Poll to condemn or condone "the violence and law breaking that took place inside the Capital on 1/6"

[Seawytch]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.

House votes to establish committee to investigate Jan. 6 Capitol riot

Two Republicans — Cheney and Kinzinger — joined the Democrats in approving the new panel.

www.nbcnews.com

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...

Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.

Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?

Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.

1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

 

[Correll]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.

House votes to establish committee to investigate Jan. 6 Capitol riot

Two Republicans — Cheney and Kinzinger — joined the Democrats in approving the new panel.

www.nbcnews.com

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...

Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.

Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?

Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.

1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

1. Plenty of rioters that are not trump supporters. Indeed, the vast majority are leftards.

2.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/16/sullivan-video-arrested/

"Sullivan, who has at turns identified himself as a racial justice protester and leftist documentarian,"


3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

 

[Seawytch]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.

House votes to establish committee to investigate Jan. 6 Capitol riot

Two Republicans — Cheney and Kinzinger — joined the Democrats in approving the new panel.

www.nbcnews.com

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...

Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.

Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?

Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.

1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

1. Plenty of rioters that are not trump supporters. Indeed, the vast majority are leftards.

2.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/16/sullivan-video-arrested/

"Sullivan, who has at turns identified himself as a racial justice protester and leftist documentarian,"


3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. Not on January 6th. That day it was all Trump supporters.

2. Fact Check: Was a member of Antifa arrested in the Capitol riot?

The Ruling​

False.​

​

None of the 230 people arrested for alleged participation in the Capitol attacks were linked to any left-wing movement. There is no evidence that Sullivan was a member of Antifa, Black Lives Matter or any other left-leaning group, especially a "leader" of Antifa.​

3. Just stating the fact that you are a racist. Facts are facts and not baiting. You believe yourself to be better and smarter than people with more melanin than you. (SPOILER ALERT...you aren't)

 

[Correll]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

whats the point of condemning them?
what really matters is a commission to investigate it.
two republicans voted for investigation.

House votes to establish committee to investigate Jan. 6 Capitol riot

Two Republicans — Cheney and Kinzinger — joined the Democrats in approving the new panel.

www.nbcnews.com

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

That's what y'all do. You did (and still do it) it with followers of Islam. Y'all do it with BLM.

just more Republican projection...

Did you forget that I was the republican that made a big deal about Trump increasing his black male vote?

Almost like I can distinguish between sub groups based on their behavior.


My point stands.

The point is that people like you have been trying to smear all republicans with the actions of a tiny group.

That is people like you, using the 1/6 riot to divide this nation in order for partisan advantage.


YOu know that. THat is why you are doing it.

Not even close. Nobody is asking for all Republicans to be thrown in jail, just the rioters. Nobody is trying to ban Republicans from entering the country like Trump tried to ban Muslims.

The only people I see “using” the riot are Trump wannabes. They are using it to make money.

Bullshit. The riot is being used to smear republicans and Trump supporters as a group. Hell, the meme right above does that. You posted in this thread, but didn't say anything about it. Do you support that behavior, or are you just remaining quite while other more partisan lefties do it?

Saying that the rioters/terrorists on January 6 were all Republican is a true statement. Saying that all Republicans are rioters and terrorists is not a true statement.

It is similar to the statement that not all Republicans are racist but most racist are Republicans.

1. Note that you had to quality "all rioters". How ironic. ANd you can't see it even now can you?

2. We have one admitted antifa guy who was there agitating. It is a plausible theory.

3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. My apologies. Let me rephrase. Not all Trumpsters rioted, but most of the rioters were Trumpsters.

