Post Obama's Foreign Policy Successes

Didn't invade a country that posed no threat to US, wasting trillions and 100s of thousands dead...

Rabbi, you supported that dumbass war that caused this shit storm...

Your say in foriegn affairs is a joke after that... Sorry but the adults are still fixing your mess...

Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Bayh (D-IN), Yea
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Carnahan (D-MO), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Cleland (D-GA), Yea
Clinton (D-NY), Yea
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Yea
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Edwards (D-NC), Yea
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Hollings (D-SC), Yea
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Miller (D-GA), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Schumer (D-NY), Yea
Torricelli (D-NJ), Yea
 
1,???

Now his failures:
1. Reset with Russia
2. Selling out Poland/Czech Republic on missle defense
3.Iran deal
4. Withdrawal from Iraq
5. Surge in Afghanistan
6. Intiative in the Middle East
7. Libyan policy
8. Syrian policy
9. Yemen policy (cited as a success by State Department)
10. Relations with Israel
11. Relations with NATO allies
12 Honduras
13. Venezuela

There is not a continent untouched by Obama's incompetence and feckless foreign policy. A total and complete record of failure.

Queing up the "But BUSH" meme in 3...2...1...

The only total failure is you.

Has it all been successes? No. Is it anywhere near the picture you paint? No.

Has there been any foreign policy successes from this administration?

A resounding no.
Saudi Arabia announces 34-state Islamic military alliance against terrorism
 
Didn't invade a country that posed no threat to US, wasting trillions and 100s of thousands dead...

Rabbi, you supported that dumbass war that caused this shit storm...

Your say in foriegn affairs is a joke after that... Sorry but the adults are still fixing your mess...

Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Bayh (D-IN), Yea
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Carnahan (D-MO), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Cleland (D-GA), Yea
Clinton (D-NY), Yea
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Yea
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Edwards (D-NC), Yea
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Hollings (D-SC), Yea
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Miller (D-GA), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Schumer (D-NY), Yea
Torricelli (D-NJ), Yea
Great job, Booooshies, with the tidal wave of lies, bs and propaganda, jingoism and bluster. GOPers forget they allowed 9/11 thru sheer incompetence, and wrecked the ME with the stupidest war ever ...making us the great satan for many, and starting ISIS in the process...Sunnis ring a bell?
 
I'm curious...why is it that you cannot compare Obama to his predecessor? If this were any other line of work, you'd compare the incumbent to the most recent replacement to see if they are doing a good job or poor one. Somehow, the only valid comparisons to Bush are ones where Bush supposedly looks better....

001_military_spending_dollars.png


I have been.

Your blood soaked Democratic Nobel Champion Of Peace has spent more money on his undeclared and unconstitutional wars than the prior president ever did.

Bush only waged war in two countries while your Democratic Nobel Hero is up to at least seven or eight and wanting to involve us in even more.

How about the cost of total destruction to the countries attacked which directly affects the economy in those countries?

Shall we compare the body counts between the two presidencies?

*****SMILE*****



:)


We have Corps of soldiers in 8 new nations under Obama with no exit strategy? Oh wait, you were not being truthful.

Feel free but remember Obama adopted a war; we actually had peace and prosperity before Bush got his hands on the nation and invaded Iraq.

Compare all you want; there are plenty of warts to go around on both men but be honest about it if you can muster enough honesty.


images


Yes it's so much easier on the progressive Democratic psyche to have an undeclared war on a country where you can sit back and press a button that releases hellfire on the population of the country you're attacking without having to worry about whether it's an enemy combatant or civilian that's on the receiving end of the hellfire. Then in turn it's even more comforting to the Democratic psyche not having to worry about the chaos and killing done in the aftermath as the survivors go about the country attacking each other and consulates because to the Democratic mind those things would never happen.

When were we at war with Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, etc? Oh wait those are all on your Democratic Nobel Champion Of Peace.

...Along with the body counts of the populations murdered by your blood soaked Democratic Hero Of Peace.

*****SMILE*****



:)
 
:desk:.......oh....oh....me ...me

Obtained a nuclear disarmament with Iran. First President in 40 years to bring Iran to the Bargaining table

Officially recognized Cuba and reopened our embassy for the first time in 55 years

Worked out a climate change agreement with 190 countries

Weapons grade stupid....
Obama is the first Nobel Peace Prize winner to bomb another Nobel Peace Prize winner.
WHo says he has no accomplishments?
 
