Republican Impeachment Report: Dems Have No Evidence On President Trump, No Crimes Committed

[The Original Tree]

The only problem with that is Mulveyny said it was held back by the President.... And the President said it was as well..And then mentioned the Bidens in the same breath,

And witness testimony showed they all believed it was what the President wanted, primarily ambassador Sondland through Giuliani, of whom he and others, including Velensky were told by the President to work with. Giuliani...

The coveted by Velensky, DC meeting was part as well....

But to me, what really matters is he was using his office, to cheat in the upcoming election... to get a leg up, over Biden....


He would not be asking a country he claims is so corrupt, to investigate an opponent or once ally, for corruption.... if he was truly concerned about corruption.... he would have gone the legal route, through the DOJ and not using Giuliani to head the effort, and another country's govt, who he claimed was corrupt.

Involving a foreign govt in his election campaign IS CORRUPT, using his govt job to do it, is doubly corrupt, and an abuse of power, and an assault on our democratic, constitutional Republic imo, and you likely would believe the same, if it were a democratic president doing his shenanigans.

The only problem with that is Mulveyny said it was held back by the President.... And the President said it was as well..And then mentioned the Bidens in the same breath,

And witness testimony showed they all believed it was what the President wanted, primarily ambassador Sondland through Giuliani, of whom he and others, including Velensky were told by the President to work with. Giuliani...

The coveted by Velensky, DC meeting was part as well....

But to me, what really matters is he was using his office, to cheat in the upcoming election... to get a leg up, over Biden....


He would not be asking a country he claims is so corrupt, to investigate an opponent or once ally, for corruption.... if he was truly concerned about corruption.... he would have gone the legal route, through the DOJ and not using Giuliani to head the effort, and another country's govt, who he claimed was corrupt.

Involving a foreign govt in his election campaign IS CORRUPT, using his govt job to do it, is doubly corrupt, and an abuse of power, and an assault on our democratic, constitutional Republic imo, and you likely would believe the same, if it were a democratic president doing his shenanigans.

Why should Trump or the Republicans legitimize this train wreck by appearing in it when:

• The day of his inauguration, many democrats chose not to even show up.
• The night of his State of Union Address, democrats boycotted, those there sat arms folded, frowning, even through obvious great things for the country.
• January 2017, they had Comey slipping secret conversations to the press to embarrass him.
• January 2018, they had democrats spitting on his cabinet and yelling 'Impeach 45!"
• January 2019, they were trying to railroad him claiming he was a Russian agent.

If Mueller couldn't "exonerate" him, I ask you where any overlap is between those charges with the current ones? And if this all began with someone walking past a doorway and hearing Trump loudly talking to Ukraine for 5 seconds saying something so heinous that it prompted an alert whistleblower to alert the government to seditious corruption by the president for the sake of the Constitution itself, then I ask you:

HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE TO PRESENT THAT?

HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE TO PROVE THAT?

How can this be such a cut and dry thing, yet after 30-40 hours of numbing, tedious testimony, STILL not have made their case?

The president does not get to decide what is legit or not, per the Constitution, it is solely the power given to the House only.

but he does get to decide foreign policy now doesn't he? so if that is the case, per the constitution as you like to say, how can he be guilty of trying to change it when changing it IS his job?

have fun with that one.

By law, he does not get to hold back congressionally passed, foreign military aid.... not without asking congress for permission.

So, by your "reason" then, a delay of even one day is an impeachable offense and the president a mere figurehead puppet of the Congress?
How is it then that Barry Obumma escaped about 10,000 impeachment charges by you???

The law itself required the Pentagon to investigate the Ukraine to ensure the funds would not go towards corruption. The Pentagon investigation took 3 months, and in June 2019 the Pentagon gave the A OK to release the aid money... No corruption in sight.

The Commander In Chief is who is in Charge of Foreign Policy and Foreign Aide. He can delegate that authority for a time, or rescind that authority at will as part of his rights and privileges in concordance with The Executive Branch being a CO-EQUAL Branch of Government.

