- Feb 22, 2017
- 109,482
- 38,112
Here's some basic math for you:Who says GDP growth gets harder as the economy gets bigger? That certainly hasn't proved to be true in the cases of China and India.Who says that?So, the slow steady decline of the GDP growth for the last 30 years is Obama's fault?
Has nothing to do with the simple mathematics that the larger some thing gets the harder it is to get high percentage changes.
who says what?
Basic math, something that seems to escape you.
If you add $10,000 to $100,000 you have a growth rate of 0.09 or 9%. If you add 10,000 to 1,000,000 you have a growth rate of 0.0099 or roughly 1%.
That is why a 100 point rally for the DJI is not a big deal like it was 20 years ago.
If $100,000 grows by 10%, then it grows by 10%.
If $1,000,000 grows by 10%, then it grows by 10%.
China's economy grows by 10%/yr, and it has the 2nd largest economy on earth. Obviously, shear size is not a constraint on growth.
China's GDP has not hit 10% growth in almost 9 years and likely never will again...because it has gotten so big.
This is not some radical idea, everything works this way.
Which is easier to do, go from 10% to 8% unemployment or from 4% to 2%?
10 years ago a gain of 150 points was a 2% jump for the DJI, today a gain of 150 points is .56% jump.