Republicans Are Extremely Fearful of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

[Papageorgio]

How is capital created, if not by someone with a work ethic?

some of it has already been created; it just needs to be financed. demand and supply.

What are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

capitalism works.

We're not talking about Capitalism, remember? Pure Capitalism would not support nonproducers.

So, since you once again attempted to answer with nonsense, what are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

what do you believe will happen by solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner?

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being being unemployed.

It won't solve poverty, every society has poverty and will always have poverty. Non-producers will cause simple poverty by being simple.

 

[danielpalos]

you need valid arguments to play; you need superior arguments to win.

Already did and already won. Thank you though.

only in right wing fantasy. you need real arguments, not just gossip.

Then you need to quit gossiping and come up with valid arguments because so far you are coming up with a lot of nothing, just tired old unproven propaganda.

you are the one claiming capitalism doesn't work, regardless if everyone is getting paid.

Really, point that out for me.

thanks for your support for solving simple poverty via market friendly means.

 

[Muhammed]

yup


just like Democrats were afraid of Palin in 2008

What did Palin get you?

She did a hell of a lot for her constituents.

 

[danielpalos]

some of it has already been created; it just needs to be financed. demand and supply.

What are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

capitalism works.

We're not talking about Capitalism, remember? Pure Capitalism would not support nonproducers.

So, since you once again attempted to answer with nonsense, what are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

what do you believe will happen by solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner?

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being being unemployed.

It won't solve poverty, every society has poverty and will always have poverty. Non-producers will cause simple poverty by being simple.

only if you know nothing about economics. we could have freer markets with less government intervention.

 

[Papageorgio]

...Because you prefer to cut social spending on the Poor.

Really? Where have I stated that? Again, you are making up BS to sidetrack the issues at hand, if you aren't going to be honest then I am done.

cuts to social services is all the right wing wants to do.

Always plenty of money for war and corporate welfare, though.

We need deep cuts across the board, and corporate welfare needs to be cut to nothing.

discretionary spending should go first. That means, our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.

First? Why not all at once, if you are going to cut do it, don't just talk about it.

 

[hadit]

How is capital created, if not by someone with a work ethic?

some of it has already been created; it just needs to be financed. demand and supply.

What are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

capitalism works.

We're not talking about Capitalism, remember? Pure Capitalism would not support nonproducers.

So, since you once again attempted to answer with nonsense, what are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

what do you believe will happen by solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner?

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being being unemployed.

Nope, I asked first and now you're frantically dodging again. You never answered the question, so until you do, you're full of fallacies and excuses and you never get it. This is why no one takes you seriously.

 

[otto105]

A positive multiplier effect means the economy will be growing. The money being circulated creates the liquidity necessary for a positive multiplier effect. Henry Ford, understood the concept.

How is capital created, if not by someone with a work ethic?

some of it has already been created; it just needs to be financed. demand and supply.

What are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

capitalism works.

We're not talking about Capitalism, remember? Pure Capitalism would not support nonproducers.

So, since you once again attempted to answer with nonsense, what are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

What do you mean by capitalism would not support non-producers?

Children don't produce, so don't old people and any family member of the trump family.

 

[Papageorgio]

What are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

capitalism works.

We're not talking about Capitalism, remember? Pure Capitalism would not support nonproducers.

So, since you once again attempted to answer with nonsense, what are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

what do you believe will happen by solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner?

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being being unemployed.

It won't solve poverty, every society has poverty and will always have poverty. Non-producers will cause simple poverty by being simple.

only if you know nothing about economics. we could have freer markets with less government intervention.

I agree with that less government intervention is a freer market. Binding business with more taxes ruins the free market.

 

[Papageorgio]

Already did and already won. Thank you though.

only in right wing fantasy. you need real arguments, not just gossip.

Then you need to quit gossiping and come up with valid arguments because so far you are coming up with a lot of nothing, just tired old unproven propaganda.

you are the one claiming capitalism doesn't work, regardless if everyone is getting paid.

Really, point that out for me.

thanks for your support for solving simple poverty via market friendly means.

Again show me where I said capitalism doesn't work, you make claims then when asked to show proof you divert.

 

[rightwinger]

A positive multiplier effect means the economy will be growing. The money being circulated creates the liquidity necessary for a positive multiplier effect. Henry Ford, understood the concept.

How is capital created, if not by someone with a work ethic?

some of it has already been created; it just needs to be financed. demand and supply.

What are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

How Ayn Rand of you

It's a valid concern. He wants to be paid simply for existing and providing nothing of value in exchange.

You do realize the takers in our society are multibillionaires

 

[rightwinger]

capitalism works.

We're not talking about Capitalism, remember? Pure Capitalism would not support nonproducers.

So, since you once again attempted to answer with nonsense, what are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

what do you believe will happen by solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner?

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being being unemployed.

