Poll to condemn or condone "the violence and law breaking that took place inside the Capital on 1/6"

[Faun]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.

There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.


Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.

Dumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?

No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies

FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.

www.reuters.com

Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.


ZERO.


If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.

LOLOLOLOL

Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.

no, they don't. That is what happens when you lie, a lot and big.


You don't get to pretend that didn't happen.


My point stands. We have one example of a self admitted leftard blm guy infiltrating and agitating, so that shows that there could be more.


It thus is a plausible and valid belief.

Your point is as dead as Ashli Targetpractice. The FBI is investigating Insurrection Day and has not found any evidence to support your delusions.

Don't fear reality, embrace it.

The FBI? The same guys that pushed the Steele Dossier and gave Hillary a pass?

FUCK THEM, they have about the same credibility as the media at this point.

LOLOL

And still more cred than a whining peon like you.

Want proof? Despite your failed attempts to discredit the FBI AND the media for reporting there's no evidence that Antifa or BLM incited Insurrection Day -- you too have no evidence they did.

I have an example, on video of a lefty like yourself, a self identified wacial justice protestor, agitating and encouraging people to riot.

That the fbi and media ignore that and claim "NO EVIDENCE" is them lying.

Remember what I said about no credibility? Now you see why.

You're brain-dead, con. The FBI never ignored Sullivan.

Which is why what I see is it's you who lacks cred.

Since he is not a formal, card carrying member of the organization, they are pretending that he doesn't count as "evidence".

That is bullshit. That is a lie. That is them playing leftard games. That is them proving that I am right to not trust them.

LOL

Moron, he's a member (and founder) of Insurgence USA, which is not affiliated with Antifa.

Like I said, since he is not a formal card carrying member of the formal structure of the group, they are choosing to not count him as a lefty infiltrator who agitated the mob.

That is them finding an excuse to lie. That is them taking a side and giving political support to one side of the partisan divide.

Their statement, which you cited, is thus proven to be false. Their credibility that I said was zero, is proven to be zero.

Thanks for helping me prove my point.

LOLOL

You're such aretard.

There's no evidence Sullivan is with Antifa. To morons like you, that's evidence he's Antifa.

He is not a Trump supporter, he is an opponent of Trump, he is aligned with you leftards.


To pretend that his being there is not evidence of what we are talking about, is the FBI, the media and you proving my point, that all of you have zero or even anti-credibility.


AND that the idea that the riot was caused by leftard infiltrators, perhaps with deep state support, is a completely plausible theory.

Dumbfuck, no one said he's a Trump supporter. The FBI made no such assertion either. They correctly identified him as the leader of Insurgence USA.

There is no evidence he's affiliated with Antifa. The FBI states that and you possess zero evidence they're either wrong or lying about that.

I got the excuse for not counting him. I addressed it. YOur excuses were noted and addressed.

The fact remains. YOu cited them saying that there was "no evidence of antifa or blm incitement".


But sullivan, a self admitted lefty infiltrator was there, and recorded himself "inciting" the mob to further violence and aggression.

That is the fucking point.

iF there was one, there could be more. Not that you or the fbi would admit it, or tell us, if you or they found out about it.


I'm sure there would be excuse they could find to NOT count any additional lefties they find or found too.

LOLOL

The FBI has been investigating this for 6 months now and has arrested close to 600. Show where any others could be "leftists." In fact, while you're at it -- prove a "leftist" can't support Trump....

The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.

LOLOL

Says you -- but you can't show they lied about Antifa not being involved with Insurrection Day.

I'm just pointing the your link, with the fbi talking shit about "no evidence" of infiltrators, when we know of one.


That is them proving my point about them being liars.

That's not what the link says. The link says there's no evidence Antifa, or any left-wing group, was involved.

You also say there is no such evidence. You're literally agreeing with the FBI while you're idiotically calling them liars.

Your pretense of not getting it is dismissed, you stonewalling spam bot.

I get it. You're delusional. You think the FBI is lying even though you too agree there is no evidence of Antifa or other leftwing group involved in Insurrection Day.

 

[Correll]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.

There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.


Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.

Dumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?

No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies

FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.

www.reuters.com

Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.


ZERO.


If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.

LOLOLOLOL

Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.

no, they don't. That is what happens when you lie, a lot and big.


You don't get to pretend that didn't happen.


My point stands. We have one example of a self admitted leftard blm guy infiltrating and agitating, so that shows that there could be more.


It thus is a plausible and valid belief.

Your point is as dead as Ashli Targetpractice. The FBI is investigating Insurrection Day and has not found any evidence to support your delusions.

Don't fear reality, embrace it.

The FBI? The same guys that pushed the Steele Dossier and gave Hillary a pass?

FUCK THEM, they have about the same credibility as the media at this point.

LOLOL

And still more cred than a whining peon like you.

Want proof? Despite your failed attempts to discredit the FBI AND the media for reporting there's no evidence that Antifa or BLM incited Insurrection Day -- you too have no evidence they did.

I have an example, on video of a lefty like yourself, a self identified wacial justice protestor, agitating and encouraging people to riot.

That the fbi and media ignore that and claim "NO EVIDENCE" is them lying.

Remember what I said about no credibility? Now you see why.

You're brain-dead, con. The FBI never ignored Sullivan.

Which is why what I see is it's you who lacks cred.

Since he is not a formal, card carrying member of the organization, they are pretending that he doesn't count as "evidence".

That is bullshit. That is a lie. That is them playing leftard games. That is them proving that I am right to not trust them.

LOL

Moron, he's a member (and founder) of Insurgence USA, which is not affiliated with Antifa.

