Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 65,169
- 55,992
No thanks.GO away if you don't like it. You're trolling their thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No thanks.GO away if you don't like it. You're trolling their thread.
Cult gonna cult.
Nope.. The experts pointed to prior impeachments where money to relatives is enough to be impeachable.There needs to be some connection to Biden, which you don't have at all.
On top of that there is no criminal connection to the money at all. Its more wild accusations, especially when Kushner gets $2B form the Saudis, in a clear bribery scandal involving Billions.
The Stanker.Republicans just made this up to distract from Trump's crimes, and Trump's policy failures.
Republicans have done this repeatedly, make up fake accusations of wrongdoing, then cry when they get debunked. Then ignore obvious crimes by members of their own party.
Cult gonna cult.Sure, let's investigate the second hand smoke, as if second hand smoke leads to a forest fire.
Ah...you prefer more American soldiers die in the Afghan meat grinder, eh?Afghanistan
The southern border
An impeachment looking for a crime. Sounds familiar.Cool edit.
Turley went on to say he supports this inquiry to determine if there is evidence to impeach, Simp.
Perhaps the "What comes around goes around" reason is good enough.There are more reasons to impeach Biden than there were Trump and I despise Trump.
thats not impeachable at all.Afghanistan
The southern border
what president was impeached for money to relatives? when that money Hunter received was all legal.Nope.. The experts pointed to prior impeachments where money to relatives is enough to be impeachable.
The Sauds are free to invest wherever they want to. You have any "quid pro quo" for Jarad?
This post stinks to high heaven of something you read on a right wing blog but won't be able to back up with facts.Nope.. The experts pointed to prior impeachments where money to relatives is enough to be impeachable.
The Sauds are free to invest wherever they want to. You have any "quid pro quo" for Jarad?
A judge was impeached for money to relatives.what president was impeached for money to relatives? when that money Hunter received was all legal.
There were no illegal money payments.
US Attorney Weiss's investigation determined that Hunter did nothing illegal beyond the pathetic little gun charge.
This is the big problem, you are making up lies that have no merit and no evidence to support them at all.
Yo spread lies, then cry when the lies get debunked and no charges filed.
I saw those facts in sworn testimony during the Impeachment Inquiry for the 1st line.This post stinks to high heaven of something you read on a right wing blog but won't be able to back up with facts.
Innuendo is not evidence. But nothing is going to stop this ball of shit now that it's rolling down hill.They have evidence.
Turley struck a more nuanced position that Comer and other hard-right Republicans may not have appreciated or anticipated: He said that he supported an impeachment inquiry but that the current evidence did not warrant articles of impeachment.Nope.. The experts pointed to prior impeachments where money to relatives is enough to be impeachable.
The Sauds[sic] are free to invest wherever they want to. You have any "quid pro quo" for Jarad[sic]?
Hunter's money?A judge was impeached for money to relatives.
Hunter's money is dirty, Selling Influence.
Link?I saw those facts in sworn testimony during the Impeachment Inquiry for the 1st line.
yea and there was an obvious connection in the case with the judgeA judge was impeached for money to relatives.
Hunter's money is dirty, Selling Influence.
What impeachment?An impeachment looking for a crime. Sounds familiar.![]()