Renowned Arab scholar: “Palestinians” uprooted themselves

[MartyNYC]

Dumbass Pestilinians uprooted themselves, as renowned Arab scholar Fouad Ajami has written. Good for them!

“The UN vote in 1947 was Israel’s title to statehood. Palestinians and Arab powers chose the path of war. Their choice was calamitous. Palestine became a great Arab shame. Few Arabs were willing to tell the story truthfully, to face its harsh verdict”

The U.N. Can't Deliver a Palestinian State

 

[cnm]

Dumbass Pestilinians uprooted themselves, as renowned Arab scholar Fouad Ajami has written.

Absolutely!

 

[cnm]

Oh. You think they didn't uproot themselves?

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Renowned Arab scholar: “Palestinians” uprooted themselves
SUBTOPIC:
※→ MartyNYC, et al,

Most people do not grasp that establishing a state is a matter of self-determination within a specific geographical boundary.

You are right on the money!

Dumbass Pestilinians uprooted themselves, as renowned Arab scholar Fouad Ajami has written. Good for them!

“The UN vote in 1947 was Israel’s title to statehood. Palestinians and Arab powers chose the path of war. Their choice was calamitous. Palestine became a great Arab shame. Few Arabs were willing to tell the story truthfully, to face its harsh verdict”

The U.N. Can't Deliver a Palestinian State

(COMMENT)

SIMPLE IDEA: ONLY the people within that particular geographic boundary may declare "Statehood." No authority outside that specific geographical boundary (including the UN) may declare statehood (external influence) • and • no authority outside that geographical boundary has the right to deny the people within the geographical boundary self-determination (external influence).

The people in the West Bank and Gaza Strip may not dictate political decisions on matters of self-determination. And there are only a fraction (less than 2%) of Palestinians (within the West Bank and Gaza Strip) that can actually claim the status of "displaced" or "refugee."

(SIDEBAR)

On the matter of the settlements, the Arab Palestinians agreed to (The Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement on the West Bank and Gaza Strip • Protocol Concerning Civil Affairs) ARTICLE IV - Special Provisions concerning Area "C" wherein the Settlements are being built in Area "C" under the agreement. The Palestinians agreed to Article IV of Annex III in which Israel would maintain Full Civil and Security Jurisdiction.

Now it is internationally recognized that the agreement was made with international eyes on the proceedings and that the legitimacy was recognized - even unto the award of a Nobel Prize. However, today there are a number of Arab Palestinians (within the West Bank and Gaza Strip) that insist that the Oslo Accords were defective and did not represent a legitimate political agreement.

This is a demonstration of just how unfaithful the Arab Palestinians (within the West Bank and Gaza Strip) are to the commitment to peace. It further demonstrates how supportive the Arab Palestinians are to the hostile and terrorist elements within their community that consider "armed struggle" as the only solution and present the two main character flaws widely exhibited:

● The Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) still attempt to confuse the issue and mask the fact that they split hairs as to the depth and meaning of armed struggle as a:​

​

◈ Strategy​

​

◈ Tactic​

​

◈ Or both.​

● The Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) attempt to justify their violations of the Geneva Convention (GCIV) and Customary / International Humanitarian Law (IHL) as if there is a justification for Jihadism, Fedayeen Activism, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence. The HoAP operates exactly opposite to the premise that:​

​

◈ International Peace and Security,​

​

◈ Prevention and Removal of Threats to the Peace,​

​

◈ Suppression of Acts of Aggression​

Well, I better get off this soapbox before I fall.

Most Respectfully,
R

References (2):

internally displaced persons • In terms of the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement, adopted by ECOSOC on 11 February 1998 (U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/1998/53/Add.2), internally displaced persons ‘are persons or groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of or in order to avoid the effects of armed conflict, situations of generalized violence, violations of human rights or natural or human-made disasters, and who have not crossed an internationally recognized State border’ (para. 2).