Let me ask you a question: Were you born a DemNazi Commie, or were you dropped on your head and became one? Does the metal plate in your head cause you problems when you go through metal detectors?

 

[Care4all]

The president does not get to decide what is legit or not, per the Constitution, it is solely the power given to the House only.

but he does get to decide foreign policy now doesn't he? so if that is the case, per the constitution as you like to say, how can he be guilty of trying to change it when changing it IS his job?

have fun with that one.

By law, he does not get to hold back congressionally passed, foreign military aid.... not without asking congress for permission.

So, by your "reason" then, a delay of even one day is an impeachable offense and the president a mere figurehead puppet of the Congress?
How is it then that Barry Obumma escaped about 10,000 impeachment charges by you???

and then how did obama send all that money to iran, w/o congressional approval?

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/obama-iran-terrorism/

Start a thread on it, and I will gladly spend the time to research the laws covering it.

This case is about Congressionally Appropriated foreign Military funds....

The Executive Branch can block the release of any funds designated as Foreign Aide to any country for any reason as part of their Rights and Privileges granted by The Constitution and our Laws in concordance with being a CO-EQUAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT.

Let me ask you a question: Did you Evolve in to STUPID or were YOU BORN THAT WAY?

Nope!

 

[The Original Tree]

So basically, your spin is that you will throw the POTUS under the wheels of the bus at the first signs of the slightest deviance on policy with some minor foreign country.

No. Just answering a simple question. My opinion has not changed. The gravest impeachable offence was the attack on half of our two party system using bipartisan foreign policy funds to coerce The Ukraine into aiding that assault. That blocking the funds itself was an illegal act is just icing on the cake. Not that it matters much to his base......

Define The Following Terms:

Due Process
Co-Equal Branch of Government
Executive Privilege
ShutTheFuckUpCommieBastard

 

[The Original Tree]

By law, he does not get to hold back congressionally passed, foreign military aid.... not without asking congress for permission.

So, by your "reason" then, a delay of even one day is an impeachable offense and the president a mere figurehead puppet of the Congress?
How is it then that Barry Obumma escaped about 10,000 impeachment charges by you???

and then how did obama send all that money to iran, w/o congressional approval?

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/obama-iran-terrorism/

Start a thread on it, and I will gladly spend the time to research the laws covering it.

This case is about Congressionally Appropriated foreign Military funds....

The Executive Branch can block the release of any funds designated as Foreign Aide to any country for any reason as part of their Rights and Privileges granted by The Constitution and our Laws in concordance with being a CO-EQUAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT.

Let me ask you a question: Did you Evolve in to STUPID or were YOU BORN THAT WAY?

Nope!

So it's a Genetic Defect, much like Gender Dysphoria or as I like to call it, Hairy Man Butt Love.

Thanks for clearing that up.

 

[BlindBoo]

Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.

Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”

President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.

Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.

“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”

(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...

-----------'

Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!

OMG republicans exonerated Trump?! Shit I didn’t see that coming! Well, I guess that’s it then. Trump has the utmost integrity and sense of morality. Just ask republicans.

Just ask Muller he found nothing with unlimited resources and money.

If nothing was found why does the White House persist in blocking testimony and documents that Congress has subpoenaed?

Please post your picture, your address, your social security number, and your record of financial holdings and your last 10 years of tax returns.

We'll be right over to search your house to make sure you have not committed any crimes against The State.

It is a small matter for you to "voluntarily" invite us in to your home for some tea, if you have nothing to hide.

Thank you in advance for your invitation.

This message is brought to you by your friends at INGSOC & The Office of Safety & Citizen Compliance.

Good Morning Trigger.

 

[iceberg]

The only problem with that is Mulveyny said it was held back by the President.... And the President said it was as well..And then mentioned the Bidens in the same breath,

And witness testimony showed they all believed it was what the President wanted, primarily ambassador Sondland through Giuliani, of whom he and others, including Velensky were told by the President to work with. Giuliani...

The coveted by Velensky, DC meeting was part as well....

But to me, what really matters is he was using his office, to cheat in the upcoming election... to get a leg up, over Biden....


