LA RAM FAN
Diamond Member
- Mar 1, 2008
- 50,055
- 17,415
everybody knows you are the one with BS fag and you know its true it was the BLM and ANTIFA funded by the dems AMERICA HATER.
Poll to condemn or condone "the violence and law breaking that took place inside the Capital on 1/6"
- Thread starter kyzr
- Start date
LeftofLeft
Diamond Member
- Oct 18, 2011
- 23,073
- 13,447
He was a con man joining the Republicans. Not only did he claim to be conservative, but he also redefined conservatism as well as redefined the GOP. Kudos to his ability as a Con Man.
"Invoking conservative icon Ronald Reagan, Trump recalled that the late president “was [once] a Democrat, and really a Democrat with a liberal leaning, or a liberal bent and became a Republican and a pretty conservative Repub—I wouldn’t say the most by any stretch, but a pretty conservative Republican.”
“When you get down to it, I am a conservative person. I am by nature a somewhat conservative person,” he added.
Trump defends himself: I'm a conservative
“When you get down to it, I am a conservative person. I am by nature a somewhat conservative person."www.politico.com
So now that you finally came out and condemned leftists violence you're going into full Trump diversion. Figures, lame is your game. You're a total con man, you claim to be a liberal when you're a leftist. Leftists are the opposite of liberals. Liberals are for free speech, tolerance, live and let live. Just don't take away our right to the same. You're hate filled, intolerant and you support violence to silence your opposition and stealing elections. I'm a liberal, you're a leftist
Liberals are for free speech…. Their free speech According to the Left, all other speech is Hate. Liberals are for Tolerance. Tolerance for them and their causes.
Liberals are for Live and Let Live….. Unless of course a mountain man has a gun or two or a valedictorian thanks Jesus at a public school that allows for prayers to allah.
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,345
- 80,983
You really can't stop posting bullshit, can ya, con?1. Yes there is evidence that Fauci paid China to do gain of function research. There are tons of credible sites.True, that would be a lie if Fauci actually knew the figure was $826K, but I have no evidence of that either. And your question about support paying China to do "gain of function" research is based on your falsehood that we paid China for gain-of-function research. That's never been proven either.Fauci is a liar. Rand is calling him a liar. The paper trail confirms that Fauci is lying. Do you support paying China to do "gain of function" research to make bat viruses more deadly? I don't.
Fauci claims US gave $600,000 to Wuhan lab research; documents show it was more
In a Senate hearing late last month, top doctor Anthony Fauci told lawmakers the U.S. granted $600,000 in funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology over a five year period, but documents provided by the Department of Health and Human Services Friday show otherwise.www.foxnews.com
But seeing as how you can't stop yourself from lying, I can't wholly state I expect anything different from you.
Why US outsourced bat virus research to Wuhan - Asia Times
The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded bat-coronavirus research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China to the tune of US$3.7 million, aasiatimes.com
There are a lot of unknowns, speculation and differences of opinion on these topics. But let’s start with what we do know: In 2014, the NIH awarded a grant to the U.S.-based EcoHealth Alliance to study the risk of the future emergence of coronaviruses from bats. In 2019, the project was renewed for another five years, but it was canceled in April 2020 — three months after the first case of the coronavirus was confirmed in the U.S.
The Wuhan Lab and the Gain-of-Function Disagreement - FactCheck.org
A disagreement between Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Dr. Anthony Fauci has put $600,000 of U.S. grant money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology back into the spotlight, while making "gain-of-function" research a household term -- all amid calls for more investigation into the origins of SARS-CoV-2.www.factcheck.org
EcoHealth ultimately received $3.7 million over six years from the NIH and distributed nearly $600,000 of that total to China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, a collaborator on the project, pre-approved by NIH.
The grant cancellation came at a time when then-President Donald Trump and others questioned the U.S. funding to a lab in Wuhan, while exaggerating the amount of federal money involved.
2. QED. You can't deny the funding.
3. My suspicion is that Dr Fauci's irresponsible research is what killed 600,000 Americans. Covid did not come directly from bats, it was enhanced via gain of function research. It will be proven.
I only got as far as this lie....
The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded bat-coronavirus research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China to the tune of US$3.7 million, a recent article in the British newspaper Daily Mail revealed.
You've now posted 2 articles on this.... one stating the NIH gave the Wuhan $826K, the other stating the NIH gave the Wuhan lab $3.7 million.
Clearly, they can't both be true. So clearly, you're posting fake news again.
So do you ever stop lying?
Ever???
This is exactly the reason you have zero cred. You say abortion is murder... then you say abortion is not murder. You say you're not pro-choice... then you say you are pro-choice. Now you say the NIH gave the Wuhan lab $826K... then you say the NIH gave the Wuhan lab $3.7 million.
You keep relying on fake news -- you keep on embarrassing yourself.
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,345
- 80,983
View attachment 505162
Doesn't that make him a hero for killing the unarmed female insurrectionist?
He should be given a medal of valor by the president himself for his courage under fire.
*****SMILE*****
He should. He saved lives.
- Jul 28, 2015
- 21,418
- 32,458
View attachment 505162
Doesn't that make him a hero for killing the unarmed female insurrectionist?
He should be given a medal of valor by the president himself for his courage under fire.
*****SMILE*****
He should. He saved lives.
So do it!
Demand it!
Make it happen!!!
*****SMILE*****
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,345
- 80,983
View attachment 505162
Doesn't that make him a hero for killing the unarmed female insurrectionist?
He should be given a medal of valor by the president himself for his courage under fire.
*****SMILE*****
He should. He saved lives.
View attachment 505195
So do it!
Demand it!
Make it happen!!!
