Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
- Sep 4, 2014
- 30,837
- 20,609
Yeah, thats probably right with an experiment so small compared to the hundred miles of atmosphere. At least they showed what GHGs do.It is a big stretch to compare a 40% increase to a 20,000% increase.
Why didn't they produce an experiment with a 100% increase, one doubling? I can tell you why. They wouldn't have got a noticeable result.
Deception is not a good thing.. The levels of CO2 used by mythbusters were so high that our earth hasn't had them in over several hundred million years. The thing about the Null Hypothesis is it still shows you are wrong even with a supported hypothesis from a lab. So a lab experiment might show minor warming but the same levels in our atmosphere might show no warming or have the opposite effect as we are seeing with CO2 in our atmosphere. Empirical evidence says our hypothesis is wrong, The Null Hypothesis simply reinforces the failure.