Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You couldn't afford to stay. You literally could not afford it.No, the question you should be asking yourself is why are you and most other conservatives so consistently wrong on the issues, including conservative advocacy that American ground forces be sent to the ME to fight the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state.'Since ISIS has a history of conducting mass executions of captured enemy soldiers, Candy...I can understand the reluctance of Iraqis to stand and fight against them.
The question you should be asking yourself is at what point do WE stand and fight against them? When they take the entire Middle East?
War-mongering conservatives were wrong in their advocacy of invading Iraq in 2003 just as they're wrong today in their advocacy of sending Americans to once again fight and die needlessly in Iraq.
If there's going to be any hope for long-term stability and peace in Iraq the Iraqi government and people alone must find their way to stability and peace absent unwarranted interference from the United States.
The fact you and most others on the war-mongering right fail to realize is that the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state' would prefer nothing more than the United States to send conventional military forces to the Region – making it easier to kill American soldiers, capture them for reasons of propaganda and exploitation, and justify the movement's legitimacy in the Muslim world that Americans and the West are 'hostile invaders' seeking to 'subjugate' the people of the Middle East.
Fortunately the president and American people reject conservative advocacy of sending Americans to again fight and die in a failed, pointless war.
Against the advice of both his military and his State Department, Barack Obama pulled out all US ground troops from Iraq. What's happening now is a direct result of that poor decision.
But remember, ISIS is no real threat. No worries really.
ISIS claims to have taken Ramadi Pentagon admits terror group has the advantage Fox News
Does that trick only work for islamists or is that why we are getting our butts kicked... for coming out in the open like we did?The more Isis comes out in the open, the more open they are to being taken out.
You couldn't afford to stay. You literally could not afford it.No, the question you should be asking yourself is why are you and most other conservatives so consistently wrong on the issues, including conservative advocacy that American ground forces be sent to the ME to fight the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state.'Since ISIS has a history of conducting mass executions of captured enemy soldiers, Candy...I can understand the reluctance of Iraqis to stand and fight against them.
The question you should be asking yourself is at what point do WE stand and fight against them? When they take the entire Middle East?
War-mongering conservatives were wrong in their advocacy of invading Iraq in 2003 just as they're wrong today in their advocacy of sending Americans to once again fight and die needlessly in Iraq.
If there's going to be any hope for long-term stability and peace in Iraq the Iraqi government and people alone must find their way to stability and peace absent unwarranted interference from the United States.
The fact you and most others on the war-mongering right fail to realize is that the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state' would prefer nothing more than the United States to send conventional military forces to the Region – making it easier to kill American soldiers, capture them for reasons of propaganda and exploitation, and justify the movement's legitimacy in the Muslim world that Americans and the West are 'hostile invaders' seeking to 'subjugate' the people of the Middle East.
Fortunately the president and American people reject conservative advocacy of sending Americans to again fight and die in a failed, pointless war.
Against the advice of both his military and his State Department, Barack Obama pulled out all US ground troops from Iraq. What's happening now is a direct result of that poor decision.
You're broke, sir. The only thing that keeps your economy sputtering along is the 5 trillion injected by the Fed, and hundreds of billions in new bonds issued year after year. Once that bubble bursts, the game is over.
If you can't afford not to engage ISIS, then you're screwed, because you literally can't afford the alternative either.You couldn't afford to stay. You literally could not afford it.No, the question you should be asking yourself is why are you and most other conservatives so consistently wrong on the issues, including conservative advocacy that American ground forces be sent to the ME to fight the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state.'Since ISIS has a history of conducting mass executions of captured enemy soldiers, Candy...I can understand the reluctance of Iraqis to stand and fight against them.
The question you should be asking yourself is at what point do WE stand and fight against them? When they take the entire Middle East?
War-mongering conservatives were wrong in their advocacy of invading Iraq in 2003 just as they're wrong today in their advocacy of sending Americans to once again fight and die needlessly in Iraq.
