Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Polygamy is not marriage, its merely cohabitation, its already legal in all 50 states.
LOL....polygamy is legal?
You should have been Tom Green's lawyer then because the court sure didn't see it your way.
Polygamy is not marriage, its merely cohabitation, its already legal in all 50 states.
LOL....polygamy is legal?
You should have been Tom Green's lawyer then because the court sure didn't see it your way.
You need to say more current on this and similar issues:
Federal judge finds part of Utah?s polygamy ban unconstitutional | FOX13Now.com
Funny how all the wacky fringe deviants insist that the red line of acceptable behavior be drawn such to exclude their own particular abomination isn't it? I mean, in a society that refuses to set a red line of acceptable behavior you'll eventually see the red line lowered further and further away from any norm as we understand it.
Why does this culture insist that the best way to go is to accept and embrace the lowest common denominator of behavior I'll never know.
The lowest common denominator of behavior would be those seeking to deny same-sex couples their equal protection rights, as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.
LOL....polygamy is legal?
You should have been Tom Green's lawyer then because the court sure didn't see it your way.
You need to say more current on this and similar issues:
Federal judge finds part of Utah?s polygamy ban unconstitutional | FOX13Now.com
I'm aware of the ruling. Do you really think that judge has the final say?
Funny how all the wacky fringe deviants insist that the red line of acceptable behavior be drawn such to exclude their own particular abomination isn't it? I mean, in a society that refuses to set a red line of acceptable behavior you'll eventually see the red line lowered further and further away from any norm as we understand it.
Why does this culture insist that the best way to go is to accept and embrace the lowest common denominator of behavior I'll never know.
The lowest common denominator of behavior would be those seeking to deny same-sex couples their equal protection rights, as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.
Seeking to deny American citizens their civil liberties is the greatest of abominations.
The lowest common denominator of behavior would be those seeking to deny same-sex couples their equal protection rights, as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.
SCOTUS sayz...not a 14th issue
but a 10th issue
See Windsor
The court hereby declares that Amendment 3 is unconstitutional because it denies the Plaintiffs their rights to due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
[T]he Windsor Court did not base its decision on the Tenth Amendment.6 Instead, the Court grounded its holding in the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which protects an individuals right to liberty. Id. at 2695 (DOMA is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the liberty of the person protected by the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.). The Court found that DOMA violated the Fifth Amendment because the statute place[d] same-sex couples in an unstable position of being in a second-tier marriage, a differentiation that demean[ed] the couple, whose moral and sexual choices the Constitution protects[.] Id. at 2694.
Funny how all the wacky fringe deviants insist that the red line of acceptable behavior be drawn such to exclude their own particular abomination isn't it? I mean, in a society that refuses to set a red line of acceptable behavior you'll eventually see the red line lowered further and further away from any norm as we understand it.
Why does this culture insist that the best way to go is to accept and embrace the lowest common denominator of behavior I'll never know.
The lowest common denominator of behavior would be those seeking to deny same-sex couples their equal protection rights, as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.
Seeking to deny American citizens their civil liberties is the greatest of abominations.
The 14th???? Are you just making this stuff up as you go???? Polygamy is legal???? Good grief.
Wouldn't equality for them necessitate polygamy. Evaluate they are attracted to both sexes and it's possible they could love a man and a woman?
The lowest common denominator of behavior would be those seeking to deny same-sex couples their equal protection rights, as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.
SCOTUS sayz...not a 14th issue
but a 10th issue
See Windsor
Incorrect.
Windsor concerned Federal law, not state.
Funny how all the wacky fringe deviants insist that the red line of acceptable behavior be drawn such to exclude their own particular abomination isn't it? I mean, in a society that refuses to set a red line of acceptable behavior you'll eventually see the red line lowered further and further away from any norm as we understand it.
Why does this culture insist that the best way to go is to accept and embrace the lowest common denominator of behavior I'll never know.
The lowest common denominator of behavior would be those seeking to deny same-sex couples their equal protection rights, as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.
Seeking to deny American citizens their civil liberties is the greatest of abominations.
The 14th???? Are you just making this stuff up as you go???? Polygamy is legal???? Good grief.
Polygamists get arrested for even trying to marry. Have fags ever had that?
Polygamists get arrested for even trying to marry. Have fags ever had that?
Polygamists get arrested for even trying to marry. Have fags ever had that?
Have gays ever been arrested for being gay you mean? Google Stonewall riot.