*****SMILE*****
It's not up to me. If it was, I would have given him a Medal of Freedom.
candycorn
Diamond Member
- Aug 25, 2009
- 110,836
- 50,999
Earlier you said I was the only one who thought it was other than Trump supporters doing the rioting. Since then, I have pointed out about a dozen folks who have said it was someone other than blob supporters. You even pointed it out yourself.1. OK, ABC wasn't in the Harvard study, not sure why it was missed, but I'm sure that they are closer to NBC on bias than FXN."The only point I'm bringing up about ABC News is that they do have a bias as documented by the following Harvard Study"1. OK, now we're getting somewhere, actual facts to debate. You like ABC news. Fine, I'm glad you didn't put up CNN or MSDNC as real news outlets. The only point I'm bringing up about ABC News is that they do have a bias as documented by the following Harvard Study:Of course I can. Here's a real news website...You can't prove that 100% of revolver is fake news, anymore than you can prove that the MSM's fake news and propaganda is real.LOLOLOLOLThere are MANY sites that are covering the potential FBI involvement, not just revolver.Dumbfuck, Carlson is just another wackadoo like you. Want proof? His source is revolver.news. Revolver.news is a fake news website. It was just started last year and it conceals who started the site...OK, I googled it and that's what came up. Funny how google puts up RT and censors RWs. WTF?RT is Russia Today, a propaganda tool of Putin/Russians....1. Xiden is quite the liar too, as you well know. Just sayin'
How Many False Claims Did Biden Make In His First 100 Days Compared To Trump?
The Washington Post's fact checker tallied all the false and misleading claims Biden made in speeches, interviews and tweets since taking office.www.huffpost.com
2. We don't know what we don't know about who all was involved in the 1/6 riot.
Media hushes up report suggesting FBI involvement in Capitol riot, as White House turns anti-terrorism efforts on American people
Court filings suggest that FBI operatives were among the mob who stormed the US Capitol in January, and may have set up the riot. With the riot used as justification for new terrorism policy, the media is downplaying the story.www.rt.com
3. Dodge/non-response/willful ignorance. The poll results are clear assuming honest responses. Republicans condemn the 1/6 riot.
4. You are totally free to have any opinion you want about the poll results. This thread was to settle a disagreement "HappyJoy" and I were having on another thread. He seems okay with the poll results. The poll questions were as agreed to, not just mine.
OK, here's another link to Tucker.
Tucker Carlson accuses the FBI of being behind January 6 Capitol riot
Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Tuesday night pointed to the number of 'unindicted co-conspirators' from the Capitol riot, arguing they were FBI agents spurring on the insurrectionists.www.dailymail.co.uk
Real news agencies don't hide who they are.
Don't forget that the MSM covers up for the deep state. I'm not saying FBI involvement is proven, just being investigated.
Were feds involved in facilitating the 1/6 siege? Number of unindicted co-conspirators raise questions.
The significant number of unindicted co-conspirators involved in the January 6 Capitol siege is strangely similar to those in Michigan plot to kidnap Gov. Whitmer, where it was discovered embedded FBI undercover/informants were intimately involved in facilitating the plot.www.lawenforcementtoday.com
NOW WE HAVE PROOF: FBI and DHS Attempted to Recruit Green Beret to Infiltrate Oath Keepers Before Jan. 6 Riot -- AND HE RECORDED IT | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Throughout 2020 the Black Lives Matter terrorist group was linked to conservatively 91% of the riots that resulted in the most expensive property damage in US insurance history There were zero Trump rallies that turned violent during that same time period.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Evidence Surfaces That The FBI Planned And Executed January 6 Capitol Riot - The Tatum Report
Evidence is mounting that the FBI was involved in planning and executing the January 6 Capitol event after…tatumreport.com
They're ALL sourcing fake news revolver.news, ya fucking moron.
All you're doing is posting fake news and pretending like it's real news because other non-news outlets are echoing that one fake news site.
You never answered my question... do you even know you’re psychotic?
Name-calling means you lose the debate. Thanks for playing.
ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
Your trusted source for breaking news, analysis, exclusive interviews, headlines, and videos at ABCNews.comabcnews.go.com
You can see who owns the site, they don't hide it. You can see it's well established, being around for 23 years...
You can click on any abcnews.go article and it shows who the authors are, with links which show they're journalists.
That's what real news looks like. It doesn't hide from the public. It doesn't conceal who's behind the articles. That's what fake news does. That's what the source you're leaning on does. They've only been around 1 year and they hide who's behind it. They conceal who's site it is...
In the article you fall for, they don't disclose who wrote it...
Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver News
Unindicted co-conspirators could unravel the full story of what the FBI knew in advance about the January 6th Capitol Riots.www.revolver.news
And you can't find that nonsense on real news.
Of course, I'm explaining this to a moron who actually claimed he's pro-choice after saying he's not pro-choice, so there's that.
View attachment 505133
Harvard Study reveals media bias
Every news outlet in the study was negative more often than positive.www.studentnewsdaily.com
2. From the above chart you can see that FXN is the most "fair and balanced" news outlet. NBC is just below CNN in bias.
3. FXN generally has both parties represented in debates. CNN, MSDNC, and most MSM programs don't have Republican views presented. If I don't hear both sides presented fairly, I'm not watching their propaganda.
4. As I already explained ad nauseum, abortion is legal, therefore it is NOT murder, duh. Yet, as a Catholic, I am morally opposed to abortion. My position isn't really to complicated unless you're a low-IQ democrat.
5. Summarizing, we don't have any set of facts or any set of alternate facts that we can agree on, correct?
I can't believe I actually have to point this out to you ... but apparently, I do ...... ABC isn't in that study. Do you ever post anything based in reality??
"As I already explained ad nauseum, abortion is legal, therefore it is NOT murder"
You just can't stop lying, can ya? YOU called it murder before you said it's not murder...
You're literally talking out of both sides of your mouth. When it's convenient for you for abortion to be murder, you call it murder. When that becomes inconvenient for you, you deny it's murder.
"Summarizing, we don't have any set of facts or any set of alternate facts that we can agree on, correct?"
Not if you're going to eschew reality and stick with fake news. I prefer to live in reality. You don't have to, mind you, it's your choice.
2. You must have reading comprehension issues, and you just love to quote things out of context. I have no clue if that blue quote is real or not. Even if it is it means in the "moral context" and not in the "legal context". So stop mis-applying my prior quotes. The "both sides of my mouth are the "legal and moral" sides. They are very different sides.
