Possible Outlook: Supreme Court Gave, Supreme Court Took

[OKTexas]

The supreme court quite likely gave Biden PA by allowing them to commit mass election fraud and mail in fraud. The decision was 4-4... and it seems like it will decide the election as Democrats will conjure up as many ballots as they need. Quite amateurish to not revert these decisions, the supreme court undermined the integrity of the election process. The naive idiots voting for the decision won't be remembered well after the fraud spectacle.

But in any case, wouldn't it be funny if the Supreme Court ordered a re-vote in PA without the bullcrap, finally a legitimate election, and Trump would win in double digits. That would certainly be the best way to end this year on.

Of course PA has not been called, but the fact that they have now committed mass fraud in at least four other states, should convince you that it won't be any different, although is glaringly obvious because of the magnitude.

It allowed states to count votes. No fraud.

That's a lie, they allowed the State to continue to violate State law. PA law does not allow for the curing (correcting) of defective ballots, yet thousand were cured. The PA State law also says only those ballots received by election day can be counted, so far the Supremes allowed the counting of ballots received up to 3 day after election day. The Supremes shouldn't have kicked the can down the road, because they will have to revisit this case and they will have no choice but to overturn the PA supreme court and disallow those ballots. That will make the court look more political than if they had held the State to their own laws from the beginning.

.

Again, it allowed the states to count votes. No fraud.

If ballots are known by election officials to be cast contrary to State law, that IS FRAUD.

.

Supreme Court Rules Pennsylvania Can Count Ballots Received After Election Day

Pennsylvania Republicans had sought to block the counting of late-arriving ballots, which the state's Supreme Court had approved last month.

www.npr.org

'fraid not.

If you bother to actually read the case, all the supremes did was refuse to issue a stay on the State courts order, it did however leave the door open to revisit the case, which they will. Like I said earlier, they shouldn't have kicked the can down the road.

.

 

[candycorn]

The supreme court quite likely gave Biden PA by allowing them to commit mass election fraud and mail in fraud. The decision was 4-4... and it seems like it will decide the election as Democrats will conjure up as many ballots as they need. Quite amateurish to not revert these decisions, the supreme court undermined the integrity of the election process. The naive idiots voting for the decision won't be remembered well after the fraud spectacle.

But in any case, wouldn't it be funny if the Supreme Court ordered a re-vote in PA without the bullcrap, finally a legitimate election, and Trump would win in double digits. That would certainly be the best way to end this year on.

Of course PA has not been called, but the fact that they have now committed mass fraud in at least four other states, should convince you that it won't be any different, although is glaringly obvious because of the magnitude.

It allowed states to count votes. No fraud.

That's a lie, they allowed the State to continue to violate State law. PA law does not allow for the curing (correcting) of defective ballots, yet thousand were cured. The PA State law also says only those ballots received by election day can be counted, so far the Supremes allowed the counting of ballots received up to 3 day after election day. The Supremes shouldn't have kicked the can down the road, because they will have to revisit this case and they will have no choice but to overturn the PA supreme court and disallow those ballots. That will make the court look more political than if they had held the State to their own laws from the beginning.

.

Again, it allowed the states to count votes. No fraud.

If ballots are known by election officials to be cast contrary to State law, that IS FRAUD.

.

Supreme Court Rules Pennsylvania Can Count Ballots Received After Election Day

Pennsylvania Republicans had sought to block the counting of late-arriving ballots, which the state's Supreme Court had approved last month.

www.npr.org

'fraid not.

If you bother to actually read the case, all the supremes did was refuse to issue a stay on the State courts order, it did however leave the door open to revisit the case, which they will. Like I said earlier, they shouldn't have kicked the can down the road.

.

If the Court said it was okay last week....thinking they're going to reverse their decision next week and disallow about a million ballots is pretty dumb. But that is what you're left with...I'd hate to be you.

 

[OKTexas]

The supreme court quite likely gave Biden PA by allowing them to commit mass election fraud and mail in fraud. The decision was 4-4... and it seems like it will decide the election as Democrats will conjure up as many ballots as they need. Quite amateurish to not revert these decisions, the supreme court undermined the integrity of the election process. The naive idiots voting for the decision won't be remembered well after the fraud spectacle.

But in any case, wouldn't it be funny if the Supreme Court ordered a re-vote in PA without the bullcrap, finally a legitimate election, and Trump would win in double digits. That would certainly be the best way to end this year on.

Of course PA has not been called, but the fact that they have now committed mass fraud in at least four other states, should convince you that it won't be any different, although is glaringly obvious because of the magnitude.

It allowed states to count votes. No fraud.