I'm curious...why is it that you cannot compare Obama to his predecessor? If this were any other line of work, you'd compare the incumbent to the most recent replacement to see if they are doing a good job or poor one. Somehow, the only valid comparisons to Bush are ones where Bush supposedly looks better....

001_military_spending_dollars.png


I have been.

Your blood soaked Democratic Nobel Champion Of Peace has spent more money on his undeclared and unconstitutional wars than the prior president ever did.

Bush only waged war in two countries while your Democratic Nobel Hero is up to at least seven or eight and wanting to involve us in even more.

How about the cost of total destruction to the countries attacked which directly affects the economy in those countries and the economies of nations worldwide?

Shall we compare the body counts between the two presidencies?

*****SMILE*****



:)


"Only" two countries where 7000 Americans were killed because of Bush's poor decisions

Shall we compare the body counts between the two presidencies?

OK

Bush:
3000 on 9-11
5000 in Iraq
2000 in Afghanistan

Your turn


images


1. There were more US soldiers killed under Obama's watch than Bush's in Afghanistan and Iraq.

2. Where's the body counts of the indigenous peoples or does it ease your progressive Democratic sensibilities not to think of how many of the indigenous have died after your Democratic Nobel Hero released hellfire on them from afar then simply walked away from the chaos he created? I can start you out with the over 25,000 dead in Libya prior to walking away God only knows how many died in the aftermath but at least the members of one US consulate.

*****SMILE*****



:)
 
I'm curious...why is it that you cannot compare Obama to his predecessor? If this were any other line of work, you'd compare the incumbent to the most recent replacement to see if they are doing a good job or poor one. Somehow, the only valid comparisons to Bush are ones where Bush supposedly looks better....

001_military_spending_dollars.png


I have been.

Your blood soaked Democratic Nobel Champion Of Peace has spent more money on his undeclared and unconstitutional wars than the prior president ever did.

Bush only waged war in two countries while your Democratic Nobel Hero is up to at least seven or eight and wanting to involve us in even more.

How about the cost of total destruction to the countries attacked which directly affects the economy in those countries and the economies of nations worldwide?

Shall we compare the body counts between the two presidencies?

*****SMILE*****



:)


"Only" two countries where 7000 Americans were killed because of Bush's poor decisions

Shall we compare the body counts between the two presidencies?

OK

Bush:
3000 on 9-11
5000 in Iraq
2000 in Afghanistan

Your turn


images


1. There were more US soldiers killed under Obama's watch than Bush's in Afghanistan and Iraq.

2. Where's the body counts of the indigenous peoples or does it ease your progressive Democratic sensibilities not to think of how many of the indigenous have died after your Democratic Nobel Hero released hellfire on them from afar then simply walked away from the chaos he created? I can start you out with the over 25,000 dead in Libya prior to walking away God only knows how many died in the aftermath but at least the members of one US consulate.

*****SMILE*****



:)

What a ridiculous dupe. We didn't have a war with ANY of those countries, just air strike police actions in favor of democracy, ADHD brainwashed functional moron. NOW the ME is learning what democracy and fundamentalism mean, and we're no longer the great satan, shyttehead.

Smart people wanted out, all we got was 170k casualties and being the Great Satan.
NOW: Saudi Arabia announces 34-state Islamic military alliance against terrorism
 
The GOP completely destabilized the Middle East with that terrible Iraq debacle and are so fucking ignorant, they don't even know it. Such stupid people.

If you do a Google search:

obama's foreign policy successes - Google Search

It's amazing how much pops up.

So then, just to see, I searched for the same about Bush. And this is what I got:

  • Foreign policy accomplishments of President Bush:
  • Ordered an invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 to overthrow the Taliban, destroy Al-Qaeda, and to capture Osama bin Laden following the September 11 terrorist attacks (only they let Bin Laden go and left Afghanistan a mess)
  • Led an invasion of Iraq in 2003 under the pretext of Iraqi refusal to relinquish its WMD (What a disastrous mess)
  • Condemned Iraq, Iran, and North Korea as part of the "Axis of Evil" and accused them of helping terrorism and seeking WMD (and left thousands of centrifuges in Iran and North Korea with nuclear weapons)
  • Signed the US-India Civil Nuclear Agreement with India, greatly improving relations between the countries
  • Established the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), an AIDS program that committed $15 billion to combat AIDS over five years, especially in Africa (and he banned funding for condoms and sex education. His ignorant policies probably caused more AIDs cases than prevented)
http://us-presidents.insidegov.com/q/39/9699/What-were-President-George-W-Bush-s-accomplishments

Slim pickens after 8 years.