3. LOL, keep drinking the state propaganda. I prefer to hear both sides of arguments, fake news only presents one side.
Your criticizing others' comprehension at this point is laughable.
- Jul 28, 2015
- 21,418
- 32,458
View attachment 505162
Doesn't that make him a hero for killing the unarmed female insurrectionist?
He should be given a medal of valor by the president himself for his courage under fire.
*****SMILE*****
He should. He saved lives.
View attachment 505195
So do it!
Demand it!
Make it happen!!!
*****SMILE*****
It's not up to me. If it was, I would have given him a Medal of Freedom.
But she was a violent unarmed female insurrectionist who threatened the very lives of those congresspersons!
You should be writing every one of those congresspersons telling them this award needs to happen soonest!
Make it happen!!!
*****SMILE*****
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,345
- 80,983
That one is so nuts, he literally refutes himself.Earlier you said I was the only one who thought it was other than Trump supporters doing the rioting. Since then, I have pointed out about a dozen folks who have said it was someone other than blob supporters. You even pointed it out yourself.1. OK, ABC wasn't in the Harvard study, not sure why it was missed, but I'm sure that they are closer to NBC on bias than FXN."The only point I'm bringing up about ABC News is that they do have a bias as documented by the following Harvard Study"1. OK, now we're getting somewhere, actual facts to debate. You like ABC news. Fine, I'm glad you didn't put up CNN or MSDNC as real news outlets. The only point I'm bringing up about ABC News is that they do have a bias as documented by the following Harvard Study:Of course I can. Here's a real news website...You can't prove that 100% of revolver is fake news, anymore than you can prove that the MSM's fake news and propaganda is real.LOLOLOLOLThere are MANY sites that are covering the potential FBI involvement, not just revolver.Dumbfuck, Carlson is just another wackadoo like you. Want proof? His source is revolver.news. Revolver.news is a fake news website. It was just started last year and it conceals who started the site...OK, I googled it and that's what came up. Funny how google puts up RT and censors RWs. WTF?RT is Russia Today, a propaganda tool of Putin/Russians....1. Xiden is quite the liar too, as you well know. Just sayin'
How Many False Claims Did Biden Make In His First 100 Days Compared To Trump?
The Washington Post's fact checker tallied all the false and misleading claims Biden made in speeches, interviews and tweets since taking office.
2. We don't know what we don't know about who all was involved in the 1/6 riot.
Media hushes up report suggesting FBI involvement in Capitol riot, as White House turns anti-terrorism efforts on American people
Court filings suggest that FBI operatives were among the mob who stormed the US Capitol in January, and may have set up the riot. With the riot used as justification for new terrorism policy, the media is downplaying the story.
3. Dodge/non-response/willful ignorance. The poll results are clear assuming honest responses. Republicans condemn the 1/6 riot.
4. You are totally free to have any opinion you want about the poll results. This thread was to settle a disagreement "HappyJoy" and I were having on another thread. He seems okay with the poll results. The poll questions were as agreed to, not just mine.
OK, here's another link to Tucker.
Tucker Carlson accuses the FBI of being behind January 6 Capitol riot
Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Tuesday night pointed to the number of 'unindicted co-conspirators' from the Capitol riot, arguing they were FBI agents spurring on the insurrectionists.
Real news agencies don't hide who they are.
Don't forget that the MSM covers up for the deep state. I'm not saying FBI involvement is proven, just being investigated.
Were feds involved in facilitating the 1/6 siege? Number of unindicted co-conspirators raise questions.
The significant number of unindicted co-conspirators involved in the January 6 Capitol siege is strangely similar to those in Michigan plot to kidnap Gov. Whitmer, where it was discovered embedded FBI undercover/informants were intimately involved in facilitating the plot.www.lawenforcementtoday.comNOW WE HAVE PROOF: FBI and DHS Attempted to Recruit Green Beret to Infiltrate Oath Keepers Before Jan. 6 Riot -- AND HE RECORDED IT | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Throughout 2020 the Black Lives Matter terrorist group was linked to conservatively 91% of the riots that resulted in the most expensive property damage in US insurance history There were zero Trump rallies that turned violent during that same time period.Evidence Surfaces That The FBI Planned And Executed January 6 Capitol Riot - The Tatum Report
Evidence is mounting that the FBI was involved in planning and executing the January 6 Capitol event after…
They're ALL sourcing fake news revolver.news, ya fucking moron.
All you're doing is posting fake news and pretending like it's real news because other non-news outlets are echoing that one fake news site.
You never answered my question... do you even know you’re psychotic?
Name-calling means you lose the debate. Thanks for playing.
ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
Your trusted source for breaking news, analysis, exclusive interviews, headlines, and videos at ABCNews.com
You can see who owns the site, they don't hide it. You can see it's well established, being around for 23 years...
You can click on any abcnews.go article and it shows who the authors are, with links which show they're journalists.
That's what real news looks like. It doesn't hide from the public. It doesn't conceal who's behind the articles. That's what fake news does. That's what the source you're leaning on does. They've only been around 1 year and they hide who's behind it. They conceal who's site it is...
In the article you fall for, they don't disclose who wrote it...
Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver News
Unindicted co-conspirators could unravel the full story of what the FBI knew in advance about the January 6th Capitol Riots.
And you can't find that nonsense on real news.
Of course, I'm explaining this to a moron who actually claimed he's pro-choice after saying he's not pro-choice, so there's that.
View attachment 505133Harvard Study reveals media bias
Every news outlet in the study was negative more often than positive.
2. From the above chart you can see that FXN is the most "fair and balanced" news outlet. NBC is just below CNN in bias.
3. FXN generally has both parties represented in debates. CNN, MSDNC, and most MSM programs don't have Republican views presented. If I don't hear both sides presented fairly, I'm not watching their propaganda.
4. As I already explained ad nauseum, abortion is legal, therefore it is NOT murder, duh. Yet, as a Catholic, I am morally opposed to abortion. My position isn't really to complicated unless you're a low-IQ democrat.
5. Summarizing, we don't have any set of facts or any set of alternate facts that we can agree on, correct?
I can't believe I actually have to point this out to you ... but apparently, I do ...... ABC isn't in that study. Do you ever post anything based in reality??