Like I said, since he is not a formal card carrying member of the formal structure of the group, they are choosing to not count him as a lefty infiltrator who agitated the mob.

That is them finding an excuse to lie. That is them taking a side and giving political support to one side of the partisan divide.

Their statement, which you cited, is thus proven to be false. Their credibility that I said was zero, is proven to be zero.

Thanks for helping me prove my point.

LOLOL

You're such aretard.

There's no evidence Sullivan is with Antifa. To morons like you, that's evidence he's Antifa.

He is not a Trump supporter, he is an opponent of Trump, he is aligned with you leftards.


To pretend that his being there is not evidence of what we are talking about, is the FBI, the media and you proving my point, that all of you have zero or even anti-credibility.


AND that the idea that the riot was caused by leftard infiltrators, perhaps with deep state support, is a completely plausible theory.

Dumbfuck, no one said he's a Trump supporter. The FBI made no such assertion either. They correctly identified him as the leader of Insurgence USA.

There is no evidence he's affiliated with Antifa. The FBI states that and you possess zero evidence they're either wrong or lying about that.

I got the excuse for not counting him. I addressed it. YOur excuses were noted and addressed.

The fact remains. YOu cited them saying that there was "no evidence of antifa or blm incitement".


But sullivan, a self admitted lefty infiltrator was there, and recorded himself "inciting" the mob to further violence and aggression.

That is the fucking point.

iF there was one, there could be more. Not that you or the fbi would admit it, or tell us, if you or they found out about it.


I'm sure there would be excuse they could find to NOT count any additional lefties they find or found too.

LOLOL

The FBI has been investigating this for 6 months now and has arrested close to 600. Show where any others could be "leftists." In fact, while you're at it -- prove a "leftist" can't support Trump....

The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.

LOLOL

Says you -- but you can't show they lied about Antifa not being involved with Insurrection Day.

I'm just pointing the your link, with the fbi talking shit about "no evidence" of infiltrators, when we know of one.


That is them proving my point about them being liars.

That's not what the link says. The link says there's no evidence Antifa, or any left-wing group, was involved.

You also say there is no such evidence. You're literally agreeing with the FBI while you're idiotically calling them liars.

Your pretense of not getting it is dismissed, you stonewalling spam bot.

I get it. You're delusional. You think the FBI is lying even though you too agree there is no evidence of Antifa or other leftwing group involved in Insurrection Day.

Dude. You lost. GET OVER IT.

 

[Faun]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.

There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.


Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.

Dumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?

No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies

FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.

www.reuters.com

Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.


ZERO.


If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.

LOLOLOLOL

Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.

no, they don't. That is what happens when you lie, a lot and big.


You don't get to pretend that didn't happen.


My point stands. We have one example of a self admitted leftard blm guy infiltrating and agitating, so that shows that there could be more.


It thus is a plausible and valid belief.

Your point is as dead as Ashli Targetpractice. The FBI is investigating Insurrection Day and has not found any evidence to support your delusions.

Don't fear reality, embrace it.

The FBI? The same guys that pushed the Steele Dossier and gave Hillary a pass?

FUCK THEM, they have about the same credibility as the media at this point.

LOLOL

And still more cred than a whining peon like you.

Want proof? Despite your failed attempts to discredit the FBI AND the media for reporting there's no evidence that Antifa or BLM incited Insurrection Day -- you too have no evidence they did.

I have an example, on video of a lefty like yourself, a self identified wacial justice protestor, agitating and encouraging people to riot.

That the fbi and media ignore that and claim "NO EVIDENCE" is them lying.

Remember what I said about no credibility? Now you see why.

You're brain-dead, con. The FBI never ignored Sullivan.

Which is why what I see is it's you who lacks cred.

Since he is not a formal, card carrying member of the organization, they are pretending that he doesn't count as "evidence".

That is bullshit. That is a lie. That is them playing leftard games. That is them proving that I am right to not trust them.

LOL

Moron, he's a member (and founder) of Insurgence USA, which is not affiliated with Antifa.

Like I said, since he is not a formal card carrying member of the formal structure of the group, they are choosing to not count him as a lefty infiltrator who agitated the mob.

That is them finding an excuse to lie. That is them taking a side and giving political support to one side of the partisan divide.

Their statement, which you cited, is thus proven to be false. Their credibility that I said was zero, is proven to be zero.

Thanks for helping me prove my point.

LOLOL

You're such aretard.

There's no evidence Sullivan is with Antifa. To morons like you, that's evidence he's Antifa.

He is not a Trump supporter, he is an opponent of Trump, he is aligned with you leftards.


To pretend that his being there is not evidence of what we are talking about, is the FBI, the media and you proving my point, that all of you have zero or even anti-credibility.


AND that the idea that the riot was caused by leftard infiltrators, perhaps with deep state support, is a completely plausible theory.

Dumbfuck, no one said he's a Trump supporter. The FBI made no such assertion either. They correctly identified him as the leader of Insurgence USA.

There is no evidence he's affiliated with Antifa. The FBI states that and you possess zero evidence they're either wrong or lying about that.

I got the excuse for not counting him. I addressed it. YOur excuses were noted and addressed.

The fact remains. YOu cited them saying that there was "no evidence of antifa or blm incitement".


But sullivan, a self admitted lefty infiltrator was there, and recorded himself "inciting" the mob to further violence and aggression.

That is the fucking point.

iF there was one, there could be more. Not that you or the fbi would admit it, or tell us, if you or they found out about it.


I'm sure there would be excuse they could find to NOT count any additional lefties they find or found too.