He would not be asking a country he claims is so corrupt, to investigate an opponent or once ally, for corruption.... if he was truly concerned about corruption.... he would have gone the legal route, through the DOJ and not using Giuliani to head the effort, and another country's govt, who he claimed was corrupt.

Involving a foreign govt in his election campaign IS CORRUPT, using his govt job to do it, is doubly corrupt, and an abuse of power, and an assault on our democratic, constitutional Republic imo, and you likely would believe the same, if it were a democratic president doing his shenanigans.

The only problem with that is Mulveyny said it was held back by the President.... And the President said it was as well..And then mentioned the Bidens in the same breath,

And witness testimony showed they all believed it was what the President wanted, primarily ambassador Sondland through Giuliani, of whom he and others, including Velensky were told by the President to work with. Giuliani...

The coveted by Velensky, DC meeting was part as well....

But to me, what really matters is he was using his office, to cheat in the upcoming election... to get a leg up, over Biden....


He would not be asking a country he claims is so corrupt, to investigate an opponent or once ally, for corruption.... if he was truly concerned about corruption.... he would have gone the legal route, through the DOJ and not using Giuliani to head the effort, and another country's govt, who he claimed was corrupt.

Involving a foreign govt in his election campaign IS CORRUPT, using his govt job to do it, is doubly corrupt, and an abuse of power, and an assault on our democratic, constitutional Republic imo, and you likely would believe the same, if it were a democratic president doing his shenanigans.

Why should Trump or the Republicans legitimize this train wreck by appearing in it when:

• The day of his inauguration, many democrats chose not to even show up.
• The night of his State of Union Address, democrats boycotted, those there sat arms folded, frowning, even through obvious great things for the country.
• January 2017, they had Comey slipping secret conversations to the press to embarrass him.
• January 2018, they had democrats spitting on his cabinet and yelling 'Impeach 45!"
• January 2019, they were trying to railroad him claiming he was a Russian agent.

If Mueller couldn't "exonerate" him, I ask you where any overlap is between those charges with the current ones? And if this all began with someone walking past a doorway and hearing Trump loudly talking to Ukraine for 5 seconds saying something so heinous that it prompted an alert whistleblower to alert the government to seditious corruption by the president for the sake of the Constitution itself, then I ask you:

HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE TO PRESENT THAT?

HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE TO PROVE THAT?

How can this be such a cut and dry thing, yet after 30-40 hours of numbing, tedious testimony, STILL not have made their case?

The president does not get to decide what is legit or not, per the Constitution, it is solely the power given to the House only.

but he does get to decide foreign policy now doesn't he? so if that is the case, per the constitution as you like to say, how can he be guilty of trying to change it when changing it IS his job?

have fun with that one.

By law, he does not get to hold back congressionally passed, foreign military aid.... not without asking congress for permission.

So, by your "reason" then, a delay of even one day is an impeachable offense and the president a mere figurehead puppet of the Congress?
How is it then that Barry Obumma escaped about 10,000 impeachment charges by you???

The law itself required the Pentagon to investigate the Ukraine to ensure the funds would not go towards corruption. The Pentagon investigation took 3 months, and in June 2019 the Pentagon gave the A OK to release the aid money... No corruption in sight.

you speak over yourself as it suits your needs. you'll say something and when presented with the same thing from "your" side you either ignore it completely or just say FAKE NEWS but you *never* really *ever* make a valid point.

i pointed to the law itself and how he has full discretion and you ignore it and just cry foul again.

*this* is why talking to you is pointless. you say whatever you need to say to be right "at the time".

 

[The Original Tree]

Hey Left Tards, How did that go for you Trying TO STOP President Trump from with holding Foreign Aide from Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador?

Trump Froze Aid To Guatemala. Now Programs Are Shutting Down

 

[The Original Tree]

The president does not get to decide what is legit or not, per the Constitution, it is solely the power given to the House only.

but he does get to decide foreign policy now doesn't he? so if that is the case, per the constitution as you like to say, how can he be guilty of trying to change it when changing it IS his job?

have fun with that one.

