Remember when 38 year old Jerry Seinfeld dated a 17 year old?

[Silhouette]

In New York, the age of consent is (regrettably) 17...

 

[francoHFW]

How can the dupes be so stupid and be so wrong? They're just amazing...

 

[francoHFW]

1 is a crime and one isn't.

 

[BULLDOG]

Oh pahlease. They are just breasts. Men have them too, ya now. *eye roll*

Not like those.

 

[airplanemechanic]

In my state the age of consent is 17 so if JS wants to date a 17yo girl I'm all for it. Have fun, it's as legal as if she were 87.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Looks like a bad joke. Not Groping... He was a comedian At the time. The kissing thing is bad...

He is mugging for the camera and his hands aren't touching her breasts.
Poor taste but not illegal

And the other difference is that the woman Franken looked like he was groping was fully clothed, as well as an adult.

The girl that Moore stripped down to underwear with and had her touch his erection was only 14.

Nope, sorry, they are two totally different situations. One is crass and in poor taste, the other is child molestation.

Look at the lefty hypocrites at it again. Ever a bullshit excuse at the ready, and never a standard they won't double.

Keep thinking that 14 year olds are the same as grown women. Thats what got Roy in trouble in the first place

Because trying to kiss a Playboy Playmate it's just like terrorizing 14 year olds... LOL

Kissing a chick in a rehersal is just like being banned from the mall for hunting teens LOL

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He is mugging for the camera and his hands aren't touching her breasts.
Poor taste but not illegal

And the other difference is that the woman Franken looked like he was groping was fully clothed, as well as an adult.

The girl that Moore stripped down to underwear with and had her touch his erection was only 14.

Nope, sorry, they are two totally different situations. One is crass and in poor taste, the other is child molestation.

Look at the lefty hypocrites at it again. Ever a bullshit excuse at the ready, and never a standard they won't double.

Keep thinking that 14 year olds are the same as grown women. Thats what got Roy in trouble in the first place

Because trying to kiss a Playboy Playmate it's just like terrorizing 14 year olds... LOL

Kissing a chick in a rehersal is just like being banned from the mall for hunting teens LOL

"Kissing a chick in a rehersal is just like being banned from the mall for hunting teens LOL"

Actually, it's worse, as that is actually sexual assault and can earn you a lifetime registry on the sex offender list, in some States. I like Franken as much as you do, but you should be more careful and accurate in your commentary.

 

[ClosedCaption]

And the other difference is that the woman Franken looked like he was groping was fully clothed, as well as an adult.

The girl that Moore stripped down to underwear with and had her touch his erection was only 14.

Nope, sorry, they are two totally different situations. One is crass and in poor taste, the other is child molestation.

Look at the lefty hypocrites at it again. Ever a bullshit excuse at the ready, and never a standard they won't double.

Keep thinking that 14 year olds are the same as grown women. Thats what got Roy in trouble in the first place

Because trying to kiss a Playboy Playmate it's just like terrorizing 14 year olds... LOL

Kissing a chick in a rehersal is just like being banned from the mall for hunting teens LOL

"Kissing a chick in a rehersal is just like being banned from the mall for hunting teens LOL"

Actually, it's worse, as that is actually sexual assault and can earn you a lifetime registry on the sex offender list, in some States. I like Franken as much as you do, but you should be more careful and accurate in your commentary.

Yes, anything could land you places but unless you see where I said anything about where accusations can land you I suggest you reread and see the real point is that comparing child fucking to NOT CHILD FUCKING isnt valid on any planet or reality

 

[hadit]

He is mugging for the camera and his hands aren't touching her breasts.
Poor taste but not illegal

And the other difference is that the woman Franken looked like he was groping was fully clothed, as well as an adult.

The girl that Moore stripped down to underwear with and had her touch his erection was only 14.

Nope, sorry, they are two totally different situations. One is crass and in poor taste, the other is child molestation.

