Private sector recovers jobs lost since 2008...gov't shed 547k jobs...idiots?

Here's where the jobs are, but not for long...

Democrats are out to kill the golden egg-layer by repealing percentage depletion and expensing of intangible drilling costs.
According to your MessiahRushie, Jerome Corsi and Creationists, oil is a renewable resource and there is an unlimited supply, so why should Big Oil get a depletion allowance for a supply that is unlimited???
 
Here's where the jobs are, but not for long...

Democrats are out to kill the golden egg-layer by repealing percentage depletion and expensing of intangible drilling costs.
According to your MessiahRushie, Jerome Corsi and Creationists, oil is a renewable resource and there is an unlimited supply, so why should Big Oil get a depletion allowance for a supply that is unlimited???

Not sure about that first bit of nonsense, but depletion allowance is only afforded so-called Independent companies and not "Big Oil".
 
Here's where the jobs are, but not for long...

Democrats are out to kill the golden egg-layer by repealing percentage depletion and expensing of intangible drilling costs.
According to your MessiahRushie, Jerome Corsi and Creationists, oil is a renewable resource and there is an unlimited supply, so why should Big Oil get a depletion allowance for a supply that is unlimited???

Not sure about that first bit of nonsense, but depletion allowance is only afforded so-called Independent companies and not "Big Oil".
Discovery backs theory oil not ?fossil fuel?

A study published in Science Magazine today presents new evidence supporting the abiotic theory for the origin of oil, which asserts oil is a natural product the Earth generates constantly rather than a “fossil fuel” derived from decaying ancient forests and dead dinosaurs.

\snip

The abiotic theory argues, in contrast, that hydrocarbons are naturally produced on a continual basis throughout the solar system, including within the mantle of the earth. The advocates believe the oil seeps up through bedrock cracks to deposit in sedimentary rock. Traditional petro-geologists, they say, have confused the rock as the originator rather than the depository of the hydrocarbons.
 
According to your MessiahRushie, Jerome Corsi and Creationists, oil is a renewable resource and there is an unlimited supply, so why should Big Oil get a depletion allowance for a supply that is unlimited???

Not sure about that first bit of nonsense, but depletion allowance is only afforded so-called Independent companies and not "Big Oil".
Discovery backs theory oil not ?fossil fuel?

A study published in Science Magazine today presents new evidence supporting the abiotic theory for the origin of oil, which asserts oil is a natural product the Earth generates constantly rather than a “fossil fuel” derived from decaying ancient forests and dead dinosaurs.

\snip

The abiotic theory argues, in contrast, that hydrocarbons are naturally produced on a continual basis throughout the solar system, including within the mantle of the earth. The advocates believe the oil seeps up through bedrock cracks to deposit in sedimentary rock. Traditional petro-geologists, they say, have confused the rock as the originator rather than the depository of the hydrocarbons.

Yes, yes. I heard this shpeal 30 years ago. I honestly don't subscribe to it.

Depletion allowance, on the other hand...
 
180,000 More Women Unemployed in March!!!

The continued Democrat/subversive "WAR ON WOMEN!!!"


The number of women who were unemployed in the United States climbed 180,000 in March, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

In March, there were 4,850,000 unemployed women, 180,000 more than the 4,670,000 American women were unemployed in February, according to BLS.

At the same time, the unemployment rate for women rose from 6.4 percent in February to 6.6 percent in March.
To be counted as unemployed, a person must have actively sought a job in the last four weeks and be part of what BLS calls the civilian noninstitutional population (meaning a person is 16 or older and not on active duty in the military or in an institution such as a prison, mental hospital or nursing home).

The number of American women who had jobs dropped 133,000 from February to March, declining from 68,458,000 to 68,325,000.
From February to March, the number of women in the civilian noninstitutional population increased by 84,000, climbing from 127,779,000 to 127,863,000. Of those 127,863,000 women in the civilian noninstitutional population, 73,175,000 participated in the civilian labor force, meaning they either had a job or actively sought one in the past four weeks. That put the labor force participation rate for women at 57.2 percent in March--the same as it was in February.

