Putin bought $100,000 in Facebook ads in the summer of 2016...Hillary spent $1.2 BILLION

Specifically, why is it OK for Obama to travel to England and ACTIVELY CAMPAIGN AGAINST BREXIT....but THE USA says that NO FOREIGN INFLUENCES ARE EVER ALLOWED TO AFFECT ANY OF OUR ELECTIONS?

We have quite a double standard, huh?

Is that American Exceptionalism that Obama was displaying in England?
You're angry because she spent more.

Don't worry. Putin "won". He got his boy Trump elected.

Imagine how much the children could have been helped with that $1.2 billion.

What about the children?!
Hilarious!

Republicans caring about children.

As if.

So funny. Ha Ha Ha Ha ................
they ain't killing children in a planned parenthood factory. Who's doing that?

American: Trump May have obstructed Justice.

Nutbag: Abortion!! Abortion!!
 
They did the same in Israel.
Specifically, why is it OK for Obama to travel to England and ACTIVELY CAMPAIGN AGAINST BREXIT....but THE USA says that NO FOREIGN INFLUENCES ARE EVER ALLOWED TO AFFECT ANY OF OUR ELECTIONS?

We have quite a double standard, huh?

Is that American Exceptionalism that Obama was displaying in England?
no, our govt really DID NOT do that in Israel...?



tom-mostlyfalse.png

Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel


"Obama has been sending taxpayer dollars, at least $350,000 to fund anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for (the) election."
Bloggers on Monday, March 16th, 2015 in a blog post
 
And that is why the greatest FOREIGN INTERFERENCE in US ELECTIONS is from

ISRAEL

the majority of Hillary's $$$$$$$$$$$$ come from AIPAC.


Want to eliminate foreign interference in US elections?


1. declare AIPAC a foreign donor, which they are
2. purge the US media of Zionists
 
this explains a lot on how it worked....

Russia’s Facebook Fake News Could Have Reached 70 Million Americans

Russian-funded covert propaganda posts on Facebook were likely seen by a minimum of 23 million people and might have reached as many as 70 million, according to analysis by an expert on the social-media giant’s complex advertising systems. That means up to 28 percent of American adults were swept in by the campaign.

On Wednesday, Facebook’s chief security officer, Alex Stamos, revealed that Russia had “likely” used 470 fake accounts to buy about $100,000 worth of advertising promoting “divisive social and political messages” to Americans. It was Facebook’s first public acknowledgment of the role it unwittingly played in the Kremlin’s “active measures” campaign. Stamos’ statement was also conspicuous by what it omitted: Facebook has refused to release the ads. More significant, it hasn’t said what kind of reach Russia attained with its ad buy.

There may be a reason for that. On the surface, $100,000 is small change in contemporary national politics, and 3,000 ads sounds like a drop in the pond when Facebook boasts 2 billion monthly users. But it turns out $100,000 on Facebook can go a surprisingly long way, if it’s used right. On average, Facebook ads run about $6 for 1,000 impressions. By that number, the Kremlin’s $100,000 buy would get its ads seen nearly 17 million times.

But that average hides a lot of complexity, and the actual rate can range from $1 to $100 for 1,000 impressions on an ad with pinpoint targeting. Virality matters, too. Ads that get more shares, likes, and comments are far cheaper than boring ads that nobody likes, and ads that send users to Facebook posts instead of third-party websites enjoy an additional price break. Finally, there are network effects, which can vastly multiply the number of users who see a promoted Facebook post.

“If they got a super high engagement rate, they’re not only going to get the traffic that you get from paying, but you get this viral factor that can multiply it,” said Dennis Yu, CTO and co-founder of BlitzMetrics, an ad agency that deals exclusively with Facebook ads. “You buy one impression and you get 20 additional impressions.”