It won't solve poverty, every society has poverty and will always have poverty. Non-producers will cause simple poverty by being simple.

only if you know nothing about economics. we could have freer markets with less government intervention.

I agree with that less government intervention is a freer market. Binding business with more taxes ruins the free market.

If taxes are a cost of doing business and applied equitably....how do they ruin a free market?

 

[Papageorgio]

We're not talking about Capitalism, remember? Pure Capitalism would not support nonproducers.

So, since you once again attempted to answer with nonsense, what are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

what do you believe will happen by solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner?

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being being unemployed.

It won't solve poverty, every society has poverty and will always have poverty. Non-producers will cause simple poverty by being simple.

only if you know nothing about economics. we could have freer markets with less government intervention.

I agree with that less government intervention is a freer market. Binding business with more taxes ruins the free market.

If taxes are a cost of doing business and applied equitably....how do they ruin a free market?

The burden of taxes falls directly on the consumer, not the business. Businesses just pass through the tax onto the consumer. Less taxes equal more spending power and stimulates the economy.

 

[basquebromance]

did you know?

Crazy Bernie won more votes from people under 40 than Trump and Clinton COMBINED!

 

[hadit]

How is capital created, if not by someone with a work ethic?

some of it has already been created; it just needs to be financed. demand and supply.

What are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

capitalism works.

We're not talking about Capitalism, remember? Pure Capitalism would not support nonproducers.

So, since you once again attempted to answer with nonsense, what are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

What do you mean by capitalism would not support non-producers?

Children don't produce, so don't old people and any family member of the trump family.

As always, there are those who CANNOT produce. I thought that was understood.

 

[rightwinger]

what do you believe will happen by solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner?

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being being unemployed.

It won't solve poverty, every society has poverty and will always have poverty. Non-producers will cause simple poverty by being simple.

only if you know nothing about economics. we could have freer markets with less government intervention.

I agree with that less government intervention is a freer market. Binding business with more taxes ruins the free market.

If taxes are a cost of doing business and applied equitably....how do they ruin a free market?

The burden of taxes falls directly on the consumer, not the business. Businesses just pass through the tax onto the consumer. Less taxes equal more spending power and stimulates the economy.

More trickle down nonsense

The market sets the price of your product. If a business could charge more for their product....they already would

 

[danielpalos]

Really? Where have I stated that? Again, you are making up BS to sidetrack the issues at hand, if you aren't going to be honest then I am done.

cuts to social services is all the right wing wants to do.

Always plenty of money for war and corporate welfare, though.

We need deep cuts across the board, and corporate welfare needs to be cut to nothing.

discretionary spending should go first. That means, our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.

First? Why not all at once, if you are going to cut do it, don't just talk about it.

discretionary spending should go first.

 

[danielpalos]

some of it has already been created; it just needs to be financed. demand and supply.

What are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

capitalism works.

We're not talking about Capitalism, remember? Pure Capitalism would not support nonproducers.

So, since you once again attempted to answer with nonsense, what are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

what do you believe will happen by solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner?

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being being unemployed.

Nope, I asked first and now you're frantically dodging again. You never answered the question, so until you do, you're full of fallacies and excuses and you never get it. This is why no one takes you seriously.

you have no valid rebuttal. we could have more efficient markets by solving for simple poverty.

 

[hadit]

How is capital created, if not by someone with a work ethic?

some of it has already been created; it just needs to be financed. demand and supply.

What are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

How Ayn Rand of you

It's a valid concern. He wants to be paid simply for existing and providing nothing of value in exchange.

You do realize the takers in our society are multibillionaires

How are they taking out without producing? Why don't you name some multibillionaires who take more taxpayer money than they generate so we can compare?

I think what you're really complaining about is someone who has more than you think they should and you're not really looking at how much economic activity they actually generate.

 

[danielpalos]

capitalism works.

We're not talking about Capitalism, remember? Pure Capitalism would not support nonproducers.

So, since you once again attempted to answer with nonsense, what are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

what do you believe will happen by solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner?

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being being unemployed.

It won't solve poverty, every society has poverty and will always have poverty. Non-producers will cause simple poverty by being simple.

only if you know nothing about economics. we could have freer markets with less government intervention.

I agree with that less government intervention is a freer market. Binding business with more taxes ruins the free market.

our current regime is worse. a general tax is much less intrusive.

 

[hadit]

It won't solve poverty, every society has poverty and will always have poverty. Non-producers will cause simple poverty by being simple.

only if you know nothing about economics. we could have freer markets with less government intervention.

I agree with that less government intervention is a freer market. Binding business with more taxes ruins the free market.

If taxes are a cost of doing business and applied equitably....how do they ruin a free market?

The burden of taxes falls directly on the consumer, not the business. Businesses just pass through the tax onto the consumer. Less taxes equal more spending power and stimulates the economy.

More trickle down nonsense

The market sets the price of your product. If a business could charge more for their product....they already would

And if every outlet was hit by the same tax increase, they would in unison raise their prices.