republicans get what they wish for

[kaz]

The Gist: The signs that the Supreme Court is grappling with a depleted bench are starting to show. But what has been a trickle of tie-votes, bizarre orders and slowed activity could turn into a series of orders with contradictory effects as the court is confronted with an onslaught of election-related litigation in the lead-up to Nov. 8...........hows it feel repubs to get what you wished for?

Such is the irresponsible, reprehensible partisan right.

Hey, the Biden rule if you didn't notice was named after a Democrat. So is Biden "irresponsible, reprehensible?"

There is no "Biden Rule", he made what seems to have been a partisan comment 25 years ago. There is no force of law to enforce an opinion. If there were every Republican who called another R a RINO would have violated Reagan's 11th Commandment.

You don't know what the Biden Rule is? Seriously? The Biden Rule is what he said, Holmes. Supreme Court Justices should not be nominated or confirmed in election years, particularly across parties with the President and Senate and the outcome of the election in doubt

oh good you finally found the 0ne thing biden said that you agree with and you had to go back 25 years to find it

True, I do agree with Biden just like I agree with McConnell. The supreme court is a lifetime political appointment. Trying to get the parties to agree in the middle of an election year is not a good idea. And I also agree I can't think of anything Biden has said since that I agree with. Let me know if you have any ideas

 

[eddiew]

Just fine. Let's leave it like this.

a true patriot lol

And you are a true idiot. It has nothing to do with patriotism.

Mark Twain: "Patriotism is usually the refuge of the scoundrel. He is the man who talks the loudest"

It's like he knew you, huh eddie?

Here's Twain's advice, "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it"

I love that last quote, it's going in my sig

Great quote, the government rarely deserves it

How can anyone support a government that attacks 3rd world countries ??

We can't, moron, I oppose the wars. You don't, you only oppose them when Republicans do it. Even when you voted for it. I do not think we should have engaged in any of the wars, other than Afghanistan who attacked us, you are a flaming hypocrite who treats it as a partisan issue when both your parties are as bad as the other. And even Afghanistan we screwed up by trying to "nation build," what a waste of money and lives that was. But your guy expanded it. Hypocrite.

You know, those of us who want a better, less meddling foreign policy could use your help. The trick is you have to oppose it all the time. Even when Democrats do it. And say so. And hold them accountable. I lost you already, your views on the subject are feigned

once again ,,you're wrong I oppose any bs war ,,,started by either party Nam too

 

[kaz]

a true patriot lol

And you are a true idiot. It has nothing to do with patriotism.

Mark Twain: "Patriotism is usually the refuge of the scoundrel. He is the man who talks the loudest"

It's like he knew you, huh eddie?

Here's Twain's advice, "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it"

I love that last quote, it's going in my sig

Great quote, the government rarely deserves it

How can anyone support a government that attacks 3rd world countries ??

We can't, moron, I oppose the wars. You don't, you only oppose them when Republicans do it. Even when you voted for it. I do not think we should have engaged in any of the wars, other than Afghanistan who attacked us, you are a flaming hypocrite who treats it as a partisan issue when both your parties are as bad as the other. And even Afghanistan we screwed up by trying to "nation build," what a waste of money and lives that was. But your guy expanded it. Hypocrite.

You know, those of us who want a better, less meddling foreign policy could use your help. The trick is you have to oppose it all the time. Even when Democrats do it. And say so. And hold them accountable. I lost you already, your views on the subject are feigned

once again ,,you're wrong I oppose any bs war ,,,started by either party Nam too

Here's the trick. You have to read and respond to my whole post, not just the first two sentences. Your endless support for the Tweedledum party shows how little of a standard that is for you

 

[eddiew]

Such is the irresponsible, reprehensible partisan right.

Hey, the Biden rule if you didn't notice was named after a Democrat. So is Biden "irresponsible, reprehensible?"

There is no "Biden Rule", he made what seems to have been a partisan comment 25 years ago. There is no force of law to enforce an opinion. If there were every Republican who called another R a RINO would have violated Reagan's 11th Commandment.

You don't know what the Biden Rule is? Seriously? The Biden Rule is what he said, Holmes. Supreme Court Justices should not be nominated or confirmed in election years, particularly across parties with the President and Senate and the outcome of the election in doubt

oh good you finally found the 0ne thing biden said that you agree with and you had to go back 25 years to find it

True, I do agree with Biden just like I agree with McConnell. The supreme court is a lifetime political appointment. Trying to get the parties to agree in the middle of an election year is not a good idea. And I also agree I can't think of anything Biden has said since that I agree with. Let me know if you have any ideas

You're very selective in what you believe

 

[eddiew]

And you are a true idiot. It has nothing to do with patriotism.

Mark Twain: "Patriotism is usually the refuge of the scoundrel. He is the man who talks the loudest"

It's like he knew you, huh eddie?

Here's Twain's advice, "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it"

I love that last quote, it's going in my sig

Great quote, the government rarely deserves it

How can anyone support a government that attacks 3rd world countries ??

