missed, but I'm sure that they are closer to NBC on bias than FXN.
2. You must have reading comprehension issues, and you just love to quote things out of context. I have no clue if that blue quote is real or not. Even if it is it means in the "moral context" and not in the "legal context". So stop mis-applying my prior quotes. The "both sides of my mouth are the "legal and moral" sides. They are very different sides.
3. LOL, keep drinking the state propaganda. I prefer to hear both sides of arguments, fake news only presents one side.

LOLOLOL

How the fuck do you not know if that "blue quote" is real or not??? There's a fucking link to your post calling abortion murder.

 

[kyzr]

As an example, Dr. Fauci's paying the Wuhan Lab for covid "gain of function" research bit him on the ass.

That's another lie. Fauci actually said “Senator Paul, with all due respect, you are entirely and completely incorrect, that the N.I.H. has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute.”

The Wuhan Lab documented that the funding came from NIH. Dr. Fauci paid the Wuhan Lab to do gain of function research, and it got out. Thank God it wasn't the deadliest virus they developed.
Point being, that we can't trust anything that the government says or does. You can drink their KoolAde, I'm not.

Funding for research did come from the N.I.H. but that funding wasn't for gain-of-function research. Nor had it been proven that was the origin of the virus. Senator Paul lied and Fauci called him on it.

Fauci is a liar. Rand is calling him a liar. The paper trail confirms that Fauci is lying. Do you support paying China to do "gain of function" research to make bat viruses more deadly? I don't.

Fauci claims US gave $600,000 to Wuhan lab research; documents show it was more

In a Senate hearing late last month, top doctor Anthony Fauci told lawmakers the U.S. granted $600,000 in funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology over a five year period, but documents provided by the Department of Health and Human Services Friday show otherwise.

www.foxnews.com

True, that would be a lie if Fauci actually knew the figure was $826K, but I have no evidence of that either. And your question about support paying China to do "gain of function" research is based on your falsehood that we paid China for gain-of-function research. That's never been proven either.

But seeing as how you can't stop yourself from lying, I can't wholly state I expect anything different from you.

1. Yes there is evidence that Fauci paid China to do gain of function research. There are tons of credible sites.

Why US outsourced bat virus research to Wuhan - Asia Times

The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded bat-coronavirus research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China to the tune of US$3.7 million, a

asiatimes.com

The Wuhan Lab and the Gain-of-Function Disagreement - FactCheck.org

A disagreement between Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Dr. Anthony Fauci has put $600,000 of U.S. grant money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology back into the spotlight, while making "gain-of-function" research a household term -- all amid calls for more investigation into the origins of SARS-CoV-2.

www.factcheck.org

There are a lot of unknowns, speculation and differences of opinion on these topics. But let’s start with what we do know: In 2014, the NIH awarded a grant to the U.S.-based EcoHealth Alliance to study the risk of the future emergence of coronaviruses from bats. In 2019, the project was renewed for another five years, but it was canceled in April 2020 — three months after the first case of the coronavirus was confirmed in the U.S.
EcoHealth ultimately received $3.7 million over six years from the NIH and distributed nearly $600,000 of that total to China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, a collaborator on the project, pre-approved by NIH.
The grant cancellation came at a time when then-President Donald Trump and others questioned the U.S. funding to a lab in Wuhan, while exaggerating the amount of federal money involved.

2. QED. You can't deny the funding.

3. My suspicion is that Dr Fauci's irresponsible research is what killed 600,000 Americans. Covid did not come directly from bats, it was enhanced via gain of function research. It will be proven.

 

[kyzr]

Jan 6th was Xi and Nancy's Reichstag Fire. To our uneducated Progressive brothers and sistas, the Reichstag Fire was a false flag that brought Hitler to power same way the Stolen election put Xi's puppets in the American White House

"Hitler had been appointed Chancellor of Germany only four weeks previously, on 30 January 1933, when he was invited by President von Hindenburg to lead a coalition government. Hitler's government had urged von Hindenburg to dissolve the Reichstag and to call elections for 5 March."