"As I already explained ad nauseum, abortion is legal, therefore it is NOT murder"
You just can't stop lying, can ya? YOU called it murder before you said it's not murder...
You're literally talking out of both sides of your mouth. When it's convenient for you for abortion to be murder, you call it murder. When that becomes inconvenient for you, you deny it's murder.
"Summarizing, we don't have any set of facts or any set of alternate facts that we can agree on, correct?"
Not if you're going to eschew reality and stick with fake news. I prefer to live in reality. You don't have to, mind you, it's your choice.
2. You must have reading comprehension issues, and you just love to quote things out of context. I have no clue if that blue quote is real or not. Even if it is it means in the "moral context" and not in the "legal context". So stop mis-applying my prior quotes. The "both sides of my mouth are the "legal and moral" sides. They are very different sides.
3. LOL, keep drinking the state propaganda. I prefer to hear both sides of arguments, fake news only presents one side.
Your criticizing others' comprehension at this point is laughable.
candycorn
Diamond Member
- Aug 25, 2009
- 110,836
- 50,999
Amazing....1. Yes there is evidence that Fauci paid China to do gain of function research. There are tons of credible sites.True, that would be a lie if Fauci actually knew the figure was $826K, but I have no evidence of that either. And your question about support paying China to do "gain of function" research is based on your falsehood that we paid China for gain-of-function research. That's never been proven either.Fauci is a liar. Rand is calling him a liar. The paper trail confirms that Fauci is lying. Do you support paying China to do "gain of function" research to make bat viruses more deadly? I don't.
Fauci claims US gave $600,000 to Wuhan lab research; documents show it was more
In a Senate hearing late last month, top doctor Anthony Fauci told lawmakers the U.S. granted $600,000 in funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology over a five year period, but documents provided by the Department of Health and Human Services Friday show otherwise.
But seeing as how you can't stop yourself from lying, I can't wholly state I expect anything different from you.
Why US outsourced bat virus research to Wuhan - Asia Times
The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded bat-coronavirus research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China to the tune of US$3.7 million, aThere are a lot of unknowns, speculation and differences of opinion on these topics. But let’s start with what we do know: In 2014, the NIH awarded a grant to the U.S.-based EcoHealth Alliance to study the risk of the future emergence of coronaviruses from bats. In 2019, the project was renewed for another five years, but it was canceled in April 2020 — three months after the first case of the coronavirus was confirmed in the U.S.The Wuhan Lab and the Gain-of-Function Disagreement - FactCheck.org
A disagreement between Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Dr. Anthony Fauci has put $600,000 of U.S. grant money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology back into the spotlight, while making "gain-of-function" research a household term -- all amid calls for more investigation into the origins of SARS-CoV-2.
EcoHealth ultimately received $3.7 million over six years from the NIH and distributed nearly $600,000 of that total to China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, a collaborator on the project, pre-approved by NIH.
The grant cancellation came at a time when then-President Donald Trump and others questioned the U.S. funding to a lab in Wuhan, while exaggerating the amount of federal money involved.
2. QED. You can't deny the funding.
3. My suspicion is that Dr Fauci's irresponsible research is what killed 600,000 Americans. Covid did not come directly from bats, it was enhanced via gain of function research. It will be proven.
And you blob had him on the payroll for 4 years?
You guys have gone from blaming China to blaming Democrats to blaming someone who appeared at numerous press conferences with your blob.
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,345
- 80,983
View attachment 505162
Doesn't that make him a hero for killing the unarmed female insurrectionist?
He should be given a medal of valor by the president himself for his courage under fire.
*****SMILE*****
He should. He saved lives.
View attachment 505195
So do it!
Demand it!
Make it happen!!!
*****SMILE*****
It's not up to me. If it was, I would have given him a Medal of Freedom.
View attachment 505196
But she was a violent unarmed female insurrectionist who threatened the very lives of those congresspersons!
You should be writing every one of those congresspersons telling them this award needs to happen soonest!
Make it happen!!!
*****SMILE*****
LOL
Besides you, who cares what you want?
candycorn
Diamond Member
- Aug 25, 2009
- 110,836
- 50,999
View attachment 505162
Doesn't that make him a hero for killing the unarmed female insurrectionist?
He should be given a medal of valor by the president himself for his courage under fire.
*****SMILE*****
He should. He saved lives.
View attachment 505195
So do it!
Demand it!
Make it happen!!!
*****SMILE*****
It's not up to me. If it was, I would have given him a Medal of Freedom.
View attachment 505196
But she was a violent unarmed female insurrectionist who threatened the very lives of those congresspersons!
You should be writing every one of those congresspersons telling them this award needs to happen soonest!
Make it happen!!!
*****SMILE*****
If you had a store and had an armed security officer....and someone was coming through the window into your store....would you want the security offier to fire or not?
Please make us all laugh harder at you and tell us you'd prefer something else
- Jul 28, 2015
- 21,418
- 32,458
View attachment 505162
Doesn't that make him a hero for killing the unarmed female insurrectionist?
He should be given a medal of valor by the president himself for his courage under fire.
*****SMILE*****
He should. He saved lives.
View attachment 505195
So do it!
Demand it!
Make it happen!!!
*****SMILE*****
It's not up to me. If it was, I would have given him a Medal of Freedom.
View attachment 505196
But she was a violent unarmed female insurrectionist who threatened the very lives of those congresspersons!
You should be writing every one of those congresspersons telling them this award needs to happen soonest!
Make it happen!!!
*****SMILE*****
If you had a store and had an armed security officer....and someone was coming through the window into your store....would you want the security offier to fire or not?
Please make us all laugh harder at you and tell us you'd prefer something else
I'm telling you that you need to honor him with a high award so I don't see what the problem is have the president prop him up and award the officer with the medal of valor for heroism above and beyond the call of duty in front of the news reporters so everyone can witness his heroism.
*****SMILE*****
candycorn
Diamond Member
- Aug 25, 2009
- 110,836
- 50,999
View attachment 505162
Doesn't that make him a hero for killing the unarmed female insurrectionist?
