Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Indefinite pronouns mean something, little buddy. Odium is something else, for sure.???? I doubt that anyone else sees what you are trying to say.Sure if you consider an echo chamber where you and the media that everyone hates are the only ones listening working...And it's working
Obviously it's not working if they don't have the support of a Nazi. I see your point
I'm saying he's a Nazi, moron. Do you read his posts? Sorry Odium, I mean you're a constipated socialist
Petraeus demonstrated a lack of qualifications to be at the rank he was besides hoping to be the SoS. He is not the man for the job.Only an idiot or a prig would claim Petraeus is not qualified.Because Rand Paul is discussing Petraeus's lack of qualifications to be SoS, not his candidates in the primaries now over.Rand Paul? Seriously? How many Republicans voted for Paul in the primaries?Republican Sen. Rand Paul said there's a "potential problem" with retired Gen. David Petraeus as secretary of state because of his "similarities" with former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton on classified information.
"You know, I think the problem they're going to have if they put him forward is there's a lot of similarities to Hillary Clinton as far as revealing classified information," Paul told CNN's Wolf Blitzer on "The Situation Room." "I think that's a potential problem."
Petraeus, once a widely celebrated military leader who oversaw operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, was sentenced to serve two years on probation and to pay a $100,000 fine for sharing classified information with his biographer and lover, Paula Broadwell.
But during the campaign, Trump castigated Clinton for her handling of classified information, despite the fact that an FBI investigation resulted in no charges being brought against her.
Rand Paul casts doubt on support of a Petraeus pick - CNNPolitics.com
One of the best parts of the election being over has been Rand Paul smacking down nearly all of Trump's rumored Secretary of State nominees. Maybe his terrible campaign taught him that becoming a hack to be palatable to a mainstream who will always hate him regardless doesn't make any sense. I would enjoy watching him be a thorn in Trump's side for four years.
How David Petraeus avoided felony charges and possible prison time
David Petraeus shared classified info. Now can he be secretary of state?
Can David Petraeus be secretary of state?
We saw how much support Pandering Paul got in the primaries eh? LOL...he is not even close to his father...his father had principles and much like me he refused to change them to pander to people. His son is a cuck.Sure if you consider an echo chamber where you and the media that everyone hates are the only ones listening working...Who gives a shit what Rand thinks? I mean really? He is DESPERATELY trying to stay relevant.Republican Sen. Rand Paul said there's a "potential problem" with retired Gen. David Petraeus as secretary of state because of his "similarities" with former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton on classified information.
"You know, I think the problem they're going to have if they put him forward is there's a lot of similarities to Hillary Clinton as far as revealing classified information," Paul told CNN's Wolf Blitzer on "The Situation Room." "I think that's a potential problem."
Petraeus, once a widely celebrated military leader who oversaw operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, was sentenced to serve two years on probation and to pay a $100,000 fine for sharing classified information with his biographer and lover, Paula Broadwell.
But during the campaign, Trump castigated Clinton for her handling of classified information, despite the fact that an FBI investigation resulted in no charges being brought against her.
Rand Paul casts doubt on support of a Petraeus pick - CNNPolitics.com
One of the best parts of the election being over has been Rand Paul smacking down nearly all of Trump's rumored Secretary of State nominees. Maybe his terrible campaign taught him that becoming a hack to be palatable to a mainstream who will always hate him regardless doesn't make any sense. I would enjoy watching him be a thorn in Trump's side for four years.
And it's working
Obviously it's not working if they don't have the support of a Nazi. I see your point
Silly stuff. Both Bush and Obama recognized his brilliance and leadership ability, and his one error in confiding in a woman he had reason to trust is an error made by thousands of military officers and politicians everywhere.Petraeus demonstrated a lack of qualifications to be at the rank he was besides hoping to be the SoS. He is not the man for the job.Only an idiot or a prig would claim Petraeus is not qualified.Because Rand Paul is discussing Petraeus's lack of qualifications to be SoS, not his candidates in the primaries now over.Rand Paul? Seriously? How many Republicans voted for Paul in the primaries?Republican Sen. Rand Paul said there's a "potential problem" with retired Gen. David Petraeus as secretary of state because of his "similarities" with former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton on classified information.
"You know, I think the problem they're going to have if they put him forward is there's a lot of similarities to Hillary Clinton as far as revealing classified information," Paul told CNN's Wolf Blitzer on "The Situation Room." "I think that's a potential problem."
Petraeus, once a widely celebrated military leader who oversaw operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, was sentenced to serve two years on probation and to pay a $100,000 fine for sharing classified information with his biographer and lover, Paula Broadwell.
