President Trump just filed a lawsuit against Hillary over the "Russian Collusion" allegations

[scruffy]

Yeah...go with that. LOL

The Deep State bitches were too cucked to put her under oath when she testified before the Senate.

If they had, she'd be in jail right now.

 

[candycorn]

The Deep State bitches were too cucked to put her under oath when she testified before the Senate.

If they had, she'd be in jail right now.

She did testify.
She was under oath.

 

[BackAgain]

He (mueller) documented the meetings between you blob's (trump) campaign and Russian intel...as did the US Senate which was under GOP control at the time.

Unless they were present, they couldn’t document any such thing. What they could do is document somebody’s claims. And once again, even if there had been any such meetings, that doesn’t establish “collusion.” So take a deep breath and feel free to try again to somehow support you claim. But the magic 8 ball says “unlikely.”

 

[candycorn]

Unless they were present, they couldn’t document any such thing. What they could do is document somebody’s claims. And once again, even if there had been any such meetings, that doesn’t establish “collusion.” So take a deep breath and feel free to try again to somehow support you claim. But the magic 8 ball says “unlikely.”

The Senate confirmed that campaign information was shared. You really don't have a clue of what you're talking about.

 

[BackAgain]

The Senate confirmed that campaign information was shared. You really don't have a clue of what you're talking about.

Actually,of the two of us, I’m the one who does know what was said and what was actually established. And turning back to the claim you made, it NOW looks like your contention becomes one that claims that “sharing campaign information” constitutes “collusion” of some amorphous kind.

 

[candycorn]

Actually,of the two of us, I’m the one who does know what was said and what was actually established. And turning back to the claim you made, it NOW looks like your contention becomes one that claims that “sharing campaign information” constitutes “collusion” of some amorphous kind.

Okay so Manafort met with Russian Intel and he didn't share anything...is that what you're stating?

 

[candycorn]

Actually,of the two of us, I’m the one who does know what was said and what was actually established. And turning back to the claim you made, it NOW looks like your contention becomes one that claims that “sharing campaign information” constitutes “collusion” of some amorphous kind.

Do you at least agree that Russian Intel hacked the DNC/Hillary Clinton?

 

[BackAgain]

Okay so Manafort met with Russian Intel and he didn't share anything...is that what you're stating?

Maybe he gave them a cool recipe for apple pie. Don’t pretend to know. We all know you don’t know. And absent that knowledge your claim of “collusion” is fiction. And we all see it.

do you even understand what “collusion” means? What was the subject of this alleged collusion?

 

[BackAgain]

Do you at least agree that Russian Intel hacked the DNC/Hillary Clinton?

They might have. Whose word should I accept on that? Was it hacked by the same Russian people Hillary and the DNC paid for their fictional oppo research?

 

[candycorn]

Maybe he gave them a cool recipe for apple pie. Don’t pretend to know.

Fascinating....earlier you claimed to know more than me. Now you're stating you don't know.

We all know you don’t know. And absent that knowledge your claim of “collusion” is fiction. And we all see it.

do you even understand what “collusion” means? What was the subject of this alleged collusion?

The GOP senate disagrees with you:

 

[candycorn]

They might have. Whose word should I accept on that? Was it hacked by the same Russian people Hillary and the DNC paid for their fictional oppo research?

Like most other trump supporters, you're as delusional as you are dishonest.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He also concluded there was no collusion.

Lie.

 

[struth]

He (mueller) documented the meetings between you blob's (trump) campaign and Russian intel...as did the US Senate which was under GOP control at the time.

Mueller and the US Congress both said there was no conspiracy or obstruction.

 

[struth]

Like most other trump supporters, you're as delusional as you are dishonest.

The Xiden DoJ has already made clear they believe the DNC and Clinton campaign paid Russians for misinformation and spread it about trump to undermine his admin

 

[scruffy]

She did testify.
She was under oath.

You lie.

 

[scruffy]

Like most other trump supporters, you're as delusional as you are dishonest.

End of discussion. You lie through your teeth. I don't have time to waste with liars

 

[Dragonlady]

Shit's fixin' to get real, yo.

Case 2:22-cv-14102-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2022 Page 1 of 108

"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. DONALD J. TRUMP, Plaintiff, v. HILLARY R. CLINTON, HFACC, INC., DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, DNC SERVICES CORPORATION, PERKINS COIE, LLC, MICHAEL SUSSMANN, MARC ELIAS, DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, CHARLES HALLIDAY DOLAN, JR., JAKE SULLIVAN, JOHN PODESTA, ROBERT E. MOOK, PHILLIPE REINES, FUSION GPS, GLENN SIMPSON, PETER FRITSCH, NELLIE OHR, BRUCE OHR, ORBIS BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE, LTD., CHRISTOPHER STEELE, IGOR DANCHENKO, NEUSTAR, INC., RODNEY JOFFE, JAMES COMEY, PETER STRZOK, LISA PAGE, KEVIN CLINESMITH, ANDREW MCCABE, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10 (said names being fictious and unknown persons), and ABC CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10 (said names being fictitious and unknown entities), Defendants.

_________________________________________/ COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY The Plaintiff, Donald J. Trump, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby serves his suit against the Defendants, Hillary R. Clinton, HFACC, Inc., the Democratic National Committee, DNC Services Corporation, Perkins Coie, LLC, Michael Sussmann, Marc Elias, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Charles Halliday Dolan, Jr., Jake Sullivan, John Podesta, Robert E. Mook..."

The lawsuit

Case dismissed. He has no evidence because it never happened

 

[struth]

Case dismissed. He has no evidence because it never happened

the Biden DOJ disagrees wiyh you they have already indicted members of the clinton campaign. for lying about their role in the conspiracy

 

[Dragonlady]

the Biden DOJ disagrees wiyh you they have already indicted members of the clinton campaign. for lying about their role in the conspiracy

No they have not. The lawyer who was indicted was not working on the Clinton campaign.

 

[struth]

No they have not. The lawyer who was indicted was not working on the Clinton campaign.

hahah it according to the indictment the Obama DOJ clearly believes he was and lied about it