He should be given a medal of valor by the president himself for his courage under fire.
*****SMILE*****
He should. He saved lives.
View attachment 505195
So do it!
Demand it!
Make it happen!!!
*****SMILE*****
It's not up to me. If it was, I would have given him a Medal of Freedom.
View attachment 505196
But she was a violent unarmed female insurrectionist who threatened the very lives of those congresspersons!
You should be writing every one of those congresspersons telling them this award needs to happen soonest!
Make it happen!!!
*****SMILE*****
If you had a store and had an armed security officer....and someone was coming through the window into your store....would you want the security offier to fire or not?
Please make us all laugh harder at you and tell us you'd prefer something else
View attachment 505199
I'm telling you that you need to honor him with a high award
I agree. That and show what he did to every officer nationwide on how to handle a Trump supporter.
kyzr
Diamond Member
- Oct 14, 2009
- 37,201
- 28,596
- Thread starter
- #1,095
Clearly you can't debate. You obfuscate. Maybe you know you are fighting the truth, so obfuscation is all you can do.You really can't stop posting bullshit, can ya, con?1. Yes there is evidence that Fauci paid China to do gain of function research. There are tons of credible sites.True, that would be a lie if Fauci actually knew the figure was $826K, but I have no evidence of that either. And your question about support paying China to do "gain of function" research is based on your falsehood that we paid China for gain-of-function research. That's never been proven either.Fauci is a liar. Rand is calling him a liar. The paper trail confirms that Fauci is lying. Do you support paying China to do "gain of function" research to make bat viruses more deadly? I don't.
Fauci claims US gave $600,000 to Wuhan lab research; documents show it was more
In a Senate hearing late last month, top doctor Anthony Fauci told lawmakers the U.S. granted $600,000 in funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology over a five year period, but documents provided by the Department of Health and Human Services Friday show otherwise.
But seeing as how you can't stop yourself from lying, I can't wholly state I expect anything different from you.
Why US outsourced bat virus research to Wuhan - Asia Times
The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded bat-coronavirus research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China to the tune of US$3.7 million, aThere are a lot of unknowns, speculation and differences of opinion on these topics. But let’s start with what we do know: In 2014, the NIH awarded a grant to the U.S.-based EcoHealth Alliance to study the risk of the future emergence of coronaviruses from bats. In 2019, the project was renewed for another five years, but it was canceled in April 2020 — three months after the first case of the coronavirus was confirmed in the U.S.The Wuhan Lab and the Gain-of-Function Disagreement - FactCheck.org
A disagreement between Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Dr. Anthony Fauci has put $600,000 of U.S. grant money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology back into the spotlight, while making "gain-of-function" research a household term -- all amid calls for more investigation into the origins of SARS-CoV-2.
EcoHealth ultimately received $3.7 million over six years from the NIH and distributed nearly $600,000 of that total to China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, a collaborator on the project, pre-approved by NIH.
The grant cancellation came at a time when then-President Donald Trump and others questioned the U.S. funding to a lab in Wuhan, while exaggerating the amount of federal money involved.
2. QED. You can't deny the funding.
3. My suspicion is that Dr Fauci's irresponsible research is what killed 600,000 Americans. Covid did not come directly from bats, it was enhanced via gain of function research. It will be proven.
I only got as far as this lie....
The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded bat-coronavirus research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China to the tune of US$3.7 million, a recent article in the British newspaper Daily Mail revealed.
You've now posted 2 articles on this.... one stating the NIH gave the Wuhan $826K, the other stating the NIH gave the Wuhan lab $3.7 million.
Clearly, they can't both be true. So clearly, you're posting fake news again.
So do you ever stop lying?
Ever???
This is exactly the reason you have zero cred. You say abortion is murder... then you say abortion is not murder. You say you're not pro-choice... then you say you are pro-choice. Now you say the NIH gave the Wuhan lab $826K... then you say the NIH gave the Wuhan lab $3.7 million.
You keep relying on fake news -- you keep on embarrassing yourself.
I'm retired, I have all day to post the truth.
1. NIH funded gain of function research at the Wuhan Lab to make bat viruses more deadly, the funding came from several US agencies, thru intermediaries, to cover their asses. So don't whine about the amounts and from whom.
US officials may have avoided the coronavirus lab-leak theory to avoid associations with controversial gain-of-function research
The US has funded labs that alter coronaviruses for research. That may have led officials to avoid investigating whether the virus leaked from a lab.
www.businessinsider.com
3. Do you ever debate with facts? Ever??
4. In the US is abortion murder, y/n? So stop your stupid grade school arguments or you lose the debate, and that's all I'll put in future replies.
5. Your empty posts show how vapid your grade school arguments are.
kyzr
Diamond Member
- Oct 14, 2009
- 37,201
- 28,596
- Thread starter
- #1,096
OMG, give it up already. Of the ~500 rioters how many were Trump supporters, and how many were non-Trump supporters?Earlier you said I was the only one who thought it was other than Trump supporters doing the rioting. Since then, I have pointed out about a dozen folks who have said it was someone other than blob supporters. You even pointed it out yourself.1. OK, ABC wasn't in the Harvard study, not sure why it was missed, but I'm sure that they are closer to NBC on bias than FXN."The only point I'm bringing up about ABC News is that they do have a bias as documented by the following Harvard Study"1. OK, now we're getting somewhere, actual facts to debate. You like ABC news. Fine, I'm glad you didn't put up CNN or MSDNC as real news outlets. The only point I'm bringing up about ABC News is that they do have a bias as documented by the following Harvard Study:Of course I can. Here's a real news website...You can't prove that 100% of revolver is fake news, anymore than you can prove that the MSM's fake news and propaganda is real.LOLOLOLOLThere are MANY sites that are covering the potential FBI involvement, not just revolver.Dumbfuck, Carlson is just another wackadoo like you. Want proof? His source is revolver.news. Revolver.news is a fake news website. It was just started last year and it conceals who started the site...OK, I googled it and that's what came up. Funny how google puts up RT and censors RWs. WTF?RT is Russia Today, a propaganda tool of Putin/Russians....1. Xiden is quite the liar too, as you well know. Just sayin'
How Many False Claims Did Biden Make In His First 100 Days Compared To Trump?
