republicans get what they wish for

[kaz]

The Gist: The signs that the Supreme Court is grappling with a depleted bench are starting to show. But what has been a trickle of tie-votes, bizarre orders and slowed activity could turn into a series of orders with contradictory effects as the court is confronted with an onslaught of election-related litigation in the lead-up to Nov. 8...........hows it feel repubs to get what you wished for?

Such is the irresponsible, reprehensible partisan right.

Hey, the Biden rule if you didn't notice was named after a Democrat. So is Biden "irresponsible, reprehensible?"

 

[eddiew]

dems even gave the moron thomas an up or down

not in an election year. That's the issue here, fool.

when didn't they then???

 

[Redfish]

dems even gave the moron thomas an up or down

not in an election year. That's the issue here, fool.

when didn't they then???

already been answered, several times.

 

[eddiew]

dems even gave the moron thomas an up or down

not in an election year. That's the issue here, fool.

when didn't they then???

already been answered, several times.

Since taking control of the U.S. Senate in 2006, Democrats have accused Republicans of filibustering almost every proposal, and, hence, requiring 60 votes to pass any legislation (e.g., the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act). (Republicans set a record for the most number of filibusters during the 111th congress.)

 

[kaz]

dems even gave the moron thomas an up or down

not in an election year. That's the issue here, fool.

when didn't they then???

Why are you so nervous about this if you're as confident you say you are you are going to win the election? The lady doth protest too much ...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

dems even gave the moron thomas an up or down

not in an election year. That's the issue here, fool.

when didn't they then???

already been answered, several times.

Since taking control of the U.S. Senate in 2006, Democrats have accused Republicans of filibustering almost every proposal, and, hence, requiring 60 votes to pass any legislation (e.g., the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act). (Republicans set a record for the most number of filibusters during the 111th congress.)

Elections have consequences

 

[eddiew]

dems even gave the moron thomas an up or down

not in an election year. That's the issue here, fool.

when didn't they then???

Why are you so nervous about this if you're as confident you say you are you are going to win the election? The lady doth protest too much ...

You ask why Because there's always the chance imbeciles will find a way to get into our WH by hook or crook, like in 2000

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I'm pretty sure republicans didn't wish for Antonin Scalia to die.

True, but the point of the thread is their wish to appoint another Alito or Thomas, the former a theocrat and the latter a Scalia echo; in not doing their job they have created another mess - the one thing the Republican's are good at.

Blocking Obama's hand picked stooge is their job.

Reid said the Senate was not a rubber stamp

 

[kaz]

dems even gave the moron thomas an up or down

not in an election year. That's the issue here, fool.

when didn't they then???

Why are you so nervous about this if you're as confident you say you are you are going to win the election? The lady doth protest too much ...

You ask why Because there's always the chance imbeciles will find a way to get into our WH by hook or crook, like in 2000

If they figured out a way to win, how did they do that if they are "imbeciles." But at least you admitted it's not in the Republican's interest to do it now, it's in yours. So cut the crap.

And W won on every measure, including the recount the media lead completion of after the election, so what are you talking about? The Florida court was the one that flat out broke every law and tried to dictate the outcome. All the Supremes did was stop them

 

[eddiew]

dems even gave the moron thomas an up or down

not in an election year. That's the issue here, fool.

when didn't they then???

Why are you so nervous about this if you're as confident you say you are you are going to win the election? The lady doth protest too much ...

You ask why Because there's always the chance imbeciles will find a way to get into our WH by hook or crook, like in 2000

If they figured out a way to win, how did they do that if they are "imbeciles." But at least you admitted it's not in the Republican's interest to do it now, it's in yours. So cut the crap.