If there's going to be any hope for long-term stability and peace in Iraq the Iraqi government and people alone must find their way to stability and peace absent unwarranted interference from the United States.
The fact you and most others on the war-mongering right fail to realize is that the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state' would prefer nothing more than the United States to send conventional military forces to the Region – making it easier to kill American soldiers, capture them for reasons of propaganda and exploitation, and justify the movement's legitimacy in the Muslim world that Americans and the West are 'hostile invaders' seeking to 'subjugate' the people of the Middle East.
Fortunately the president and American people reject conservative advocacy of sending Americans to again fight and die in a failed, pointless war.
Against the advice of both his military and his State Department, Barack Obama pulled out all US ground troops from Iraq. What's happening now is a direct result of that poor decision.
You're broke, sir. The only thing that keeps your economy sputtering along is the 5 trillion injected by the Fed, and hundreds of billions in new bonds issued year after year. Once that bubble bursts, the game is over.
The US economy is still the strongest in the world...despite the idiots we have running it in Washington these days. What we can't "afford" is to let ISIS become strong enough to take over the Middle East. That's what's happened in large part because Barry and his merry band of progressive amateurs don't have a clue what they are doing when it comes to foreign policy. We've got John Kerry as our Secretary of State! He's probably the worst choice EVER for that post! He's a nice suit and an expensive hair cut with no skills at all at diplomacy.
America can't be broke. Just like the Europeans, we print our own money. If we needs some more we just add another zero to the debt clock.If you can't afford not to engage ISIS, then you're screwed, because you literally can't afford the alternative either.You couldn't afford to stay. You literally could not afford it.No, the question you should be asking yourself is why are you and most other conservatives so consistently wrong on the issues, including conservative advocacy that American ground forces be sent to the ME to fight the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state.'Since ISIS has a history of conducting mass executions of captured enemy soldiers, Candy...I can understand the reluctance of Iraqis to stand and fight against them.
The question you should be asking yourself is at what point do WE stand and fight against them? When they take the entire Middle East?
War-mongering conservatives were wrong in their advocacy of invading Iraq in 2003 just as they're wrong today in their advocacy of sending Americans to once again fight and die needlessly in Iraq.
If there's going to be any hope for long-term stability and peace in Iraq the Iraqi government and people alone must find their way to stability and peace absent unwarranted interference from the United States.
The fact you and most others on the war-mongering right fail to realize is that the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state' would prefer nothing more than the United States to send conventional military forces to the Region – making it easier to kill American soldiers, capture them for reasons of propaganda and exploitation, and justify the movement's legitimacy in the Muslim world that Americans and the West are 'hostile invaders' seeking to 'subjugate' the people of the Middle East.
Fortunately the president and American people reject conservative advocacy of sending Americans to again fight and die in a failed, pointless war.
Against the advice of both his military and his State Department, Barack Obama pulled out all US ground troops from Iraq. What's happening now is a direct result of that poor decision.
You're broke, sir. The only thing that keeps your economy sputtering along is the 5 trillion injected by the Fed, and hundreds of billions in new bonds issued year after year. Once that bubble bursts, the game is over.
The US economy is still the strongest in the world...despite the idiots we have running it in Washington these days. What we can't "afford" is to let ISIS become strong enough to take over the Middle East. That's what's happened in large part because Barry and his merry band of progressive amateurs don't have a clue what they are doing when it comes to foreign policy. We've got John Kerry as our Secretary of State! He's probably the worst choice EVER for that post! He's a nice suit and an expensive hair cut with no skills at all at diplomacy.
Even assuming the world had an infinite appetite for US debt, markets can only eat it up so quickly. Sec. Kerry is doing what the secretary of a broke nation does: Look nice in a suit; make a good show of trying to broker peace.
You don't have to take my word on "you can't afford another war". I'm telling you right now that regardless of who wins the 2016 election (it will be Ms. Clinton, for the record), you're not going to get another large-scale offensive against ISIS. You're broke. You can't afford it. Even if you don't realize it, your leaders are bound by this reality. You can scream "Pax Americana" at 'em all you want.