LOLOL

The FBI has been investigating this for 6 months now and has arrested close to 600. Show where any others could be "leftists." In fact, while you're at it -- prove a "leftist" can't support Trump....

The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.

LOLOL

Says you -- but you can't show they lied about Antifa not being involved with Insurrection Day.

I'm just pointing the your link, with the fbi talking shit about "no evidence" of infiltrators, when we know of one.


That is them proving my point about them being liars.

That's not what the link says. The link says there's no evidence Antifa, or any left-wing group, was involved.

You also say there is no such evidence. You're literally agreeing with the FBI while you're idiotically calling them liars.

Your pretense of not getting it is dismissed, you stonewalling spam bot.

I get it. You're delusional. You think the FBI is lying even though you too agree there is no evidence of Antifa or other leftwing group involved in Insurrection Day.

Dude. You lost. GET OVER IT.

LOLOLOLOL

You can't prove any leftist groups were involved but you think I lost.

 

[Correll]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.

There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.


Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.

Dumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?

No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies

FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.

www.reuters.com

Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.


ZERO.


If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.

LOLOLOLOL

Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.

no, they don't. That is what happens when you lie, a lot and big.


You don't get to pretend that didn't happen.


My point stands. We have one example of a self admitted leftard blm guy infiltrating and agitating, so that shows that there could be more.


It thus is a plausible and valid belief.

Your point is as dead as Ashli Targetpractice. The FBI is investigating Insurrection Day and has not found any evidence to support your delusions.

Don't fear reality, embrace it.

The FBI? The same guys that pushed the Steele Dossier and gave Hillary a pass?

FUCK THEM, they have about the same credibility as the media at this point.

LOLOL

And still more cred than a whining peon like you.

Want proof? Despite your failed attempts to discredit the FBI AND the media for reporting there's no evidence that Antifa or BLM incited Insurrection Day -- you too have no evidence they did.

I have an example, on video of a lefty like yourself, a self identified wacial justice protestor, agitating and encouraging people to riot.

That the fbi and media ignore that and claim "NO EVIDENCE" is them lying.

Remember what I said about no credibility? Now you see why.

You're brain-dead, con. The FBI never ignored Sullivan.

Which is why what I see is it's you who lacks cred.

Since he is not a formal, card carrying member of the organization, they are pretending that he doesn't count as "evidence".

That is bullshit. That is a lie. That is them playing leftard games. That is them proving that I am right to not trust them.

LOL

Moron, he's a member (and founder) of Insurgence USA, which is not affiliated with Antifa.

Like I said, since he is not a formal card carrying member of the formal structure of the group, they are choosing to not count him as a lefty infiltrator who agitated the mob.

That is them finding an excuse to lie. That is them taking a side and giving political support to one side of the partisan divide.

Their statement, which you cited, is thus proven to be false. Their credibility that I said was zero, is proven to be zero.

Thanks for helping me prove my point.

LOLOL

You're such aretard.

There's no evidence Sullivan is with Antifa. To morons like you, that's evidence he's Antifa.

He is not a Trump supporter, he is an opponent of Trump, he is aligned with you leftards.


To pretend that his being there is not evidence of what we are talking about, is the FBI, the media and you proving my point, that all of you have zero or even anti-credibility.


AND that the idea that the riot was caused by leftard infiltrators, perhaps with deep state support, is a completely plausible theory.

Dumbfuck, no one said he's a Trump supporter. The FBI made no such assertion either. They correctly identified him as the leader of Insurgence USA.

There is no evidence he's affiliated with Antifa. The FBI states that and you possess zero evidence they're either wrong or lying about that.

I got the excuse for not counting him. I addressed it. YOur excuses were noted and addressed.

The fact remains. YOu cited them saying that there was "no evidence of antifa or blm incitement".


But sullivan, a self admitted lefty infiltrator was there, and recorded himself "inciting" the mob to further violence and aggression.

That is the fucking point.

iF there was one, there could be more. Not that you or the fbi would admit it, or tell us, if you or they found out about it.


I'm sure there would be excuse they could find to NOT count any additional lefties they find or found too.

LOLOL

The FBI has been investigating this for 6 months now and has arrested close to 600. Show where any others could be "leftists." In fact, while you're at it -- prove a "leftist" can't support Trump....

The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.

LOLOL

Says you -- but you can't show they lied about Antifa not being involved with Insurrection Day.

I'm just pointing the your link, with the fbi talking shit about "no evidence" of infiltrators, when we know of one.


That is them proving my point about them being liars.

That's not what the link says. The link says there's no evidence Antifa, or any left-wing group, was involved.

You also say there is no such evidence. You're literally agreeing with the FBI while you're idiotically calling them liars.

Your pretense of not getting it is dismissed, you stonewalling spam bot.

I get it. You're delusional. You think the FBI is lying even though you too agree there is no evidence of Antifa or other leftwing group involved in Insurrection Day.

Dude. You lost. GET OVER IT.

LOLOLOLOL

You can't prove any leftist groups were involved but you think I lost.

Said the man that admitted that a "lefty group" was involved. Or did you forget when you did that, re: Insurgence USA.?


Dumbass.

 

[Faun]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.

There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.


Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.

Dumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?

No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies

FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.

www.reuters.com

Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.


ZERO.


If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.

LOLOLOLOL

Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.

no, they don't. That is what happens when you lie, a lot and big.


You don't get to pretend that didn't happen.


My point stands. We have one example of a self admitted leftard blm guy infiltrating and agitating, so that shows that there could be more.


It thus is a plausible and valid belief.

