Question about immigration

[Votto]

Why is it that people are allowed to invade the US illegally by the thousands?


Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Why is the government not protecting the citizens from the invasion from the thousands of illegal immigrants every year when they have a Constitutional obligation to do so?

 

[Votto]

How can the courts stop Trump from detaining and returning illegal aliens when the laws on the books state that is what is to be done? Why does Trump even need to sign an Executive Order to do so?

And why did the GOP not challenge the Obama Executive Order to protect certain illegal aliens when it defies the laws on the books?

 

[ColonelAngus]

Why is it that people are allowed to invade the US illegally by the thousands?


Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Why is the government not protecting the citizens from the invasion from the thousands of illegal immigrants every year when they have a Constitutional obligation to do so?

The Democrats want the votes.

If these illegal immigrants happened to be voting Republican, the Dems would be clamoring for Federal Law to be enforced.

 

[ColonelAngus]

How can the courts stop Trump from detaining and returning illegal aliens when the laws on the books state that is what is to be done? Why does Trump even need to sign an Executive Order to do so?

And why did the GOP not challenge the Obama Executive Order to protect certain illegal aliens when it defies the laws on the books?

It does seem funny to have to sign an EO to enforce current laws.

 

[Votto]

How can the courts stop Trump from detaining and returning illegal aliens when the laws on the books state that is what is to be done? Why does Trump even need to sign an Executive Order to do so?

And why did the GOP not challenge the Obama Executive Order to protect certain illegal aliens when it defies the laws on the books?

It does seem funny to have to sign an EO to enforce current laws.

No, no, it's insane, not funny.

 

[ColonelAngus]

How can the courts stop Trump from detaining and returning illegal aliens when the laws on the books state that is what is to be done? Why does Trump even need to sign an Executive Order to do so?

And why did the GOP not challenge the Obama Executive Order to protect certain illegal aliens when it defies the laws on the books?

It does seem funny to have to sign an EO to enforce current laws.

No, no, it's insane, not funny.

I should have used peculiar.

Trump is a racist for enforcing Federal Laws.

I can't wait for him to strip all sanctuary cities of all federal tax subsidies.

 

[FA_Q2]

How can the courts stop Trump from detaining and returning illegal aliens when the laws on the books state that is what is to be done? Why does Trump even need to sign an Executive Order to do so?

And why did the GOP not challenge the Obama Executive Order to protect certain illegal aliens when it defies the laws on the books?

They can't. Is there somewhere that the courts have stated he is not legally allowed to enforce immigration standards?

 

[Clementine]

Why is it that people are allowed to invade the US illegally by the thousands?


Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Why is the government not protecting the citizens from the invasion from the thousands of illegal immigrants every year when they have a Constitutional obligation to do so?

The Democrats want the votes.

If these illegal immigrants happened to be voting Republican, the Dems would be clamoring for Federal Law to be enforced.

Even Bill Clinton called for secure borders, saying that illegal immigration was a problem for us. And the left cheered and reelected him. Since then, the radicals have taken over the Dem party. I noticed during the DNC conventions in 2008 and 2012 that communists seemed to be running it.

Now we have the extremists calling for a revolution. I think they want global socialism/communism. That means one world government dictators, wealth redistribution, equal sharing of misery, and no borders. Every single protest/riot over the past few years has been organized by these radicals and paid for by Soros and his ilk. None of the vagina costume wearing protesters or those calling for the death of cops realize that they are puppets and part of a big plan to destroy the moral fabric of our society. These people who want to destroy capitalist America saw their plan close to becoming reality until Hillary lost. Now they've stepped it up and aren't even afraid to start being honest about wanting a revolution. Of course, they aren't being honest about the endgame. These protesters actually believe they need to protest for things they already have or to protest against racist cops when it's not the problem they think it is.

Protesting a legal election is just crazy but these people know how to play on the emotions of the sheep.

Of course, they don't want people armed. Their idea of a revolution is to attack innocent, helpless people into submission. They don't want real opposition. People like Hillary want this. Hillary already said that we don't have a right to guns and she did plan to ban them. She can lie all she wants but it's the truth. She wanted open borders and one world government and said as much in her Wall Street speeches.

I'm hearing more and more radicals admit that they want a bloody revolution because they hate capitalism and are bound and determined to stop it, along with our liberty and freedom. Fuck them all. They are still outnumbered and stupid if they think the majority of Americans will go along with them.

The fact that Trump is being sued for trying to uphold our immigration laws is proof of how the left has no regard for any laws other than the ones they want. Even Arizona was sued for trying to uphold the law. This is how the left operates these days. It's not about our constitution and laws. It's about getting what they want and behaving like tyrants in order to make their agenda reality.

All of the politicians who directly broke our nation's laws should be charged. That is especially true of those who turned our cities into sanctuary cities.

 

[Votto]

How can the courts stop Trump from detaining and returning illegal aliens when the laws on the books state that is what is to be done? Why does Trump even need to sign an Executive Order to do so?

And why did the GOP not challenge the Obama Executive Order to protect certain illegal aliens when it defies the laws on the books?

They can't. Is there somewhere that the courts have stated he is not legally allowed to enforce immigration standards?