Running up debt works like a sunuvagun... until it doesn't.America can't be broke. Just like the Europeans, we print our own money. If we needs some more we just add another zero to the debt clock.If you can't afford not to engage ISIS, then you're screwed, because you literally can't afford the alternative either.You couldn't afford to stay. You literally could not afford it.No, the question you should be asking yourself is why are you and most other conservatives so consistently wrong on the issues, including conservative advocacy that American ground forces be sent to the ME to fight the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state.'
War-mongering conservatives were wrong in their advocacy of invading Iraq in 2003 just as they're wrong today in their advocacy of sending Americans to once again fight and die needlessly in Iraq.
If there's going to be any hope for long-term stability and peace in Iraq the Iraqi government and people alone must find their way to stability and peace absent unwarranted interference from the United States.
The fact you and most others on the war-mongering right fail to realize is that the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state' would prefer nothing more than the United States to send conventional military forces to the Region – making it easier to kill American soldiers, capture them for reasons of propaganda and exploitation, and justify the movement's legitimacy in the Muslim world that Americans and the West are 'hostile invaders' seeking to 'subjugate' the people of the Middle East.
Fortunately the president and American people reject conservative advocacy of sending Americans to again fight and die in a failed, pointless war.
Against the advice of both his military and his State Department, Barack Obama pulled out all US ground troops from Iraq. What's happening now is a direct result of that poor decision.
You're broke, sir. The only thing that keeps your economy sputtering along is the 5 trillion injected by the Fed, and hundreds of billions in new bonds issued year after year. Once that bubble bursts, the game is over.
The US economy is still the strongest in the world...despite the idiots we have running it in Washington these days. What we can't "afford" is to let ISIS become strong enough to take over the Middle East. That's what's happened in large part because Barry and his merry band of progressive amateurs don't have a clue what they are doing when it comes to foreign policy. We've got John Kerry as our Secretary of State! He's probably the worst choice EVER for that post! He's a nice suit and an expensive hair cut with no skills at all at diplomacy.
Even assuming the world had an infinite appetite for US debt, markets can only eat it up so quickly. Sec. Kerry is doing what the secretary of a broke nation does: Look nice in a suit; make a good show of trying to broker peace.
You don't have to take my word on "you can't afford another war". I'm telling you right now that regardless of who wins the 2016 election (it will be Ms. Clinton, for the record), you're not going to get another large-scale offensive against ISIS. You're broke. You can't afford it. Even if you don't realize it, your leaders are bound by this reality. You can scream "Pax Americana" at 'em all you want.
Then you just reset the monetary system. Easy button..Running up debt works like a sunuvagun... until it doesn't.America can't be broke. Just like the Europeans, we print our own money. If we needs some more we just add another zero to the debt clock.If you can't afford not to engage ISIS, then you're screwed, because you literally can't afford the alternative either.You couldn't afford to stay. You literally could not afford it.Against the advice of both his military and his State Department, Barack Obama pulled out all US ground troops from Iraq. What's happening now is a direct result of that poor decision.
You're broke, sir. The only thing that keeps your economy sputtering along is the 5 trillion injected by the Fed, and hundreds of billions in new bonds issued year after year. Once that bubble bursts, the game is over.
The US economy is still the strongest in the world...despite the idiots we have running it in Washington these days. What we can't "afford" is to let ISIS become strong enough to take over the Middle East. That's what's happened in large part because Barry and his merry band of progressive amateurs don't have a clue what they are doing when it comes to foreign policy. We've got John Kerry as our Secretary of State! He's probably the worst choice EVER for that post! He's a nice suit and an expensive hair cut with no skills at all at diplomacy.
Even assuming the world had an infinite appetite for US debt, markets can only eat it up so quickly. Sec. Kerry is doing what the secretary of a broke nation does: Look nice in a suit; make a good show of trying to broker peace.
