Synthaholic
Diamond Member
Republican strategist: Benghazi much worse than 9/11
Republican strategist Jack Burkman on Thursday asserted that the 2012 attacks in Benghazi that killed four Americans were much worse than the original attacks on Sept. 11, 2001 that killed almost 3,000 people because of the level of how things were ignored.
In an panel segment on Current TV, host Michael Shure asked Burkman if he agreed that the Republican obsession with Benghazi was totally about politics.
Well, its about both, Burkman explained. This thing could turn into a Watergate. I dont think you realize how bad this is. Obama all of this why did any of this happen? This happened because Obama is so afraid. He didnt want to defend the embassy because he didnt want to offend Islam. Then he didnt want to call it an act of terrorism because he didnt want to offend Islam. Thats fundamentally what its about.
There are reasonable ways to disagree on this, but to say he didnt want to defend the embassy because he didnt want to defend Islam Ill give you political advice too, stay away from that one, Shure advised.
But the evidence shows that, Burkman insisted. Strip aside all the politics and the theory. The evidence shows take [U.S. diplomat] Gregory Hicks, these guys were trying to get through at 2 in the morning, they were trying to warn, they made so many repeated calls and contacts. What other conclusions can you draw? They were systemically ignored. I mean, Ive just never seen or heard of anything like this.
Well, how about 9/11? Shure noted. Talk about systemically ignored.
I would say, oh, sure, 9/11 is much worse in terms of in terms of what happened, Burkman opined. But this is much worse in terms of the level of how things were ignored. Its almost unfathomable.
What a tool.
Republican strategist Jack Burkman on Thursday asserted that the 2012 attacks in Benghazi that killed four Americans were much worse than the original attacks on Sept. 11, 2001 that killed almost 3,000 people because of the level of how things were ignored.
In an panel segment on Current TV, host Michael Shure asked Burkman if he agreed that the Republican obsession with Benghazi was totally about politics.
Well, its about both, Burkman explained. This thing could turn into a Watergate. I dont think you realize how bad this is. Obama all of this why did any of this happen? This happened because Obama is so afraid. He didnt want to defend the embassy because he didnt want to offend Islam. Then he didnt want to call it an act of terrorism because he didnt want to offend Islam. Thats fundamentally what its about.
There are reasonable ways to disagree on this, but to say he didnt want to defend the embassy because he didnt want to defend Islam Ill give you political advice too, stay away from that one, Shure advised.
But the evidence shows that, Burkman insisted. Strip aside all the politics and the theory. The evidence shows take [U.S. diplomat] Gregory Hicks, these guys were trying to get through at 2 in the morning, they were trying to warn, they made so many repeated calls and contacts. What other conclusions can you draw? They were systemically ignored. I mean, Ive just never seen or heard of anything like this.
Well, how about 9/11? Shure noted. Talk about systemically ignored.
I would say, oh, sure, 9/11 is much worse in terms of in terms of what happened, Burkman opined. But this is much worse in terms of the level of how things were ignored. Its almost unfathomable.
What a tool.
