Republicans Are Extremely Fearful of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

[rightwinger]

Has any incoming congress person ever generated so much talk among the opposing party? There are easily 5 to 6 threads a day about her on this forum alone.

She has already moved into their heads

They talked about her because she was such a sad, pathetic joke, and her antics were hilarious. She was the quintessential political buffoon.

Palin was a political punchline

Mean Girl Cheerleader running for Class President

 

[danielpalos]

employment is at the will of either party. why does the right wing prefer to use Capitalism to Punish the Poor?

They don't. And you still don't get to redefine words.

why the work ethic to punish instead of simply capital to encourage?

Capital requires work or it won't be produced. It's not punishment to require an able bodied person with available work to provide something of value in return for money that was forcibly taken from someone else. Earning something is better for the psych than simply having it given.

A positive multiplier effect means the economy will be growing. The money being circulated creates the liquidity necessary for a positive multiplier effect. Henry Ford, understood the concept.

How is capital created, if not by someone with a work ethic?

some of it has already been created; it just needs to be financed. demand and supply.

 

[danielpalos]

the right wing doesn't believe, liquidity matters.

Henry Ford, knew better.

Henry Ford was in a unique position, and I've schooled you on this before. Don't even try.

Not all labor is in a unique position. Hence, unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.

Irrelevant. If you can work and jobs are available, you should provide value for what you receive. Stop, and I really mean stop, using words that don't mean what you say they mean.

All Capitalists should be required to make like Henry Ford and double wages.

All customers should be required to be like Ford's customers and demand all products.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. It is not Labor's natural rate of unemployment. Labor should have a right to work in right to work States.

 

[hadit]

Henry Ford was in a unique position, and I've schooled you on this before. Don't even try.

Not all labor is in a unique position. Hence, unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.

Irrelevant. If you can work and jobs are available, you should provide value for what you receive. Stop, and I really mean stop, using words that don't mean what you say they mean.

All Capitalists should be required to make like Henry Ford and double wages.

All customers should be required to be like Ford's customers and demand all products.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. It is not Labor's natural rate of unemployment. Labor should have a right to work in right to work States.

What does that mean in the real world?

 

[hadit]

They don't. And you still don't get to redefine words.

why the work ethic to punish instead of simply capital to encourage?

Capital requires work or it won't be produced. It's not punishment to require an able bodied person with available work to provide something of value in return for money that was forcibly taken from someone else. Earning something is better for the psych than simply having it given.

A positive multiplier effect means the economy will be growing. The money being circulated creates the liquidity necessary for a positive multiplier effect. Henry Ford, understood the concept.

How is capital created, if not by someone with a work ethic?

some of it has already been created; it just needs to be financed. demand and supply.

What are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

 

[rightwinger]

why the work ethic to punish instead of simply capital to encourage?

Capital requires work or it won't be produced. It's not punishment to require an able bodied person with available work to provide something of value in return for money that was forcibly taken from someone else. Earning something is better for the psych than simply having it given.

A positive multiplier effect means the economy will be growing. The money being circulated creates the liquidity necessary for a positive multiplier effect. Henry Ford, understood the concept.

How is capital created, if not by someone with a work ethic?

some of it has already been created; it just needs to be financed. demand and supply.

What are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

How Ayn Rand of you

 

[Auld Phart]

They are fearful because, finally, they have to contend with an unabashed liberal progressive that's fighting for the people. Moreover, she's a woman, so they won't be able to just come out her any type of way.

And the best part is, she know exactly how to counter their foolishness.

Yes Republicans, she's coming, and HELL'S coming with her!!!

Any other thoughts one why Republicans are left quaking in their boots over this. one. little. woman?

yup


just like Democrats were afraid of Palin in 2008

People didn't like Palin because she was entirely unfit for national office: she's of mediocre intelligence, mediocre knowledge of national and international issues; in fact, she has an all encompassing mediocre ability and intellect in general. She was a joke as a vice presidential candidate and caused McCain to lose the election---this is something we all know, especially McCain. He was painfully aware that she lost him the election. People were not 'afraid' of her other than if she were vice president, she would do a great deal of harm to the country. It's the kind of harm Drumph is doing, and you all support him like you supported Palin. Some people apparently have no idea at all what it takes to govern the greatest country in the world. No idea at all.

People were not 'afraid' of her other than if she were vice president, she would do a great deal of harm to the country.