Your point is as dead as Ashli Targetpractice. The FBI is investigating Insurrection Day and has not found any evidence to support your delusions.

Don't fear reality, embrace it.

The FBI? The same guys that pushed the Steele Dossier and gave Hillary a pass?

FUCK THEM, they have about the same credibility as the media at this point.

LOLOL

And still more cred than a whining peon like you.

Want proof? Despite your failed attempts to discredit the FBI AND the media for reporting there's no evidence that Antifa or BLM incited Insurrection Day -- you too have no evidence they did.

I have an example, on video of a lefty like yourself, a self identified wacial justice protestor, agitating and encouraging people to riot.

That the fbi and media ignore that and claim "NO EVIDENCE" is them lying.

Remember what I said about no credibility? Now you see why.

You're brain-dead, con. The FBI never ignored Sullivan.

Which is why what I see is it's you who lacks cred.

Since he is not a formal, card carrying member of the organization, they are pretending that he doesn't count as "evidence".

That is bullshit. That is a lie. That is them playing leftard games. That is them proving that I am right to not trust them.

LOL

Moron, he's a member (and founder) of Insurgence USA, which is not affiliated with Antifa.

Like I said, since he is not a formal card carrying member of the formal structure of the group, they are choosing to not count him as a lefty infiltrator who agitated the mob.

That is them finding an excuse to lie. That is them taking a side and giving political support to one side of the partisan divide.

Their statement, which you cited, is thus proven to be false. Their credibility that I said was zero, is proven to be zero.

Thanks for helping me prove my point.

LOLOL

You're such aretard.

There's no evidence Sullivan is with Antifa. To morons like you, that's evidence he's Antifa.

He is not a Trump supporter, he is an opponent of Trump, he is aligned with you leftards.


To pretend that his being there is not evidence of what we are talking about, is the FBI, the media and you proving my point, that all of you have zero or even anti-credibility.


AND that the idea that the riot was caused by leftard infiltrators, perhaps with deep state support, is a completely plausible theory.

Dumbfuck, no one said he's a Trump supporter. The FBI made no such assertion either. They correctly identified him as the leader of Insurgence USA.

There is no evidence he's affiliated with Antifa. The FBI states that and you possess zero evidence they're either wrong or lying about that.

I got the excuse for not counting him. I addressed it. YOur excuses were noted and addressed.

The fact remains. YOu cited them saying that there was "no evidence of antifa or blm incitement".


But sullivan, a self admitted lefty infiltrator was there, and recorded himself "inciting" the mob to further violence and aggression.

That is the fucking point.

iF there was one, there could be more. Not that you or the fbi would admit it, or tell us, if you or they found out about it.


I'm sure there would be excuse they could find to NOT count any additional lefties they find or found too.

LOLOL

The FBI has been investigating this for 6 months now and has arrested close to 600. Show where any others could be "leftists." In fact, while you're at it -- prove a "leftist" can't support Trump....

The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.

LOLOL

Says you -- but you can't show they lied about Antifa not being involved with Insurrection Day.

I'm just pointing the your link, with the fbi talking shit about "no evidence" of infiltrators, when we know of one.


That is them proving my point about them being liars.

That's not what the link says. The link says there's no evidence Antifa, or any left-wing group, was involved.

You also say there is no such evidence. You're literally agreeing with the FBI while you're idiotically calling them liars.

Your pretense of not getting it is dismissed, you stonewalling spam bot.

I get it. You're delusional. You think the FBI is lying even though you too agree there is no evidence of Antifa or other leftwing group involved in Insurrection Day.

Dude. You lost. GET OVER IT.

LOLOLOLOL

You can't prove any leftist groups were involved but you think I lost.

Said the man that admitted that a "lefty group" was involved. Or did you forget when you did that, re: Insurgence USA.?


Dumbass.

Now you've reduced yourself to lying as I never said any "lefty group" was involved.

 

[Correll]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.

There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.


Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.

Dumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?

No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies

FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.

www.reuters.com

Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.


ZERO.


If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.

LOLOLOLOL

Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.

no, they don't. That is what happens when you lie, a lot and big.


You don't get to pretend that didn't happen.


My point stands. We have one example of a self admitted leftard blm guy infiltrating and agitating, so that shows that there could be more.


It thus is a plausible and valid belief.

Your point is as dead as Ashli Targetpractice. The FBI is investigating Insurrection Day and has not found any evidence to support your delusions.

Don't fear reality, embrace it.

The FBI? The same guys that pushed the Steele Dossier and gave Hillary a pass?

FUCK THEM, they have about the same credibility as the media at this point.

LOLOL

And still more cred than a whining peon like you.

Want proof? Despite your failed attempts to discredit the FBI AND the media for reporting there's no evidence that Antifa or BLM incited Insurrection Day -- you too have no evidence they did.

I have an example, on video of a lefty like yourself, a self identified wacial justice protestor, agitating and encouraging people to riot.

That the fbi and media ignore that and claim "NO EVIDENCE" is them lying.

Remember what I said about no credibility? Now you see why.

You're brain-dead, con. The FBI never ignored Sullivan.

Which is why what I see is it's you who lacks cred.

Since he is not a formal, card carrying member of the organization, they are pretending that he doesn't count as "evidence".

That is bullshit. That is a lie. That is them playing leftard games. That is them proving that I am right to not trust them.

LOL

Moron, he's a member (and founder) of Insurgence USA, which is not affiliated with Antifa.

Like I said, since he is not a formal card carrying member of the formal structure of the group, they are choosing to not count him as a lefty infiltrator who agitated the mob.