Yada yada yada. More leftist whack job propaganda. Bush handed a stable Iraq over to Obama, and he proceeded to stomp all over it.
Why do you say that lie? You know it's not true. The Sunni's were disenfranchised and joining Isis during the time you call Iraq stable???? And you call that stable? What the fuck is wrong with you????

------------------------------------------

The terror associated with Jeb Bush's definition of "stability" in Iraq and the latest conservative whitewashing of the Iraq War's bloody history is staggering. The U.S. Department of State records that in 2008 alone, 3,256 terrorist attacks occurred in Iraq. As far as Bush "winning" the war, 19,077 people were "killed, kidnapped, or injured as a result of terrorism" in Iraq during George W. Bush's last year in office. Prior to 2008, the U.S. Department of State cites a total of 12,841 terrorist attacks in Iraq from 2006 to 2007, resulting in the death of 82,891 Iraqis. Apparently, Jeb Bush and others never read the State Department's Country Reports on Terrorism 2009, which states that "Since 2005 [until 2009], Iraq continues to be the single country with the most attacks and fatalities due to terrorism."

Jeb Bush is wrong; Iraq was not stable before Obama

-------------------------------------------

These tards can look this stuff up any time and know the truth. Instead, they repeat the same ignorant bullshit. Why? Why? Why?

Why this determined ignorance? Why this stupidity? Why not find out the truth?

Who is going to believe morons on anything if they keep lying?

Anyone? Can anyone explain this to me?
 
:desk:.......oh....oh....me ...me

Obtained a nuclear disarmament with Iran. First President in 40 years to bring Iran to the Bargaining table

Officially recognized Cuba and reopened our embassy for the first time in 55 years

Worked out a climate change agreement with 190 countries

Weapons grade stupid....
Obama is the first Nobel Peace Prize winner to bomb another Nobel Peace Prize winner.
WHo says he has no accomplishments?

Yeah, the Nobel Prize ain't what it used to be. Once Al Bore and Hussein got one, the crediblility got flushed down the toilet.
 
:desk:.......oh....oh....me ...me

Obtained a nuclear disarmament with Iran. First President in 40 years to bring Iran to the Bargaining table

Officially recognized Cuba and reopened our embassy for the first time in 55 years

Worked out a climate change agreement with 190 countries

Weapons grade stupid....
Obama is the first Nobel Peace Prize winner to bomb another Nobel Peace Prize winner.
WHo says he has no accomplishments?

Yeah, the Nobel Prize ain't what it used to be. Once Al Bore and Hussein got one, the crediblility got flushed down the toilet.
It was already tarnished when they awarded it to Yasser Arafat.
 
The GOP completely destabilized the Middle East with that terrible Iraq debacle and are so fucking ignorant, they don't even know it. Such stupid people.

If you do a Google search:

obama's foreign policy successes - Google Search

It's amazing how much pops up.

So then, just to see, I searched for the same about Bush. And this is what I got:

  • Foreign policy accomplishments of President Bush:
  • Ordered an invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 to overthrow the Taliban, destroy Al-Qaeda, and to capture Osama bin Laden following the September 11 terrorist attacks (only they let Bin Laden go and left Afghanistan a mess)
  • Led an invasion of Iraq in 2003 under the pretext of Iraqi refusal to relinquish its WMD (What a disastrous mess)
  • Condemned Iraq, Iran, and North Korea as part of the "Axis of Evil" and accused them of helping terrorism and seeking WMD (and left thousands of centrifuges in Iran and North Korea with nuclear weapons)
  • Signed the US-India Civil Nuclear Agreement with India, greatly improving relations between the countries
  • Established the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), an AIDS program that committed $15 billion to combat AIDS over five years, especially in Africa (and he banned funding for condoms and sex education. His ignorant policies probably caused more AIDs cases than prevented)
http://us-presidents.insidegov.com/q/39/9699/What-were-President-George-W-Bush-s-accomplishments

Slim pickens after 8 years.