By law, he does not get to hold back congressionally passed, foreign military aid.... not without asking congress for permission.

So, by your "reason" then, a delay of even one day is an impeachable offense and the president a mere figurehead puppet of the Congress?
How is it then that Barry Obumma escaped about 10,000 impeachment charges by you???

The law itself required the Pentagon to investigate the Ukraine to ensure the funds would not go towards corruption. The Pentagon investigation took 3 months, and in June 2019 the Pentagon gave the A OK to release the aid money... No corruption in sight.

you speak over yourself as it suits your needs. you'll say something and when presented with the same thing from "your" side you either ignore it completely or just say FAKE NEWS but you *never* really *ever* make a valid point.

i pointed to the law itself and how he has full discretion and you ignore it and just cry foul again.

*this* is why talking to you is pointless. you say whatever you need to say to be right "at the time".

Have you found a single Leftist Bot Troll here that you could actually have a conversation with? Why do you think they are here? To disrupt legitimate conversation and debate about FACTS. They are here for DISINFORMATION, and that is it.

 

[NightFox]

Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.

Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”

President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.

Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.

“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”

(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...

-----------'

Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!

OMG republicans exonerated Trump?! Shit I didn’t see that coming! Well, I guess that’s it then. Trump has the utmost integrity and sense of morality. Just ask republicans.

Just ask Muller he found nothing with unlimited resources and money.

If nothing was found why does the White House persist in blocking testimony and documents that Congress has subpoenaed?

I believe the narrative coming from the Donny Regime is that this is a Congressional fishing expedition to which they are not inclined to willingly supply more bait.

You're using that "if you have nothing to hide then you'd give us everything we ask for" logic that is the stock & trade of overreach, let Congress make their case for whatever materials they deem relevant to the Judicial Branch if they are so inclined.

Usaully, well in the past at least they have almost always been able come to a compromise. But they are proceediing.....

Uh-huh BOTH sides are acting like spoiled infants, IMHO neither side is interested in truth or justice, just advancing their own accumulation of power by hurting the other political Crime Family.

The funny thing is that the most likely outcome of this circus is going to be purely symbolic for both sides, Crime Family-D will get to claim "LOOK! our valiant heroes in the House impeached The Donald" and Crime Family-R will get to claim "LOOK! they tried to overthrow The Donald but our brave boys & girls in the Senate stopped them"

It'd be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.

Judge denies request for stay on McGahn testimony

There ya go, our black robed dictators of the Judicial Branch fulfilling (one of ) it's roles as the neutral arbiter between The Infants of the Legislative Branch and The Infants of the Executive Branch.

 

[The Original Tree]

Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.

Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”

President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.

Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.

“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”

(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...

-----------'

Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!

OMG republicans exonerated Trump?! Shit I didn’t see that coming! Well, I guess that’s it then. Trump has the utmost integrity and sense of morality. Just ask republicans.

Just ask Muller he found nothing with unlimited resources and money.

If nothing was found why does the White House persist in blocking testimony and documents that Congress has subpoenaed?

Please post your picture, your address, your social security number, and your record of financial holdings and your last 10 years of tax returns.

We'll be right over to search your house to make sure you have not committed any crimes against The State.

It is a small matter for you to "voluntarily" invite us in to your home for some tea, if you have nothing to hide.

Thank you in advance for your invitation.

This message is brought to you by your friends at INGSOC & The Office of Safety & Citizen Compliance.

Good Morning Trigger.

View attachment 292949

As I told you before, that is lame, and ineffective with me, and is just another deflection, Troll Bot.

Call me when you stop President Trump from withholding Aide to South America.

It's his right to do so per the Rights and Privileges granted The Executive Branch.

As promised, Trump slashes aid to Central America over migrants

 

[The Original Tree]

OMG republicans exonerated Trump?! Shit I didn’t see that coming! Well, I guess that’s it then. Trump has the utmost integrity and sense of morality. Just ask republicans.

Just ask Muller he found nothing with unlimited resources and money.