2. Did you link to this alleged "antifa guy"? Who is this alleged individual?

3. Pointing out the undeniable fact that you are a racist isn't baiting, it's stating facts.

1. Plenty of rioters that are not trump supporters. Indeed, the vast majority are leftards.

2.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/16/sullivan-video-arrested/

"Sullivan, who has at turns identified himself as a racial justice protester and leftist documentarian,"


3. Your wace baiting is just you being an asshole.

1. Not on January 6th. That day it was all Trump supporters.

2. Fact Check: Was a member of Antifa arrested in the Capitol riot?

The Ruling​

False.​

​

None of the 230 people arrested for alleged participation in the Capitol attacks were linked to any left-wing movement. There is no evidence that Sullivan was a member of Antifa, Black Lives Matter or any other left-leaning group, especially a "leader" of Antifa.​

3. Just stating the fact that you are a racist. Facts are facts and not baiting. You believe yourself to be better and smarter than people with more melanin than you. (SPOILER ALERT...you aren't)

1. YOu assume.

2. Sorry. He self identifies as a "wacial justice" what have you. THat makes him yours.

3. Better? I never said better. That was the voices in your head, mr wacistbaiter.

 

[lennypartiv]

Not on January 6th. That day it was all Trump supporters.

Some people have more information than you. Gaetz was quoted saying Antifa was involved.

 

[HappyJoy]

I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.

Do you think that "unarmed petite woman" was practicing her rights as an American while she was trespassing?

The answer to trespassing is a no trespass warning (less than arrest), not the death penalty.

Apparently not, she dead. Stopped everyone else in their tracks, they got the warning they needed.

Murder is an effective warning mechanism. It’s just that people who do it are not supposed to be hidden from responsibility and not law enforcement.
The murderer was likely disguised as security and was a plant to kill someone to send the message “No protesting about results of election”

Hey dumbfuck, all the protesting was to be had outside. Not a single person had a gun pointed at them...outside.

A plant? You're a plant.

 

[dudmuck]

lennypartiv

 

[Faun]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

 

[Faun]

Are you retarded? I am accusation you of smearing republicans as a group. Address that or stfu.

LOL

Address what, exactly? Can you stop sucking a cock long enough to post in coherent English?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Are you retarded? I am accusation you of smearing republicans as a group. Address that or stfu.

LOL

Address what, exactly? Can you stop sucking a cock long enough to post in coherent English?

Playing stupid... well in your case I guess you are not playing.....

 

[Faun]

Are you retarded? I am accusation you of smearing republicans as a group. Address that or stfu.

LOL

Address what, exactly? Can you stop sucking a cock long enough to post in coherent English?

Playing stupid... well in your case I guess you are not playing.....

I have no doubt Correll appreciates you giving him a reach-around like that.

 

[kyzr]

I want to know why an unarmed petite woman can be shot dead, and the shooter isn't made public, not to mention stand trial for murder.

Do you think that "unarmed petite woman" was practicing her rights as an American while she was trespassing?

The answer to trespassing is a no trespass warning (less than arrest), not the death penalty.

Apparently not, she dead. Stopped everyone else in their tracks, they got the warning they needed.

Murder is an effective warning mechanism. It’s just that people who do it are not supposed to be hidden from responsibility and not law enforcement.
The murderer was likely disguised as security and was a plant to kill someone to send the message “No protesting about results of election”

Hey dumbfuck, all the protesting was to be had outside. Not a single person had a gun pointed at them...outside.

A plant? You're a plant.

Hey, this thread was very successful, 2,000 posts and climbing. Poll worked well.

I'm not happy that only 80% of Republicans condemn the capital riot. But that's a solid majority.

 

[Correll]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.

There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.


Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.

 

[Correll]

Are you retarded? I am accusation you of smearing republicans as a group. Address that or stfu.

LOL

Address what, exactly? Can you stop sucking a cock long enough to post in coherent English?

Are you retarded? The accusation I just made in the sentence you responded to, you fucking moronic faggot.

 

[Faun]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.

There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.


Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.

Dumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?

No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies

FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.

www.reuters.com

 

[dudmuck]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.

There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.


Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.

following Trump's orders to disrupt the electoral vote for Biden, those lefties did. Yes they wanted four more years of Trump those lefties did.

 

[Correll]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.

There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.


Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.

Dumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?

No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies

FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.

www.reuters.com

Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.


ZERO.


If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.

 

[Correll]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.

There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.


Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.

following Trump's orders to disrupt the electoral vote for Biden, those lefties did. Yes they wanted four more years of Trump those lefties did.

The motive would be to give the leftards, like yourself, something to gin up into a smear campaign against the Right.


Not to actually succeed. Are you so stupid that you...

Oh, got it. You're playing retarded to avoid addressing my point.


That's not the type of thing that people confident in their position do.


That is the type of thing people who fear the truth do.

 

[Faun]

Are you retarded? I am accusation you of smearing republicans as a group. Address that or stfu.

LOL

Address what, exactly? Can you stop sucking a cock long enough to post in coherent English?

Are you retarded? The accusation I just made in the sentence you responded to, you fucking moronic faggot.

LOLOL

"I am accusation"

You're an accusation, moron?

 

[Faun]

.

Insurrection is defined by the goal of the actors.
Trying to alter the results of an election through physical disruption of the democratic process is an insurrection.

Please tell us, oh TDS-suffering, irrational hate-driven, Marxist Socialist talking points parroter, how unarmed, selfie-taking trespassers were going to alter the 2020 election?

Now compare that incident to the Democrat/foreign-supported domestic terrorists whose violent 'insurrection' caused the President and his family to be rushed to the WH bunker while agents from the FBI, DHS, & Secret Service along with the Capitol and Local Police were forced to engage and push back the violent terrorists, resulting in 14 Secret Service members being injured, the DC mayor ordering new security fencing be installed, the clearing of the park by police IOT put up that fencing, and another Debunked LIE / 'Conspiracy Theory' about Trump having something to d with the clearing of the park.

In the end, this is just another one of MANY incidents in which Democrats accuse others of doing what they have already done and of being who they are.

the reason Trump went to hide in his bunker last summer and setup barriers around whitehouse is that he wanted to shoot protesters, even the peaceful ones

Trump wanted military to ‘crack skulls’ of George Floyd protesters, book claims

Former president called demonstrators ‘thugs’ amid nationwide outrage over racial injustice

www.independent.co.uk

The vast majority of republicans have voted to condemn the 1/6 rioters.


Your talk of "soft" is just you lying. Like the liberal you are.

And the vast majority of those believe the left led the violence to make Trump look bad.

That would be your irrelevant opinion.


The point stands. THe attempt by filthy lying fucktards to use the 1/6 riot to smear all republicans is just liberals being the lying fucktards they are.

False. That is the opinion of rightards, captured in polls. Your point is DOA.

How many lefties do you think had infiltrated the crowd with the intent of agitating?

One.

How do you know that was the only one?

There's only one I've seen. If you have evidence of more ... post them...

I'm not really in a position to do such an investigation.

I mean I could. But my wife would not be happy with me quitting my job and spending our money travelling around interviewing the hundreds of people that were in the 1/6 riot.

So then all you have is one.

If there is one, there could be more. It is a plausible possibility.

Especially considering the context of hundreds of NON-violent republican protests.

Sadly for you, none others have been identified.

That we know of. Which is fine in the context of the question.

There is legitimate grounds to suspect that this riot was result of lefty infiltrators, if not a planned and orchestrated event by non-trump supporters.


Pretending otherwise is just... being a lying asshole.

Dumbfuck, why are you so afraid of reality?

No evidence U.S. Capitol rioters belong to antifa movement, FBI chief Wray testifies

FBI Director Chris Wray on Tuesday debunked conspiracy theories promoted by right-wing supporters of former President Donald Trump, saying there was no evidence that leftist extremists disguised themselves as Trump supporters to storm the U.S. Capitol.

www.reuters.com

Sorry, the media has no credibility since the "very fine people" scandal.


ZERO.


If fact, they have negative credibility. THe possibility is MORE credible now that they have denied it.

LOLOLOLOL

Reuters has infinitely more credibility than you.