There were also 54,688,000 women who did not participate in the civilian labor force in March, meaning they neither held a job nor actively sought one. That was up by 36,000 from the 54,652,000 women who were not in the labor force in February.

180,000 More Women Unemployed in March | CNS News
 
180,000 More Women Unemployed in March!!!

The continued Democrat/subversive "WAR ON WOMEN!!!"


The number of women who were unemployed in the United States climbed 180,000 in March, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

In March, there were 4,850,000 unemployed women, 180,000 more than the 4,670,000 American women were unemployed in February, according to BLS.

At the same time, the unemployment rate for women rose from 6.4 percent in February to 6.6 percent in March.
To be counted as unemployed, a person must have actively sought a job in the last four weeks and be part of what BLS calls the civilian noninstitutional population (meaning a person is 16 or older and not on active duty in the military or in an institution such as a prison, mental hospital or nursing home).

The number of American women who had jobs dropped 133,000 from February to March, declining from 68,458,000 to 68,325,000.
From February to March, the number of women in the civilian noninstitutional population increased by 84,000, climbing from 127,779,000 to 127,863,000. Of those 127,863,000 women in the civilian noninstitutional population, 73,175,000 participated in the civilian labor force, meaning they either had a job or actively sought one in the past four weeks. That put the labor force participation rate for women at 57.2 percent in March--the same as it was in February.

There were also 54,688,000 women who did not participate in the civilian labor force in March, meaning they neither held a job nor actively sought one. That was up by 36,000 from the 54,652,000 women who were not in the labor force in February.

180,000 More Women Unemployed in March | CNS News

Silent No More! Women?s Energy Leadership Coalition: ?Natural Gas Now?
Women + hydrocarbons = jobs.
 
What a bunch of pathetic all the way around. The crap coming from all of you, both on the right and left is nauseating.
 
The economy sucks. No amount of spin will change those facts. Wage growth is completely stagnant, and there are fewer people in the workforce than in anytime since the late 1970's. Why start a thread of utter bullshit?

I guess it's the Obama credo....tell the big lie and hope people are stupid enough to believe it. In this instance I don't think anyone believes it...not even the Kool-aid drinkers.
 
The economy sucks. No amount of spin will change those facts. Wage growth is completely stagnant, and there are fewer people in the workforce than in anytime since the late 1970's. Why start a thread of utter bullshit?

I guess it's the Obama credo....tell the big lie and hope people are stupid enough to believe it. In this instance I don't think anyone believes it...not even the Kool-aid drinkers.
The workforce was in decline every year of the Bush Regime, even when employment peaked in 2007, and Bush didn't have the Boomers retiring, but the Right never said the the Bush economy sucked as the workforce declined. No they told us it was the best strongest economy in the history of the world that the media TALKED into a recession. :cuckoo:
 
The economy sucks. No amount of spin will change those facts. Wage growth is completely stagnant, and there are fewer people in the workforce than in anytime since the late 1970's. Why start a thread of utter bullshit?

I guess it's the Obama credo....tell the big lie and hope people are stupid enough to believe it. In this instance I don't think anyone believes it...not even the Kool-aid drinkers.
The workforce was in decline every year of the Bush Regime, even when employment peaked in 2007, and Bush didn't have the Boomers retiring, but the Right never said the the Bush economy sucked as the workforce declined. No they told us it was the best strongest economy in the history of the world that the media TALKED into a recession. :cuckoo:


WTF are you talking about? Bush got blamed for e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g. Or are you saying the recession of 2008 was not his fault?
 
The economy sucks. No amount of spin will change those facts. Wage growth is completely stagnant, and there are fewer people in the workforce than in anytime since the late 1970's. Why start a thread of utter bullshit?