Yada yada yada. More leftist whack job propaganda. Bush handed a stable Iraq over to Obama, and he proceeded to stomp all over it.
Why do you say that lie? You know it's not true. The Sunni's were disenfranchised and joining Isis during the time you call Iraq stable???? And you call that stable? What the fuck is wrong with you????

------------------------------------------

The terror associated with Jeb Bush's definition of "stability" in Iraq and the latest conservative whitewashing of the Iraq War's bloody history is staggering. The U.S. Department of State records that in 2008 alone, 3,256 terrorist attacks occurred in Iraq. As far as Bush "winning" the war, 19,077 people were "killed, kidnapped, or injured as a result of terrorism" in Iraq during George W. Bush's last year in office. Prior to 2008, the U.S. Department of State cites a total of 12,841 terrorist attacks in Iraq from 2006 to 2007, resulting in the death of 82,891 Iraqis. Apparently, Jeb Bush and others never read the State Department's Country Reports on Terrorism 2009, which states that "Since 2005 [until 2009], Iraq continues to be the single country with the most attacks and fatalities due to terrorism."

Jeb Bush is wrong; Iraq was not stable before Obama

-------------------------------------------

These tards can look this stuff up any time and know the truth. Instead, they repeat the same ignorant bullshit. Why? Why? Why?

Why this determined ignorance? Why this stupidity? Why not find out the truth?

Who is going to believe morons on anything if they keep lying?

Anyone? Can anyone explain this to me?

The truth is that Bush and Petraeus implemented the Surge and it worked and had stabilized Iraq. We had won the war in Iraq. Obama was against the Surge, and he went ahead and destabilized the entire region.

Why the Surge Worked

Peter Beinart - Admit It: The Surge Worked
 
The GOP completely destabilized the Middle East with that terrible Iraq debacle and are so fucking ignorant, they don't even know it. Such stupid people.

If you do a Google search:

obama's foreign policy successes - Google Search

It's amazing how much pops up.

So then, just to see, I searched for the same about Bush. And this is what I got:

  • Foreign policy accomplishments of President Bush:
  • Ordered an invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 to overthrow the Taliban, destroy Al-Qaeda, and to capture Osama bin Laden following the September 11 terrorist attacks (only they let Bin Laden go and left Afghanistan a mess)
  • Led an invasion of Iraq in 2003 under the pretext of Iraqi refusal to relinquish its WMD (What a disastrous mess)
  • Condemned Iraq, Iran, and North Korea as part of the "Axis of Evil" and accused them of helping terrorism and seeking WMD (and left thousands of centrifuges in Iran and North Korea with nuclear weapons)
  • Signed the US-India Civil Nuclear Agreement with India, greatly improving relations between the countries
  • Established the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), an AIDS program that committed $15 billion to combat AIDS over five years, especially in Africa (and he banned funding for condoms and sex education. His ignorant policies probably caused more AIDs cases than prevented)
http://us-presidents.insidegov.com/q/39/9699/What-were-President-George-W-Bush-s-accomplishments

Slim pickens after 8 years.

Yada yada yada. More leftist whack job propaganda. Bush handed a stable Iraq over to Obama, and he proceeded to stomp all over it.
Why do you say that lie? You know it's not true. The Sunni's were disenfranchised and joining Isis during the time you call Iraq stable???? And you call that stable? What the fuck is wrong with you????

------------------------------------------

The terror associated with Jeb Bush's definition of "stability" in Iraq and the latest conservative whitewashing of the Iraq War's bloody history is staggering. The U.S. Department of State records that in 2008 alone, 3,256 terrorist attacks occurred in Iraq. As far as Bush "winning" the war, 19,077 people were "killed, kidnapped, or injured as a result of terrorism" in Iraq during George W. Bush's last year in office. Prior to 2008, the U.S. Department of State cites a total of 12,841 terrorist attacks in Iraq from 2006 to 2007, resulting in the death of 82,891 Iraqis. Apparently, Jeb Bush and others never read the State Department's Country Reports on Terrorism 2009, which states that "Since 2005 [until 2009], Iraq continues to be the single country with the most attacks and fatalities due to terrorism."

Jeb Bush is wrong; Iraq was not stable before Obama

-------------------------------------------

These tards can look this stuff up any time and know the truth. Instead, they repeat the same ignorant bullshit. Why? Why? Why?

Why this determined ignorance? Why this stupidity? Why not find out the truth?