On the evening of 27 February 1933—six days before the parliamentary election—fire broke out in the Reichstag chambers.
Reichstag Fire Decree - Wikipedia

"The Reichstag Fire Decree (German: Reichstagsbrandverordnung) is the common name of the Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of People and State (German: Verordnung des Reichspräsidenten zum Schutz von Volk und Staat) issued by German President Paul von Hindenburg on the advice of Chancellor Adolf Hitler on 28 February 1933 in immediate response to the Reichstag fire. The decree nullified many of the key civil liberties of German citizens. With Nazis in powerful positions in the German government, the decree was used as the legal basis for the imprisonment of anyone considered to be opponents of the Nazis, and to suppress publications not considered "friendly" to the Nazi cause. The decree is considered by historians as one of the key steps in the establishment of a one-party Nazi state in Germany."

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to support democrats

kyzr

See...your fellow blob supporters think it wasn't Trump supporters who stormed the capitol.

So your poll is useless unless you change it to condemning their fellow Trump supporters....which they never, ever will. When you're weak minded...you have to have a herd mentality because you're too dumb to exist on your own for long.

1. How do you know that the posters being referenced aren't just messing with you? T

There is no way of knowing if they really believe what they post. Trump is the most prolific liar to ever enter the public space. That his supporters would also lie their ass off is a very small jump in logic. Feel free to man up and call them out if you want. We all know you don't have the stones to do it.

2. My poll proves that at least 80% of GOP voters condemn the violence at the capital caused by Trump supporters. Until it can be proven that any other groups were involved. The rioters were herded to the capital by people with bullhorns.

Either you're being willfully aloof or you're just retarded. I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.

3. We'll see in 2022 and 2024 how Republicans and Trump supporters do. Buckle-up buttercup.

I know what the Trump supporters will do; they will vote for anyone with an R next to their name on the ballot.

Your poll is still useless.

1. Xiden is quite the liar too, as you well know. Just sayin'

How Many False Claims Did Biden Make In His First 100 Days Compared To Trump?

The Washington Post's fact checker tallied all the false and misleading claims Biden made in speeches, interviews and tweets since taking office.

www.huffpost.com

2. We don't know what we don't know about who all was involved in the 1/6 riot.

Media hushes up report suggesting FBI involvement in Capitol riot, as White House turns anti-terrorism efforts on American people

Court filings suggest that FBI operatives were among the mob who stormed the US Capitol in January, and may have set up the riot. With the riot used as justification for new terrorism policy, the media is downplaying the story.

www.rt.com

3. Dodge/non-response/willful ignorance. The poll results are clear assuming honest responses. Republicans condemn the 1/6 riot.

4. You are totally free to have any opinion you want about the poll results. This thread was to settle a disagreement "HappyJoy" and I were having on another thread. He seems okay with the poll results. The poll questions were as agreed to, not just mine.

RT is Russia Today, a propaganda tool of Putin/Russians....

OK, I googled it and that's what came up. Funny how google puts up RT and censors RWs. WTF?
OK, here's another link to Tucker.

Tucker Carlson accuses the FBI of being behind January 6 Capitol riot

Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Tuesday night pointed to the number of 'unindicted co-conspirators' from the Capitol riot, arguing they were FBI agents spurring on the insurrectionists.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Dumbfuck, Carlson is just another wackadoo like you. Want proof? His source is revolver.news. Revolver.news is a fake news website. It was just started last year and it conceals who started the site...

Whois revolver.news

Whois Lookup for revolver.news

www.whois.com

Real news agencies don't hide who they are.

There are MANY sites that are covering the potential FBI involvement, not just revolver.
Don't forget that the MSM covers up for the deep state. I'm not saying FBI involvement is proven, just being investigated.

Were feds involved in facilitating the 1/6 siege? Number of unindicted co-conspirators raise questions.

The significant number of unindicted co-conspirators involved in the January 6 Capitol siege is strangely similar to those in Michigan plot to kidnap Gov. Whitmer, where it was discovered embedded FBI undercover/informants were intimately involved in facilitating the plot.

www.lawenforcementtoday.com

NOW WE HAVE PROOF: FBI and DHS Attempted to Recruit Green Beret to Infiltrate Oath Keepers Before Jan. 6 Riot -- AND HE RECORDED IT | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Throughout 2020 the Black Lives Matter terrorist group was linked to conservatively 91% of the riots that resulted in the most expensive property damage in US insurance history There were zero Trump rallies that turned violent during that same time period.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

You are being redirected...

Evidence Surfaces That The FBI Planned And Executed January 6 Capitol Riot - The Tatum Report

Evidence is mounting that the FBI was involved in planning and executing the January 6 Capitol event after…

tatumreport.com

LOLOLOLOL

They're ALL sourcing fake news revolver.news, ya fucking moron.