You don't have to take my word on "you can't afford another war". I'm telling you right now that regardless of who wins the 2016 election (it will be Ms. Clinton, for the record), you're not going to get another large-scale offensive against ISIS. You're broke. You can't afford it. Even if you don't realize it, your leaders are bound by this reality. You can scream "Pax Americana" at 'em all you want.
*lol*Then you just reset the monetary system. Easy button..Running up debt works like a sunuvagun... until it doesn't.America can't be broke. Just like the Europeans, we print our own money. If we needs some more we just add another zero to the debt clock.If you can't afford not to engage ISIS, then you're screwed, because you literally can't afford the alternative either.You couldn't afford to stay. You literally could not afford it.
You're broke, sir. The only thing that keeps your economy sputtering along is the 5 trillion injected by the Fed, and hundreds of billions in new bonds issued year after year. Once that bubble bursts, the game is over.
The US economy is still the strongest in the world...despite the idiots we have running it in Washington these days. What we can't "afford" is to let ISIS become strong enough to take over the Middle East. That's what's happened in large part because Barry and his merry band of progressive amateurs don't have a clue what they are doing when it comes to foreign policy. We've got John Kerry as our Secretary of State! He's probably the worst choice EVER for that post! He's a nice suit and an expensive hair cut with no skills at all at diplomacy.
Even assuming the world had an infinite appetite for US debt, markets can only eat it up so quickly. Sec. Kerry is doing what the secretary of a broke nation does: Look nice in a suit; make a good show of trying to broker peace.
You don't have to take my word on "you can't afford another war". I'm telling you right now that regardless of who wins the 2016 election (it will be Ms. Clinton, for the record), you're not going to get another large-scale offensive against ISIS. You're broke. You can't afford it. Even if you don't realize it, your leaders are bound by this reality. You can scream "Pax Americana" at 'em all you want.
No, the question you should be asking yourself is why are you and most other conservatives so consistently wrong on the issues, including conservative advocacy that American ground forces be sent to the ME to fight the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state.'Since ISIS has a history of conducting mass executions of captured enemy soldiers, Candy...I can understand the reluctance of Iraqis to stand and fight against them.
The question you should be asking yourself is at what point do WE stand and fight against them? When they take the entire Middle East?
War-mongering conservatives were wrong in their advocacy of invading Iraq in 2003 just as they're wrong today in their advocacy of sending Americans to once again fight and die needlessly in Iraq.
If there's going to be any hope for long-term stability and peace in Iraq the Iraqi government and people alone must find their way to stability and peace absent unwarranted interference from the United States.
The fact you and most others on the war-mongering right fail to realize is that the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state' would prefer nothing more than the United States to send conventional military forces to the Region – making it easier to kill American soldiers, capture them for reasons of propaganda and exploitation, and justify the movement's legitimacy in the Muslim world that Americans and the West are 'hostile invaders' seeking to 'subjugate' the people of the Middle East.
Fortunately the president and American people reject conservative advocacy of sending Americans to again fight and die in a failed, pointless war.
Against the advice of both his military and his State Department, Barack Obama pulled out all US ground troops from Iraq. What's happening now is a direct result of that poor decision.
Fallujah is gone, Tikrit gone. To this obastard it is a success.No, the question you should be asking yourself is why are you and most other conservatives so consistently wrong on the issues, including conservative advocacy that American ground forces be sent to the ME to fight the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state.'Since ISIS has a history of conducting mass executions of captured enemy soldiers, Candy...I can understand the reluctance of Iraqis to stand and fight against them.
The question you should be asking yourself is at what point do WE stand and fight against them? When they take the entire Middle East?
War-mongering conservatives were wrong in their advocacy of invading Iraq in 2003 just as they're wrong today in their advocacy of sending Americans to once again fight and die needlessly in Iraq.
If there's going to be any hope for long-term stability and peace in Iraq the Iraqi government and people alone must find their way to stability and peace absent unwarranted interference from the United States.