Who is going to believe morons on anything if they keep lying?

Anyone? Can anyone explain this to me?

The truth is that Bush and Petraeus implemented the Surge and it worked and had stabilized Iraq. We had won the war in Iraq. Obama was against the Surge, and he went ahead and destabilized the entire region.

Why the Surge Worked

Peter Beinart - Admit It: The Surge Worked
The left simply cannot admit that the Iraq War was a success, we achieved every objective we set, and we did so with minimal loss of American life (recall what the media were predicting for casualty figures). So they will spin, obfuscate, deflect, or do anything to deny this reality.
 
The GOP completely destabilized the Middle East with that terrible Iraq debacle and are so fucking ignorant, they don't even know it. Such stupid people.

If you do a Google search:

obama's foreign policy successes - Google Search

It's amazing how much pops up.

So then, just to see, I searched for the same about Bush. And this is what I got:

  • Foreign policy accomplishments of President Bush:
  • Ordered an invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 to overthrow the Taliban, destroy Al-Qaeda, and to capture Osama bin Laden following the September 11 terrorist attacks (only they let Bin Laden go and left Afghanistan a mess)
  • Led an invasion of Iraq in 2003 under the pretext of Iraqi refusal to relinquish its WMD (What a disastrous mess)
  • Condemned Iraq, Iran, and North Korea as part of the "Axis of Evil" and accused them of helping terrorism and seeking WMD (and left thousands of centrifuges in Iran and North Korea with nuclear weapons)
  • Signed the US-India Civil Nuclear Agreement with India, greatly improving relations between the countries
  • Established the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), an AIDS program that committed $15 billion to combat AIDS over five years, especially in Africa (and he banned funding for condoms and sex education. His ignorant policies probably caused more AIDs cases than prevented)
http://us-presidents.insidegov.com/q/39/9699/What-were-President-George-W-Bush-s-accomplishments

Slim pickens after 8 years.

Yada yada yada. More leftist whack job propaganda. Bush handed a stable Iraq over to Obama, and he proceeded to stomp all over it.
Why do you say that lie? You know it's not true. The Sunni's were disenfranchised and joining Isis during the time you call Iraq stable???? And you call that stable? What the fuck is wrong with you????

------------------------------------------

The terror associated with Jeb Bush's definition of "stability" in Iraq and the latest conservative whitewashing of the Iraq War's bloody history is staggering. The U.S. Department of State records that in 2008 alone, 3,256 terrorist attacks occurred in Iraq. As far as Bush "winning" the war, 19,077 people were "killed, kidnapped, or injured as a result of terrorism" in Iraq during George W. Bush's last year in office. Prior to 2008, the U.S. Department of State cites a total of 12,841 terrorist attacks in Iraq from 2006 to 2007, resulting in the death of 82,891 Iraqis. Apparently, Jeb Bush and others never read the State Department's Country Reports on Terrorism 2009, which states that "Since 2005 [until 2009], Iraq continues to be the single country with the most attacks and fatalities due to terrorism."

Jeb Bush is wrong; Iraq was not stable before Obama

-------------------------------------------

These tards can look this stuff up any time and know the truth. Instead, they repeat the same ignorant bullshit. Why? Why? Why?

Why this determined ignorance? Why this stupidity? Why not find out the truth?

Who is going to believe morons on anything if they keep lying?

Anyone? Can anyone explain this to me?

The truth is that Bush and Petraeus implemented the Surge and it worked and had stabilized Iraq. We had won the war in Iraq. Obama was against the Surge, and he went ahead and destabilized the entire region.

Why the Surge Worked

Peter Beinart - Admit It: The Surge Worked
The left simply cannot admit that the Iraq War was a success, we achieved every objective we set, and we did so with minimal loss of American life (recall what the media were predicting for casualty figures). So they will spin, obfuscate, deflect, or do anything to deny this reality.

It was no longer a question whether we had won the war, even Obama was on board with that. But then he proceeded to destroy all the achievements and American lives lost in what we had gained in Iraq.
 
The GOP completely destabilized the Middle East with that terrible Iraq debacle and are so fucking ignorant, they don't even know it. Such stupid people.

If you do a Google search:

obama's foreign policy successes - Google Search

It's amazing how much pops up.