Politically charged posts—especially salacious ones—draw high engagement, said Yu. “With certain topics it’s kind of hard to lose. ‘Hillary Clinton got caught hiding something!’ Well, OK. I already believe she hides stuff.” Yu said he suspects Russia maximized its impact with a basic strategy practiced by Facebook marketers: Seed a new Facebook post with a tiny buy as low as $1 a day, then watch Facebook’s ad console and see if the post catches fire. If it doesn’t, write it off and start on the next post. But if people begin engaging with the post in a serious way, you go all in.

GoDaddy and the Golden State Warriors. “Then you’re going to boost the heck out of that sucker. You’re going to put $10,000 on it. And Facebook’s algorithm already knows who to show it to, like the friends of the people who already liked it… It’s a risk-free lottery. The minimum cost is $1 per day.”
 
Specifically, why is it OK for Obama to travel to England and ACTIVELY CAMPAIGN AGAINST BREXIT....but THE USA says that NO FOREIGN INFLUENCES ARE EVER ALLOWED TO AFFECT ANY OF OUR ELECTIONS?

We have quite a double standard, huh?

You are just figuring that out? The only country to ever use a nuke is also the country that thinks it has the right to tell countries which ones are allowed to have them and which are not.
 
Specifically, why is it OK for Obama to travel to England and ACTIVELY CAMPAIGN AGAINST BREXIT....but THE USA says that NO FOREIGN INFLUENCES ARE EVER ALLOWED TO AFFECT ANY OF OUR ELECTIONS?

We have quite a double standard, huh?

You are just figuring that out? The only country to ever use a nuke is also the country that thinks it has the right to tell countries which ones are allowed to have them and which are not.
But who else would you trust with the job? I personally don't know the answer to that....
 
They did the same in Israel.
Specifically, why is it OK for Obama to travel to England and ACTIVELY CAMPAIGN AGAINST BREXIT....but THE USA says that NO FOREIGN INFLUENCES ARE EVER ALLOWED TO AFFECT ANY OF OUR ELECTIONS?

We have quite a double standard, huh?

Is that American Exceptionalism that Obama was displaying in England?
no, our govt really DID NOT do that in Israel...?



tom-mostlyfalse.png

Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel


"Obama has been sending taxpayer dollars, at least $350,000 to fund anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for (the) election."
Bloggers on Monday, March 16th, 2015 in a blog post


Bullshit..

Where were you on this monster thread where I proved with out a doubt Obama meddeld in isreal election ?

7 reasons why liberals are incapable of understanding the world
 
They did the same in Israel.
Specifically, why is it OK for Obama to travel to England and ACTIVELY CAMPAIGN AGAINST BREXIT....but THE USA says that NO FOREIGN INFLUENCES ARE EVER ALLOWED TO AFFECT ANY OF OUR ELECTIONS?

We have quite a double standard, huh?

Is that American Exceptionalism that Obama was displaying in England?
no, our govt really DID NOT do that in Israel...?



tom-mostlyfalse.png

Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel


"Obama has been sending taxpayer dollars, at least $350,000 to fund anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for (the) election."
Bloggers on Monday, March 16th, 2015 in a blog post


Obama’s offensive against Netanyahu backfires
By Marc A. Thiessen

February 2, 2015 at 10:45 AM

The Obamaadministration is going all out to see that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is defeated, but the campaign of veiled threats and anonymous leaks is backfiring: Instead of sinking in the polls, Netanyahu is rising.


When Netanyahu accepted House Speaker John Boehner’s invitation to address a joint meeting of Congress in supportof new sanctions on Iran, the Obama administration began a full-scale press offensive with a clear message: Netanyahu was endangering Israel by playing politics with the country’srelationship with the United States.Secretary of State John F. Kerry warned(through ananonymous aide) that “playing politics with that relationship could blunt [Kerry’s]enthusiasm for being Israel’s primarydefender” and revealed that Israel’s Mossadintelligence agency had told him that new a sanctions bill would be “like throwing a grenade” into the negotiations with Iran. A senior administration officialdeclaredominously to Haaretz that “President Obama has a year and a half left to his presidency, and that there will be a price.” A member of “Obama’s inner circle” launched an attackagainst Israeli ambassador RonDermer in the New York Times, accusing him of having “repeatedlyplaced Mr. Netanyahu’s political fortunes above the relationship between Israel and the United States.” The Times noted “Suchofficially authorized criticisms of diplomatsfrom major allies are unusual.” The message to Israeli voters was unmistakable: If they reelect Netanyahu,Israel will pay a “price
 