If nothing was found why does the White House persist in blocking testimony and documents that Congress has subpoenaed?

I believe the narrative coming from the Donny Regime is that this is a Congressional fishing expedition to which they are not inclined to willingly supply more bait.

You're using that "if you have nothing to hide then you'd give us everything we ask for" logic that is the stock & trade of overreach, let Congress make their case for whatever materials they deem relevant to the Judicial Branch if they are so inclined.

Usaully, well in the past at least they have almost always been able come to a compromise. But they are proceediing.....

Uh-huh BOTH sides are acting like spoiled infants, IMHO neither side is interested in truth or justice, just advancing their own accumulation of power by hurting the other political Crime Family.

The funny thing is that the most likely outcome of this circus is going to be purely symbolic for both sides, Crime Family-D will get to claim "LOOK! our valiant heroes in the House impeached The Donald" and Crime Family-R will get to claim "LOOK! they tried to overthrow The Donald but our brave boys & girls in the Senate stopped them"

It'd be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.

Judge denies request for stay on McGahn testimony

There ya go, our black robed dictators of the Judicial Branch fulfilling (one of ) it's roles as the neutral arbiter between The Infants of the Legislative Branch and The Infants of the Executive Branch.

I disagree. The Executive Branch Authority is under attack and The Democrats are trying to USURP Executive Branch Authority and make it a PUPPET of Congress.

It is a CO-EQUAL BRANCH.

The Executive Branch has a right to defend itself from any COUPs, Intrusions in to it's authority, Interference in it's policies, and Overreach Efforts Mounted by Congress or any other branch. It is the only Branch of Government Elected by ALL The PEOPLE of The UNITED STATES.

The Executive Branch has a right to defend itself from unlawful attacks from The Judicial or Legislative Branch and does not have to comply with unlawful orders.

 

[BlindBoo]

The Executive Branch has Executive Branch Privilege Protections as GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION.

Claims of blanket immunity will continue to go down in flames.

Judge denies request for stay on McGahn testimony

 

[The Original Tree]

The Executive Branch has Executive Branch Privilege Protections as GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION.

Claims of blanket immunity will continue to go down in flames.

Judge denies request for stay on McGahn testimony

The Executive Branch does not have to comply and can appeal that decision, or simply ignore it and exert Executive Privilege.

When are you going to give us your address so we can search your house for contraband and your computer for Thought Crimes?

 

[easyt65]

The fact that this latest 'Impeachment' attempt was just another evidence-less coup attempt was obvious before Schiff began holding his public circus theatrics.

It was obvious the moment it was reported that an admitted biased, leftist-leaning, Biden-connected/supporting, Deep State, Brennan-groomed, hand-picked CIA Agent specifically trained in Ukraine Geo-Political operations planted in the WH temporarily filed a 'Whistle Blower' complaint against the President, despite the fact that they did not qualify as a 'Whistle Blower' and the complaint was based on complete HEARSAY, no 1st-hand account information at all.

It was obvious when it was reported that the prosecutorial divisions within the DOJ had already reviewed the complaint and DISMISSED it because it was completely based on hearsay, rumor, opinion, and a disagreement with Policy rather than any actual criminal activity.

It was obvious when it was reported that the IC IG changed the Whistle Blower rules based on this one complaint, allowing complaints to be expedited straight to the already-proven coup-pushing conspirators in the House, especially lying, compromised, admitted leaking criminal D-Schiff who was running the House Intel Committee.

It was obvious when it was reported, and admitted by Schiff himself, that he and his staff had communicated with the non-qualifying Whistle Blower before the complaint was even filed, making Schiff a CONTACT Witness, disqualifying him from not only leading the Impeachment proceedings but from even participating in it.

It was confirmed when the news broke that Schiff had not only taken a large sum of money from a Russian-born arms dealer who did business with corrupt former Ukraine officials who assisted the Democrats collect 'dirt' on Trump and his team back in 2016 but also took money from Burisma / Burisma-associated companies.