But during the campaign, Trump castigated Clinton for her handling of classified information, despite the fact that an FBI investigation resulted in no charges being brought against her.
Rand Paul casts doubt on support of a Petraeus pick - CNNPolitics.com
One of the best parts of the election being over has been Rand Paul smacking down nearly all of Trump's rumored Secretary of State nominees. Maybe his terrible campaign taught him that becoming a hack to be palatable to a mainstream who will always hate him regardless doesn't make any sense. I would enjoy watching him be a thorn in Trump's side for four years.
How David Petraeus avoided felony charges and possible prison time
David Petraeus shared classified info. Now can he be secretary of state?
Can David Petraeus be secretary of state?
Army officers commanding troops abroad do NOT commonly have mistresses, while their wives work with stateside army wives to keep families afloat while the men defend our country. And army officers do NOT commonly give secret info to their mistresses to write news stories with.Silly stuff. Both Bush and Obama recognized his brilliance and leadership ability, and his one error in confiding in a woman he had reason to trust is an error made by thousands of military officers and politicians everywhere.Petraeus demonstrated a lack of qualifications to be at the rank he was besides hoping to be the SoS. He is not the man for the job.Only an idiot or a prig would claim Petraeus is not qualified.Because Rand Paul is discussing Petraeus's lack of qualifications to be SoS, not his candidates in the primaries now over.Rand Paul? Seriously? How many Republicans voted for Paul in the primaries?Rand Paul casts doubt on support of a Petraeus pick - CNNPolitics.com
One of the best parts of the election being over has been Rand Paul smacking down nearly all of Trump's rumored Secretary of State nominees. Maybe his terrible campaign taught him that becoming a hack to be palatable to a mainstream who will always hate him regardless doesn't make any sense. I would enjoy watching him be a thorn in Trump's side for four years.
How David Petraeus avoided felony charges and possible prison time
David Petraeus shared classified info. Now can he be secretary of state?
Can David Petraeus be secretary of state?
With this post you are confirming what I said, that you would rather America fail than Trump succeed in improving our security and economy.
Petraeus is unqualified to be SOS. He is a convict. He leaked classified information, much less mis-storing it. No.
We saw how much support Pandering Paul got in the primaries eh? LOL...he is not even close to his father...his father had principles and much like me he refused to change them to pander to people. His son is a cuck.Sure if you consider an echo chamber where you and the media that everyone hates are the only ones listening working...Who gives a shit what Rand thinks? I mean really? He is DESPERATELY trying to stay relevant.Rand Paul casts doubt on support of a Petraeus pick - CNNPolitics.com
One of the best parts of the election being over has been Rand Paul smacking down nearly all of Trump's rumored Secretary of State nominees. Maybe his terrible campaign taught him that becoming a hack to be palatable to a mainstream who will always hate him regardless doesn't make any sense. I would enjoy watching him be a thorn in Trump's side for four years.
And it's working
Obviously it's not working if they don't have the support of a Nazi. I see your point
And you know all the secrets of army officers.Army officers commanding troops abroad do NOT commonly have mistresses, while their wives work with stateside army wives to keep families afloat while the men defend our country. And army officers do NOT commonly give secret info to their mistresses to write news stories with.Silly stuff. Both Bush and Obama recognized his brilliance and leadership ability, and his one error in confiding in a woman he had reason to trust is an error made by thousands of military officers and politicians everywhere.Petraeus demonstrated a lack of qualifications to be at the rank he was besides hoping to be the SoS. He is not the man for the job.Only an idiot or a prig would claim Petraeus is not qualified.Because Rand Paul is discussing Petraeus's lack of qualifications to be SoS, not his candidates in the primaries now over.Rand Paul? Seriously? How many Republicans voted for Paul in the primaries?
How David Petraeus avoided felony charges and possible prison time
David Petraeus shared classified info. Now can he be secretary of state?
Can David Petraeus be secretary of state?
With this post you are confirming what I said, that you would rather America fail than Trump succeed in improving our security and economy.
Petraeus is unqualified to be SOS. He is a convict. He leaked classified information, much less mis-storing it. No.
I thought it was going to be ironic when they extended a job to Patraeus on Fox News. But THIS? Convicted of mishandling information and considering him for it really shows that mishandling information is not really a disqualifier.
Now Republicans will have to figure out a way to say its not a big deal after Trump made them believe it was all this time.
