Putin tells Poland any aggression against Belarus is attack on Russia

Fuck around and find out Putin. If Russia attacks Poland Russia is going to get properly fucked up. They'll be lucky to keep Moscow.
+1
BjElmy6IIAAEwPV.jpg

 
The Belarusian artist Vlad Bokhan introduced himself as a member of United Russia and demanded that the school in Klin hold an action "Work sets you free" with the slogan "One people, one nation, one ruler." readiness to carry out any order of the ruling party is frightening


FV9P1pPX0AMejjH
 
Who knows? And yes, if the Poland's mercenaries can fight in Russia, Russian mercenaries can fight in Poland, too.
Fight in Russia? They might fight in defending their friends in Ukraine from your demented dictator and his private Muslim horde, but no one is fighting in Russia.

Maybe that is why you have centuries of autocratic rule and violent, depraved dictators.
 
Fight in Russia? They might fight in defending their friends in Ukraine from your demented dictator and his private Muslim horde, but no one is fighting in Russia.

Maybe that is why you have centuries of autocratic rule and violent, depraved dictators.
Actually, Lukashenko just declared that the PMC Wagner wants to "have a tour" in Poland (specifically in Rzeszaw and Warsaw) and he hardly can prevent it.

 
To use military force, but not to declare the war. It's still up to Congress.
It's hard to talk to someone as stupid as you, but when the Senate acccepted the NATO treaty, Congress implicitly gave the authorization to the aministration to use military force as required to meet America's obligations if article 5 is activated.
 
It's hard to talk to someone as stupid as you, but when the Senate acccepted the NATO treaty, Congress implicitly gave the authorization to the aministration to use military force as required to meet America's obligations if article 5 is activated.
One more time. "Usage of military force" and "declaring a war" are close, but not equal terms.
 
A distinction without a difference. No further congressional authorization is necessary to send troops if article 5 is activated.
Really? Fighting a war (especially a large-scale war against Russia) is much more sophisticated thing than just sending troops.
First of all, even the preparation to the large-scale war with Russia demands significant efforts.
 
Really? Fighting a war (especially a large-scale war against Russia) is much more sophisticated thing than just sending troops.
First of all, even the preparation to the large-scale war with Russia demands significant efforts.
Again, you show us how stupid you are. Article 5 does not authorize war against Russia but only military force to stop Russian aggression against NATO members. The troops needed to do that are nearly all there now.
 
Again, you show us how stupid you are. Article 5 does not authorize war against Russia but only military force to stop Russian aggression against NATO members. The troops needed to do that are nearly all there now.
You can't win a war with Russia by this peace-time forces. They are not even supposed to win a war. They supposed to buy some time to allow NATO prepare the war-time forces.
 
You can't win a war with Russia by this peace-time forces. They are not even supposed to win a war. They supposed to buy some time to allow NATO prepare the war-time forces.
No, they are actually sufficient to stop a Russian attack. The Russian military is just a faint echo of what the USSR military once was.
 
No, they are actually sufficient to stop a Russian attack. The Russian military is just a faint echo of what the USSR military once was.
Of course, no. Russia has thousands of tactical nukes. And NATO forces hardly have capabilities to intercept all of them.
 
Of course, no. Russia has thousands of tactical nukes. And NATO forces hardly have capabilities to intercept all of them.
So we agree, the Russian military is almost nothing and the only answer Russia can ever give is to threaten nuclear war, in effect, to commit suicide.
 

Forum List

Back
Top