That is them finding an excuse to lie. That is them taking a side and giving political support to one side of the partisan divide.

Their statement, which you cited, is thus proven to be false. Their credibility that I said was zero, is proven to be zero.

Thanks for helping me prove my point.

LOLOL

You're such aretard.

There's no evidence Sullivan is with Antifa. To morons like you, that's evidence he's Antifa.

He is not a Trump supporter, he is an opponent of Trump, he is aligned with you leftards.


To pretend that his being there is not evidence of what we are talking about, is the FBI, the media and you proving my point, that all of you have zero or even anti-credibility.


AND that the idea that the riot was caused by leftard infiltrators, perhaps with deep state support, is a completely plausible theory.

Dumbfuck, no one said he's a Trump supporter. The FBI made no such assertion either. They correctly identified him as the leader of Insurgence USA.

There is no evidence he's affiliated with Antifa. The FBI states that and you possess zero evidence they're either wrong or lying about that.

I got the excuse for not counting him. I addressed it. YOur excuses were noted and addressed.

The fact remains. YOu cited them saying that there was "no evidence of antifa or blm incitement".


But sullivan, a self admitted lefty infiltrator was there, and recorded himself "inciting" the mob to further violence and aggression.

That is the fucking point.

iF there was one, there could be more. Not that you or the fbi would admit it, or tell us, if you or they found out about it.


I'm sure there would be excuse they could find to NOT count any additional lefties they find or found too.

LOLOL

The FBI has been investigating this for 6 months now and has arrested close to 600. Show where any others could be "leftists." In fact, while you're at it -- prove a "leftist" can't support Trump....

The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.

LOLOL

Says you -- but you can't show they lied about Antifa not being involved with Insurrection Day.

I'm just pointing the your link, with the fbi talking shit about "no evidence" of infiltrators, when we know of one.


That is them proving my point about them being liars.

That's not what the link says. The link says there's no evidence Antifa, or any left-wing group, was involved.

You also say there is no such evidence. You're literally agreeing with the FBI while you're idiotically calling them liars.

Your pretense of not getting it is dismissed, you stonewalling spam bot.

I get it. You're delusional. You think the FBI is lying even though you too agree there is no evidence of Antifa or other leftwing group involved in Insurrection Day.

Dude. You lost. GET OVER IT.

LOLOLOLOL

You can't prove any leftist groups were involved but you think I lost.

Said the man that admitted that a "lefty group" was involved. Or did you forget when you did that, re: Insurgence USA.?


Dumbass.

Now you've reduced yourself to lying as I never said any "lefty group" was involved.

Did you not admit that sullivan the founder of the lefty group, Insurgence USA was involved?

 

[dudmuck]

Correll

 

[Correll]

Correll

How many w.s. are in this country?

 

[Faun]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.

There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.


Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.

Dumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?

No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies

FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.

www.reuters.com

Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.


ZERO.


If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.

LOLOLOLOL

Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.

no, they don't. That is what happens when you lie, a lot and big.


You don't get to pretend that didn't happen.


My point stands. We have one example of a self admitted leftard blm guy infiltrating and agitating, so that shows that there could be more.


It thus is a plausible and valid belief.

Your point is as dead as Ashli Targetpractice. The FBI is investigating Insurrection Day and has not found any evidence to support your delusions.

Don't fear reality, embrace it.

The FBI? The same guys that pushed the Steele Dossier and gave Hillary a pass?

FUCK THEM, they have about the same credibility as the media at this point.

LOLOL

And still more cred than a whining peon like you.

Want proof? Despite your failed attempts to discredit the FBI AND the media for reporting there's no evidence that Antifa or BLM incited Insurrection Day -- you too have no evidence they did.

I have an example, on video of a lefty like yourself, a self identified wacial justice protestor, agitating and encouraging people to riot.

That the fbi and media ignore that and claim "NO EVIDENCE" is them lying.

Remember what I said about no credibility? Now you see why.

You're brain-dead, con. The FBI never ignored Sullivan.

Which is why what I see is it's you who lacks cred.

Since he is not a formal, card carrying member of the organization, they are pretending that he doesn't count as "evidence".

That is bullshit. That is a lie. That is them playing leftard games. That is them proving that I am right to not trust them.

LOL

Moron, he's a member (and founder) of Insurgence USA, which is not affiliated with Antifa.

Like I said, since he is not a formal card carrying member of the formal structure of the group, they are choosing to not count him as a lefty infiltrator who agitated the mob.

That is them finding an excuse to lie. That is them taking a side and giving political support to one side of the partisan divide.

Their statement, which you cited, is thus proven to be false. Their credibility that I said was zero, is proven to be zero.

Thanks for helping me prove my point.

LOLOL

You're such aretard.

There's no evidence Sullivan is with Antifa. To morons like you, that's evidence he's Antifa.

He is not a Trump supporter, he is an opponent of Trump, he is aligned with you leftards.


To pretend that his being there is not evidence of what we are talking about, is the FBI, the media and you proving my point, that all of you have zero or even anti-credibility.


AND that the idea that the riot was caused by leftard infiltrators, perhaps with deep state support, is a completely plausible theory.

Dumbfuck, no one said he's a Trump supporter. The FBI made no such assertion either. They correctly identified him as the leader of Insurgence USA.

There is no evidence he's affiliated with Antifa. The FBI states that and you possess zero evidence they're either wrong or lying about that.

I got the excuse for not counting him. I addressed it. YOur excuses were noted and addressed.

The fact remains. YOu cited them saying that there was "no evidence of antifa or blm incitement".


