Republican Rep Gets Destroyed Trying to Defend his Fake Impeachment Allegations

Cult gonna cult.
trump-supporters.gif


You people try very hard to project out a label that fits you al to a tee.

The Trump Cult-of-Personality is comprised not of sheeple, but of Lemmings.
 
There needs to be some connection to Biden, which you don't have at all.

On top of that there is no criminal connection to the money at all. Its more wild accusations, especially when Kushner gets $2B form the Saudis, in a clear bribery scandal involving Billions.
Nope.. The experts pointed to prior impeachments where money to relatives is enough to be impeachable.

The Sauds are free to invest wherever they want to. You have any "quid pro quo" for Jarad?
 
Republicans just made this up to distract from Trump's crimes, and Trump's policy failures.

Republicans have done this repeatedly, make up fake accusations of wrongdoing, then cry when they get debunked. Then ignore obvious crimes by members of their own party.
The Stanker.
Trump has done nothing wrong, yet you support a evil felon who allows unchecked volumes of fentanyli into the country to become the number one killer of our 18-49 year olds...along with disease and crime, not to mention his own illegal activities and ft bank accounts through illegal means.
Are you stupid or somethin Forrest??
 
Nope.. The experts pointed to prior impeachments where money to relatives is enough to be impeachable.

The Sauds are free to invest wherever they want to. You have any "quid pro quo" for Jarad?
what president was impeached for money to relatives? when that money Hunter received was all legal.

There were no illegal money payments.
US Attorney Weiss's investigation determined that Hunter did nothing illegal beyond the pathetic little gun charge.

This is the big problem, you are making up lies that have no merit and no evidence to support them at all.

Yo spread lies, then cry when the lies get debunked and no charges filed.
 
Nope.. The experts pointed to prior impeachments where money to relatives is enough to be impeachable.

The Sauds are free to invest wherever they want to. You have any "quid pro quo" for Jarad?
This post stinks to high heaven of something you read on a right wing blog but won't be able to back up with facts.
 
what president was impeached for money to relatives? when that money Hunter received was all legal.
There were no illegal money payments.
US Attorney Weiss's investigation determined that Hunter did nothing illegal beyond the pathetic little gun charge.
This is the big problem, you are making up lies that have no merit and no evidence to support them at all.
Yo spread lies, then cry when the lies get debunked and no charges filed.
A judge was impeached for money to relatives.
Hunter's money is dirty, Selling Influence.
 
This post stinks to high heaven of something you read on a right wing blog but won't be able to back up with facts.
I saw those facts in sworn testimony during the Impeachment Inquiry for the 1st line.
 
Nope.. The experts pointed to prior impeachments where money to relatives is enough to be impeachable.

The Sauds[sic] are free to invest wherever they want to. You have any "quid pro quo" for Jarad[sic]?
Turley struck a more nuanced position that Comer and other hard-right Republicans may not have appreciated or anticipated: He said that he supported an impeachment inquiry but that the current evidence did not warrant articles of impeachment.
“I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment,” said Turley. “But I also do believe that the House has passed the threshold for an impeachment inquiry.”

He added that “dishonesty alone” is not sufficient grounds to pursue articles of impeachment — a reference to Biden’s claims that his son Hunter was not accepting money from China and that he did not discuss his business dealings with him.

source: WAPO
 
A judge was impeached for money to relatives.
Hunter's money is dirty, Selling Influence.
Hunter's money?

Not Joe's Money.

Okay.

Turley struck a more nuanced position that Comer and other hard-right Republicans may not have appreciated or anticipated: He said that he supported an impeachment inquiry but that the current evidence did not warrant articles of impeachment.

“I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment,” said Turley. “But I also do believe that the House has passed the threshold for an impeachment inquiry.”

He added that “dishonesty alone” is not sufficient grounds to pursue articles of impeachment — a reference to Biden’s claims that his son Hunter was not accepting money from China and that he did not discuss his business dealings with him.

source: WAPO
 
A judge was impeached for money to relatives.
Hunter's money is dirty, Selling Influence.
yea and there was an obvious connection in the case with the judge

The money to Hunter is legal
There is no connection to the legal payments Hunter received and Joe Biden at all in anyway.

You are lying and exaggerating again. You people are so gullible and you get your hopes up over crimes that are total lies. Then you cry like weaklings when the people do not get indicted, just like in the failed Durham probe that was supposed to destroy HRC and it did nothing at all.

How stupid can you be? At what point do you realize you are getting played yet again?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top