Reagan's Benghazi

Show us the report or whatever that backs up his claim that the truck had to go through a series of barricades. Otherwise just look up any source, military, congressional, news media. They all expose that lie. But the big lie was the one about the Marines firing on the terrorist. Under Reagan's command the Marine sentries and force protection were ordered to carry unloaded weapons. Ronald Reagan sent Marines into an active combat zone with specific orders to not carry loaded weapons. He specifically lied about Marines firing on the truck bomber. The Marines never got off a shot. He attempted to cover up his negligence by claiming otherwise.

Bullshit. Shame on you for slandering the dead.
he's talking out of his ass. Typical leftist mulesqueeze to avert attention from his Messiah and the lies. These jackasses are running scared Rabbi.
 
First you don't know if I am or not but it is fun to see how your type forget the past and then bitch like hell about this because of who he is. It is that simple. Everything that happens in this administration pisses your type off. Yet the previous administrations(REP) seem to get a pass. You know like the Iran Contra lie from Reagan and who took the fall. Just one of many.
When you come to some consensus that one of your saviors has the same faults. Maybe you will see the fake hatred you have built.




No, you don't seem to understand. It is the pure blind hatred for this administration and how you keep beating this horse about coverups and denial.
Yet when confronted with facts and similar situations within your own party you hate having it brought up.Then when things of this nature are provided , all you can do is comment on how utterly ridiculous it is for someone to show you that it happened under the Rep. watch.
Think about Iran Contra!




You progressive twirps are absolutely hopeless.

No, YOU don't get it.
Obama lied about Benghazi for weeks afterwards, refusing to call it a terrorist attack by al Qaeda, which is what it was. He knew this almost immediately.
Now, the only question is, Why aren't you outraged by this?
 
Last edited:
First you don't know if I am or not but it is fun to see how your type forget the past and then bitch like hell about this because of who he is. It is that simple. Everything that happens in this administration pisses your type off. Yet the previous administrations(REP) seem to get a pass. You know like the Iran Contra lie from Reagan and who took the fall. Just one of many.
When you come to some consensus that one of your saviors has the same faults. Maybe you will see the fake hatred you have built.




No, you don't seem to understand. It is the pure blind hatred for this administration and how you keep beating this horse about coverups and denial.
Yet when confronted with facts and similar situations within your own party you hate having it brought up.Then when things of this nature are provided , all you can do is comment on how utterly ridiculous it is for someone to show you that it happened under the Rep. watch.
Think about Iran Contra!

No, YOU don't get it.
Obama lied about Benghazi for weeks afterwards, refusing to call it a terrorist attack by al Qaeda, which is what it was. He knew this almost immediately.
Now, the only question is, Why aren't you outraged by this?

So are you outraged that Obama lied about this? Yes or no.
 
Show us the report or whatever that backs up his claim that the truck had to go through a series of barricades. Otherwise just look up any source, military, congressional, news media. They all expose that lie. But the big lie was the one about the Marines firing on the terrorist. Under Reagan's command the Marine sentries and force protection were ordered to carry unloaded weapons. Ronald Reagan sent Marines into an active combat zone with specific orders to not carry loaded weapons. He specifically lied about Marines firing on the truck bomber. The Marines never got off a shot. He attempted to cover up his negligence by claiming otherwise.

Bullshit. Shame on you for slandering the dead.
he's talking out of his ass. Typical leftist mulesqueeze to avert attention from his Messiah and the lies. These jackasses are running scared Rabbi.

No, you are talking out your ass, not me. Anybody can google ' Marines unloaded weapons Beirut' and stumble on pages and pages or source after source about the lies Reagan told about the barricades and firing on the terrorist. It was big news at the time. He got caught.
 
Bullshit. Shame on you for slandering the dead.
he's talking out of his ass. Typical leftist mulesqueeze to avert attention from his Messiah and the lies. These jackasses are running scared Rabbi.

No, you are talking out your ass, not me. Anybody can google ' Marines unloaded weapons Beirut' and stumble on pages and pages or source after source about the lies Reagan told about the barricades and firing on the terrorist. It was big news at the time. He got caught.

YOU made a statement. POST the proof or shut up. Plain, simple. :eusa_hand:
 
Reagan did not spend the weeks following the Beirut bombing lying about what caused it.

Fail.

What did Obama lie about again? I keep asking and no one has answered yet



Thanks Frank great video, from CNN no less.