So then, just to see, I searched for the same about Bush. And this is what I got:

  • Foreign policy accomplishments of President Bush:
  • Ordered an invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 to overthrow the Taliban, destroy Al-Qaeda, and to capture Osama bin Laden following the September 11 terrorist attacks (only they let Bin Laden go and left Afghanistan a mess)
  • Led an invasion of Iraq in 2003 under the pretext of Iraqi refusal to relinquish its WMD (What a disastrous mess)
  • Condemned Iraq, Iran, and North Korea as part of the "Axis of Evil" and accused them of helping terrorism and seeking WMD (and left thousands of centrifuges in Iran and North Korea with nuclear weapons)
  • Signed the US-India Civil Nuclear Agreement with India, greatly improving relations between the countries
  • Established the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), an AIDS program that committed $15 billion to combat AIDS over five years, especially in Africa (and he banned funding for condoms and sex education. His ignorant policies probably caused more AIDs cases than prevented)
http://us-presidents.insidegov.com/q/39/9699/What-were-President-George-W-Bush-s-accomplishments

Slim pickens after 8 years.

Yada yada yada. More leftist whack job propaganda. Bush handed a stable Iraq over to Obama, and he proceeded to stomp all over it.
Why do you say that lie? You know it's not true. The Sunni's were disenfranchised and joining Isis during the time you call Iraq stable???? And you call that stable? What the fuck is wrong with you????

------------------------------------------

The terror associated with Jeb Bush's definition of "stability" in Iraq and the latest conservative whitewashing of the Iraq War's bloody history is staggering. The U.S. Department of State records that in 2008 alone, 3,256 terrorist attacks occurred in Iraq. As far as Bush "winning" the war, 19,077 people were "killed, kidnapped, or injured as a result of terrorism" in Iraq during George W. Bush's last year in office. Prior to 2008, the U.S. Department of State cites a total of 12,841 terrorist attacks in Iraq from 2006 to 2007, resulting in the death of 82,891 Iraqis. Apparently, Jeb Bush and others never read the State Department's Country Reports on Terrorism 2009, which states that "Since 2005 [until 2009], Iraq continues to be the single country with the most attacks and fatalities due to terrorism."

Jeb Bush is wrong; Iraq was not stable before Obama

-------------------------------------------

These tards can look this stuff up any time and know the truth. Instead, they repeat the same ignorant bullshit. Why? Why? Why?

Why this determined ignorance? Why this stupidity? Why not find out the truth?

Who is going to believe morons on anything if they keep lying?

Anyone? Can anyone explain this to me?

The truth is that Bush and Petraeus implemented the Surge and it worked and had stabilized Iraq. We had won the war in Iraq. Obama was against the Surge, and he went ahead and destabilized the entire region.

Why the Surge Worked

Peter Beinart - Admit It: The Surge Worked
The left simply cannot admit that the Iraq War was a success, we achieved every objective we set, and we did so with minimal loss of American life (recall what the media were predicting for casualty figures). So they will spin, obfuscate, deflect, or do anything to deny this reality.

Iraq was a foreign policy disaster

It was based on a lie
It was poorly executed
It killed over 100,000 Iraqis and 5000 Americans
It disrupted the balance of power in the region
It left a government that is unable to maintain an aliance between Shiite, Suni and Kurds
 
1,???

Now his failures:
1. Reset with Russia
2. Selling out Poland/Czech Republic on missle defense
3.Iran deal
4. Withdrawal from Iraq
5. Surge in Afghanistan
6. Intiative in the Middle East
7. Libyan policy
8. Syrian policy
9. Yemen policy (cited as a success by State Department)
10. Relations with Israel
11. Relations with NATO allies
12 Honduras
13. Venezuela

There is not a continent untouched by Obama's incompetence and feckless foreign policy. A total and complete record of failure.

Queing up the "But BUSH" meme in 3...2...1...
He absorbed 15 inches of Iranian treachery and never even whimpered.
 
The GOP completely destabilized the Middle East with that terrible Iraq debacle and are so fucking ignorant, they don't even know it. Such stupid people.

If you do a Google search:

obama's foreign policy successes - Google Search

It's amazing how much pops up.