All you're doing is posting fake news and pretending like it's real news because other non-news outlets are echoing that one fake news site.

You never answered my question... do you even know you’re psychotic?

You can't prove that 100% of revolver is fake news, anymore than you can prove that the MSM's fake news and propaganda is real.
Name-calling means you lose the debate. Thanks for playing.

Of course I can. Here's a real news website...

ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News and Videos

Your trusted source for breaking news, analysis, exclusive interviews, headlines, and videos at ABCNews.com

abcnews.go.com

You can see who owns the site, they don't hide it. You can see it's well established, being around for 23 years...

Whois go.com

Whois Lookup for go.com

www.whois.com

You can click on any abcnews.go article and it shows who the authors are, with links which show they're journalists.

That's what real news looks like. It doesn't hide from the public. It doesn't conceal who's behind the articles. That's what fake news does. That's what the source you're leaning on does. They've only been around 1 year and they hide who's behind it. They conceal who's site it is...

Whois revolver.news

Whois Lookup for revolver.news

www.whois.com

In the article you fall for, they don't disclose who wrote it...

Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver News

Unindicted co-conspirators could unravel the full story of what the FBI knew in advance about the January 6th Capitol Riots.

www.revolver.news

And you can't find that nonsense on real news.

Of course, I'm explaining this to a moron who actually claimed he's pro-choice after saying he's not pro-choice, so there's that.

1. OK, now we're getting somewhere, actual facts to debate. You like ABC news. Fine, I'm glad you didn't put up CNN or MSDNC as real news outlets. The only point I'm bringing up about ABC News is that they do have a bias as documented by the following Harvard Study:

Harvard Study reveals media bias

Every news outlet in the study was negative more often than positive.

www.studentnewsdaily.com

View attachment 505133

2. From the above chart you can see that FXN is the most "fair and balanced" news outlet. NBC is just below CNN in bias.

3. FXN generally has both parties represented in debates. CNN, MSDNC, and most MSM programs don't have Republican views presented. If I don't hear both sides presented fairly, I'm not watching their propaganda.

4. As I already explained ad nauseum, abortion is legal, therefore it is NOT murder, duh. Yet, as a Catholic, I am morally opposed to abortion. My position isn't really to complicated unless you're a low-IQ democrat.

5. Summarizing, we don't have any set of facts or any set of alternate facts that we can agree on, correct?

"The only point I'm bringing up about ABC News is that they do have a bias as documented by the following Harvard Study"

I can't believe I actually have to point this out to you ... but apparently, I do ...... ABC isn't in that study. Do you ever post anything based in reality??

"As I already explained ad nauseum, abortion is legal, therefore it is NOT murder"

You just can't stop lying, can ya? YOU called it murder before you said it's not murder...

Abortion is the murder of babies for convenience.

You're literally talking out of both sides of your mouth. When it's convenient for you for abortion to be murder, you call it murder. When that becomes inconvenient for you, you deny it's murder.

"Summarizing, we don't have any set of facts or any set of alternate facts that we can agree on, correct?"

Not if you're going to eschew reality and stick with fake news. I prefer to live in reality. You don't have to, mind you, it's your choice.

1. OK, ABC wasn't in the Harvard study, not sure why it was missed, but I'm sure that they are closer to NBC on bias than FXN.
2. You must have reading comprehension issues, and you just love to quote things out of context. I have no clue if that blue quote is real or not. Even if it is it means in the "moral context" and not in the "legal context". So stop mis-applying my prior quotes. The "both sides of my mouth are the "legal and moral" sides. They are very different sides.
3. LOL, keep drinking the state propaganda. I prefer to hear both sides of arguments, fake news only presents one side.

How the fuck do you not know if that "blue quote" is real or not??? There's a fucking link to your post calling abortion murder.

Stop dodging my post. Either debate or try your luck in another thread.
1. OK, ABC wasn't in the Harvard study, not sure why it was missed, but I'm sure that they are closer to NBC on bias than FXN.
2. Abortion is legal, it isn't murder, duh. For the 100th time.
3. LOL, keep drinking the state propaganda. I prefer to hear both sides of arguments, fake news only presents one side.

 

[Death-Ninja]

It was not an attack, if it were an attack then all of the democrats encountered, including the black racist cop who murdered Mrs Babbit, would be dead!

 

[kaz]

What? That must be fake news. Ya'll told me all the riots were going to stop once Commander Joe was in charge. Or did you mean the anarchist in Portland are still anarchist? Shocked I'm sure.

