Remember That Poor Little White Girl who got Her head pounded Into the Sidewalk?

Or that they know that a jury would find a huge settlement when a lawyer got out there and pointed out that Wilson had been fired from his previous job.
None of which has jack shit to do witht he fact that you keep repeating proven lies about the Brown Wilson shooting

It was proven justified and you are full of shit
 
Not the case. Grand Jury reviewed the evidence and found the officer acted within the law for lethal force after reviewing all the evidence.
A grand jury organized by a corrupt DA who suppressed evidence and let the cop make self-serving statements. .

Hey, did the cop get his job back? No. Did any other police department hire him? No.

Seems to me that they didn't think his actions were all that good.
 
A grand jury organized by a corrupt DA who suppressed evidence and let the cop make self-serving statements. .

Hey, did the cop get his job back? No. Did any other police department hire him? No.

Seems to me that they didn't think his actions were all that good.
so, you agree The Georgia and New York and DC Grand Juries that indicted Trump were tainted since they were organized by trump hating individuals? Right?
 
That's like saying the lynching of Emmet Till was justified because the Klan guys were acquitted.
No it is not

You are stating a massively false equivelancy

The evidence in the wilson brown shooting was massive and proves it was justified.

You habve to lie as you ALWAYS do to make your claim
 
A grand jury organized by a corrupt DA who suppressed evidence and let the cop make self-serving statements. .

Hey, did the cop get his job back? No. Did any other police department hire him? No.

Seems to me that they didn't think his actions were all that good.
That is a pile of lies

The DA was not corrupt and he suppressed no evidence

He did not seek another police job you simple minded liar

No one blames him either with low life dishonest people lie you trying to smear him
 
We heard all kinds if descriptions about the black kids in that fight. And that white girl was made out to be the victim of the fake epidemic of blacks attacking whites. Come to find out that the white girl was not such a pure innocent child.

Kaylee Gain was suspended from school for brawling with another student day before fracturing skull in fight: sources​


The Missouri teen who was left fighting for her life after having her head pounded into the sidewalk earlier this month was suspended from school the day prior for brawling with another student, The Post has learned.

Kaylee Gain, 16, suffered a skull fracture and a brain bleed that left her in a coma for two weeks after she squared off with another female teen about a mile away from Hazelwood East High School in St. Louis on March 8.

Her family revealed on Friday her condition is stable and she has been moved out of intensive care — though it is unclear whether she has regained consciousness.

The teen with whom Gain had an altercation the previous day was friends with the student who would later smash Gain’s head into the pavement, leaving her unconscious and her body twitching, sources said.


Of course we will now begin reading all kinds of excuses as the double standard of racism is applied here.
If the Black girl had simply brawled with the White girl, no one would give two shits. The Black girl took it too far and beat the White girl towards death,,didn’t let up. That’s the issue.
 
No it is not

You are stating a massively false equivelancy

The evidence in the wilson brown shooting was massive and proves it was justified.

You habve to lie as you ALWAYS do to make your claim
Actually, it wasn't massive. He ignored evidence he didn't like, and included questionable evidence he did.


That is a pile of lies

The DA was not corrupt and he suppressed no evidence

He did not seek another police job you simple minded liar

No one blames him either with low life dishonest people lie you trying to smear him
How do you know he didn't seek a LE job?
 
Actually, it wasn't massive. He ignored evidence he didn't like, and included questionable evidence he did.



How do you know he didn't seek a LE job?
Yes it was

He did not suppress evidence. He did not include questionable evidence

You are sijmply a liar as always

Because he said so in interviews
 
Yes it was

He did not suppress evidence. He did not include questionable evidence




As protests continue across the country over the police killing of Michael Brown, new questions are being raised about the grand jury that failed to indict Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson for shooting Brown. Many questions center on a woman identified in the grand jury documents simply as “Witness 40.” She told the grand jury that Brown charged at Wilson “like a football player.” Earlier this week, the website TheSmokingGun.com identified Witness 40 as Sandra McElroy. The website described her as a “bipolar Missouri woman with a criminal past who has a history of making racist remarks and once insinuated herself into another high-profile St. Louis criminal case with claims that police eventually dismissed as a 'complete fabrication.'” It now appears McElroy may have lied about witnessing the shooting, which occurred 30 miles from her home. On Tuesday, Rev. Al Sharpton said the report about Witness 40 gave new hope to the Brown family.
 