The same reasons people should be afraid of Hillary as President.

 

[rightwinger]

They are fearful because, finally, they have to contend with an unabashed liberal progressive that's fighting for the people. Moreover, she's a woman, so they won't be able to just come out her any type of way.

And the best part is, she know exactly how to counter their foolishness.

Yes Republicans, she's coming, and HELL'S coming with her!!!

Any other thoughts one why Republicans are left quaking in their boots over this. one. little. woman?

yup


just like Democrats were afraid of Palin in 2008

People didn't like Palin because she was entirely unfit for national office: she's of mediocre intelligence, mediocre knowledge of national and international issues; in fact, she has an all encompassing mediocre ability and intellect in general. She was a joke as a vice presidential candidate and caused McCain to lose the election---this is something we all know, especially McCain. He was painfully aware that she lost him the election. People were not 'afraid' of her other than if she were vice president, she would do a great deal of harm to the country. It's the kind of harm Drumph is doing, and you all support him like you supported Palin. Some people apparently have no idea at all what it takes to govern the greatest country in the world. No idea at all.

People were not 'afraid' of her other than if she were vice president, she would do a great deal of harm to the country.

The same reasons people should be afraid of Hillary as President.

What a ridiculous comment
HIllary is eminently more intelligent and more qualified than Palin

But....but.....What about Hillary?

 

[danielpalos]

Not all labor is in a unique position. Hence, unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.

Irrelevant. If you can work and jobs are available, you should provide value for what you receive. Stop, and I really mean stop, using words that don't mean what you say they mean.

All Capitalists should be required to make like Henry Ford and double wages.

All customers should be required to be like Ford's customers and demand all products.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. It is not Labor's natural rate of unemployment. Labor should have a right to work in right to work States.

What does that mean in the real world?

some understanding of economics?

 

[hadit]

Capital requires work or it won't be produced. It's not punishment to require an able bodied person with available work to provide something of value in return for money that was forcibly taken from someone else. Earning something is better for the psych than simply having it given.

A positive multiplier effect means the economy will be growing. The money being circulated creates the liquidity necessary for a positive multiplier effect. Henry Ford, understood the concept.

How is capital created, if not by someone with a work ethic?

some of it has already been created; it just needs to be financed. demand and supply.

What are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

How Ayn Rand of you

It's a valid concern. He wants to be paid simply for existing and providing nothing of value in exchange.

 

[danielpalos]

why the work ethic to punish instead of simply capital to encourage?

Capital requires work or it won't be produced. It's not punishment to require an able bodied person with available work to provide something of value in return for money that was forcibly taken from someone else. Earning something is better for the psych than simply having it given.

A positive multiplier effect means the economy will be growing. The money being circulated creates the liquidity necessary for a positive multiplier effect. Henry Ford, understood the concept.

How is capital created, if not by someone with a work ethic?

some of it has already been created; it just needs to be financed. demand and supply.

What are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

capitalism works.

 

[Auld Phart]

They are fearful because, finally, they have to contend with an unabashed liberal progressive that's fighting for the people. Moreover, she's a woman, so they won't be able to just come out her any type of way.

And the best part is, she know exactly how to counter their foolishness.

Yes Republicans, she's coming, and HELL'S coming with her!!!

Any other thoughts one why Republicans are left quaking in their boots over this. one. little. woman?

yup


just like Democrats were afraid of Palin in 2008

People didn't like Palin because she was entirely unfit for national office: she's of mediocre intelligence, mediocre knowledge of national and international issues; in fact, she has an all encompassing mediocre ability and intellect in general. She was a joke as a vice presidential candidate and caused McCain to lose the election---this is something we all know, especially McCain. He was painfully aware that she lost him the election. People were not 'afraid' of her other than if she were vice president, she would do a great deal of harm to the country. It's the kind of harm Drumph is doing, and you all support him like you supported Palin. Some people apparently have no idea at all what it takes to govern the greatest country in the world. No idea at all.

People were not 'afraid' of her other than if she were vice president, she would do a great deal of harm to the country.

The same reasons people should be afraid of Hillary as President.

What a ridiculous comment
HIllary is eminently more intelligent and more qualified than Palin

But....but.....What about Hillary?

qualified?

no

 

[hadit]

Irrelevant. If you can work and jobs are available, you should provide value for what you receive. Stop, and I really mean stop, using words that don't mean what you say they mean.