Sorry dimbulb, that was you incompetent morons saying that. Portland is ALL yours side’s violence and crime. Own it. Or just keep trying to deflect and project. Still no condemnation of BLM rioters. No shock there.

I don't live anywhere near Portland. I condemn and have condemned the anarchists violence for decades. Now continue to piss up the flagpole.

Anarchists, but not leftists. Telling that you still refuse to condemn your side’s criminals. The flagpole thing must be a leftist thing. Seems to fit with their others perversions.

Still pissing up that pole I see. Anarchist, Antifa, Prayer boys, Proud Boys Bungholeboys Lefties, Righties or anyone else who instigates violence deserves the full punishment of the law for their crimes.

Violence is the last resort of the incompetent.

Notice what word I still didn't use?

You buried it, but FINALLY you even condemned your own leftists committing violence. Wow, that was hard

Finally my ass. Americans condemn the violence from both sides of the extremes like even this poll shows. You fucks tried to lie about what I said. So let me reiterate. Fuck you.

You can't be a liberal and do illiberal things like instigating political violence, or defacing public or private property.

It took you long enough. You steadfastly and repeatedly refuse to condemn violence from the left. Everyone saw your endless evasion and squirming to condemn left violence.

Hey, you FINALLY did, I acknowledge that

 

[kaz]

What? That must be fake news. Ya'll told me all the riots were going to stop once Commander Joe was in charge. Or did you mean the anarchist in Portland are still anarchist? Shocked I'm sure.

Sorry dimbulb, that was you incompetent morons saying that. Portland is ALL yours side’s violence and crime. Own it. Or just keep trying to deflect and project. Still no condemnation of BLM rioters. No shock there.

I don't live anywhere near Portland. I condemn and have condemned the anarchists violence for decades. Now continue to piss up the flagpole.

Anarchists, but not leftists. Telling that you still refuse to condemn your side’s criminals. The flagpole thing must be a leftist thing. Seems to fit with their others perversions.

Still pissing up that pole I see. Anarchist, Antifa, Prayer boys, Proud Boys Bungholeboys Lefties, Righties or anyone else who instigates violence deserves the full punishment of the law for their crimes.

Violence is the last resort of the incompetent.

Notice what word I still didn't use?

You buried it, but FINALLY you even condemned your own leftists committing violence. Wow, that was hard

Finally my ass. Americans condemn the violence from both sides of the extremes like even this poll shows. You fucks tried to lie about what I said. So let me reiterate. Fuck you.

You can't be a liberal and do illiberal things like instigating political violence, or defacing public or private property.

You caveated it!! That’s an out and not sincere

BlindBoob isn't a liberal, he's a leftist. Those are entirely different things

 

[kaz]

What? That must be fake news. Ya'll told me all the riots were going to stop once Commander Joe was in charge. Or did you mean the anarchist in Portland are still anarchist? Shocked I'm sure.

Sorry dimbulb, that was you incompetent morons saying that. Portland is ALL yours side’s violence and crime. Own it. Or just keep trying to deflect and project. Still no condemnation of BLM rioters. No shock there.

I don't live anywhere near Portland. I condemn and have condemned the anarchists violence for decades. Now continue to piss up the flagpole.

Anarchists, but not leftists. Telling that you still refuse to condemn your side’s criminals. The flagpole thing must be a leftist thing. Seems to fit with their others perversions.

Still pissing up that pole I see. Anarchist, Antifa, Prayer boys, Proud Boys Bungholeboys Lefties, Righties or anyone else who instigates violence deserves the full punishment of the law for their crimes.

Violence is the last resort of the incompetent.

Notice what word I still didn't use?

You buried it, but FINALLY you even condemned your own leftists committing violence. Wow, that was hard

Finally my ass. Americans condemn the violence from both sides of the extremes like even this poll shows. You fucks tried to lie about what I said. So let me reiterate. Fuck you.

You can't be a liberal and do illiberal things like instigating political violence, or defacing public or private property.

and yet many claiming that title actually do JUST that.

Yep. And BlindBoob is silent about it when they do. He's a leftist, not a liberal

 

[kaz]

The point is, the Left starts fires in cities when they are angry.\

So we've gone from Burning down cities to 'well they start fires'.

you just claimed they did no such thing.

I said it was an illiberal thing to do.