The Washington Post's fact checker tallied all the false and misleading claims Biden made in speeches, interviews and tweets since taking office.
2. We don't know what we don't know about who all was involved in the 1/6 riot.
Media hushes up report suggesting FBI involvement in Capitol riot, as White House turns anti-terrorism efforts on American people
Court filings suggest that FBI operatives were among the mob who stormed the US Capitol in January, and may have set up the riot. With the riot used as justification for new terrorism policy, the media is downplaying the story.
3. Dodge/non-response/willful ignorance. The poll results are clear assuming honest responses. Republicans condemn the 1/6 riot.
4. You are totally free to have any opinion you want about the poll results. This thread was to settle a disagreement "HappyJoy" and I were having on another thread. He seems okay with the poll results. The poll questions were as agreed to, not just mine.
OK, here's another link to Tucker.
Tucker Carlson accuses the FBI of being behind January 6 Capitol riot
Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Tuesday night pointed to the number of 'unindicted co-conspirators' from the Capitol riot, arguing they were FBI agents spurring on the insurrectionists.
Real news agencies don't hide who they are.
Don't forget that the MSM covers up for the deep state. I'm not saying FBI involvement is proven, just being investigated.
Were feds involved in facilitating the 1/6 siege? Number of unindicted co-conspirators raise questions.
The significant number of unindicted co-conspirators involved in the January 6 Capitol siege is strangely similar to those in Michigan plot to kidnap Gov. Whitmer, where it was discovered embedded FBI undercover/informants were intimately involved in facilitating the plot.www.lawenforcementtoday.comNOW WE HAVE PROOF: FBI and DHS Attempted to Recruit Green Beret to Infiltrate Oath Keepers Before Jan. 6 Riot -- AND HE RECORDED IT | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Throughout 2020 the Black Lives Matter terrorist group was linked to conservatively 91% of the riots that resulted in the most expensive property damage in US insurance history There were zero Trump rallies that turned violent during that same time period.Evidence Surfaces That The FBI Planned And Executed January 6 Capitol Riot - The Tatum Report
Evidence is mounting that the FBI was involved in planning and executing the January 6 Capitol event after…
They're ALL sourcing fake news revolver.news, ya fucking moron.
All you're doing is posting fake news and pretending like it's real news because other non-news outlets are echoing that one fake news site.
You never answered my question... do you even know you’re psychotic?
Name-calling means you lose the debate. Thanks for playing.
ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
Your trusted source for breaking news, analysis, exclusive interviews, headlines, and videos at ABCNews.com
You can see who owns the site, they don't hide it. You can see it's well established, being around for 23 years...
You can click on any abcnews.go article and it shows who the authors are, with links which show they're journalists.
That's what real news looks like. It doesn't hide from the public. It doesn't conceal who's behind the articles. That's what fake news does. That's what the source you're leaning on does. They've only been around 1 year and they hide who's behind it. They conceal who's site it is...
In the article you fall for, they don't disclose who wrote it...
Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver News
Unindicted co-conspirators could unravel the full story of what the FBI knew in advance about the January 6th Capitol Riots.
And you can't find that nonsense on real news.
Of course, I'm explaining this to a moron who actually claimed he's pro-choice after saying he's not pro-choice, so there's that.
View attachment 505133Harvard Study reveals media bias
Every news outlet in the study was negative more often than positive.
2. From the above chart you can see that FXN is the most "fair and balanced" news outlet. NBC is just below CNN in bias.
3. FXN generally has both parties represented in debates. CNN, MSDNC, and most MSM programs don't have Republican views presented. If I don't hear both sides presented fairly, I'm not watching their propaganda.
4. As I already explained ad nauseum, abortion is legal, therefore it is NOT murder, duh. Yet, as a Catholic, I am morally opposed to abortion. My position isn't really to complicated unless you're a low-IQ democrat.
5. Summarizing, we don't have any set of facts or any set of alternate facts that we can agree on, correct?
I can't believe I actually have to point this out to you ... but apparently, I do ...... ABC isn't in that study. Do you ever post anything based in reality??
"As I already explained ad nauseum, abortion is legal, therefore it is NOT murder"
You just can't stop lying, can ya? YOU called it murder before you said it's not murder...
You're literally talking out of both sides of your mouth. When it's convenient for you for abortion to be murder, you call it murder. When that becomes inconvenient for you, you deny it's murder.
"Summarizing, we don't have any set of facts or any set of alternate facts that we can agree on, correct?"
Not if you're going to eschew reality and stick with fake news. I prefer to live in reality. You don't have to, mind you, it's your choice.
2. You must have reading comprehension issues, and you just love to quote things out of context. I have no clue if that blue quote is real or not. Even if it is it means in the "moral context" and not in the "legal context". So stop mis-applying my prior quotes. The "both sides of my mouth are the "legal and moral" sides. They are very different sides.
3. LOL, keep drinking the state propaganda. I prefer to hear both sides of arguments, fake news only presents one side.
Your criticizing others' comprehension at this point is laughable.
My point being that the vast majority of the 500 were Trump supporters, and the poll questions are reasonable, which is what we were debating. You wanted Republicans listed, I said the vast majority of the rioters were obviously Trump supporters.
If the FBI, or antifa, or BLM, or other anarchists were in attendance, doesn't matter as far as the poll is concerned.
kyzr
Diamond Member
- Oct 14, 2009
- 37,201
- 28,596
- Thread starter
- #1,097
Read your post again. Try re-writing it so it makes sense.Amazing....1. Yes there is evidence that Fauci paid China to do gain of function research. There are tons of credible sites.True, that would be a lie if Fauci actually knew the figure was $826K, but I have no evidence of that either. And your question about support paying China to do "gain of function" research is based on your falsehood that we paid China for gain-of-function research. That's never been proven either.Fauci is a liar. Rand is calling him a liar. The paper trail confirms that Fauci is lying. Do you support paying China to do "gain of function" research to make bat viruses more deadly? I don't.