That's a lie, they allowed the State to continue to violate State law. PA law does not allow for the curing (correcting) of defective ballots, yet thousand were cured. The PA State law also says only those ballots received by election day can be counted, so far the Supremes allowed the counting of ballots received up to 3 day after election day. The Supremes shouldn't have kicked the can down the road, because they will have to revisit this case and they will have no choice but to overturn the PA supreme court and disallow those ballots. That will make the court look more political than if they had held the State to their own laws from the beginning.

.

Again, it allowed the states to count votes. No fraud.

If ballots are known by election officials to be cast contrary to State law, that IS FRAUD.

.

Supreme Court Rules Pennsylvania Can Count Ballots Received After Election Day

Pennsylvania Republicans had sought to block the counting of late-arriving ballots, which the state's Supreme Court had approved last month.

www.npr.org

'fraid not.

If you bother to actually read the case, all the supremes did was refuse to issue a stay on the State courts order, it did however leave the door open to revisit the case, which they will. Like I said earlier, they shouldn't have kicked the can down the road.

.

If the Court said it was okay last week....thinking they're going to reverse their decision next week and disallow about a million ballots is pretty dumb. But that is what you're left with...I'd hate to be you.

No, they voted 4-4 on the State courts decision, which allowed it to stand, temporarily. Roberts voted with the commies in favor of lawlessness. It won't be 4-4 next time, there are 9 justices on the court now. And they will vote to uphold the black letter State law.

.

 

[candycorn]

The supreme court quite likely gave Biden PA by allowing them to commit mass election fraud and mail in fraud. The decision was 4-4... and it seems like it will decide the election as Democrats will conjure up as many ballots as they need. Quite amateurish to not revert these decisions, the supreme court undermined the integrity of the election process. The naive idiots voting for the decision won't be remembered well after the fraud spectacle.

But in any case, wouldn't it be funny if the Supreme Court ordered a re-vote in PA without the bullcrap, finally a legitimate election, and Trump would win in double digits. That would certainly be the best way to end this year on.

Of course PA has not been called, but the fact that they have now committed mass fraud in at least four other states, should convince you that it won't be any different, although is glaringly obvious because of the magnitude.

It allowed states to count votes. No fraud.

That's a lie, they allowed the State to continue to violate State law. PA law does not allow for the curing (correcting) of defective ballots, yet thousand were cured. The PA State law also says only those ballots received by election day can be counted, so far the Supremes allowed the counting of ballots received up to 3 day after election day. The Supremes shouldn't have kicked the can down the road, because they will have to revisit this case and they will have no choice but to overturn the PA supreme court and disallow those ballots. That will make the court look more political than if they had held the State to their own laws from the beginning.

.

Again, it allowed the states to count votes. No fraud.

If ballots are known by election officials to be cast contrary to State law, that IS FRAUD.

.

Supreme Court Rules Pennsylvania Can Count Ballots Received After Election Day

Pennsylvania Republicans had sought to block the counting of late-arriving ballots, which the state's Supreme Court had approved last month.

www.npr.org

'fraid not.

If you bother to actually read the case, all the supremes did was refuse to issue a stay on the State courts order, it did however leave the door open to revisit the case, which they will. Like I said earlier, they shouldn't have kicked the can down the road.

.

If the Court said it was okay last week....thinking they're going to reverse their decision next week and disallow about a million ballots is pretty dumb. But that is what you're left with...I'd hate to be you.

No, they voted 4-4 on the State courts decision, which allowed it to stand, temporarily. Roberts voted with the commies in favor of lawlessness. It won't be 4-4 next time, there are 9 justices on the court now. And they will vote to uphold the black letter State law.

.

Again, you're betting that the court will say that it was okay, let the State accept all of these votes, then say "not!"...

You're sounding pretty dumb.

 

[OKTexas]

The supreme court quite likely gave Biden PA by allowing them to commit mass election fraud and mail in fraud. The decision was 4-4... and it seems like it will decide the election as Democrats will conjure up as many ballots as they need. Quite amateurish to not revert these decisions, the supreme court undermined the integrity of the election process. The naive idiots voting for the decision won't be remembered well after the fraud spectacle.

But in any case, wouldn't it be funny if the Supreme Court ordered a re-vote in PA without the bullcrap, finally a legitimate election, and Trump would win in double digits. That would certainly be the best way to end this year on.

Of course PA has not been called, but the fact that they have now committed mass fraud in at least four other states, should convince you that it won't be any different, although is glaringly obvious because of the magnitude.

It allowed states to count votes. No fraud.

That's a lie, they allowed the State to continue to violate State law. PA law does not allow for the curing (correcting) of defective ballots, yet thousand were cured. The PA State law also says only those ballots received by election day can be counted, so far the Supremes allowed the counting of ballots received up to 3 day after election day. The Supremes shouldn't have kicked the can down the road, because they will have to revisit this case and they will have no choice but to overturn the PA supreme court and disallow those ballots. That will make the court look more political than if they had held the State to their own laws from the beginning.