It was confirmed when Schiff's own witness during the Impeachment hearing declared he found no crime committed by the President but believed former VP Biden and his son should be immediately investigated for crimes, to include Biden's videotaped confession of extorting the former Ukraine PM.

This entire 'Collusion Delusion 2.0' has been like the worst 'parody' every presented by 'SNL'....but the 'stupid' snowflakes Jonathon Gruber repeatedly bragged about have bought what their masters keep feeding them:

No Evidence + No Crime + No Witnesses = the President / Republicans / Conservatives / anyone who does not embrace their ideology being 'Guilty Until Proven Innocent'





.

 

[NightFox]

I disagree. The Executive Branch Authority is under attack and The Democrats are trying to USURP Executive Branch Authority and make it a PUPPET of Congress.

You don't say...

Anywho, back on Earth, the infantile shenanigans between Crime Family-D and Crime Family-R continue to consume time, effort and tax payer money as if they were going out of style.

 

[easyt65]

Claims of blanket immunity will continue to go down in flames.
Judge denies request for stay on McGahn testimony

Perhaps Barr will give him Immunity for absolutely NOTHING, as Obama & his crooked DOJ did for Hillary's Campaign Manager, John Podesta?!

Or, he could always follow the example / precedent set by former Obama IRS member Lois Lerner:

'I would like to say I did nothing wrong, you people suck, and I now plead the 5th' .... followed by his walking out with his lawyer.

 

[BlindBoo]

I'm not a lawyer (Thank God) so I wouldn't even begin to pronounce what was done legal or not but as a layman the case against the Executive on this point seems pretty weak.

To each their own. If that were the only thing he ever did or tried to do, I just think that combined with the events the witnesses describe it show a a clear pattern of abusive behavior.

"Moreover, Trump’s own White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) was told that his actions were illegal, and appears to have tacitly acknowledged that fact, but continued to hold up the funding anyway."

Not sure if the article says who told them that but I think it was a lawyer.

 

[The Original Tree]

I disagree. The Executive Branch Authority is under attack and The Democrats are trying to USURP Executive Branch Authority and make it a PUPPET of Congress.

You don't say...

Anywho, back on Earth, the infantile shenanigans between Crime Family-D and Crime Family-R continue to consume time, effort and tax payer money as if they were going out of style.

That is easy to resolve. Ger rid of Crime Family D since they are trying to have America all to their Little DemNazi Tyrannical Selves. They are the assholes trying to USURP our Democracy.

Time to bring back Treason and Sedition Trials.

Don't Start None, Won't Be None!

 

[toobfreak]

So basically, your spin is that you will throw the POTUS under the wheels of the bus at the first signs of the slightest deviance on policy with some minor foreign country.

No. Just answering a simple question. My opinion has not changed. The gravest impeachable offence was the attack on half of our two party system using bipartisan foreign policy funds to coerce The Ukraine into aiding that assault. That blocking the funds itself was an illegal act is just icing on the cake. Not that it matters much to his base......

Wow! When did all that happen?!
Then you must really be upset at how the Democrats used a foreign-assisted Steele Dossier to try to thwart an election in 2016
and are now using bipartisan taxpayer funding from the treasury in order to harm Trump ahead of the 2020 election for their own personal gain because they cannot beat him in a straight up vote?!

And you must be rip snorting mad at how Obama used the IRS as an attack on half of our two party system in order to block supporters of Romney in 2012 to swing an election his way he did not deserve at all!

 

[The Original Tree]

I'm not a lawyer (Thank God) so I wouldn't even begin to pronounce what was done legal or not but as a layman the case against the Executive on this point seems pretty weak.

To each their own. If that were the only thing he ever did or tried to do, I just think that combined with the events the witnesses describe it show a a clear pattern of abusive behavior.

"Moreover, Trump’s own White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) was told that his actions were illegal, and appears to have tacitly acknowledged that fact, but continued to hold up the funding anyway."

Not sure if the article says who told them that but I think it was a lawyer.

More Lies.

Hows that going with you stopping President Trump from withholding Foreign Aide to Central America, again?

Donald Trump cuts off aid to Central America