Fauci claims US gave $600,000 to Wuhan lab research; documents show it was more
In a Senate hearing late last month, top doctor Anthony Fauci told lawmakers the U.S. granted $600,000 in funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology over a five year period, but documents provided by the Department of Health and Human Services Friday show otherwise.
But seeing as how you can't stop yourself from lying, I can't wholly state I expect anything different from you.
Why US outsourced bat virus research to Wuhan - Asia Times
The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded bat-coronavirus research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China to the tune of US$3.7 million, aThere are a lot of unknowns, speculation and differences of opinion on these topics. But let’s start with what we do know: In 2014, the NIH awarded a grant to the U.S.-based EcoHealth Alliance to study the risk of the future emergence of coronaviruses from bats. In 2019, the project was renewed for another five years, but it was canceled in April 2020 — three months after the first case of the coronavirus was confirmed in the U.S.The Wuhan Lab and the Gain-of-Function Disagreement - FactCheck.org
A disagreement between Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Dr. Anthony Fauci has put $600,000 of U.S. grant money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology back into the spotlight, while making "gain-of-function" research a household term -- all amid calls for more investigation into the origins of SARS-CoV-2.
EcoHealth ultimately received $3.7 million over six years from the NIH and distributed nearly $600,000 of that total to China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, a collaborator on the project, pre-approved by NIH.
The grant cancellation came at a time when then-President Donald Trump and others questioned the U.S. funding to a lab in Wuhan, while exaggerating the amount of federal money involved.
2. QED. You can't deny the funding.
3. My suspicion is that Dr Fauci's irresponsible research is what killed 600,000 Americans. Covid did not come directly from bats, it was enhanced via gain of function research. It will be proven.
And you blob had him on the payroll for 4 years?
You guys have gone from blaming China to blaming Democrats to blaming someone who appeared at numerous press conferences with your blob.
SweetSue92
Diamond Member
- Jul 18, 2018
- 33,708
- 28,938
I vote other. I vote that the outsized obsession with this nearly non-event some five months later is a pathetic attempt to distract from the utter failures of the Democrats, which are legion: inflation, crime, the border, gas prices, the economy, covid, lockdowns, and on and on and on
candycorn
Diamond Member
- Aug 25, 2009
- 110,836
- 50,999
All Trump supporters.OMG, give it up already. Of the ~500 rioters how many were Trump supporters, and how many were non-Trump supporters?Earlier you said I was the only one who thought it was other than Trump supporters doing the rioting. Since then, I have pointed out about a dozen folks who have said it was someone other than blob supporters. You even pointed it out yourself.1. OK, ABC wasn't in the Harvard study, not sure why it was missed, but I'm sure that they are closer to NBC on bias than FXN."The only point I'm bringing up about ABC News is that they do have a bias as documented by the following Harvard Study"1. OK, now we're getting somewhere, actual facts to debate. You like ABC news. Fine, I'm glad you didn't put up CNN or MSDNC as real news outlets. The only point I'm bringing up about ABC News is that they do have a bias as documented by the following Harvard Study:Of course I can. Here's a real news website...You can't prove that 100% of revolver is fake news, anymore than you can prove that the MSM's fake news and propaganda is real.LOLOLOLOLThere are MANY sites that are covering the potential FBI involvement, not just revolver.Dumbfuck, Carlson is just another wackadoo like you. Want proof? His source is revolver.news. Revolver.news is a fake news website. It was just started last year and it conceals who started the site...OK, I googled it and that's what came up. Funny how google puts up RT and censors RWs. WTF?RT is Russia Today, a propaganda tool of Putin/Russians....1. Xiden is quite the liar too, as you well know. Just sayin'
How Many False Claims Did Biden Make In His First 100 Days Compared To Trump?
The Washington Post's fact checker tallied all the false and misleading claims Biden made in speeches, interviews and tweets since taking office.
2. We don't know what we don't know about who all was involved in the 1/6 riot.
Media hushes up report suggesting FBI involvement in Capitol riot, as White House turns anti-terrorism efforts on American people
Court filings suggest that FBI operatives were among the mob who stormed the US Capitol in January, and may have set up the riot. With the riot used as justification for new terrorism policy, the media is downplaying the story.
3. Dodge/non-response/willful ignorance. The poll results are clear assuming honest responses. Republicans condemn the 1/6 riot.
4. You are totally free to have any opinion you want about the poll results. This thread was to settle a disagreement "HappyJoy" and I were having on another thread. He seems okay with the poll results. The poll questions were as agreed to, not just mine.
OK, here's another link to Tucker.
Tucker Carlson accuses the FBI of being behind January 6 Capitol riot
Fox News host Tucker Carlson on Tuesday night pointed to the number of 'unindicted co-conspirators' from the Capitol riot, arguing they were FBI agents spurring on the insurrectionists.
Real news agencies don't hide who they are.
Don't forget that the MSM covers up for the deep state. I'm not saying FBI involvement is proven, just being investigated.
Were feds involved in facilitating the 1/6 siege? Number of unindicted co-conspirators raise questions.
The significant number of unindicted co-conspirators involved in the January 6 Capitol siege is strangely similar to those in Michigan plot to kidnap Gov. Whitmer, where it was discovered embedded FBI undercover/informants were intimately involved in facilitating the plot.www.lawenforcementtoday.comNOW WE HAVE PROOF: FBI and DHS Attempted to Recruit Green Beret to Infiltrate Oath Keepers Before Jan. 6 Riot -- AND HE RECORDED IT | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Throughout 2020 the Black Lives Matter terrorist group was linked to conservatively 91% of the riots that resulted in the most expensive property damage in US insurance history There were zero Trump rallies that turned violent during that same time period.Evidence Surfaces That The FBI Planned And Executed January 6 Capitol Riot - The Tatum Report
Evidence is mounting that the FBI was involved in planning and executing the January 6 Capitol event after…
They're ALL sourcing fake news revolver.news, ya fucking moron.
All you're doing is posting fake news and pretending like it's real news because other non-news outlets are echoing that one fake news site.
You never answered my question... do you even know you’re psychotic?
