Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hhaha that's not the way it works....while hte DOJ might not of had it, the Govt nonetheless did, and thus is deemed to be in their position. The fact that corrupt Dems on the Committee hide the stuff doesn't mean it's not a violation of Brady
It didn’t have to do with Chansley.Hahahah it had to do with the videos....Chansley's case was one of many impacted by the Govt violating their US Constitutional rights.
Keep making excuses for your Demafascist that shit all over the rule of law and lied
And that's the problem when the political system is weaponized against those who the system doesn't like.
"So what if we broke the law and the Constitution? We can threaten our way out of it!!!"
Yes, it is without question the lawyers stated they did not ever get these videos from the Govt. That's absolutely a fact
No we don’t all know it.You haven’t described any misbehavior. You are making arguments based on hypotheticals or misunderstanding of what due process actually is.
Chansley took a plea deal because he was fucked. We all know it.
True. Some of you are kept ignorant.No we don’t all know it.
yes, prosecutors have to disclouse the material in the Govts position. Prosecutors work for the Govt tooLOL
Yet again, you demonstrate you're either not reading what YOU post or you're not understanding it.
YOU posted...
The Brady rule, named after Brady v. Maryland, requires prosecutors to disclose material, exculpatory information...
The emphasis is mine to show you Brady does not extend to other areas of the government beyond the DoJ.
other then when i showed you that it was trueYou also said the DoJ said they didn't turn it over. That proved to be untrue.
um Brady deals with people's Constitutional right to Due Process. The Demafasict hide brady evidence.It didn’t have to do with Chansley.
No constitutional rights were violated. The DoJ was in the process of discovery, having already turned over massive amounts of video to him.
If he wanted to wait for the DoJ to complete discovery, he was free to do so. He chose to take the deal instead.
If he wanted all the Brady material, he shouldn’t have jumped the gun and taken the plea deal.um Brady deals with people's Constitutional right to Due Process. The Demafasict hide brady evidence.
They had a duty to turn it over right away.....he wasn't sentenced until November, they had 11 months.......nope it was hidden. The Govt was well aware of the videos in the Capital, and they hide and refused to turn it over, the Dems are still pissed it was released.If he wanted all the Brady material, he shouldn’t have jumped the gun and taken the plea deal.
It wasn’t hidden, he just wasnt patient enough.
They have a duty to turn it over before trial.They had a duty to turn it over right away
She was half in and out of the window, and he was the only cop the whole day who felt the need to. There were SWAT armed cops on the same side of the barrier and they didn't feel the need to open fire.
Look at the video of the aftermath, heavily armed cops amongst the crowd, with no one else being shot at.
The guy panicked and shot an unarmed woman.
But of course since she was a righty, it's OK in your book.
Pour Encouragement les Autres isn't a justifiable reason for deadly force.
they have a duty to turn it over as soon as possible so that it could be used at trial. We already went over this.They have a duty to turn it over before trial.
It never went to trial.
Therefore it can’t be said it was hidden.
The narrative the XIden DOJ went with about him was a lie....this video clearly shows that, that is favorable evidence to the Defendant and required under the law to be turned over.
That’s what they were doing.they have a duty to turn it over as soon as possible
of course it matters if they were lying in their prosecution...geez man....you think Prosecutors can simply lie their way to a conviction? What sort of National Socialist style system do you want?It doesn't matter what their narrative was. Again, he was neither charged with, nor pled guilty to, a violent crime.
He pled guilty for entering the Capitol.and not leaving when first told to leave.
More video of him meandering around the Capitol only serves to bolster the prosecution's case.
yes, prosecutors have to disclouse the material in the Govts position. Prosecutors work for the Govt too
um,....the Govt had the evidence....it was the Prosecutor's job to get it and turn it over.No, they don't. It's absurd to say prosecutors need to turn over evidence they don't have.
other then when i showed you that it was true