All Capitalists should be required to make like Henry Ford and double wages.

All customers should be required to be like Ford's customers and demand all products.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. It is not Labor's natural rate of unemployment. Labor should have a right to work in right to work States.

What does that mean in the real world?

some understanding of economics?

Nope. Wrong. Try again.

 

[danielpalos]

All Capitalists should be required to make like Henry Ford and double wages.

All customers should be required to be like Ford's customers and demand all products.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. It is not Labor's natural rate of unemployment. Labor should have a right to work in right to work States.

What does that mean in the real world?

some understanding of economics?

Nope. Wrong. Try again.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. It is not Labor's natural rate of unemployment. Labor should have a right to work in right to work States.

 

[hadit]

Capital requires work or it won't be produced. It's not punishment to require an able bodied person with available work to provide something of value in return for money that was forcibly taken from someone else. Earning something is better for the psych than simply having it given.

A positive multiplier effect means the economy will be growing. The money being circulated creates the liquidity necessary for a positive multiplier effect. Henry Ford, understood the concept.

How is capital created, if not by someone with a work ethic?

some of it has already been created; it just needs to be financed. demand and supply.

What are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

capitalism works.

We're not talking about Capitalism, remember? Pure Capitalism would not support nonproducers.

So, since you once again attempted to answer with nonsense, what are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

 

[danielpalos]

A positive multiplier effect means the economy will be growing. The money being circulated creates the liquidity necessary for a positive multiplier effect. Henry Ford, understood the concept.

How is capital created, if not by someone with a work ethic?

some of it has already been created; it just needs to be financed. demand and supply.

What are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

capitalism works.

We're not talking about Capitalism, remember? Pure Capitalism would not support nonproducers.

So, since you once again attempted to answer with nonsense, what are you going to do when the takers outnumber the producers?

what do you believe will happen by solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner?

a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being being unemployed.

 

[Papageorgio]

I think you are a bot, you post mindless, pointless posts. No wonder no one takes you seriously.

you need valid arguments to play; you need superior arguments to win.

Already did and already won. Thank you though.

only in right wing fantasy. you need real arguments, not just gossip.

Then you need to quit gossiping and come up with valid arguments because so far you are coming up with a lot of nothing, just tired old unproven propaganda.

you are the one claiming capitalism doesn't work, regardless if everyone is getting paid.

Really, point that out for me.

 

[Papageorgio]

sure; Capital must circulate not labor. Simply circulating capital is what engenders the liquidity necessary to promote a positive multiplier effect.

Good point. A strong economy needs a balance between investment capital (business) and working capital. (consumers i.e the working class) Money in the hands of the working class is what makes investments profitable. A good flow of money between business and workers makes a strong economy. If that money collects in one place, (usually at the top) it pinches off the velocity of money and the economy falters.

the right wing doesn't believe, liquidity matters.

Henry Ford, knew better.

Henry Ford was in a unique position, and I've schooled you on this before. Don't even try.

He brings out the same old tired unproven arguments all the time, ones that he has given a thousand times before and then has no way to back up his arguments and then blames us for having the same tired responses to his same tired BS.

He really needs to get his BS together because I want to retire and him and Alexandria to pay for my cruises and travel.

all you have is gossip, not valid arguments.

Your argument is laziness, my argument is the American Dream.

 

[Papageorgio]

Has any incoming congress person ever generated so much talk among the opposing party? There are easily 5 to 6 threads a day about her on this forum alone.

She has already moved into their heads

They talked about her because she was such a sad, pathetic joke, and her antics were hilarious. She was the quintessential political buffoon.

Are you talking about the wonderful Ms. Cortez? Love that lady, she has the establishment Democrats on the ropes!

 

[Papageorgio]

Not all labor is in a unique position. Hence, unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed.

Irrelevant. If you can work and jobs are available, you should provide value for what you receive. Stop, and I really mean stop, using words that don't mean what you say they mean.

All Capitalists should be required to make like Henry Ford and double wages.

All customers should be required to be like Ford's customers and demand all products.

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment. It is not Labor's natural rate of unemployment. Labor should have a right to work in right to work States.

What does that mean in the real world?

WAIT!!! The real world? daniel doesn't live in the real world, he is Fantasy Island on steroids!