Rep: Franks Awans seek immunity for significant disturbing testimony against Wasserman Shchultz

MindWars

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2016
42,227
10,772
Imran Awan, the former congressional IT staffer, and his wife are likely seeking immunity from federal prosecutors in exchange for “significant, disturbing” testimony against Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-Fla.).
Rep. Franks: Awans Seek Immunity For “Significant, Disturbing” Testimony Against Wasserman- Schultz
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

This snatch has lied so bad it is sickening, and she's been caught doing it . Those who pay attention to her bs have heard it themselves.
 
Oh no, if Hillary is involved in this. The poor guy will be committing suicide soon.
 
Did anyone actually READ the article? :lol: It's NOT any kind of news? It's all just gossip....certainly you have the capability to discern this? What in the world is wrong with you trumpsters, you are like thoughtless zombies?
 
Did anyone actually READ the article? :lol: It's NOT any kind of news? It's all just gossip....certainly you have the capability to discern this? What in the world is wrong with you trumpsters, you are like thoughtless zombies?
I'm a Trump supporter who knows that everything Mindwars posts is complete horse shit.
 
Did anyone actually READ the article? :lol: It's NOT any kind of news? It's all just gossip....certainly you have the capability to discern this? What in the world is wrong with you trumpsters, you are like thoughtless zombies?
Meanwhile you wait with baited breath for every scrap about Russia when there is No actual evidence anything happened.
 
Did anyone actually READ the article? :lol: It's NOT any kind of news? It's all just gossip....certainly you have the capability to discern this? What in the world is wrong with you trumpsters, you are like thoughtless zombies?

Say what? That's the way the left has the media set up these days. You do realize that most of articles you guys take as gospel concerning Russian collusion is nothing more than gossip didn't you? Who do you think all of those unnamed sources are? No one on record and no evidence, but BY GAWD, Trump colluded with the Ruskies!
 
Did anyone actually READ the article? :lol: It's NOT any kind of news? It's all just gossip....certainly you have the capability to discern this? What in the world is wrong with you trumpsters, you are like thoughtless zombies?

Say what? That's the way the left has the media set up these days. You do realize that most of articles you guys take as gospel concerning Russian collusion is nothing more than gossip didn't you? Who do you think all of those unnamed sources are? No one on record and no evidence, but BY GAWD, Trump colluded with the Ruskies!
yes, much of it can not be confirmed with anonymous sources! At least not by us...though the newspapers like WSJ, WP, NYTIMES, yahoo news, the AP etc do have requirements on posting news stories... the unnamed sources have to be confirmed by their editors and they have to get at least one other person not related to their first source, to confirm the original sources info....sometimes these investigative reporters wait months before they can get a second source and get their articles printed.

so, there is a bit of a difference between real news reporting and opinions and gossip.

Does the press get it wrong sometimes, even with their at minimum, 2 independent anonymous sources, sure they do....maybe 1 time in every 100 unnamed sourced articles, they have to retract and apologize for getting it wrong.

opinions and editorials, are what they are named, and not a drop more!

It's hard these days, with all the nightly cable political commentary shows that are more like entertainment to discern what is actually news.....and with all the internet sites proclaiming to be legit news, only with no journalistic standards.
 
No credible sources reporting this and Awans IS the suspect; so he wants to frame Wasserman-Shultz. Since when do conservatives approve of immunity from prosecution?
 
Did anyone actually READ the article? :lol: It's NOT any kind of news? It's all just gossip....certainly you have the capability to discern this? What in the world is wrong with you trumpsters, you are like thoughtless zombies?
Meanwhile you wait with baited breath for every scrap about Russia when there is No actual evidence anything happened.
there is plenty of evidence, have you been living in a bubble?
 
Did anyone actually READ the article? :lol: It's NOT any kind of news? It's all just gossip....certainly you have the capability to discern this? What in the world is wrong with you trumpsters, you are like thoughtless zombies?
Meanwhile you wait with baited breath for every scrap about Russia when there is No actual evidence anything happened.
there is plenty of evidence, have you been living in a bubble?

Please provide. There is plenty of wishful thinking if that is what you consider evidence.
 
Did anyone actually READ the article? :lol: It's NOT any kind of news? It's all just gossip....certainly you have the capability to discern this? What in the world is wrong with you trumpsters, you are like thoughtless zombies?
Meanwhile you wait with baited breath for every scrap about Russia when there is No actual evidence anything happened.
there is plenty of evidence, have you been living in a bubble?

Please provide. There is plenty of wishful thinking if that is what you consider evidence.


Russian Cyber Hacks on U.S. Electoral System Far Wider Than Previously Known
Russian Election Hacking Efforts, Wider Than Previously Known, Draw Little Scrutiny
Trump Jr.'s meeting with a Russian lawyer sheds new light on the extent of Russia's election interference

Business Insider isn't 'liberal'; there are scores of reports in any event. The question is, should Trump be blamed for his son's acts, if proven? The answer is NO, unless Trump took part in some way.
 
Did anyone actually READ the article? :lol: It's NOT any kind of news? It's all just gossip....certainly you have the capability to discern this? What in the world is wrong with you trumpsters, you are like thoughtless zombies?
Meanwhile you wait with baited breath for every scrap about Russia when there is No actual evidence anything happened.
there is plenty of evidence, have you been living in a bubble?

Please provide. There is plenty of wishful thinking if that is what you consider evidence.
here's just 1

the Russian gvt created bots and paid trolls to infiltrate social media (about 40,000 of them) and the Russian govt paid for $100,000 worth of facebook ads promoting fake news, Russian propaganda...

and they did the same on twitter...
 
the russian gvt, congratulated itself on their interference success after trump won...
 
Imran Awan, the former congressional IT staffer, and his wife are likely seeking immunity from federal prosecutors in exchange for “significant, disturbing” testimony against Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-Fla.).
Rep. Franks: Awans Seek Immunity For “Significant, Disturbing” Testimony Against Wasserman- Schultz
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

This snatch has lied so bad it is sickening, and she's been caught doing it . Those who pay attention to her bs have heard it themselves.

Sure it would be great if they spilled the beans on her, but I still think they need some punishment for their own dirty deeds
 

Forum List

Back
Top