🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Recent Rapid SST Rise

Except your heroes never let us look at the DATA. Instead they FUDGE it and post color charts you cut and paste all day... and bill the taxpayer for them...
LIAR

Data, free

If there really was WARMING in the oceans, we WOULD have more and bigger canes. We do NOT....
You don't know what you're talkling about. See post #11 above.
 
LIAR

Data, free

You don't know what you're talkling about. See post #11 above.



We disagree.

You say your heroes are not fudging the data to show "warming" in the oceans that really does not exist.

The hurricane data DOES NOT SUPPORT THAT....

WHY is there no breakout in canes given all your "ocean warming?"


LOL!!!


Someone is lying, and it is not the hurricanes...
 
We disagree.

You say your heroes are not fudging the data to show "warming" in the oceans that really does not exist.

The hurricane data DOES NOT SUPPORT THAT....

WHY is there no breakout in canes given all your "ocean warming?"


LOL!!!


Someone is lying, and it is not the hurricanes...
You said climate scientists never let us look at their data. That is complete bullshit. We don't disagree. I'M TELLING THE TRUTH AND YOU ARE A LIAR.
 
You said climate scientists never let us look at their data.



Since the 2005 fudging of the atmospheric data, that is correct. To get the actual data recorded requires a lawsuit, and is often met with furious resistance....




satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Is that in any of your colored FUDGE charts??
 
Since the 2005 fudging of the atmospheric data, that is correct. To get the actual data recorded requires a lawsuit, and is often met with furious resistance....




satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Is that in any of your colored FUDGE charts??
For the fourth or fifth time, this link explicitly refutes what you're telling us. Do you know what the word "refute" means?
 
For the fourth or fifth time, this link explicitly refutes what you're telling us. Do you know what the word "refute" means?


LOL!!!

This LINK accurately describes how your fudgebaking liar heroes FUDGE DATA.


The DATA = highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere

PROBLEM = Co2 rose, atmospheric temps did not

"Solution" = FUDGE the data




REAL SCIENCE works this way:

Hypothesis: increasing atmospheric Co2 will increase atmospheric temperature

The DATA: Nope

SCIENCE: Hypothesis REJECTED



the conflict of these fudgebaking liars is ABSOLUTE, since if they followed REAL SCIENCE, they would be UNEMPLOYED and facing criminal fraud charges, charges that were ready to go in 2010 when homO hid them IN THE CLOSET....

 
LOL!!!

This LINK accurately describes how your fudgebaking liar heroes FUDGE DATA.


The DATA = highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere

PROBLEM = Co2 rose, atmospheric temps did not

"Solution" = FUDGE the data




REAL SCIENCE works this way:

Hypothesis: increasing atmospheric Co2 will increase atmospheric temperature

The DATA: Nope

SCIENCE: Hypothesis REJECTED



the conflict of these fudgebaking liars is ABSOLUTE, since if they followed REAL SCIENCE, they would be UNEMPLOYED and facing criminal fraud charges, charges that were ready to go in 2010 when homO hid them IN THE CLOSET....

Show us a single scientist who believes what you're trying to tell us.

And if you're going to tell us that they were forced to do so or bought off to do so, I'd like to see some evidence of that.
 
Show us a single scientist who believes what you're trying to tell us.

And if you're going to tell us that they were forced to do so or bought off to do so, I'd like to see some evidence of that.


 
So, Tony Heller and James Dellingpole.

Delingpole is a writer. He has a degree in English
Tony Heller has a BS in geology and a MS in Electrical Engineering. He was a high school science teacher once. The only research his CV mentions is all in geology.

I find it far easier to believe that these two are being paid for specific opinions than that the thousands of actively researching PhDs are all involved in a conspiracy to lie to the public. You should too.
 
Remember Billy Boy's 22 January claim that the oceans were devoid of excess heat and there would be no El Nino in the foreseeable future?



and the study on which this is based


I wonder if he needs a do-over.

I'm unclear when the laws of physics stopped working on planet Earth, now that it's taken on Faith that a wisp of atmospheric CO2 heats the oceans, at depths too!