Look at the lefty hypocrites at it again. Ever a bullshit excuse at the ready, and never a standard they won't double.

Keep thinking that 14 year olds are the same as grown women. Thats what got Roy in trouble in the first place

Because trying to kiss a Playboy Playmate it's just like terrorizing 14 year olds... LOL

Kissing a chick in a rehersal is just like being banned from the mall for hunting teens LOL

That didn't happen, so no, not alike at all.

 

[francoHFW]

And the other difference is that the woman Franken looked like he was groping was fully clothed, as well as an adult.

The girl that Moore stripped down to underwear with and had her touch his erection was only 14.

Nope, sorry, they are two totally different situations. One is crass and in poor taste, the other is child molestation.

Look at the lefty hypocrites at it again. Ever a bullshit excuse at the ready, and never a standard they won't double.

Keep thinking that 14 year olds are the same as grown women. Thats what got Roy in trouble in the first place

Because trying to kiss a Playboy Playmate it's just like terrorizing 14 year olds... LOL

Kissing a chick in a rehersal is just like being banned from the mall for hunting teens LOL

That didn't happen, so no, not alike at all.

What didn't happen?

 

[hadit]

Look at the lefty hypocrites at it again. Ever a bullshit excuse at the ready, and never a standard they won't double.

Keep thinking that 14 year olds are the same as grown women. Thats what got Roy in trouble in the first place

Because trying to kiss a Playboy Playmate it's just like terrorizing 14 year olds... LOL

Kissing a chick in a rehersal is just like being banned from the mall for hunting teens LOL

That didn't happen, so no, not alike at all.

What didn't happen?

There's no hard evidence that Moore was banned from the mail. Thus, under the rules in play where we declare unsubstantiated things as fact, it never happened.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Keep thinking that 14 year olds are the same as grown women. Thats what got Roy in trouble in the first place

Because trying to kiss a Playboy Playmate it's just like terrorizing 14 year olds... LOL

Kissing a chick in a rehersal is just like being banned from the mall for hunting teens LOL

That didn't happen, so no, not alike at all.

What didn't happen?

There's no hard evidence that Moore was banned from the mail. Thus, under the rules in play where we declare unsubstantiated things as fact, it never happened.

The only reason you keep asking for evidence is because there wouldn' be any evidence of being banned. But if you don't believe the word of several others you have to have a reason and you reason has to be valid or else it' fair to say they ate telling the truth.

 

[hadit]

Because trying to kiss a Playboy Playmate it's just like terrorizing 14 year olds... LOL

Kissing a chick in a rehersal is just like being banned from the mall for hunting teens LOL

That didn't happen, so no, not alike at all.

What didn't happen?

There's no hard evidence that Moore was banned from the mail. Thus, under the rules in play where we declare unsubstantiated things as fact, it never happened.

The only reason you keep asking for evidence is because there wouldn' be any evidence of being banned. But if you don't believe the word of several others you have to have a reason and you reason has to be valid or else it' fair to say they ate telling the truth.

Of course there could be records, as long as the mall is in existence.

Basically, at this point anyone can say anything about Moore that they want and the antis can leap on it and proclaim it to be irrefutable evidence.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Kissing a chick in a rehersal is just like being banned from the mall for hunting teens LOL

That didn't happen, so no, not alike at all.

What didn't happen?

There's no hard evidence that Moore was banned from the mail. Thus, under the rules in play where we declare unsubstantiated things as fact, it never happened.

The only reason you keep asking for evidence is because there wouldn' be any evidence of being banned. But if you don't believe the word of several others you have to have a reason and you reason has to be valid or else it' fair to say they ate telling the truth.

Of course there could be records, as long as the mall is in existence.

Basically, at this point anyone can say anything about Moore that they want and the antis can leap on it and proclaim it to be irrefutable evidence.

What sort of records are those? Go one tell us what paperwork malls and high schools keep to watch out for suspicious guys. And then since eyou know how long do they typically keep the information. When you say you don' know, that's the problem.