It is really sad that the whole of the Obama administration made excuses for the riots by Muslims over a stupid video they probably never saw. My opinion is that the remarks by the Obama administration may well have caused the riots.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What did Obama lie about again? I keep asking and no one has answered yet



Thanks Frank great video, from CNN no less.

It is really sad that the whole of the Obama administration made excuses for the riots by Muslims over a stupid video they probably never saw. My opinion is that the remarks by the Obama administration may well have caused the riots.
As well as his world apology tour...where he apologized to the Muslim world for us...(For what I have yet to understand), but they understand from Obama's weakness is that WE are ripe for the picking.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
he's talking out of his ass. Typical leftist mulesqueeze to avert attention from his Messiah and the lies. These jackasses are running scared Rabbi.

No, you are talking out your ass, not me. Anybody can google ' Marines unloaded weapons Beirut' and stumble on pages and pages or source after source about the lies Reagan told about the barricades and firing on the terrorist. It was big news at the time. He got caught.

YOU made a statement. POST the proof or shut up. Plain, simple. :eusa_hand:

Look up Marine barracks bombing Beirut you dumb ass. Use wikipedia or any other source. They all include the unloaded weapons and lack of barricades. What kind of proof do you want from me? Every history from any half way reliable source about the incident includes that information. You got a problem with the Reagan speech? Think I doctored it? I gave the date and title of the speech. Look it up yourself.
 
No, you are talking out your ass, not me. Anybody can google ' Marines unloaded weapons Beirut' and stumble on pages and pages or source after source about the lies Reagan told about the barricades and firing on the terrorist. It was big news at the time. He got caught.

YOU made a statement. POST the proof or shut up. Plain, simple. :eusa_hand:

Look up Marine barracks bombing Beirut you dumb ass. Use wikipedia or any other source. They all include the unloaded weapons and lack of barricades. What kind of proof do you want from me? Every history from any half way reliable source about the incident includes that information. You got a problem with the Reagan speech? Think I doctored it? I gave the date and title of the speech. Look it up yourself.

NO. YOU made the assertion. YOU post the imperical proof. Otherwise? *I* have ZERO else to write to you. Put up or shut up.:eusa_hand:
 
YOU made a statement. POST the proof or shut up. Plain, simple. :eusa_hand:

Look up Marine barracks bombing Beirut you dumb ass. Use wikipedia or any other source. They all include the unloaded weapons and lack of barricades. What kind of proof do you want from me? Every history from any half way reliable source about the incident includes that information. You got a problem with the Reagan speech? Think I doctored it? I gave the date and title of the speech. Look it up yourself.

NO. YOU made the assertion. YOU post the imperical proof. Otherwise? *I* have ZERO else to write to you. Put up or shut up.:eusa_hand:

The educated and aware will know the common well known facts I have posted. The curious will do a four minute search and read and become a member of the educated and aware. You, we will let you just stay stupid and lazy so you will be easy to poke and ambush again later on.
 
If only we could return to sanity and cut the political witch hunts.

All too true. But the modern-day RW of the Republican Party doesn't care about what's true and what isn't true, or about what's right or what's wrong. They only care about regaining power. And any and all tactics that they believe will aid them in that effort, even if it's not demonstrably true, is a perfectly fine avenue of attack in order to pursue their agenda.

Nixon was held accountable for his lies, Clinton was held accountable for his, obama should be held accountable for his.

The hypocrisy of you libs is amazing. Your blind adoration of obama is a form of mental illness.


Indeed, typical Nazi behavior on the left. Deflect, deflect, deflect and then deflect some more.

Nixon lied about Watergate and was forced to resign. Clinton lied and was impeached (although the bastard skated).

When do we hold this THUG accountable for HIS bullshit? WHEN!?!?
 
Yes, actually, both Reagan and Bush did lie.

10250094_746443565396651_1710527506268447500_n_zps6c66a5d4.jpg

Where were you when Clinton bungled the Black hawk mission in Mogadishu? Hmm? That was in 1993. Didn't hear anyone on the left demanding an investigation then.
Why don't you respond to the post instead of deflecting?
 
All too true. But the modern-day RW of the Republican Party doesn't care about what's true and what isn't true, or about what's right or what's wrong. They only care about regaining power. And any and all tactics that they believe will aid them in that effort, even if it's not demonstrably true, is a perfectly fine avenue of attack in order to pursue their agenda.