If people liked him and liked what he was saying he would have won at least 1 damn state. They didn't. He does nothing but whine in DC to get attention he is barely known. He WAS known when he first ran because he used his fathers supporters to win. He has done nothing but pander HEAVILY and it got him no where.We saw how much support Pandering Paul got in the primaries eh? LOL...he is not even close to his father...his father had principles and much like me he refused to change them to pander to people. His son is a cuck.Sure if you consider an echo chamber where you and the media that everyone hates are the only ones listening working...Who gives a shit what Rand thinks? I mean really? He is DESPERATELY trying to stay relevant.
And it's working
Obviously it's not working if they don't have the support of a Nazi. I see your point
So your definition of relevance is primary votes? So in your mind, no one is relevant in DC but Trump, Bernie and Hillary? That's a pretty stupid definition
Not a problem. Petraeus is a very impressive man and will be easily confirmed by the Senate.Petraeus is unqualified to be SOS. He is a convict. He leaked classified information, much less mis-storing it. No.
I thought it was going to be ironic when they extended a job to Patraeus on Fox News. But THIS? Convicted of mishandling information and considering him for it really shows that mishandling information is not really a disqualifier.
Now Republicans will have to figure out a way to say its not a big deal after Trump made them believe it was all this time.
So you think what Petraeus did qualifies for SoS. Really?Petraeus is unqualified to be SOS. He is a convict. He leaked classified information, much less mis-storing it. No.
I thought it was going to be ironic when they extended a job to Patraeus on Fox News. But THIS? Convicted of mishandling information and considering him for it really shows that mishandling information is not really a disqualifier.
Now Republicans will have to figure out a way to say its not a big deal after Trump made them believe it was all this time.
Wow, people who "mishandle information" is really a standard to you, isn't it?
No wonder you're the driver of the kommunist klown kar, you're a real knut job
Not a problem. Petraeus is a very impressive man and will be easily confirmed by the Senate.Petraeus is unqualified to be SOS. He is a convict. He leaked classified information, much less mis-storing it. No.
I thought it was going to be ironic when they extended a job to Patraeus on Fox News. But THIS? Convicted of mishandling information and considering him for it really shows that mishandling information is not really a disqualifier.
Now Republicans will have to figure out a way to say its not a big deal after Trump made them believe it was all this time.
Trump needs to steer clear of Bush/Obama retreads. Especially Petraeus. He'll always be associated with Bush's awful Iraq War blunder. So Rand's right, Trump should definitely pass on Petraeus.
He has done same amazing things as well as some dumb things that disqualify.Not a problem. Petraeus is a very impressive man and will be easily confirmed by the Senate.Petraeus is unqualified to be SOS. He is a convict. He leaked classified information, much less mis-storing it. No.
I thought it was going to be ironic when they extended a job to Patraeus on Fox News. But THIS? Convicted of mishandling information and considering him for it really shows that mishandling information is not really a disqualifier.
Now Republicans will have to figure out a way to say its not a big deal after Trump made them believe it was all this time.
Then out of who he has before him who do you suggest? NONE of them I particularly love. I DESPISE Romney and Bolton,Don't care for Corker,Meh on Giuiliani and Petraeus.Trump needs to steer clear of Bush/Obama retreads. Especially Petraeus. He'll always be associated with Bush's awful Iraq War blunder. So Rand's right, Trump should definitely pass on Petraeus.
Code of Military justice, snowflake.And you know all the secrets of army officers.Army officers commanding troops abroad do NOT commonly have mistresses, while their wives work with stateside army wives to keep families afloat while the men defend our country. And army officers do NOT commonly give secret info to their mistresses to write news stories with.Silly stuff. Both Bush and Obama recognized his brilliance and leadership ability, and his one error in confiding in a woman he had reason to trust is an error made by thousands of military officers and politicians everywhere.Petraeus demonstrated a lack of qualifications to be at the rank he was besides hoping to be the SoS. He is not the man for the job.Only an idiot or a prig would claim Petraeus is not qualified.Because Rand Paul is discussing Petraeus's lack of qualifications to be SoS, not his candidates in the primaries now over.
How David Petraeus avoided felony charges and possible prison time
David Petraeus shared classified info. Now can he be secretary of state?
Can David Petraeus be secretary of state?
With this post you are confirming what I said, that you would rather America fail than Trump succeed in improving our security and economy.
So you think what Petraeus did qualifies for SoS. Really?Petraeus is unqualified to be SOS. He is a convict. He leaked classified information, much less mis-storing it. No.
I thought it was going to be ironic when they extended a job to Patraeus on Fox News. But THIS? Convicted of mishandling information and considering him for it really shows that mishandling information is not really a disqualifier.
Now Republicans will have to figure out a way to say its not a big deal after Trump made them believe it was all this time.
Wow, people who "mishandle information" is really a standard to you, isn't it?
No wonder you're the driver of the kommunist klown kar, you're a real knut job