But sullivan, a self admitted lefty infiltrator was there, and recorded himself "inciting" the mob to further violence and aggression.

That is the fucking point.

iF there was one, there could be more. Not that you or the fbi would admit it, or tell us, if you or they found out about it.


I'm sure there would be excuse they could find to NOT count any additional lefties they find or found too.

LOLOL

The FBI has been investigating this for 6 months now and has arrested close to 600. Show where any others could be "leftists." In fact, while you're at it -- prove a "leftist" can't support Trump....

The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.

LOLOL

Says you -- but you can't show they lied about Antifa not being involved with Insurrection Day.

I'm just pointing the your link, with the fbi talking shit about "no evidence" of infiltrators, when we know of one.


That is them proving my point about them being liars.

That's not what the link says. The link says there's no evidence Antifa, or any left-wing group, was involved.

You also say there is no such evidence. You're literally agreeing with the FBI while you're idiotically calling them liars.

Your pretense of not getting it is dismissed, you stonewalling spam bot.

I get it. You're delusional. You think the FBI is lying even though you too agree there is no evidence of Antifa or other leftwing group involved in Insurrection Day.

Dude. You lost. GET OVER IT.

LOLOLOLOL

You can't prove any leftist groups were involved but you think I lost.

Said the man that admitted that a "lefty group" was involved. Or did you forget when you did that, re: Insurgence USA.?


Dumbass.

Now you've reduced yourself to lying as I never said any "lefty group" was involved.

Did you not admit that sullivan the founder of the lefty group, Insurgence USA was involved?

Dumbfuck, one person is not a group. You should already know that without me having to tell you.

 

[Correll]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.

There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.


Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.

Dumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?

No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies

FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.

www.reuters.com

Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.


ZERO.


If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.

LOLOLOLOL

Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.

no, they don't. That is what happens when you lie, a lot and big.


You don't get to pretend that didn't happen.


My point stands. We have one example of a self admitted leftard blm guy infiltrating and agitating, so that shows that there could be more.


It thus is a plausible and valid belief.

Your point is as dead as Ashli Targetpractice. The FBI is investigating Insurrection Day and has not found any evidence to support your delusions.

Don't fear reality, embrace it.

The FBI? The same guys that pushed the Steele Dossier and gave Hillary a pass?

FUCK THEM, they have about the same credibility as the media at this point.

LOLOL

And still more cred than a whining peon like you.

Want proof? Despite your failed attempts to discredit the FBI AND the media for reporting there's no evidence that Antifa or BLM incited Insurrection Day -- you too have no evidence they did.

I have an example, on video of a lefty like yourself, a self identified wacial justice protestor, agitating and encouraging people to riot.

That the fbi and media ignore that and claim "NO EVIDENCE" is them lying.

Remember what I said about no credibility? Now you see why.

You're brain-dead, con. The FBI never ignored Sullivan.

Which is why what I see is it's you who lacks cred.

Since he is not a formal, card carrying member of the organization, they are pretending that he doesn't count as "evidence".

That is bullshit. That is a lie. That is them playing leftard games. That is them proving that I am right to not trust them.

LOL

Moron, he's a member (and founder) of Insurgence USA, which is not affiliated with Antifa.

Like I said, since he is not a formal card carrying member of the formal structure of the group, they are choosing to not count him as a lefty infiltrator who agitated the mob.

That is them finding an excuse to lie. That is them taking a side and giving political support to one side of the partisan divide.

Their statement, which you cited, is thus proven to be false. Their credibility that I said was zero, is proven to be zero.

Thanks for helping me prove my point.

LOLOL

You're such aretard.

There's no evidence Sullivan is with Antifa. To morons like you, that's evidence he's Antifa.

He is not a Trump supporter, he is an opponent of Trump, he is aligned with you leftards.


To pretend that his being there is not evidence of what we are talking about, is the FBI, the media and you proving my point, that all of you have zero or even anti-credibility.


AND that the idea that the riot was caused by leftard infiltrators, perhaps with deep state support, is a completely plausible theory.

Dumbfuck, no one said he's a Trump supporter. The FBI made no such assertion either. They correctly identified him as the leader of Insurgence USA.

There is no evidence he's affiliated with Antifa. The FBI states that and you possess zero evidence they're either wrong or lying about that.

I got the excuse for not counting him. I addressed it. YOur excuses were noted and addressed.

The fact remains. YOu cited them saying that there was "no evidence of antifa or blm incitement".


But sullivan, a self admitted lefty infiltrator was there, and recorded himself "inciting" the mob to further violence and aggression.

That is the fucking point.

iF there was one, there could be more. Not that you or the fbi would admit it, or tell us, if you or they found out about it.


I'm sure there would be excuse they could find to NOT count any additional lefties they find or found too.

LOLOL

The FBI has been investigating this for 6 months now and has arrested close to 600. Show where any others could be "leftists." In fact, while you're at it -- prove a "leftist" can't support Trump....

The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.

LOLOL

Says you -- but you can't show they lied about Antifa not being involved with Insurrection Day.

I'm just pointing the your link, with the fbi talking shit about "no evidence" of infiltrators, when we know of one.


That is them proving my point about them being liars.

That's not what the link says. The link says there's no evidence Antifa, or any left-wing group, was involved.

You also say there is no such evidence. You're literally agreeing with the FBI while you're idiotically calling them liars.

Your pretense of not getting it is dismissed, you stonewalling spam bot.

I get it. You're delusional. You think the FBI is lying even though you too agree there is no evidence of Antifa or other leftwing group involved in Insurrection Day.