.

Again, it allowed the states to count votes. No fraud.

If ballots are known by election officials to be cast contrary to State law, that IS FRAUD.

.

Supreme Court Rules Pennsylvania Can Count Ballots Received After Election Day

Pennsylvania Republicans had sought to block the counting of late-arriving ballots, which the state's Supreme Court had approved last month.

www.npr.org

'fraid not.

If you bother to actually read the case, all the supremes did was refuse to issue a stay on the State courts order, it did however leave the door open to revisit the case, which they will. Like I said earlier, they shouldn't have kicked the can down the road.

.

If the Court said it was okay last week....thinking they're going to reverse their decision next week and disallow about a million ballots is pretty dumb. But that is what you're left with...I'd hate to be you.

No, they voted 4-4 on the State courts decision, which allowed it to stand, temporarily. Roberts voted with the commies in favor of lawlessness. It won't be 4-4 next time, there are 9 justices on the court now. And they will vote to uphold the black letter State law.

.

Again, you're betting that the court will say that it was okay, let the State accept all of these votes, then say "not!"...

You're sounding pretty dumb.

No, I said they initially allowed the State court order to stand, they didn't rule on the merits of the case. PA will lose on the merits.

.

 

[candycorn]

The supreme court quite likely gave Biden PA by allowing them to commit mass election fraud and mail in fraud. The decision was 4-4... and it seems like it will decide the election as Democrats will conjure up as many ballots as they need. Quite amateurish to not revert these decisions, the supreme court undermined the integrity of the election process. The naive idiots voting for the decision won't be remembered well after the fraud spectacle.

But in any case, wouldn't it be funny if the Supreme Court ordered a re-vote in PA without the bullcrap, finally a legitimate election, and Trump would win in double digits. That would certainly be the best way to end this year on.

Of course PA has not been called, but the fact that they have now committed mass fraud in at least four other states, should convince you that it won't be any different, although is glaringly obvious because of the magnitude.

It allowed states to count votes. No fraud.

That's a lie, they allowed the State to continue to violate State law. PA law does not allow for the curing (correcting) of defective ballots, yet thousand were cured. The PA State law also says only those ballots received by election day can be counted, so far the Supremes allowed the counting of ballots received up to 3 day after election day. The Supremes shouldn't have kicked the can down the road, because they will have to revisit this case and they will have no choice but to overturn the PA supreme court and disallow those ballots. That will make the court look more political than if they had held the State to their own laws from the beginning.

.

Again, it allowed the states to count votes. No fraud.

If ballots are known by election officials to be cast contrary to State law, that IS FRAUD.

.

Supreme Court Rules Pennsylvania Can Count Ballots Received After Election Day

Pennsylvania Republicans had sought to block the counting of late-arriving ballots, which the state's Supreme Court had approved last month.

www.npr.org

'fraid not.

If you bother to actually read the case, all the supremes did was refuse to issue a stay on the State courts order, it did however leave the door open to revisit the case, which they will. Like I said earlier, they shouldn't have kicked the can down the road.

.

If the Court said it was okay last week....thinking they're going to reverse their decision next week and disallow about a million ballots is pretty dumb. But that is what you're left with...I'd hate to be you.

No, they voted 4-4 on the State courts decision, which allowed it to stand, temporarily. Roberts voted with the commies in favor of lawlessness. It won't be 4-4 next time, there are 9 justices on the court now. And they will vote to uphold the black letter State law.

.

Again, you're betting that the court will say that it was okay, let the State accept all of these votes, then say "not!"...

You're sounding pretty dumb.

No, I said they initially allowed the State court order to stand, they didn't rule on the merits of the case. PA will lose on the merits.

.

The outcome of changing the ruling will be throwing out about a million votes. Not going to happen.

 

[Norman]

President Trump takes this to the Supreme Court if need be.

Right now Trump has a way to victory even without that. But I do think the Supreme Court will be throwing the late mail in ballots away in PA.

This new mail in system is so awesome. Takes months to decide an election and more idiot young people who should not vote at all are voting in masses because it's convenient enough. Total keeper!

 

[Mercurialmind]

The supreme court quite likely gave Biden PA by allowing them to commit mass election fraud and mail in fraud. The decision was 4-4... and it seems like it will decide the election as Democrats will conjure up as many ballots as they need. Quite amateurish to not revert these decisions, the supreme court undermined the integrity of the election process. The naive idiots voting for the decision won't be remembered well after the fraud spectacle.

But in any case, wouldn't it be funny if the Supreme Court ordered a re-vote in PA without the bullcrap, finally a legitimate election, and Trump would win in double digits. That would certainly be the best way to end this year on.

Of course PA has not been called, but the fact that they have now committed mass fraud in at least four other states, should convince you that it won't be any different, although is glaringly obvious because of the magnitude.

