President’s Golf Weekend Could Have Saved 341 Workers Who Might Be Furloughed By Sequ

[Stephanie]

links in article at site

SNIP:


We do well to remember that the President has broad latitude when considering what to cut, “flexibility”, one might say. So that when he goes on about this or that being cut, it is a decision made by his administration rather than some other cost-saving measure. To put our safety at risk by releasing criminal illegal aliens or by not deploying troops or ships that are needed for our defense readiness, for political tactics, is shameful.

The purpose of this effort is to demonize Republicans, to destroy the opposition, not to come to the table and bargain. Let us hope that more will adopt the clear-headed approach of Jeff Sessions and call out this base tactic of the President.

Via The Weekly Standard:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs...h-341-federal-workers-furloughed_704915.html#

In a sharply written statement, Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama blasts President Obama for campaigning and not governing. He calls Obama’s response to the sequestration “the most cynical behavior I have seen during my time in Washington.”

Adds the senator, “Replacing the sequester would require the President to save $85 billion out of a $3,500 billion federal budget. One would think that any President would leap at the opportunity to make government more effective and responsive.

But what does the President do instead? He says Republicans are ‘cutting vital services for children’ in order to ‘benefit the well-off and well-connected.’ This has been the strategy now for years: block any attempt to reform the government and then relentlessly attack the reformers.

Does any lawmaker, reporter, or citizen believe that the only way to save taxpayer dollars is to hurt children, that every government program is effective and helpful and not one penny is wasted?”

Sessions is the top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee.

“While the White House operatives may think this attack is clever, it betrays an astonishing elitism: the federal government is perfect and requires no reform. That is why they have no plan to make our government leaner and more efficient.

The President had 18 months to develop reforms to improve the government, but instead he announced furloughs of federal workers as a political cudgel. Yet, his golf weekend at the yacht club with Tiger Woods cost taxpayers over a million dollars—enough money to save 341 federal workers from furlough,” Sessions writes.

“These workers know firsthand how much waste and inefficiency exists in the government. Our Budget Committee office will look for a way to solicit federal employees to send suggestions for how to save money in their departments, agencies, and divisions. What is better? To furlough someone or to empower them to make their office more efficient?

“Now, we learn that the President is going to submit his budget plan—which contains his recommendations to Congress, the reason the law requires it to be submitted early in February before our budget work begins—on March 25th.
Yet he will be submitting it after the House and Senate have produced a budget proposal and adjourned for Easter.

So while the President speaks of his deep concern for American workers and families, he fails to even submit to Congress his financial plan to help those workers and families.
Why then doesn’t the President furlough his entire 500 person staff at the Office of Management and Budget instead of threatening teachers and law enforcement personnel?

The budget deals with more than just deficits. It is the chief executive’s plan for American prosperity. What does it mean that he doesn’t want to lay that out? He is the CEO of the Executive Branch and every cabinet official and government employee answers to him. It is his duty to the American people to be the person advancing reform, not blocking it.

all of it here

- See more at: Weasel Zippers | Scouring the bowels of the internet | Weasel Zippers