The fact you and most others on the war-mongering right fail to realize is that the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state' would prefer nothing more than the United States to send conventional military forces to the Region – making it easier to kill American soldiers, capture them for reasons of propaganda and exploitation, and justify the movement's legitimacy in the Muslim world that Americans and the West are 'hostile invaders' seeking to 'subjugate' the people of the Middle East.
Fortunately the president and American people reject conservative advocacy of sending Americans to again fight and die in a failed, pointless war.
Against the advice of both his military and his State Department, Barack Obama pulled out all US ground troops from Iraq. What's happening now is a direct result of that poor decision.
As Oblahblah would say. Just a minor setback. The majority of Iraq is still a success.
Fallujah is gone, Tikrit gone. To this obastard it is a success.No, the question you should be asking yourself is why are you and most other conservatives so consistently wrong on the issues, including conservative advocacy that American ground forces be sent to the ME to fight the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state.'Since ISIS has a history of conducting mass executions of captured enemy soldiers, Candy...I can understand the reluctance of Iraqis to stand and fight against them.
The question you should be asking yourself is at what point do WE stand and fight against them? When they take the entire Middle East?
War-mongering conservatives were wrong in their advocacy of invading Iraq in 2003 just as they're wrong today in their advocacy of sending Americans to once again fight and die needlessly in Iraq.
If there's going to be any hope for long-term stability and peace in Iraq the Iraqi government and people alone must find their way to stability and peace absent unwarranted interference from the United States.
The fact you and most others on the war-mongering right fail to realize is that the self-proclaimed 'Islamic state' would prefer nothing more than the United States to send conventional military forces to the Region – making it easier to kill American soldiers, capture them for reasons of propaganda and exploitation, and justify the movement's legitimacy in the Muslim world that Americans and the West are 'hostile invaders' seeking to 'subjugate' the people of the Middle East.
Fortunately the president and American people reject conservative advocacy of sending Americans to again fight and die in a failed, pointless war.
Against the advice of both his military and his State Department, Barack Obama pulled out all US ground troops from Iraq. What's happening now is a direct result of that poor decision.
As Oblahblah would say. Just a minor setback. The majority of Iraq is still a success.
Haven't you heard that is just a setback. To quote Kevin Bacon near the end of animal house remain calm all is well.But remember, ISIS is no real threat. No worries really.
ISIS claims to have taken Ramadi Pentagon admits terror group has the advantage Fox News
JV TeamBut remember, ISIS is no real threat. No worries really.
ISIS claims to have taken Ramadi Pentagon admits terror group has the advantage Fox News
Ramadi is now under the full control of isis. The reports say that isis was a very small force both outnumbered and outgunned by the Iraqis. When the Iraqis saw that the American air strikes were having no effect, they broke and ran.
Fallujah is gone, Tikrit gone. To this obastard it is a success.
You do realize these people are invaders and they are killing Iraqis, ... right?Ramadi is now under the full control of isis. The reports say that isis was a very small force both outnumbered and outgunned by the Iraqis. When the Iraqis saw that the American air strikes were having no effect, they broke and ran.
Yes, Bush really fucked up by deposing Saddam, didn't he?
Oh, wait, that's not the point you were making, was it?
Look, everyone predicted this the minute it was clear that the Iraqis were not throwing flowers at our feet. That eventually, Iraq would break up into three countries, One Shi'ite, on Kurdish and one Sunni Arab.
The only difference between Iraq and the USA is the conservatives are still in power over most of the states. Once you authoritarians buy enough power with our taxes you'll be doing the same thing here in the states.Fallujah is gone, Tikrit gone. To this obastard it is a success.
Again, and this is our problem, why?
The Shi'ites in Baghdad decided they didn't want to share power. The Sunnis took matters into their own hands.
Why is this our problem again?
Ramadi is now under the full control of isis. The reports say that isis was a very small force both outnumbered and outgunned by the Iraqis. When the Iraqis saw that the American air strikes were having no effect, they broke and ran.