So then, just to see, I searched for the same about Bush. And this is what I got:

  • Foreign policy accomplishments of President Bush:
  • Ordered an invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 to overthrow the Taliban, destroy Al-Qaeda, and to capture Osama bin Laden following the September 11 terrorist attacks (only they let Bin Laden go and left Afghanistan a mess)
  • Led an invasion of Iraq in 2003 under the pretext of Iraqi refusal to relinquish its WMD (What a disastrous mess)
  • Condemned Iraq, Iran, and North Korea as part of the "Axis of Evil" and accused them of helping terrorism and seeking WMD (and left thousands of centrifuges in Iran and North Korea with nuclear weapons)
  • Signed the US-India Civil Nuclear Agreement with India, greatly improving relations between the countries
  • Established the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), an AIDS program that committed $15 billion to combat AIDS over five years, especially in Africa (and he banned funding for condoms and sex education. His ignorant policies probably caused more AIDs cases than prevented)
http://us-presidents.insidegov.com/q/39/9699/What-were-President-George-W-Bush-s-accomplishments

Slim pickens after 8 years.

Yada yada yada. More leftist whack job propaganda. Bush handed a stable Iraq over to Obama, and he proceeded to stomp all over it.
Why do you say that lie? You know it's not true. The Sunni's were disenfranchised and joining Isis during the time you call Iraq stable???? And you call that stable? What the fuck is wrong with you????

------------------------------------------

The terror associated with Jeb Bush's definition of "stability" in Iraq and the latest conservative whitewashing of the Iraq War's bloody history is staggering. The U.S. Department of State records that in 2008 alone, 3,256 terrorist attacks occurred in Iraq. As far as Bush "winning" the war, 19,077 people were "killed, kidnapped, or injured as a result of terrorism" in Iraq during George W. Bush's last year in office. Prior to 2008, the U.S. Department of State cites a total of 12,841 terrorist attacks in Iraq from 2006 to 2007, resulting in the death of 82,891 Iraqis. Apparently, Jeb Bush and others never read the State Department's Country Reports on Terrorism 2009, which states that "Since 2005 [until 2009], Iraq continues to be the single country with the most attacks and fatalities due to terrorism."

Jeb Bush is wrong; Iraq was not stable before Obama

-------------------------------------------

These tards can look this stuff up any time and know the truth. Instead, they repeat the same ignorant bullshit. Why? Why? Why?

Why this determined ignorance? Why this stupidity? Why not find out the truth?

Who is going to believe morons on anything if they keep lying?

Anyone? Can anyone explain this to me?

The truth is that Bush and Petraeus implemented the Surge and it worked and had stabilized Iraq. We had won the war in Iraq. Obama was against the Surge, and he went ahead and destabilized the entire region.

Why the Surge Worked

Peter Beinart - Admit It: The Surge Worked
The left simply cannot admit that the Iraq War was a success, we achieved every objective we set, and we did so with minimal loss of American life (recall what the media were predicting for casualty figures). So they will spin, obfuscate, deflect, or do anything to deny this reality.

Iraq was a foreign policy disaster

It was based on a lie
It was poorly executed
It killed over 100,000 Iraqis and 5000 Americans
It disrupted the balance of power in the region
It left a government that is unable to maintain an alliance between Shiite, Suni and Kurds
So if you favor tyrants (Saddam) why don't you support Trump?
 
All done better than the past administration, and that is relevant, because the current GOP position is to reinstate a replay of the past administration.

A 'replay' or 'reset' is not a bad idea. BEFORE Obama:
- The last successful terrorist attack on US soil was 9/11/01, at the very beginning of Bush's 8 year term as President. Obama has allowed 4 successful terrorist attacks on this country.

- The last time a US Ambassador was murdered was more than 30 years ago

- Al Qaeida did not have their own country, and the US certainly did not go to war and use our own military to help them get one.

- The US did not arm Mexican Drug cartels, and over 500 people killed by those guns would still be alive

- Iraq would still be liberated, not divided by terrorists the current President supplied, armed, and even trained

- We would not be seen as 'cowards' because no 'Red Line' would have foolishly been issued, from which the current President backed down.

- We would not be 'importing' terrorists...

- The Constitution and Rule of law would still be respected and enforced...

- We would have $6+ Trillion LESS added onto our national debt

- The nation would not be as racially divided as it is now

etc...
 
Yada yada yada. More leftist whack job propaganda. Bush handed a stable Iraq over to Obama, and he proceeded to stomp all over it.
Why do you say that lie? You know it's not true. The Sunni's were disenfranchised and joining Isis during the time you call Iraq stable???? And you call that stable? What the fuck is wrong with you????