Specifically, why is it OK for Obama to travel to England and ACTIVELY CAMPAIGN AGAINST BREXIT....but THE USA says that NO FOREIGN INFLUENCES ARE EVER ALLOWED TO AFFECT ANY OF OUR ELECTIONS?

We have quite a double standard, huh?

Is that American Exceptionalism that Obama was displaying in England?
You're angry because she spent more.

Don't worry. Putin "won". He got his boy Trump elected.

Imagine how much the children could have been helped with that $1.2 billion.

What about the children?!
Hilarious!

Republicans caring about children.

As if.

So funny. Ha Ha Ha Ha ................
they ain't killing children in a planned parenthood factory. Who's doing that?
If you know where children are being killed shame on you for sitting on your ass playing with a keyboard. Man up and ACT!
 
I love it. Our USMB nutbags are so desperate to defend their shitbag moron that they are judging the actions of a hostile Russia with more slack than those of fellow Americans.


View attachment 168217

Incorrect meme is incorrect.


Alternative facts ?

So why did Debbie have to step down?

Perception. It’s USUALLY enough to sink a public servant.


And Donna doesn't ring a bell?


Donna Brazile: I found 'proof' the DNC rigged the nomination for Hillary Clinton


Last year's presidential primary between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders was rigged by the Democratic National Committee - just as Sanders' supporters suspected - to hand the nomination to Clinton, according to a bombshell claim by Donna Brazile. The onetime Clinton confidante, CNN commentator and former interim party boss made the explosive claim Thursday while touting a new book that could sever her ties to Team Clinton for good.
 
Hillary's $1.2 billion couldn't defeat $100,000 in Facebook ads? :badgrin:

How did we expect her to influence foreign leaders when she can't even influence US voters with $1.2 billion more than Russia did with $100,000 in Facebook ads in the summer of 2016?

Good Lord

Let's add another fact or two to your post:
Here's How Much of His Own Money Donald Trump Spent on His Campaign
"U.S. President-elect Donald Trump pumped a total of $66 million of his own money into his campaign – far from the $100 million he frequently boasted he was going to spend, according to campaign finance disclosures filed on Thursday night."
 
Hillary's $1.2 billion couldn't defeat $100,000 in Facebook ads? :badgrin:

How did we expect her to influence foreign leaders when she can't even influence US voters with $1.2 billion more than Russia did with $100,000 in Facebook ads in the summer of 2016?

Good Lord

Let's add another fact or two to your post:
Here's How Much of His Own Money Donald Trump Spent on His Campaign
"U.S. President-elect Donald Trump pumped a total of $66 million of his own money into his campaign – far from the $100 million he frequently boasted he was going to spend, according to campaign finance disclosures filed on Thursday night."


So you posting Hillary out spent Trump?


Glad you finally know the facts

.
 
Specifically, why is it OK for Obama to travel to England and ACTIVELY CAMPAIGN AGAINST BREXIT....but THE USA says that NO FOREIGN INFLUENCES ARE EVER ALLOWED TO AFFECT ANY OF OUR ELECTIONS?

We have quite a double standard, huh?

Is that American Exceptionalism that Obama was displaying in England?
You're angry because she spent more.

Don't worry. Putin "won". He got his boy Trump elected.

Imagine how much the children could have been helped with that $1.2 billion.

What about the children?!

What about the links?

Oh wait. There still aren't any.
 

Forum List

Back
Top