What? That must be fake news. Ya'll told me all the riots were going to stop once Commander Joe was in charge. Or did you mean the anarchist in Portland are still anarchist? Shocked I'm sure.

Sorry dimbulb, that was you incompetent morons saying that. Portland is ALL yours side’s violence and crime. Own it. Or just keep trying to deflect and project. Still no condemnation of BLM rioters. No shock there.

I don't live anywhere near Portland. I condemn and have condemned the anarchists violence for decades. Now continue to piss up the flagpole.

Anarchists, but not leftists. Telling that you still refuse to condemn your side’s criminals. The flagpole thing must be a leftist thing. Seems to fit with their others perversions.

Still pissing up that pole I see. Anarchist, Antifa, Prayer boys, Proud Boys Bungholeboys Lefties, Righties or anyone else who instigates violence deserves the full punishment of the law for their crimes.

Violence is the last resort of the incompetent.

Notice what word I still didn't use?

You buried it, but FINALLY you even condemned your own leftists committing violence. Wow, that was hard

Finally my ass. Americans condemn the violence from both sides of the extremes like even this poll shows. You fucks tried to lie about what I said. So let me reiterate. Fuck you.

You can't be a liberal and do illiberal things like instigating political violence, or defacing public or private property.

and yet many claiming that title actually do JUST that.

So what? People lie. Trumpybear claimed to be a conservative too.

The Trump diversion was lame, but at lease you admitted you lied about being a liberal

 

[kaz]

The point is, the Left starts fires in cities when they are angry.\

So we've gone from Burning down cities to 'well they start fires'.

you just claimed they did no such thing.

I said it was an illiberal thing to do.

What? That must be fake news. Ya'll told me all the riots were going to stop once Commander Joe was in charge. Or did you mean the anarchist in Portland are still anarchist? Shocked I'm sure.

Sorry dimbulb, that was you incompetent morons saying that. Portland is ALL yours side’s violence and crime. Own it. Or just keep trying to deflect and project. Still no condemnation of BLM rioters. No shock there.

I don't live anywhere near Portland. I condemn and have condemned the anarchists violence for decades. Now continue to piss up the flagpole.

Anarchists, but not leftists. Telling that you still refuse to condemn your side’s criminals. The flagpole thing must be a leftist thing. Seems to fit with their others perversions.

Still pissing up that pole I see. Anarchist, Antifa, Prayer boys, Proud Boys Bungholeboys Lefties, Righties or anyone else who instigates violence deserves the full punishment of the law for their crimes.

Violence is the last resort of the incompetent.

Notice what word I still didn't use?

You buried it, but FINALLY you even condemned your own leftists committing violence. Wow, that was hard

Finally my ass. Americans condemn the violence from both sides of the extremes like even this poll shows. You fucks tried to lie about what I said. So let me reiterate. Fuck you.

You can't be a liberal and do illiberal things like instigating political violence, or defacing public or private property.

and yet many claiming that title actually do JUST that.

So what? People lie. Trumpybear claimed to be a conservative too.

I dont recall him claiming any such thing

He was a con man joining the Republicans. Not only did he claim to be conservative, but he also redefined conservatism as well as redefined the GOP. Kudos to his ability as a Con Man.

"Invoking conservative icon Ronald Reagan, Trump recalled that the late president “was [once] a Democrat, and really a Democrat with a liberal leaning, or a liberal bent and became a Republican and a pretty conservative Repub—I wouldn’t say the most by any stretch, but a pretty conservative Republican.”

“When you get down to it, I am a conservative person. I am by nature a somewhat conservative person,” he added.

Trump defends himself: I'm a conservative

“When you get down to it, I am a conservative person. I am by nature a somewhat conservative person."

www.politico.com

So now that you finally came out and condemned leftists violence you're going into full Trump diversion. Figures, lame is your game. You're a total con man, you claim to be a liberal when you're a leftist. Leftists are the opposite of liberals. Liberals are for free speech, tolerance, live and let live. Just don't take away our right to the same. You're hate filled, intolerant and you support violence to silence your opposition and stealing elections. I'm a liberal, you're a leftist

 

[kaz]

I condemned the people who entered the capital repeatedly

But still can't call them what they are.

Criminals

 

[Damaged Eagle]

What murderer? A capitol police officers did his/her duty.

Doesn't that make him a hero for killing the unarmed female insurrectionist?

He should be given a medal of valor by the president himself for his courage under fire.

*****SMILE*****