------------------------------------------

The terror associated with Jeb Bush's definition of "stability" in Iraq and the latest conservative whitewashing of the Iraq War's bloody history is staggering. The U.S. Department of State records that in 2008 alone, 3,256 terrorist attacks occurred in Iraq. As far as Bush "winning" the war, 19,077 people were "killed, kidnapped, or injured as a result of terrorism" in Iraq during George W. Bush's last year in office. Prior to 2008, the U.S. Department of State cites a total of 12,841 terrorist attacks in Iraq from 2006 to 2007, resulting in the death of 82,891 Iraqis. Apparently, Jeb Bush and others never read the State Department's Country Reports on Terrorism 2009, which states that "Since 2005 [until 2009], Iraq continues to be the single country with the most attacks and fatalities due to terrorism."

Jeb Bush is wrong; Iraq was not stable before Obama

-------------------------------------------

These tards can look this stuff up any time and know the truth. Instead, they repeat the same ignorant bullshit. Why? Why? Why?

Why this determined ignorance? Why this stupidity? Why not find out the truth?

Who is going to believe morons on anything if they keep lying?

Anyone? Can anyone explain this to me?

The truth is that Bush and Petraeus implemented the Surge and it worked and had stabilized Iraq. We had won the war in Iraq. Obama was against the Surge, and he went ahead and destabilized the entire region.

Why the Surge Worked

Peter Beinart - Admit It: The Surge Worked
The left simply cannot admit that the Iraq War was a success, we achieved every objective we set, and we did so with minimal loss of American life (recall what the media were predicting for casualty figures). So they will spin, obfuscate, deflect, or do anything to deny this reality.

Iraq was a foreign policy disaster

It was based on a lie
It was poorly executed
It killed over 100,000 Iraqis and 5000 Americans
It disrupted the balance of power in the region
It left a government that is unable to maintain an alliance between Shiite, Suni and Kurds
So if you favor tyrants (Saddam) why don't you support Trump?

Saddam was a tyrant, but he was not my problem
Trump is a problem
 
Yada yada yada. More leftist whack job propaganda. Bush handed a stable Iraq over to Obama, and he proceeded to stomp all over it.
Why do you say that lie? You know it's not true. The Sunni's were disenfranchised and joining Isis during the time you call Iraq stable???? And you call that stable? What the fuck is wrong with you????

------------------------------------------

The terror associated with Jeb Bush's definition of "stability" in Iraq and the latest conservative whitewashing of the Iraq War's bloody history is staggering. The U.S. Department of State records that in 2008 alone, 3,256 terrorist attacks occurred in Iraq. As far as Bush "winning" the war, 19,077 people were "killed, kidnapped, or injured as a result of terrorism" in Iraq during George W. Bush's last year in office. Prior to 2008, the U.S. Department of State cites a total of 12,841 terrorist attacks in Iraq from 2006 to 2007, resulting in the death of 82,891 Iraqis. Apparently, Jeb Bush and others never read the State Department's Country Reports on Terrorism 2009, which states that "Since 2005 [until 2009], Iraq continues to be the single country with the most attacks and fatalities due to terrorism."

Jeb Bush is wrong; Iraq was not stable before Obama

-------------------------------------------

These tards can look this stuff up any time and know the truth. Instead, they repeat the same ignorant bullshit. Why? Why? Why?

Why this determined ignorance? Why this stupidity? Why not find out the truth?

Who is going to believe morons on anything if they keep lying?

Anyone? Can anyone explain this to me?

The truth is that Bush and Petraeus implemented the Surge and it worked and had stabilized Iraq. We had won the war in Iraq. Obama was against the Surge, and he went ahead and destabilized the entire region.

Why the Surge Worked

Peter Beinart - Admit It: The Surge Worked
The left simply cannot admit that the Iraq War was a success, we achieved every objective we set, and we did so with minimal loss of American life (recall what the media were predicting for casualty figures). So they will spin, obfuscate, deflect, or do anything to deny this reality.

Iraq was a foreign policy disaster

It was based on a lie
It was poorly executed
It killed over 100,000 Iraqis and 5000 Americans
It disrupted the balance of power in the region
It left a government that is unable to maintain an alliance between Shiite, Suni and Kurds
So if you favor tyrants (Saddam) why don't you support Trump?

Saddam was a tyrant, but he was not my problem
Trump is a problem
 

Forum List

Back
Top