We can't, moron, I oppose the wars. You don't, you only oppose them when Republicans do it. Even when you voted for it. I do not think we should have engaged in any of the wars, other than Afghanistan who attacked us, you are a flaming hypocrite who treats it as a partisan issue when both your parties are as bad as the other. And even Afghanistan we screwed up by trying to "nation build," what a waste of money and lives that was. But your guy expanded it. Hypocrite.

You know, those of us who want a better, less meddling foreign policy could use your help. The trick is you have to oppose it all the time. Even when Democrats do it. And say so. And hold them accountable. I lost you already, your views on the subject are feigned

once again ,,you're wrong I oppose any bs war ,,,started by either party Nam too

Here's the trick. You have to read and respond to my whole post, not just the first two sentences. Your endless support for the Tweedledum party shows how little of a standard that is for you

maybe support now but was a republican all my life ,even voted for the &^%^& GWB in 2000

 

[kaz]

Hey, the Biden rule if you didn't notice was named after a Democrat. So is Biden "irresponsible, reprehensible?"

There is no "Biden Rule", he made what seems to have been a partisan comment 25 years ago. There is no force of law to enforce an opinion. If there were every Republican who called another R a RINO would have violated Reagan's 11th Commandment.

You don't know what the Biden Rule is? Seriously? The Biden Rule is what he said, Holmes. Supreme Court Justices should not be nominated or confirmed in election years, particularly across parties with the President and Senate and the outcome of the election in doubt

oh good you finally found the 0ne thing biden said that you agree with and you had to go back 25 years to find it

True, I do agree with Biden just like I agree with McConnell. The supreme court is a lifetime political appointment. Trying to get the parties to agree in the middle of an election year is not a good idea. And I also agree I can't think of anything Biden has said since that I agree with. Let me know if you have any ideas

You're very selective in what you believe

What does that mean? What I said was pretty direct, and I said I agreed with both parties when the shoe was on their foot. You on the other hand have to spin your changing standard. You're for it when Democrats do it, against it when Republican's do. Now that's "selective"

 

[kaz]

Mark Twain: "Patriotism is usually the refuge of the scoundrel. He is the man who talks the loudest"

It's like he knew you, huh eddie?

Here's Twain's advice, "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it"

I love that last quote, it's going in my sig

Great quote, the government rarely deserves it

How can anyone support a government that attacks 3rd world countries ??

We can't, moron, I oppose the wars. You don't, you only oppose them when Republicans do it. Even when you voted for it. I do not think we should have engaged in any of the wars, other than Afghanistan who attacked us, you are a flaming hypocrite who treats it as a partisan issue when both your parties are as bad as the other. And even Afghanistan we screwed up by trying to "nation build," what a waste of money and lives that was. But your guy expanded it. Hypocrite.

You know, those of us who want a better, less meddling foreign policy could use your help. The trick is you have to oppose it all the time. Even when Democrats do it. And say so. And hold them accountable. I lost you already, your views on the subject are feigned

once again ,,you're wrong I oppose any bs war ,,,started by either party Nam too

Here's the trick. You have to read and respond to my whole post, not just the first two sentences. Your endless support for the Tweedledum party shows how little of a standard that is for you

maybe support now but was a republican all my life ,even voted for the &^%^& GWB in 2000

Oh yeah, before 2000 the Democrat party didn't exist. In fact W won unanimously. You all voted for him. It was in fact that election that created the Democrat party. That was when all of you leftist socialists suddenly realized that OMG, you aren't Republicans and created the new party.

How many of you are going to claim that lame story before giving it up under the realization it's stupid?

Curious, given that was when you stopped being a Republican, what made you realize the Democrats were right on every issue? What triggered that epiphany?

 

[eddiew]

There is no "Biden Rule", he made what seems to have been a partisan comment 25 years ago. There is no force of law to enforce an opinion. If there were every Republican who called another R a RINO would have violated Reagan's 11th Commandment.

You don't know what the Biden Rule is? Seriously? The Biden Rule is what he said, Holmes. Supreme Court Justices should not be nominated or confirmed in election years, particularly across parties with the President and Senate and the outcome of the election in doubt

oh good you finally found the 0ne thing biden said that you agree with and you had to go back 25 years to find it

True, I do agree with Biden just like I agree with McConnell. The supreme court is a lifetime political appointment. Trying to get the parties to agree in the middle of an election year is not a good idea. And I also agree I can't think of anything Biden has said since that I agree with. Let me know if you have any ideas

You're very selective in what you believe

What does that mean? What I said was pretty direct, and I said I agreed with both parties when the shoe was on their foot. You on the other hand have to spin your changing standard. You're for it when Democrats do it, against it when Republican's do. Now that's "selective"

If you can only find one thing you agree on with such a principled man as Biden and have to go back 25 years to find it then you're just a hard headed republican who will never change I changed

 

[kaz]

You don't know what the Biden Rule is? Seriously? The Biden Rule is what he said, Holmes. Supreme Court Justices should not be nominated or confirmed in election years, particularly across parties with the President and Senate and the outcome of the election in doubt

oh good you finally found the 0ne thing biden said that you agree with and you had to go back 25 years to find it

