Oddball
Unobtanium Member
You don't need a tin foil hat to recognize insider cliques when you see them.I've also seen plenty of sites that try to debunk and discredit this research but typically it's not from people I would consider to be experts.
Oh, so your no expert, yet your inexpert "consideration" can weed out the "true" experts from the dilettantes.
You left out "carefully hand-picked and screened" in that blank part there, pal.Yes, politics is in play, but logic tells me what when_________________scientists around the world generally agree on something, there is probably some merit to it. I have a hard time believing this is a world wide conspiracy.
LOL, Your tin foil hat is too tight.
When you start showing me actual proof that all the climatologists from all those agencies around the world are hand picked based upon their opinion then maybe I'll start to care about anything you have to say. Until then, you'll continue to be a loud mouth, all opinion, no substance corporate stooge. You're a dinosaur, face it. Your time and your mindset have passed.
But don't take my word on it, just ask IPCC insider Michael Mann, speaking of allowing a skeptical paper be reviewed by the panel:
K (Trenberth) and I will keep them out somehow-even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!
http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2009/11/redefining-peer-review.html
Last edited: