Montrovant
Fuzzy bears!
I always wondered this. Hillary Clinton for instance. Terrible candidate, and terrible human being. Why do you have to say her and Podesta are running a satanic child sex trafficking ring out of the basement of a pizza shop? Are people so desperate about politics nowadays that they have to make up the most batshit crazy stories possible? Why not just say, "Look. It's Hillary Clinton."
They do it because Alex Jones, Glenn Beck, Hannity, everyone at Fox, and all the other right wing outlets do it. Lots of people believe all that bullshit is real.
Do you think only right-wing sources do that sort of thing?
I haven't heard of any republican child sex slave pizza places, or seen a list of dead people that a republican ex-president had murdered.
I don't want to argue about who has been the target of wilder stories, my point was just that people falling for false negative stories; having false negative stories being created; is not limited to "right wing outlets." I would agree that, based on those stories I can remember, at least, those targeting liberals/Democrats seem to more often fall into the tin-foil hat realm.![]()
Trying to say both parties share equal responsibility for bat shit crazy accusations is a lie. The right lost their mind quite a while ago, and there is no limit to what they will claim, and what their crazy followers will believe.
I don't know how much responsibility either of the two major parties has for the BS stories that get tossed about. Is a political party at fault if a media outlet runs with a story without verifying the content? Is a political party at fault if someone falls for a satire story as being real?
Besides, I didn't say anything about who has the most responsibility. I saw that your post was directed at "right wing outlets," which seemed to imply that those right wing outlets are responsible for all the BS political stories out there. I just asked if you believed that only right-wing sources do that sort of thing.