A grand jury organized by a corrupt DA who suppressed evidence and let the cop make self-serving statements.
Where is your evidence, other than dangerous speculation.

Here is more documentation for you to not read... from the DOJ.

Oh... and the case was re-examined to see if charges could be brought on.... Guess what. Nope.

Prosecutor: No charges for officer in Michael Brown’s death

Hey, did the cop get his job back? No. Did any other police department hire him? No.
Irrelevant to the actual facts that occurred and do not place blame of culpability on the officer. What we have here, is the optics and the backlash of any police department to hire the officer. Why is that? Well, let's look at what happened to Ferguson.

1713372238348.png


1713372228212.png


1713372218030.png


1713372205653.png


1713372191889.png

Despite the outcome of the Grand Jury, and waiting for all evidence, Politicians, the MSM, and the large vocal minority swayed public opinion so much that the officer had no chance of re-hire or being hired by another department.

Please tell me you understand the optics and perception and the backlash of any city hiring the officer?
 
Where is your evidence, other than dangerous speculation.

Here is more documentation for you to not read... from the DOJ.

Don't care. The hacks at the DOJ covered for the cops.

Irrelevant to the actual facts that occurred and do not place blame of culpability on the officer. What we have here, is the optics and the backlash of any police department to hire the officer. Why is that? Well, let's look at what happened to Ferguson.
He could find some sleepy little town of white people who would hire him... except they know he's a trigger happy maniac.
 


As protests continue across the country over the police killing of Michael Brown, new questions are being raised about the grand jury that failed to indict Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson for shooting Brown. Many questions center on a woman identified in the grand jury documents simply as “Witness 40.” She told the grand jury that Brown charged at Wilson “like a football player.” Earlier this week, the website TheSmokingGun.com identified Witness 40 as Sandra McElroy. The website described her as a “bipolar Missouri woman with a criminal past who has a history of making racist remarks and once insinuated herself into another high-profile St. Louis criminal case with claims that police eventually dismissed as a 'complete fabrication.'” It now appears McElroy may have lied about witnessing the shooting, which occurred 30 miles from her home. On Tuesday, Rev. Al Sharpton said the report about Witness 40 gave new hope to the Brown family.

That was not the evidence.

Witneses ar ea narrative.

The physical evidence including multiple autopsies prove it was justified
 
The Autopsies prove that he was murdered. He was still shooting when the kid was going down, judging by the bullet in the TOP of his head.

No they do not

That is either the dumbest statement you have ever made which would be bizzare because you have made legins of dumb statements, or a deliberate bald faced lie

The autopsies prove he was charging toward Wilson. The wound to the top of the head would not have been made if Brown were surrenduring. His head was bent and chin tucked which is a typical posture for someone in a sprint. It is never how someone is executed. When executed they are shot in front side or back of the head. One has to twist and crane the gun hand into an awkward postion to shoot someon in the top of the head if they are on their knees.

One always shoots until the target is down, NOT going down but DOWN
 
The autopsies prove he was charging toward Wilson. The wound to the top of the head would not have been made if Brown were surrenduring. His head was bent and chin tucked which is a typical posture for someone in a sprint. It is never how someone is executed. When executed they are shot in front side or back of the head. One has to twist and crane the gun hand into an awkward postion to shoot someon in the top of the head if they are on their knees.

Okay, um... no. Bam. First bullet hits him in the stomach. He doubles over, like most of us would.
Bam- Next bullet goes into the top of the head.
 
Don't care. The hacks at the DOJ covered for the cops.


He could find some sleepy little town of white people who would hire him... except they know he's a trigger happy maniac.
You and IM2 are the same person. You have to be. And don't even try to explain how you will call IM2 out.. because you're just as ignorant as he is when presented with information that you don't agree with.
 
Okay, um... no. Bam. First bullet hits him in the stomach. He doubles over, like most of us would.
Bam- Next bullet goes into the top of the head.
First bullet hit him in the hand, when he assaulted the cop in the car and went after his service pistol. All the forensic evidence is there. Why don't you read so you don't sound pathetic.
 
Okay, um... no. Bam. First bullet hits him in the stomach. He doubles over, like most of us would.
Bam- Next bullet goes into the top of the head.
ok um yes he would not have been shot in the stomach if on his knees surrenduring you idiot

He would have been shot in the head once. The multiple shots to one arm are further proof. He was swinging his arm UP which is what one does when running
 

Forum List

Back
Top