Dude. You lost. GET OVER IT.

LOLOLOLOL

You can't prove any leftist groups were involved but you think I lost.

Said the man that admitted that a "lefty group" was involved. Or did you forget when you did that, re: Insurgence USA.?


Dumbass.

Now you've reduced yourself to lying as I never said any "lefty group" was involved.

Did you not admit that sullivan the founder of the lefty group, Insurgence USA was involved?

Dumbfuck, one person is not a group. You should already know that without me having to tell you.

Yeah that bit where you moved the goal posts to "groups" away from "infiltrators"?


Yeah, I don't care about your silly games.


The point stands. WE have one solid, proven example of a lefty infiltrator in the forefront of the mob on 1/6.

That the fbi said "NO EVIDENCE" while we clearly have evidence, is them lying.


That we have one solid piece of such evidence, proves that the theory of lefty infiltrators being there, possibly with support from federal deep state types, is completely plausible.


Anyone that ridicules it, is a dishonest troll asshole.

 

[Faun]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.

There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.


Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.

Dumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?

No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies

FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.

www.reuters.com

Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.


ZERO.


If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.

LOLOLOLOL

Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.

no, they don't. That is what happens when you lie, a lot and big.


You don't get to pretend that didn't happen.


My point stands. We have one example of a self admitted leftard blm guy infiltrating and agitating, so that shows that there could be more.


It thus is a plausible and valid belief.

Your point is as dead as Ashli Targetpractice. The FBI is investigating Insurrection Day and has not found any evidence to support your delusions.

Don't fear reality, embrace it.

The FBI? The same guys that pushed the Steele Dossier and gave Hillary a pass?

FUCK THEM, they have about the same credibility as the media at this point.

LOLOL

And still more cred than a whining peon like you.

Want proof? Despite your failed attempts to discredit the FBI AND the media for reporting there's no evidence that Antifa or BLM incited Insurrection Day -- you too have no evidence they did.

I have an example, on video of a lefty like yourself, a self identified wacial justice protestor, agitating and encouraging people to riot.

That the fbi and media ignore that and claim "NO EVIDENCE" is them lying.

Remember what I said about no credibility? Now you see why.

You're brain-dead, con. The FBI never ignored Sullivan.

Which is why what I see is it's you who lacks cred.

Since he is not a formal, card carrying member of the organization, they are pretending that he doesn't count as "evidence".

That is bullshit. That is a lie. That is them playing leftard games. That is them proving that I am right to not trust them.

LOL

Moron, he's a member (and founder) of Insurgence USA, which is not affiliated with Antifa.

Like I said, since he is not a formal card carrying member of the formal structure of the group, they are choosing to not count him as a lefty infiltrator who agitated the mob.

That is them finding an excuse to lie. That is them taking a side and giving political support to one side of the partisan divide.

Their statement, which you cited, is thus proven to be false. Their credibility that I said was zero, is proven to be zero.

Thanks for helping me prove my point.

LOLOL

You're such aretard.

There's no evidence Sullivan is with Antifa. To morons like you, that's evidence he's Antifa.

He is not a Trump supporter, he is an opponent of Trump, he is aligned with you leftards.


To pretend that his being there is not evidence of what we are talking about, is the FBI, the media and you proving my point, that all of you have zero or even anti-credibility.


AND that the idea that the riot was caused by leftard infiltrators, perhaps with deep state support, is a completely plausible theory.

Dumbfuck, no one said he's a Trump supporter. The FBI made no such assertion either. They correctly identified him as the leader of Insurgence USA.

There is no evidence he's affiliated with Antifa. The FBI states that and you possess zero evidence they're either wrong or lying about that.

I got the excuse for not counting him. I addressed it. YOur excuses were noted and addressed.

The fact remains. YOu cited them saying that there was "no evidence of antifa or blm incitement".


But sullivan, a self admitted lefty infiltrator was there, and recorded himself "inciting" the mob to further violence and aggression.

That is the fucking point.

iF there was one, there could be more. Not that you or the fbi would admit it, or tell us, if you or they found out about it.


I'm sure there would be excuse they could find to NOT count any additional lefties they find or found too.

LOLOL

The FBI has been investigating this for 6 months now and has arrested close to 600. Show where any others could be "leftists." In fact, while you're at it -- prove a "leftist" can't support Trump....

The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.

LOLOL

Says you -- but you can't show they lied about Antifa not being involved with Insurrection Day.

I'm just pointing the your link, with the fbi talking shit about "no evidence" of infiltrators, when we know of one.


That is them proving my point about them being liars.

That's not what the link says. The link says there's no evidence Antifa, or any left-wing group, was involved.

You also say there is no such evidence. You're literally agreeing with the FBI while you're idiotically calling them liars.

Your pretense of not getting it is dismissed, you stonewalling spam bot.

I get it. You're delusional. You think the FBI is lying even though you too agree there is no evidence of Antifa or other leftwing group involved in Insurrection Day.

Dude. You lost. GET OVER IT.

LOLOLOLOL

You can't prove any leftist groups were involved but you think I lost.

Said the man that admitted that a "lefty group" was involved. Or did you forget when you did that, re: Insurgence USA.?


Dumbass.

Now you've reduced yourself to lying as I never said any "lefty group" was involved.

Did you not admit that sullivan the founder of the lefty group, Insurgence USA was involved?

Dumbfuck, one person is not a group. You should already know that without me having to tell you.

Yeah that bit where you moved the goal posts to "groups" away from "infiltrators"?


Yeah, I don't care about your silly games.


The point stands. WE have one solid, proven example of a lefty infiltrator in the forefront of the mob on 1/6.