Moore admitted he dated teens. So when teens come out and make claims guess who's fAult that is? Moores.

So many people have stories about him you need aomething more than saying all of them are lying. It''s statically impossible and a weird conspiracy at that.

 

[hadit]

That didn't happen, so no, not alike at all.

What didn't happen?

There's no hard evidence that Moore was banned from the mail. Thus, under the rules in play where we declare unsubstantiated things as fact, it never happened.

The only reason you keep asking for evidence is because there wouldn' be any evidence of being banned. But if you don't believe the word of several others you have to have a reason and you reason has to be valid or else it' fair to say they ate telling the truth.

Of course there could be records, as long as the mall is in existence.

Basically, at this point anyone can say anything about Moore that they want and the antis can leap on it and proclaim it to be irrefutable evidence.

What sort of records are those? Go one tell us what paperwork malls and high schools keep to watch out for suspicious guys. And then since eyou know how long do they typically keep the information. When you say you don' know, that's the problem.

Moore admitted he dated teens. So when teens come out and make claims guess who's fAult that is? Moores.

So many people have stories about him you need aomething more than saying all of them are lying. It''s statically impossible and a weird conspiracy at that.

There's a difference between saying a guy dated teenagers and that he was named from a mall. At least be accurate when you want to smear someone. I mean, how credible were some of the things proclaimed as fact about Benghazi?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Yes there are differences between those 2 things but the one similarity they have is that both involve Moore.

How many times has any grown man been known to fuck with teens? Doesn't that happen to everyone?

No, it doesnt.

 

[ABikerSailor]

What didn't happen?

There's no hard evidence that Moore was banned from the mail. Thus, under the rules in play where we declare unsubstantiated things as fact, it never happened.

The only reason you keep asking for evidence is because there wouldn' be any evidence of being banned. But if you don't believe the word of several others you have to have a reason and you reason has to be valid or else it' fair to say they ate telling the truth.

Of course there could be records, as long as the mall is in existence.

Basically, at this point anyone can say anything about Moore that they want and the antis can leap on it and proclaim it to be irrefutable evidence.

What sort of records are those? Go one tell us what paperwork malls and high schools keep to watch out for suspicious guys. And then since eyou know how long do they typically keep the information. When you say you don' know, that's the problem.

Moore admitted he dated teens. So when teens come out and make claims guess who's fAult that is? Moores.

So many people have stories about him you need aomething more than saying all of them are lying. It''s statically impossible and a weird conspiracy at that.

There's a difference between saying a guy dated teenagers and that he was named from a mall. At least be accurate when you want to smear someone. I mean, how credible were some of the things proclaimed as fact about Benghazi?

Here ya go...........................

Roy Moore accuser: I got him banned from the mall

Roy Moore was reportedly once banned from an Alabama shopping mall for bothering teen girls

Locals Were Troubled by Roy Moore’s Interactions with Teen Girls at the Gadsden Mall

And, here's a link to what Snopes found out about the whole thing...............

Was Roy Moore Banned From the Gadsden Mall For Harassing Teenage Girls?

So, although the mall doesn't have records that go back that far, there are several witnesses that have stated repeatedly that Moore was banned from the mall because he was hassling teen age girls.

 

[hadit]

There's no hard evidence that Moore was banned from the mail. Thus, under the rules in play where we declare unsubstantiated things as fact, it never happened.

The only reason you keep asking for evidence is because there wouldn' be any evidence of being banned. But if you don't believe the word of several others you have to have a reason and you reason has to be valid or else it' fair to say they ate telling the truth.

Of course there could be records, as long as the mall is in existence.

Basically, at this point anyone can say anything about Moore that they want and the antis can leap on it and proclaim it to be irrefutable evidence.

What sort of records are those? Go one tell us what paperwork malls and high schools keep to watch out for suspicious guys. And then since eyou know how long do they typically keep the information. When you say you don' know, that's the problem.