Sanctuary cities have openly stated they will challenge Trump in the courts for trying to send these folks back to where they came from, openly defying the Executive Branch and illegal immigration laws.

It just boggles the mind.

 

[Votto]

Why is it that people are allowed to invade the US illegally by the thousands?


Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Why is the government not protecting the citizens from the invasion from the thousands of illegal immigrants every year when they have a Constitutional obligation to do so?

The Democrats want the votes.

If these illegal immigrants happened to be voting Republican, the Dems would be clamoring for Federal Law to be enforced.

Even Bill Clinton called for secure borders, saying that illegal immigration was a problem for us. And the left cheered and reelected him. Since then, the radicals have taken over the Dem party. I noticed during the DNC conventions in 2008 and 2012 that communists seemed to be running it.

Now we have the extremists calling for a revolution. I think they want global socialism/communism. That means one world government dictators, wealth redistribution, equal sharing of misery, and no borders. Every single protest/riot over the past few years has been organized by these radicals and paid for by Soros and his ilk. None of the vagina costume wearing protesters or those calling for the death of cops realize that they are puppets and part of a big plan to destroy the moral fabric of our society. These people who want to destroy capitalist America saw their plan close to becoming reality until Hillary lost. Now they've stepped it up and aren't even afraid to start being honest about wanting a revolution. Of course, they aren't being honest about the endgame. These protesters actually believe they need to protest for things they already have or to protest against racist cops when it's not the problem they think it is.

Protesting a legal election is just crazy but these people know how to play on the emotions of the sheep.

Of course, they don't want people armed. Their idea of a revolution is to attack innocent, helpless people into submission. They don't want real opposition. People like Hillary want this. Hillary already said that we don't have a right to guns and she did plan to ban them. She can lie all she wants but it's the truth. She wanted open borders and one world government and said as much in her Wall Street speeches.

I'm hearing more and more radicals admit that they want a bloody revolution because they hate capitalism and are bound and determined to stop it, along with our liberty and freedom. Fuck them all. They are still outnumbered and stupid if they think the majority of Americans will go along with them.

The fact that Trump is being sued for trying to uphold our immigration laws is proof of how the left has no regard for any laws other than the ones they want. Even Arizona was sued for trying to uphold the law. This is how the left operates these days. It's not about our constitution and laws. It's about getting what they want and behaving like tyrants in order to make their agenda reality.

All of the politicians who directly broke our nation's laws should be charged. That is especially true of those who turned our cities into sanctuary cities.

The goal of any collectivist is world wide domination. So instead of referring to it as a Fourth Reich, they simply call themselves globalists.

The goal is to end nationalism and borders. The court system is stacked with people that now view immigration as a natural right.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

How can the courts stop Trump from detaining and returning illegal aliens when the laws on the books state that is what is to be done? Why does Trump even need to sign an Executive Order to do so?

And why did the GOP not challenge the Obama Executive Order to protect certain illegal aliens when it defies the laws on the books?

They can't. Is there somewhere that the courts have stated he is not legally allowed to enforce immigration standards?

Sanctuary cities have openly stated they will challenge Trump in the courts for trying to send these folks back to where they came from, openly defying the Executive Branch and illegal immigration laws.

It just boggles the mind.

What else are they going to say?

They will huff and puff and beat their chests, but when the money is actually cutoff, they will have no choice but to give in......at least most of them.

In places like California, they have to put up a fight because not doing so would mean not getting reelected. So it's a do-or-die situation for them. Trump put them in a really bad position.

 

[Tehon]

Why is it that people are allowed to invade the US illegally by the thousands?

Economics.

Why is the government not protecting the citizens from the invasion from the thousands of illegal immigrants every year when they have a Constitutional obligation to do so?

The government works to protect capitalist interests first and foremost. Why does everyone not know this, it's elementary.

 

[ColonelAngus]

The media and the DEMS have colluded to make any enforcement of current immigration laws seem to be racist because they want the votes.

 

[WillReadmore]

Why is it that people are allowed to invade the US illegally by the thousands?


Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Why is the government not protecting the citizens from the invasion from the thousands of illegal immigrants every year when they have a Constitutional obligation to do so?

Are you suggesting ending tourism, business travel, etc?

 

[FA_Q2]

How can the courts stop Trump from detaining and returning illegal aliens when the laws on the books state that is what is to be done? Why does Trump even need to sign an Executive Order to do so?

And why did the GOP not challenge the Obama Executive Order to protect certain illegal aliens when it defies the laws on the books?

They can't. Is there somewhere that the courts have stated he is not legally allowed to enforce immigration standards?

Sanctuary cities have openly stated they will challenge Trump in the courts for trying to send these folks back to where they came from, openly defying the Executive Branch and illegal immigration laws.

It just boggles the mind.

They can bloviate all they want on the issue - they have no say in the feds enforcing immigration law. If the feds come by and deport illegals then the states simply have to abide by that enforcement. I seriously doubt that those cites will even bring a case to the courts as the outcome is a given. It has already been established through the SCOTUS (as though the constitution was not crystal clear in that on its own) that the feds have the final say in the matter.