True, I do agree with Biden just like I agree with McConnell. The supreme court is a lifetime political appointment. Trying to get the parties to agree in the middle of an election year is not a good idea. And I also agree I can't think of anything Biden has said since that I agree with. Let me know if you have any ideas

You're very selective in what you believe

What does that mean? What I said was pretty direct, and I said I agreed with both parties when the shoe was on their foot. You on the other hand have to spin your changing standard. You're for it when Democrats do it, against it when Republican's do. Now that's "selective"

If you can only find one thing you agree on with such a principled man as Biden and have to go back 25 years to find it then you're just a hard headed republican who will never change I changed

Not a Republican at all, Holmes. So seriously, when I said I oppose all the wars, you heard Republican? No wonder I keep pointing out what a dumb ass you are, you are.

As for Biden, he's one of the biggest boobs in DC. A leftist Quayle gaffe machine. Remember how the Taliban brought down his helecopter in Afghanistan? Oops, it was ... wait for it ... SNOW! LOL. Even left wing Time said he has foot in mouth disease:

Top 10 Joe Biden Gaffes - TIME

 

[Wry Catcher]

oh good you finally found the 0ne thing biden said that you agree with and you had to go back 25 years to find it

True, I do agree with Biden just like I agree with McConnell. The supreme court is a lifetime political appointment. Trying to get the parties to agree in the middle of an election year is not a good idea. And I also agree I can't think of anything Biden has said since that I agree with. Let me know if you have any ideas

You're very selective in what you believe

What does that mean? What I said was pretty direct, and I said I agreed with both parties when the shoe was on their foot. You on the other hand have to spin your changing standard. You're for it when Democrats do it, against it when Republican's do. Now that's "selective"

If you can only find one thing you agree on with such a principled man as Biden and have to go back 25 years to find it then you're just a hard headed republican who will never change I changed

Not a Republican at all, Holmes. So seriously, when I said I oppose all the wars, you heard Republican? No wonder I keep pointing out what a dumb ass you are, you are.

As for Biden, he's one of the biggest boobs in DC. A leftist Quayle gaffe machine. Remember how the Taliban brought down his helecopter in Afghanistan? Oops, it was ... wait for it ... SNOW! LOL. Even left wing Time said he has foot in mouth disease:

Top 10 Joe Biden Gaffes - TIME

Biden is a good and decent man, in fact, G.W. Bush is a good and decent man. Both may put their feet in their mouth, but that is not a character flaw as is the callous disregard for humanity, expressed by many who disdain both parties and the archetype neo conservative that is Dick Cheney.

 

[kaz]

True, I do agree with Biden just like I agree with McConnell. The supreme court is a lifetime political appointment. Trying to get the parties to agree in the middle of an election year is not a good idea. And I also agree I can't think of anything Biden has said since that I agree with. Let me know if you have any ideas

You're very selective in what you believe

What does that mean? What I said was pretty direct, and I said I agreed with both parties when the shoe was on their foot. You on the other hand have to spin your changing standard. You're for it when Democrats do it, against it when Republican's do. Now that's "selective"

If you can only find one thing you agree on with such a principled man as Biden and have to go back 25 years to find it then you're just a hard headed republican who will never change I changed

Not a Republican at all, Holmes. So seriously, when I said I oppose all the wars, you heard Republican? No wonder I keep pointing out what a dumb ass you are, you are.

As for Biden, he's one of the biggest boobs in DC. A leftist Quayle gaffe machine. Remember how the Taliban brought down his helecopter in Afghanistan? Oops, it was ... wait for it ... SNOW! LOL. Even left wing Time said he has foot in mouth disease:

Top 10 Joe Biden Gaffes - TIME

Biden is a good and decent man, in fact, G.W. Bush is a good and decent man. Both may put their feet in their mouth, but that is not a character flaw as is the callous disregard for humanity, expressed by many who disdain both parties and the archetype neo conservative that is Dick Cheney.

At least you're recognizing both sides for once. W is a decent man. One of the worse Presidents in American history, but a good guy

 

[OKTexas]

no need for a vote, the senate has already told obozo that this guy will not be confirmed.

Yep, they gave their advice and consent, their Constitutional duty

Actually the gave their advice and withheld consent, which they have every right to do.

Is that supposed to be different than what I said?

Ugh, yes. Giving consent is confirming the nomination.

con·sent
[kənˈsent]

NOUN

1. permission for something to happen or agreement to do something:

VERB

1. give permission for something to happen:

agreement · assent · acceptance · approval ·
Oxford Dictionaries · © Oxford University Press · Translation by Bing Translator

Right, for candidates they decide to approve. They decided not to approve another Democrat socialist. We obviously agree, I have no idea what point you're trying to make

My bold
You said: "Yep, they gave their advice and consent, their Constitutional duty"

For the sake of accuracy I simply pointed out they haven't given consent. And yes, we do agree, so let's just leave it at that.