Parry & Grant Encyclopaedic Dictionary of International Law / John P. Grant and J. Craig Barker. -- 3rd ed. © 2009 by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 pp 284

refugee(s) • In terms of art. 1 of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951 ( 189 U.N.T.S. 150), as amended by the Protocol of 16 December 1966, a refugee is any person who: ‘

(1) Has been considered a refugee under the Arrangements of 12 May 1926 and 30 June 1928 or under the Conventions of 28 October 1933 and 10 February 1938, the Protocol of 14 September 1939 or the Constitution of the International Refugee Organization . . .;​

​

(2) Owing to well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it’.​

Parry & Grant Encyclopaedic Dictionary of International Law / John P. Grant and J. Craig Barker. -- 3rd ed. © 2009 by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 pp 511
.

 

[MartyNYC]

Absolutely!

LOL, keys sold as souvenirs!

 

[cnm]

LOL, keys sold as souvenirs!

Kept as mementos of land theft...

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

We salute Greater Israel.

 

[cnm]

We salute Greater Israel.

I assume that includes the Bantustans?

 

[MartyNYC]

Kept as mementos of land theft...

Um, there were no locks, you moron. Arabs in the early and mid 20th century, and earlier, lived in mud huts. Those keys are souvenirs. Duh! LOL!

 

[MartyNYC]

I assume that includes the Bantustans?

Meet Sumaiiah Almheiri, the first Emirati Arab woman to attend university in Israel.

“When I arrived, I saw how beautiful the country is. I saw the diversity of the society. I saw the Arabs and Jews sitting together. It was mind-blowing!”

 

[MartyNYC]

View attachment 779111
Oh. You think they didn't uproot themselves?

Uprooted from where? LOL!

 

[cnm]

Land thieves are very defensive.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Renowned Arab scholar: “Palestinians” uprooted themselves
SUBTOPIC: Positive Contributions
※→ John Edger Slow Horse, et al,

(OPENING)

While, as an outsider, it is hard to deduce the intent and motivations of the Israelis, the fact is that within the region Israel stands head and shoulder above any Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) Nation by a substantial margin.

◈ Among the world's nations, in terms of human development, Israel Ranks #22 highest; but stands first of any MENA nation.​

​

◈ Looking at the top 50 nations worldwide, the United Arab Emirate Ranks 26th followed by Bahrain and Saudi Arabia (sharing that Ranking of 35th), Qatar (Ranking 42d), and Kuwait (Ranking 50th).​

Put in perspective, the United States only Ranks 21st, being below such countries as the Republic of Korea (ROK), Japan, the United States, and of course Luxembourg and Liechtenstein. (I add this observation because I was under the impression that the US ranked much higher than it actually is.)

We salute Greater Israel.

(COMMENT)
.
Israel has put in place what is considered to be, a "welfare-to-work" measure which continues to erode issues like long-term unemployment. It demonstrates just how advanced the Israelis are in matters that concern its citizenry (light-years beyond the leadership inside the Beltway).

Israel has made a significant impact on regional peace and stability. Normally, the outside observer tends to fixate on the strife and suppression of the Jihadists, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters. But from the perspective of containment, the adverse effects of the discord have not spilled over the frontier and into the adjacent neighbors.

Of course, the Israeli measures do not include a remedy for the deficit in water and energy needs for the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAPs). Even though the HoAPs probably would not appreciate a massive desalinization solution to HoAP water needs, it would have a positive effect. And if the Israelis were to build an expansive photoelectric field to produce clean solar energy, this would permit Israel to provide the HoAP with nearly free (subsidized by the Israelis). And while the initial outlay would be expensive, in the long run, the effort would begin to pay for itself.

Neither of these alternatives are my ideas. In fact, they came from a discussion I had with an Israeli friend. But then politics raises its ugly head and creates unnecessary obstacles to such alternatives.

Well, again, I've taken too much bandwidth.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[MartyNYC]

Land thieves are very defensive.

Arafat was Egyptian. Duh! LOL!

 

[MartyNYC]

Land thieves are very defensive.

Whose land?