And W won on every measure, including the recount the media lead completion of after the election, so what are you talking about? The Florida court was the one that flat out broke every law and tried to dictate the outcome. All the Supremes did was stop them

Yes the Supremes stopped them or else gore had a shot Scalia gone? Guess revenge is best served cold

 

[Wry Catcher]

The Gist: The signs that the Supreme Court is grappling with a depleted bench are starting to show. But what has been a trickle of tie-votes, bizarre orders and slowed activity could turn into a series of orders with contradictory effects as the court is confronted with an onslaught of election-related litigation in the lead-up to Nov. 8...........hows it feel repubs to get what you wished for?

Such is the irresponsible, reprehensible partisan right.

Hey, the Biden rule if you didn't notice was named after a Democrat. So is Biden "irresponsible, reprehensible?"

There is no "Biden Rule", he made what seems to have been a partisan comment 25 years ago. There is no force of law to enforce an opinion. If there were every Republican who called another R a RINO would have violated Reagan's 11th Commandment.

 

[bripat9643]

The GOP leadership will wish like hell they had taken what was offered by Obama after the election and after they not only fail to take the white house but lose their majority in the senate. They are some VERY foolish men.

The R leadership is afraid to lose and paralyzed by fear. Too bad they lack the integrity to follow the advice of Mark Twain: "When in doubt, tell the truth"

Everyone should be terrified at the kind of people Obama wants to put on the court.

 

[PredFan]

The Gist: The signs that the Supreme Court is grappling with a depleted bench are starting to show. But what has been a trickle of tie-votes, bizarre orders and slowed activity could turn into a series of orders with contradictory effects as the court is confronted with an onslaught of election-related litigation in the lead-up to Nov. 8...........hows it feel repubs to get what you wished for?

Just fine. Let's leave it like this.

a true patriot lol

And you are a true idiot. It has nothing to do with patriotism.

 

[eddiew]

The GOP leadership will wish like hell they had taken what was offered by Obama after the election and after they not only fail to take the white house but lose their majority in the senate. They are some VERY foolish men.

The R leadership is afraid to lose and paralyzed by fear. Too bad they lack the integrity to follow the advice of Mark Twain: "When in doubt, tell the truth"

Everyone should be terrified at the kind of people Obama wants to put on the court.

yes bripat but not terrified of mental midgets like thomas??

 

[kaz]

not in an election year. That's the issue here, fool.

when didn't they then???

Why are you so nervous about this if you're as confident you say you are you are going to win the election? The lady doth protest too much ...

You ask why Because there's always the chance imbeciles will find a way to get into our WH by hook or crook, like in 2000

If they figured out a way to win, how did they do that if they are "imbeciles." But at least you admitted it's not in the Republican's interest to do it now, it's in yours. So cut the crap.

And W won on every measure, including the recount the media lead completion of after the election, so what are you talking about? The Florida court was the one that flat out broke every law and tried to dictate the outcome. All the Supremes did was stop them

Yes the Supremes stopped them or else gore had a shot Scalia gone? Guess revenge is best served cold

Not sure what that means. You mean because the democrat election committees in the four counties were still voting? And, revenge? How Democrats got Obamacare through shows you have no limits now. If you're promising revenge for Scalia, you already blew your wad on that

 

[kaz]

The Gist: The signs that the Supreme Court is grappling with a depleted bench are starting to show. But what has been a trickle of tie-votes, bizarre orders and slowed activity could turn into a series of orders with contradictory effects as the court is confronted with an onslaught of election-related litigation in the lead-up to Nov. 8...........hows it feel repubs to get what you wished for?

Just fine. Let's leave it like this.

a true patriot lol

And you are a true idiot. It has nothing to do with patriotism.

Mark Twain: "Patriotism is usually the refuge of the scoundrel. He is the man who talks the loudest"

It's like he knew you, huh eddie?

Here's Twain's advice, "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it"

I love that last quote, it's going in my sig

Great quote, the government rarely deserves it

 

[kaz]

The Gist: The signs that the Supreme Court is grappling with a depleted bench are starting to show. But what has been a trickle of tie-votes, bizarre orders and slowed activity could turn into a series of orders with contradictory effects as the court is confronted with an onslaught of election-related litigation in the lead-up to Nov. 8...........hows it feel repubs to get what you wished for?