 
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMH
So, Tony Heller and James Dellingpole.

Delingpole is a writer. He has a degree in English
Tony Heller has a BS in geology and a MS in Electrical Engineering. He was a high school science teacher once. The only research his CV mentions is all in geology.

I find it far easier to believe that these two are being paid for specific opinions than that the thousands of actively researching PhDs are all involved in a conspiracy to lie to the public. You should too.


LOL!!!


Once again the mental case beaked birdbrain parrot insists it is the NUMBER of conflicted liars that matters, not the actual DATA...
 
Remember Billy Boy's 22 January claim that the oceans were devoid of excess heat and there would be no El Nino in the foreseeable future?



and the study on which this is based


I wonder if he needs a do-over.

The linked article claims that raising temperatures 1C will kill marine life

 
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMH
I'm unclear when the laws of physics stopped working on planet Earth, now that it's taken on Faith that a wisp of atmospheric CO2 heats the oceans, at depths too!




 
The linked article claims that raising temperatures 1C will kill marine life
The linked article says this:

Even this seemingly small average increase has significant real-world consequences.
  • Loss of species: more frequent and intense marine heatwaves lead to mass mortality of sea life. This is particularly damaging for coral reefs.
  • More extreme weather: increased heat in the upper ocean surface means hurricanes and cyclones can pick up more energy. This means they become more intense and longer-lasting.
  • Sea-level rise: warmer waters take up more space - known as thermal expansion - and can greatly accelerate the melting of glaciers from Greenland and Antarctica that flow into the oceans. This raises global sea levels, increasing risks of coastal flooding.
  • Less ability to absorb CO2: the oceans currently take up about a quarter of greenhouse gas emissions. Warmer waters have less ability to absorb CO2. If the oceans take up less CO2 in future, more would accumulate in the atmosphere - further warming the air and oceans.

Please explain why you think these are humorous.
 
The linked article says this:

Even this seemingly small average increase has significant real-world consequences.
  • Loss of species: more frequent and intense marine heatwaves lead to mass mortality of sea life. This is particularly damaging for coral reefs.
  • More extreme weather: increased heat in the upper ocean surface means hurricanes and cyclones can pick up more energy. This means they become more intense and longer-lasting.
  • Sea-level rise: warmer waters take up more space - known as thermal expansion - and can greatly accelerate the melting of glaciers from Greenland and Antarctica that flow into the oceans. This raises global sea levels, increasing risks of coastal flooding.
  • Less ability to absorb CO2: the oceans currently take up about a quarter of greenhouse gas emissions. Warmer waters have less ability to absorb CO2. If the oceans take up less CO2 in future, more would accumulate in the atmosphere - further warming the air and oceans.

Please explain why you think these are humorous.

Repeating absurd, false, paid for claims ad infinitum does not make them true

First, CO2 does not raise temperature on planet Earth, never did, never will, never could.
Second, see First above
 
There is fudge and there is data.

The worst decade for hurricanes is the 1940s..

The DATA...




And the last time a Cat 5 put 180+ mph gusts on Martha's Vineyard was 1938, which is why homO and Michael Robinson bought beachfront property with money from Chinese and Ukrainian kickbacks...


NO BREAKOUT IN CANE ACTIVITY = NO OCEAN WARMING
his own link told him it wasn't true. Here's a sentence from the summary of the report he attached":

In summary, it is premature to conclude with high confidence that human-caused increases in greenhouse gases have caused a change in past Atlantic basin hurricane activity that is outside the range of natural variability, although greenhouse gases are strongly linked to global warming.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMH
his own link told him it wasn't true. Here's a sentence from the summary of the report he attached":

In summary, it is premature to conclude with high confidence that human-caused increases in greenhouse gases have caused a change in past Atlantic basin hurricane activity that is outside the range of natural variability, although greenhouse gases are strongly linked to global warming.


It also clearly documents that the 1940s are still the strongest Cane decade on record.

Which explains why crick tried once to say "hurricanes SINCE 1950...."
 

Forum List

Back
Top