Moore admitted he dated teens. So when teens come out and make claims guess who's fAult that is? Moores.

So many people have stories about him you need aomething more than saying all of them are lying. It''s statically impossible and a weird conspiracy at that.

There's a difference between saying a guy dated teenagers and that he was named from a mall. At least be accurate when you want to smear someone. I mean, how credible were some of the things proclaimed as fact about Benghazi?

Here ya go...........................

Roy Moore accuser: I got him banned from the mall

Roy Moore was reportedly once banned from an Alabama shopping mall for bothering teen girls

Locals Were Troubled by Roy Moore’s Interactions with Teen Girls at the Gadsden Mall

And, here's a link to what Snopes found out about the whole thing...............

Was Roy Moore Banned From the Gadsden Mall For Harassing Teenage Girls?

So, although the mall doesn't have records that go back that far, there are several witnesses that have stated repeatedly that Moore was banned from the mall because he was hassling teen age girls.

That's good enough for the mob to hang him then.

 

[ClosedCaption]

The only reason you keep asking for evidence is because there wouldn' be any evidence of being banned. But if you don't believe the word of several others you have to have a reason and you reason has to be valid or else it' fair to say they ate telling the truth.

Of course there could be records, as long as the mall is in existence.

Basically, at this point anyone can say anything about Moore that they want and the antis can leap on it and proclaim it to be irrefutable evidence.

What sort of records are those? Go one tell us what paperwork malls and high schools keep to watch out for suspicious guys. And then since eyou know how long do they typically keep the information. When you say you don' know, that's the problem.

Moore admitted he dated teens. So when teens come out and make claims guess who's fAult that is? Moores.

So many people have stories about him you need aomething more than saying all of them are lying. It''s statically impossible and a weird conspiracy at that.

There's a difference between saying a guy dated teenagers and that he was named from a mall. At least be accurate when you want to smear someone. I mean, how credible were some of the things proclaimed as fact about Benghazi?

Here ya go...........................

Roy Moore accuser: I got him banned from the mall

Roy Moore was reportedly once banned from an Alabama shopping mall for bothering teen girls

Locals Were Troubled by Roy Moore’s Interactions with Teen Girls at the Gadsden Mall

And, here's a link to what Snopes found out about the whole thing...............

Was Roy Moore Banned From the Gadsden Mall For Harassing Teenage Girls?

So, although the mall doesn't have records that go back that far, there are several witnesses that have stated repeatedly that Moore was banned from the mall because he was hassling teen age girls.

That's good enough for the mob to hang him then.

Try a little lower of a reaction. Don't jump to the absurd. Can you see there is a problem with all these people independently knowing the same informations about 1 person?

 

[francoHFW]

What didn't happen?

There's no hard evidence that Moore was banned from the mail. Thus, under the rules in play where we declare unsubstantiated things as fact, it never happened.

The only reason you keep asking for evidence is because there wouldn' be any evidence of being banned. But if you don't believe the word of several others you have to have a reason and you reason has to be valid or else it' fair to say they ate telling the truth.

Of course there could be records, as long as the mall is in existence.

Basically, at this point anyone can say anything about Moore that they want and the antis can leap on it and proclaim it to be irrefutable evidence.

What sort of records are those? Go one tell us what paperwork malls and high schools keep to watch out for suspicious guys. And then since eyou know how long do they typically keep the information. When you say you don' know, that's the problem.

Moore admitted he dated teens. So when teens come out and make claims guess who's fAult that is? Moores.

So many people have stories about him you need aomething more than saying all of them are lying. It''s statically impossible and a weird conspiracy at that.

There's a difference between saying a guy dated teenagers and that he was named from a mall. At least be accurate when you want to smear someone. I mean, how credible were some of the things proclaimed as fact about Benghazi?

He also smeared himself on the Hannity Show... You people are amazing so thick.