That the fbi said "NO EVIDENCE" while we clearly have evidence, is them lying.


That we have one solid piece of such evidence, proves that the theory of lefty infiltrators being there, possibly with support from federal deep state types, is completely plausible.


Anyone that ridicules it, is a dishonest troll asshole.

Sadly, you just can't stop lying. I never said a "lefty group" was involved and the FBI never denied Sullivan was involved. In fact, they had him charged.

 

[lennypartiv]

Sadly, you just can't stop lying. I never said a "lefty group" was involved and the FBI never denied Sullivan was involved. In fact, they had him charged.

So it was Antifa after all.

 

[Faun]

Sadly, you just can't stop lying. I never said a "lefty group" was involved and the FBI never denied Sullivan was involved. In fact, they had him charged.

So it was Antifa after all.

No, Sullivan was not Antifa.

 

[Correll]

Sadly, you just can't stop lying. I never said a "lefty group" was involved and the FBI never denied Sullivan was involved. In fact, they had him charged.

So it was Antifa after all.

No, Sullivan was not Antifa.

DUMBASS.

 

[Faun]

Sadly, you just can't stop lying. I never said a "lefty group" was involved and the FBI never denied Sullivan was involved. In fact, they had him charged.

So it was Antifa after all.

No, Sullivan was not Antifa.

DUMBASS.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.

There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.


Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.

Dumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?

No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies

FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.

www.reuters.com

Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.


ZERO.


If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.

LOLOLOLOL

Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.

no, they don't. That is what happens when you lie, a lot and big.


You don't get to pretend that didn't happen.


My point stands. We have one example of a self admitted leftard blm guy infiltrating and agitating, so that shows that there could be more.


It thus is a plausible and valid belief.

Your point is as dead as Ashli Targetpractice. The FBI is investigating Insurrection Day and has not found any evidence to support your delusions.

Don't fear reality, embrace it.

The FBI? The same guys that pushed the Steele Dossier and gave Hillary a pass?

FUCK THEM, they have about the same credibility as the media at this point.

LOLOL

And still more cred than a whining peon like you.

Want proof? Despite your failed attempts to discredit the FBI AND the media for reporting there's no evidence that Antifa or BLM incited Insurrection Day -- you too have no evidence they did.

I have an example, on video of a lefty like yourself, a self identified wacial justice protestor, agitating and encouraging people to riot.

That the fbi and media ignore that and claim "NO EVIDENCE" is them lying.

Remember what I said about no credibility? Now you see why.

You're brain-dead, con. The FBI never ignored Sullivan.

Which is why what I see is it's you who lacks cred.

Since he is not a formal, card carrying member of the organization, they are pretending that he doesn't count as "evidence".

That is bullshit. That is a lie. That is them playing leftard games. That is them proving that I am right to not trust them.

LOL

Moron, he's a member (and founder) of Insurgence USA, which is not affiliated with Antifa.

Like I said, since he is not a formal card carrying member of the formal structure of the group, they are choosing to not count him as a lefty infiltrator who agitated the mob.

That is them finding an excuse to lie. That is them taking a side and giving political support to one side of the partisan divide.

Their statement, which you cited, is thus proven to be false. Their credibility that I said was zero, is proven to be zero.

Thanks for helping me prove my point.

LOLOL

You're such aretard.

There's no evidence Sullivan is with Antifa. To morons like you, that's evidence he's Antifa.

He is not a Trump supporter, he is an opponent of Trump, he is aligned with you leftards.


To pretend that his being there is not evidence of what we are talking about, is the FBI, the media and you proving my point, that all of you have zero or even anti-credibility.


AND that the idea that the riot was caused by leftard infiltrators, perhaps with deep state support, is a completely plausible theory.

Dumbfuck, no one said he's a Trump supporter. The FBI made no such assertion either. They correctly identified him as the leader of Insurgence USA.

There is no evidence he's affiliated with Antifa. The FBI states that and you possess zero evidence they're either wrong or lying about that.

I got the excuse for not counting him. I addressed it. YOur excuses were noted and addressed.

The fact remains. YOu cited them saying that there was "no evidence of antifa or blm incitement".


But sullivan, a self admitted lefty infiltrator was there, and recorded himself "inciting" the mob to further violence and aggression.

That is the fucking point.

iF there was one, there could be more. Not that you or the fbi would admit it, or tell us, if you or they found out about it.


I'm sure there would be excuse they could find to NOT count any additional lefties they find or found too.

LOLOL

The FBI has been investigating this for 6 months now and has arrested close to 600. Show where any others could be "leftists." In fact, while you're at it -- prove a "leftist" can't support Trump....

The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.

The FBI, as you pointed you, can't be trusted to tell US the truth.

But you can?

 

[JustAGuy1]

I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.

Do you think that "unarmed petite woman" was practicing her rights as an American while she was trespassing?

Ahhhhhh good, you obviously support shooting blacks that are rioting, looting and burning. That's a start.

 

[JustAGuy1]

I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.

What murder? A criminal insurgent was shot attacking the seat of our government.

Why don't you go out and protest, hopefully you'll get shot.

 

[dudmuck]

Correll

How many w.s. are in this country?

growing numbers since theiy're a rising threat

White supremacist groups pose rising U.S. threat, Garland says

Domestic violent extremist groups, particularly white supremacists, pose a growing threat to the United States, Attorney General Merrick Garland told a Senate panel on Wednesday.

www.reuters.com

 

[WEATHER53]

We continue to condemn the murder of Babbit which was The Violence of that short lived protest