I guess it's the Obama credo....tell the big lie and hope people are stupid enough to believe it. In this instance I don't think anyone believes it...not even the Kool-aid drinkers.
The workforce was in decline every year of the Bush Regime, even when employment peaked in 2007, and Bush didn't have the Boomers retiring, but the Right never said the the Bush economy sucked as the workforce declined. No they told us it was the best strongest economy in the history of the world that the media TALKED into a recession. :cuckoo:


WTF are you talking about? Bush got blamed for e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g. Or are you saying the recession of 2008 was not his fault?
The RIGHT blamed everyone else but Bush for everything that happened during the Bush Regime, 9/11 on Clinton, the first Bush Recession of 2001 on Clinton, the banking crisis on Carter, the housing crash on powerless minority Congressman Frank and powerless minority Senator Dodd, The Bush Depression of 2007 on Obama and the media. Everything Bush screwed up the Right blamed someone else.
 
The workforce was in decline every year of the Bush Regime, even when employment peaked in 2007, and Bush didn't have the Boomers retiring, but the Right never said the the Bush economy sucked as the workforce declined. No they told us it was the best strongest economy in the history of the world that the media TALKED into a recession. :cuckoo:


WTF are you talking about? Bush got blamed for e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g. Or are you saying the recession of 2008 was not his fault?
The RIGHT blamed everyone else but Bush for everything that happened during the Bush Regime, 9/11 on Clinton, the first Bush Recession of 2001 on Clinton, the banking crisis on Carter, the housing crash on powerless minority Congressman Frank and powerless minority Senator Dodd, The Bush Depression of 2007 on Obama and the media. Everything Bush screwed up the Right blamed someone else.


No they didn't. More bullshit.
 
Perspective: the Obama (Faux) Recovery is the Worst Evah!

boedicca-albums-mo-4-boedicca-s-stuff-picture6505-jobs.jpg

That's exactly because of the reduction of the size of government.

This recovery is what conservatives wanted. Of course they always claimed that smaller government would be a job creator for the private sector.

Stop blaming Obama for a scenario you conservatives wished for.
 
WTF are you talking about? Bush got blamed for e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g. Or are you saying the recession of 2008 was not his fault?
The RIGHT blamed everyone else but Bush for everything that happened during the Bush Regime, 9/11 on Clinton, the first Bush Recession of 2001 on Clinton, the banking crisis on Carter, the housing crash on powerless minority Congressman Frank and powerless minority Senator Dodd, The Bush Depression of 2007 on Obama and the media. Everything Bush screwed up the Right blamed someone else.


No they didn't. More bullshit.

You didn't?

Which of those did you blame on conservatives and/or Republicans?
 
WE cannot agree on BASIC FACTS.

So how can one have a serious discussion about this topic?

We cannot even agree on the numbers that the government posts.
 
I don't TRUST anything this administration puts out in the news

NOT ONE FRIKKEN THING

like you can keep your insurance plan if you like your plan

how sad we have come down to this about our Government? Especially under Obama and all his comrades he's unleashed on us in every government agency
 
Last edited:
The workforce was in decline every year of the Bush Regime, even when employment peaked in 2007, and Bush didn't have the Boomers retiring, but the Right never said the the Bush economy sucked as the workforce declined. No they told us it was the best strongest economy in the history of the world that the media TALKED into a recession. :cuckoo:


WTF are you talking about? Bush got blamed for e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g. Or are you saying the recession of 2008 was not his fault?
The RIGHT blamed everyone else but Bush for everything that happened during the Bush Regime, 9/11 on Clinton, the first Bush Recession of 2001 on Clinton, the banking crisis on Carter, the housing crash on powerless minority Congressman Frank and powerless minority Senator Dodd, The Bush Depression of 2007 on Obama and the media. Everything Bush screwed up the Right blamed someone else.

and the Left is doing the same thing right now....blaming everyone else but Obama during his regime.....its no wonder both parties suck so bad...
 

Forum List

Back
Top