Such is the irresponsible, reprehensible partisan right.

Hey, the Biden rule if you didn't notice was named after a Democrat. So is Biden "irresponsible, reprehensible?"

There is no "Biden Rule", he made what seems to have been a partisan comment 25 years ago. There is no force of law to enforce an opinion. If there were every Republican who called another R a RINO would have violated Reagan's 11th Commandment.

You don't know what the Biden Rule is? Seriously? The Biden Rule is what he said, Holmes. Supreme Court Justices should not be nominated or confirmed in election years, particularly across parties with the President and Senate and the outcome of the election in doubt

 

[eddiew]

The Gist: The signs that the Supreme Court is grappling with a depleted bench are starting to show. But what has been a trickle of tie-votes, bizarre orders and slowed activity could turn into a series of orders with contradictory effects as the court is confronted with an onslaught of election-related litigation in the lead-up to Nov. 8...........hows it feel repubs to get what you wished for?

Just fine. Let's leave it like this.

a true patriot lol

And you are a true idiot. It has nothing to do with patriotism.

Mark Twain: "Patriotism is usually the refuge of the scoundrel. He is the man who talks the loudest"

It's like he knew you, huh eddie?

Here's Twain's advice, "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it"

I love that last quote, it's going in my sig

Great quote, the government rarely deserves it

How can anyone support a government that attacks 3rd world countries ??

 

[kaz]

The Gist: The signs that the Supreme Court is grappling with a depleted bench are starting to show. But what has been a trickle of tie-votes, bizarre orders and slowed activity could turn into a series of orders with contradictory effects as the court is confronted with an onslaught of election-related litigation in the lead-up to Nov. 8...........hows it feel repubs to get what you wished for?

Just fine. Let's leave it like this.

a true patriot lol

And you are a true idiot. It has nothing to do with patriotism.

Mark Twain: "Patriotism is usually the refuge of the scoundrel. He is the man who talks the loudest"

It's like he knew you, huh eddie?

Here's Twain's advice, "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it"

I love that last quote, it's going in my sig

Great quote, the government rarely deserves it

How can anyone support a government that attacks 3rd world countries ??

We can't, moron, I oppose the wars. You don't, you only oppose them when Republicans do it. Even when you voted for it. I do not think we should have engaged in any of the wars, other than Afghanistan who attacked us, you are a flaming hypocrite who treats it as a partisan issue when both your parties are as bad as the other. And even Afghanistan we screwed up by trying to "nation build," what a waste of money and lives that was. But your guy expanded it. Hypocrite.

You know, those of us who want a better, less meddling foreign policy could use your help. The trick is you have to oppose it all the time. Even when Democrats do it. And say so. And hold them accountable. I lost you already, your views on the subject are feigned

 

[eddiew]

The Gist: The signs that the Supreme Court is grappling with a depleted bench are starting to show. But what has been a trickle of tie-votes, bizarre orders and slowed activity could turn into a series of orders with contradictory effects as the court is confronted with an onslaught of election-related litigation in the lead-up to Nov. 8...........hows it feel repubs to get what you wished for?

Such is the irresponsible, reprehensible partisan right.

Hey, the Biden rule if you didn't notice was named after a Democrat. So is Biden "irresponsible, reprehensible?"

There is no "Biden Rule", he made what seems to have been a partisan comment 25 years ago. There is no force of law to enforce an opinion. If there were every Republican who called another R a RINO would have violated Reagan's 11th Commandment.

You don't know what the Biden Rule is? Seriously? The Biden Rule is what he said, Holmes. Supreme Court Justices should not be nominated or confirmed in election years, particularly across parties with the President and Senate and the outcome of the election in doubt

oh good you finally found the 0ne thing biden said that you agree with and you had to go back 25 years to find it