Nixon was held accountable for his lies, Clinton was held accountable for his, obama should be held accountable for his.

The hypocrisy of you libs is amazing. Your blind adoration of obama is a form of mental illness.


Indeed, typical Nazi behavior on the left. Deflect, deflect, deflect and then deflect some more.

Nixon lied about Watergate and was forced to resign. Clinton lied and was impeached (although the bastard skated).

When do we hold this THUG accountable for HIS bullshit? WHEN!?!?

When Congress grows a SPINE...and Dingy Harry Reid is GONE as Leader of the Senate.
 
No, you are talking out your ass, not me. Anybody can google ' Marines unloaded weapons Beirut' and stumble on pages and pages or source after source about the lies Reagan told about the barricades and firing on the terrorist. It was big news at the time. He got caught.

YOU made a statement. POST the proof or shut up. Plain, simple. :eusa_hand:

Look up Marine barracks bombing Beirut you dumb ass. Use wikipedia or any other source. They all include the unloaded weapons and lack of barricades. What kind of proof do you want from me? Every history from any half way reliable source about the incident includes that information. You got a problem with the Reagan speech? Think I doctored it? I gave the date and title of the speech. Look it up yourself.

I'll tell the story yet again. The INSTALLATION COMMANDER was responsible for the unloaded weapons. He was following SOP from the State Department. Blame Reagan if you must - he WAS the CIC. But that opens Barry up to shoulder the blame for Benghazi - it's tit for tat. So, if Reagan must posthumously accept blame for Beirut, Why must not Barry do the same?

I was at that very Barracks 3 weeks before the attack on unrelated DOD business. I am very aware of that tragic situation.
 
If only we could return to sanity and cut the political witch hunts.

There were more than enough opportunities to lay blame for the horrific losses at high U.S. officials' feet. But unlike today's Congress, congressmen did not talk of impeaching Ronald Reagan, who was then President, nor were any subpoenas sent to cabinet members. This was true even though then, as now, the opposition party controlled the majority in the House. Tip O'Neill, the Democratic Speaker of the House, was no pushover. He, like today's opposition leaders in the House, demanded an investigation -- but a real one, and only one. Instead of playing it for political points, a House committee undertook a serious investigation into what went wrong at the barracks in Beirut. Two months later, it issued a report finding "very serious errors in judgment" by officers on the ground, as well as responsibility up through the military chain of command, and called for better security measures against terrorism in U.S. government installations throughout the world.

In other words, Congress actually undertook a useful investigation and made helpful recommendations. The report's findings, by the way, were bipartisan. (The Pentagon, too, launched an investigation, issuing a report that was widely accepted by both parties.)

For starters the Reagan admin did not blame a video hardly anyone seen.
 
That is not the point. If you had any real consistency to your outrage then the previous administrations and their lies and trumped phony intelligence information would have someone like you screaming still.
But I have never seen anything even close.
It is always one sided.




First you don't know if I am or not but it is fun to see how your type forget the past and then bitch like hell about this because of who he is. It is that simple. Everything that happens in this administration pisses your type off. Yet the previous administrations(REP) seem to get a pass. You know like the Iran Contra lie from Reagan and who took the fall. Just one of many.
When you come to some consensus that one of your saviors has the same faults. Maybe you will see the fake hatred you have built.




No, YOU don't get it.
Obama lied about Benghazi for weeks afterwards, refusing to call it a terrorist attack by al Qaeda, which is what it was. He knew this almost immediately.
Now, the only question is, Why aren't you outraged by this?

So are you outraged that Obama lied about this? Yes or no.
 
Another one sided phony outraged right winger.



All too true. But the modern-day RW of the Republican Party doesn't care about what's true and what isn't true, or about what's right or what's wrong. They only care about regaining power. And any and all tactics that they believe will aid them in that effort, even if it's not demonstrably true, is a perfectly fine avenue of attack in order to pursue their agenda.

Nixon was held accountable for his lies, Clinton was held accountable for his, obama should be held accountable for his.

The hypocrisy of you libs is amazing. Your blind adoration of obama is a form of mental illness.


Indeed, typical Nazi behavior on the left. Deflect, deflect, deflect and then deflect some more.

Nixon lied about Watergate and was forced to resign. Clinton lied and was impeached (although the bastard skated).

When do we hold this THUG accountable for HIS bullshit? WHEN!?!?
 

Forum List

Back
Top