JoeB131
Diamond Member
Horribly wrong. Believe your polls it makes no difference to me at all.
Well, you are right. What is going on with Policy By Shitter Tweet is truly horrible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Horribly wrong. Believe your polls it makes no difference to me at all.
And Republicans control the House. Ask Rasmussen!Nate Silver pointed out that Rasmussen predicted a narrow GOP victory in the 2018 House midterms, and Democrats ended up winning easily.
Trump's favorite pollster became instantly triggered:
Polls “shmoles” silver blows............
Trump is your President as everyone knows....
Horribly wrong. Believe your polls it makes no difference to me at all.
Well, you are right. What is going on with Policy By Shitter Tweet is truly horrible.
I love Trump's Tweets....
He gets the Truth out in spite of the lying left wing media....
I love Trump's Tweets....
He gets the Truth out in spite of the lying left wing media....
Actually, he just reminds us why he's unfit for the presidency.
I often what average Romans thought when Caligula pranced around putting his head on all the statues of the gods...
And then we have Trump, Caligula looks relatively sane.
Rasmussen is the one who has lost credibility by consistently giving Trump higher approval ratings than anyone else and that is why rhey are freaking out. Their click bait polls supporting Trump have been a short term effort for increasing attention for their site, but a current and long term loss.
Or your left loon polls consistently give Trump lower aporoval ratings lol
Polls are worthless....as witnessed in 2016.
Election night was hilarious watching you loons meltdown...because you believed the polls
Polls were dead on in 2018, AL Senate election, and Marie La Pen’s crushing defeat.
Expecting polls to always be right is like expecting oddsmakers in sports to always be right. It’s like saying “The Patriots were 8 point favorites to be the Giants in the Super Bowl, but the Giants won anyways, so all oddsmakers are worthless.”
That, of course, is dumb. But that’s no different than saying all pollsters are worthless. People just don’t understand the math.
Any poll can be manipulated to achieve any desired result. I suspect that's what happened in 2016...and is happening now.
I put little stock in any poll just as I don't in 98% of the media
Any single poll can, buy thousands of polls aren’t. Silver analyzes all the polls. He’s not a pollster.
The polls nationally were actually correct. As a group, they came within 1% of the actual group. Where they were wrong was in assuming the distribution of votes. They made assumptions about the electoral college and the national vote which turned out to be wrong.
Horribly wrong. Believe your polls it makes no difference to me at all.
I love Trump's Tweets....
He gets the Truth out in spite of the lying left wing media....
Actually, he just reminds us why he's unfit for the presidency.
I often what average Romans thought when Caligula pranced around putting his head on all the statues of the gods...
And then we have Trump, Caligula looks relatively sane.
Yeah Silver had Clinton over Trump 71% -29%.
Lol
Yep. So much for Nate's famed 'objectivity'.
^^^^^^
Math is hard
derp derp derp
Do you have any credible evidence that the polls were not faked?Polls measure the popular vote. We are talking about poll accuracy, therefore we have to talk about the popular vote, not the electoral college. You are too dumb for this thread.The Washington Post had Hillary ahead by 3%. She won by 2%.Rasmussen is the one who has lost credibility by consistently giving Trump higher approval ratings than anyone else and that is why rhey are freaking out. Their click bait polls supporting Trump have been a short term effort for increasing attention for their site, but a current and long term loss.lol lol lol and of course that's why you as well as the MSM has less than zero credibility now. Your lying has caught up with you deviants and hacks.
Or your left loon polls consistently give Trump lower aporoval ratings lol
Polls are worthless....as witnessed in 2016.
Election night was hilarious watching you loons meltdown...because you believed the polls
She lost....retard
Yeah Silver had Clinton over Trump 71% -29%.
Lol
Yep. So much for Nate's famed 'objectivity'.
^^^^^^
Math is hard
derp derp derp
It certainly is for you, as you prove almost daily.
Do you have any credible evidence that the polls were not faked?Polls measure the popular vote. We are talking about poll accuracy, therefore we have to talk about the popular vote, not the electoral college. You are too dumb for this thread.The Washington Post had Hillary ahead by 3%. She won by 2%.Rasmussen is the one who has lost credibility by consistently giving Trump higher approval ratings than anyone else and that is why rhey are freaking out. Their click bait polls supporting Trump have been a short term effort for increasing attention for their site, but a current and long term loss.
Or your left loon polls consistently give Trump lower aporoval ratings lol
Polls are worthless....as witnessed in 2016.
Election night was hilarious watching you loons meltdown...because you believed the polls
She lost....retard
Horribly wrong. Believe your polls it makes no difference to me at all.
Well, you are right. What is going on with Policy By Shitter Tweet is truly horrible.
I love Trump's Tweets....
He gets the Truth out in spite of the lying left wing media....
Yeah Silver had Clinton over Trump 71% -29%.
Lol
Yep. So much for Nate's famed 'objectivity'.
^^^^^^
Math is hard
derp derp derp
It certainly is for you, as you prove almost daily.
Pictardo, I doubt you could do addition above how many fingers you have. And you probably lost a few due to the meth lab and/or still you have in/outside your trailer.
The Washington Post had Hillary up by 3%. She won the popular vote by 2%. You haven't addressed that. Address it.
You are dodging the question, scumbag.Do you have any credible evidence that the polls were not faked?Polls measure the popular vote. We are talking about poll accuracy, therefore we have to talk about the popular vote, not the electoral college. You are too dumb for this thread.The Washington Post had Hillary ahead by 3%. She won by 2%.Or your left loon polls consistently give Trump lower aporoval ratings lol
Polls are worthless....as witnessed in 2016.
Election night was hilarious watching you loons meltdown...because you believed the polls
She lost....retard
Can’t prove a negative.
This is why Right wingers are so dumb. They defend Rasmussen, which had Hillary up by 2%. Then in the same thread they claim that it was TRUMP who won the popular vote due to fraud. But they forget that if this were there case, then Rasmussen was inaccurate .The Washington Post had Hillary up by 3%. She won the popular vote by 2%. You haven't addressed that. Address it.
Sure thing..voter fraud. Trump won the popular vote by 3M, not Hillary.....it will be 6M in 2020 and then maybe 12M in 2024....nobody wants you stinking Ratocrats in power anymore....we want you in prison camps.....eating moldy baloney and stamping out license plates.
Yeah Silver had Clinton over Trump 71% -29%.
Lol
Yep. So much for Nate's famed 'objectivity'.
^^^^^^
Math is hard
derp derp derp
It certainly is for you, as you prove almost daily.
Pictardo, I doubt you could do addition above how many fingers you have. And you probably lost a few due to the meth lab and/or still you have in/outside your trailer.
Toro The Wonder Dummy has some comment or other to make here. lol the dork is still mad that he has no safe space here and his math sucks.
You are dodging the question, scumbag.Do you have any credible evidence that the polls were not faked?Polls measure the popular vote. We are talking about poll accuracy, therefore we have to talk about the popular vote, not the electoral college. You are too dumb for this thread.The Washington Post had Hillary ahead by 3%. She won by 2%.
She lost....retard
Can’t prove a negative.
This is why Right wingers are so dumb. They defend Rasmussen, which had Hillary up by 2%. Then in the same thread they claim that it was TRUMP who won the popular vote due to fraud. But they forget that if this were there case, then Rasmussen was inaccurate .
Then he sucks as an analyst. PatheticExcept she won by 3 million votes, and he did allow for a 30% chance that Trump might win under the archaic, anti-Democratic system devised by 18th century Slave Rapists.