Name-calling means you lose the debate. Thanks for playing.
ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
Your trusted source for breaking news, analysis, exclusive interviews, headlines, and videos at ABCNews.com
You can see who owns the site, they don't hide it. You can see it's well established, being around for 23 years...
You can click on any abcnews.go article and it shows who the authors are, with links which show they're journalists.
That's what real news looks like. It doesn't hide from the public. It doesn't conceal who's behind the articles. That's what fake news does. That's what the source you're leaning on does. They've only been around 1 year and they hide who's behind it. They conceal who's site it is...
In the article you fall for, they don't disclose who wrote it...
Unindicted Co-Conspirators in 1/6 Cases Raise Disturbing Questions of Federal Foreknowledge - Revolver News
Unindicted co-conspirators could unravel the full story of what the FBI knew in advance about the January 6th Capitol Riots.
And you can't find that nonsense on real news.
Of course, I'm explaining this to a moron who actually claimed he's pro-choice after saying he's not pro-choice, so there's that.
View attachment 505133Harvard Study reveals media bias
Every news outlet in the study was negative more often than positive.
2. From the above chart you can see that FXN is the most "fair and balanced" news outlet. NBC is just below CNN in bias.
3. FXN generally has both parties represented in debates. CNN, MSDNC, and most MSM programs don't have Republican views presented. If I don't hear both sides presented fairly, I'm not watching their propaganda.
4. As I already explained ad nauseum, abortion is legal, therefore it is NOT murder, duh. Yet, as a Catholic, I am morally opposed to abortion. My position isn't really to complicated unless you're a low-IQ democrat.
5. Summarizing, we don't have any set of facts or any set of alternate facts that we can agree on, correct?
I can't believe I actually have to point this out to you ... but apparently, I do ...... ABC isn't in that study. Do you ever post anything based in reality??
"As I already explained ad nauseum, abortion is legal, therefore it is NOT murder"
You just can't stop lying, can ya? YOU called it murder before you said it's not murder...
You're literally talking out of both sides of your mouth. When it's convenient for you for abortion to be murder, you call it murder. When that becomes inconvenient for you, you deny it's murder.
"Summarizing, we don't have any set of facts or any set of alternate facts that we can agree on, correct?"
Not if you're going to eschew reality and stick with fake news. I prefer to live in reality. You don't have to, mind you, it's your choice.
2. You must have reading comprehension issues, and you just love to quote things out of context. I have no clue if that blue quote is real or not. Even if it is it means in the "moral context" and not in the "legal context". So stop mis-applying my prior quotes. The "both sides of my mouth are the "legal and moral" sides. They are very different sides.
3. LOL, keep drinking the state propaganda. I prefer to hear both sides of arguments, fake news only presents one side.
Your criticizing others' comprehension at this point is laughable.
No. What I said was your poll question didn't specify blob supporters as those who committed the acts of violence.
Blob supporters have come to occupy a fantasy land where Trump was a conservative, he never lied, he won the election, and someone else committed the acts of violence at the capitol. You, yourself, after insisting nobody had that view other than me cited Fox News as having that view....after I gave you about 20 instances of people spouting that nonsense on this very forum.
Had your poll question cited the violence by blob supporters, you wouldn't have gotten any buy-in from blob supporters on the poll. Such is the life inside the cult.
Correct. They were not in attendance.
candycorn
Diamond Member
- Aug 25, 2009
- 110,836
- 50,999
It makes perfect sense.Read your post again. Try re-writing it so it makes sense.Amazing....1. Yes there is evidence that Fauci paid China to do gain of function research. There are tons of credible sites.True, that would be a lie if Fauci actually knew the figure was $826K, but I have no evidence of that either. And your question about support paying China to do "gain of function" research is based on your falsehood that we paid China for gain-of-function research. That's never been proven either.Fauci is a liar. Rand is calling him a liar. The paper trail confirms that Fauci is lying. Do you support paying China to do "gain of function" research to make bat viruses more deadly? I don't.
Fauci claims US gave $600,000 to Wuhan lab research; documents show it was more
In a Senate hearing late last month, top doctor Anthony Fauci told lawmakers the U.S. granted $600,000 in funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology over a five year period, but documents provided by the Department of Health and Human Services Friday show otherwise.
But seeing as how you can't stop yourself from lying, I can't wholly state I expect anything different from you.
Why US outsourced bat virus research to Wuhan - Asia Times
The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded bat-coronavirus research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China to the tune of US$3.7 million, aThere are a lot of unknowns, speculation and differences of opinion on these topics. But let’s start with what we do know: In 2014, the NIH awarded a grant to the U.S.-based EcoHealth Alliance to study the risk of the future emergence of coronaviruses from bats. In 2019, the project was renewed for another five years, but it was canceled in April 2020 — three months after the first case of the coronavirus was confirmed in the U.S.The Wuhan Lab and the Gain-of-Function Disagreement - FactCheck.org
A disagreement between Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Dr. Anthony Fauci has put $600,000 of U.S. grant money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology back into the spotlight, while making "gain-of-function" research a household term -- all amid calls for more investigation into the origins of SARS-CoV-2.
EcoHealth ultimately received $3.7 million over six years from the NIH and distributed nearly $600,000 of that total to China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, a collaborator on the project, pre-approved by NIH.
The grant cancellation came at a time when then-President Donald Trump and others questioned the U.S. funding to a lab in Wuhan, while exaggerating the amount of federal money involved.
2. QED. You can't deny the funding.
3. My suspicion is that Dr Fauci's irresponsible research is what killed 600,000 Americans. Covid did not come directly from bats, it was enhanced via gain of function research. It will be proven.
And you blob had him on the payroll for 4 years?
You guys have gone from blaming China to blaming Democrats to blaming someone who appeared at numerous press conferences with your blob.
When the blob was in office, you guys blamed China for the virus.
When the blob was in office, you guys blamed the deaths from his mismanagement on the Democrats.
Now that Biden is in office, you guys are blaming Fauci...the same guy your blob had on the payroll for 4 years and appeared at numerous briefings with the blob himself.
Are you really this dense?
Similar threads
- Locked