Only a Trump cultist would parrot the rhetoric of a grifter who has spewed a record amount of lies and not feel absolutely foolish...

Trump Averaging More Than 50 Lies Each Day

Trump Averaging More Than 50 Lies Each Day

Washington Post: "As President Trump entered the final stretch of the election season, he began making more than 50 false or misleading claims a day. It’s only gotten worse — so much so that the Fact Checker team cannot keep up.""At his current pace, the president will surely exceed 25,000 cla

politicalwire.com

 

[OKTexas]

The supreme court quite likely gave Biden PA by allowing them to commit mass election fraud and mail in fraud. The decision was 4-4... and it seems like it will decide the election as Democrats will conjure up as many ballots as they need. Quite amateurish to not revert these decisions, the supreme court undermined the integrity of the election process. The naive idiots voting for the decision won't be remembered well after the fraud spectacle.

But in any case, wouldn't it be funny if the Supreme Court ordered a re-vote in PA without the bullcrap, finally a legitimate election, and Trump would win in double digits. That would certainly be the best way to end this year on.

Of course PA has not been called, but the fact that they have now committed mass fraud in at least four other states, should convince you that it won't be any different, although is glaringly obvious because of the magnitude.

It allowed states to count votes. No fraud.

That's a lie, they allowed the State to continue to violate State law. PA law does not allow for the curing (correcting) of defective ballots, yet thousand were cured. The PA State law also says only those ballots received by election day can be counted, so far the Supremes allowed the counting of ballots received up to 3 day after election day. The Supremes shouldn't have kicked the can down the road, because they will have to revisit this case and they will have no choice but to overturn the PA supreme court and disallow those ballots. That will make the court look more political than if they had held the State to their own laws from the beginning.

.

Again, it allowed the states to count votes. No fraud.

If ballots are known by election officials to be cast contrary to State law, that IS FRAUD.

.

Supreme Court Rules Pennsylvania Can Count Ballots Received After Election Day

Pennsylvania Republicans had sought to block the counting of late-arriving ballots, which the state's Supreme Court had approved last month.

www.npr.org

'fraid not.

If you bother to actually read the case, all the supremes did was refuse to issue a stay on the State courts order, it did however leave the door open to revisit the case, which they will. Like I said earlier, they shouldn't have kicked the can down the road.

.

If the Court said it was okay last week....thinking they're going to reverse their decision next week and disallow about a million ballots is pretty dumb. But that is what you're left with...I'd hate to be you.

No, they voted 4-4 on the State courts decision, which allowed it to stand, temporarily. Roberts voted with the commies in favor of lawlessness. It won't be 4-4 next time, there are 9 justices on the court now. And they will vote to uphold the black letter State law.

.

Again, you're betting that the court will say that it was okay, let the State accept all of these votes, then say "not!"...

You're sounding pretty dumb.

No, I said they initially allowed the State court order to stand, they didn't rule on the merits of the case. PA will lose on the merits.

.

The outcome of changing the ruling will be throwing out about a million votes. Not going to happen.

If the votes were cast illegally, that's the way it goes. The law is the law and the State supreme court doesn't have the authority to unilaterally rewrite it. The US Constitution vests that authority only in the State legislature.

.

 

[Turtlesoup]

The supreme court quite likely gave Biden PA by allowing them to commit mass election fraud and mail in fraud. The decision was 4-4... and it seems like it will decide the election as Democrats will conjure up as many ballots as they need. Quite amateurish to not revert these decisions, the supreme court undermined the integrity of the election process. The naive idiots voting for the decision won't be remembered well after the fraud spectacle.

But in any case, wouldn't it be funny if the Supreme Court ordered a re-vote in PA without the bullcrap, finally a legitimate election, and Trump would win in double digits. That would certainly be the best way to end this year on.

Of course PA has not been called, but the fact that they have now committed mass fraud in at least four other states, should convince you that it won't be any different, although is glaringly obvious because of the magnitude.

It allowed states to count votes. No fraud.

That's a lie, they allowed the State to continue to violate State law. PA law does not allow for the curing (correcting) of defective ballots, yet thousand were cured. The PA State law also says only those ballots received by election day can be counted, so far the Supremes allowed the counting of ballots received up to 3 day after election day. The Supremes shouldn't have kicked the can down the road, because they will have to revisit this case and they will have no choice but to overturn the PA supreme court and disallow those ballots. That will make the court look more political than if they had held the State to their own laws from the beginning.

.

Again, it allowed the states to count votes. No fraud.

Lots of Fraud---they were literally buying votes and I suspect that all the extra votes these years have a lot to do with DOUBLE VOTING and the selling of Ballots. Mail out a ballot, they get filled out and sold/turned in along with your dead/nursing home mothers------vote in person as well.