*Respected* late term abortionist lies to women, puts them at risk...caught on tape.

It will hold up just fine. But you go ahead and dream your nasty little dream, pervert.

And no, abortion isn't safer than childbirth. It's a lie perpetuated by the abortion industry.

Excuse me, but early abortions ARE safer than childbirth. Much less risk of complications. Suction only, no "scraping." 12 weeks along or less.

So, tell me something. You seem adamantly against abortion, yet you don't seem to want to hold women responsible for their role in it. Why is that?

I mean, MOST women in this country simply decide to get an abortion and go get it. They speak English, they're not ignorant, nobody is forcing them. So, based on things you've said to other people on this thread they must be a bunch of murderous, baby-killing ghouls, eh? I mean, surely you hold them culpable as well? If not, why not.
 
Last edited:
But not in THIS case. In this case, the victims were poor, illiterate, non-English speaking women and their babies.

And your abortion *facts* are just lies perpetuated by the abortion industry and willing dupes, like yourself.

When babykillers stop lying to women about abortion, and preying upon them, then it will be time to look at the women who, fully comprehending, seek illegal abortions.

Right now, abortion is legal.It is unlikely the woman who died had any inkling that what she was seeking was illegal. It wasn't illegal across the river. She was just manipulated, lied to, and steered to Gosnell, probably for a kick back.
 
Yeah, they are pretending it didn't happen, and also pretending the grand jury didn't deliver a scathing indictment of the entire industry...multiple groups who are trusted with the oversight and protection of vulnerable individuals...and who, time after time, failed the public miserably. Why? Because they are part of the sickness.

Abortion, except in cases of medical emergency, should be illegal. Legal, it leads to increased depravity of society, and abuse of those who most need our protection...pregnant women, and children.
 
So, have we determined yet whether all of this flopping-around has changed the 3-count Murder Verdict of that lowlife bottom-feeder in Philadelphia? ;-)
 
Chances of a pardon for this murderer by the President?

Pretty damned good if you ask me sometime around January 18, 2017.

Immie
 
Can't do the crime don't do the time.

Can't do the kid, don't pop your lid.

Come on down to Dr. Gosnell's.

You fuck 'em, we muck 'em.

No bag, no tag.

In and out in an hour.

How flippant. You're sickening.

How about a doctor killing a baby after it is born, pretty fucking sick, isn't it.

Did an ME do an autopsy on one of those babies to determine that it was, in fact, alive at the time the spine was snipped?
 
How about a doctor killing a baby after it is born, pretty fucking sick, isn't it.

Did an ME do an autopsy on one of those babies to determine that it was, in fact, alive at the time the spine was snipped?

He was convicted of first degree murder, which means he illegally took the life a human, the humans were babies. Get up to speed on the law.

I know that and I respect the decision of the jury. That doesn't mean I understand WHY these babies were deemed alive at the time they were killed, when there is no physical evidence of it.
 
How about a doctor killing a baby after it is born, pretty fucking sick, isn't it.

Did an ME do an autopsy on one of those babies to determine that it was, in fact, alive at the time the spine was snipped?
If the baby was already dead, there would be no reason to snip the spine, you moron.

I can agree with that, but that isn't physical evidence the babies were alive and breathing, is it?

How can a jury convict someone of murder when there was no physical evidence to suggest the babies were breathing at the time the spines were snipped?

Its a simple question that should be answered.
 
Did an ME do an autopsy on one of those babies to determine that it was, in fact, alive at the time the spine was snipped?
If the baby was already dead, there would be no reason to snip the spine, you moron.

I can agree with that, but that isn't physical evidence the babies were alive and breathing, is it?

How can a jury convict someone of murder when there was no physical evidence to suggest the babies were breathing at the time the spines were snipped?

Its a simple question that should be answered.
You may very well be the dumbest person on this board. Others who worked there gave sworn testimony. People were cross-examined and evidence was presented to the jury, and the jury gave their decision. That's what trials are for. You are either dumb or you are struggling to defend your pro abortion position. But I guess the two are intertwined.
 
If the baby was already dead, there would be no reason to snip the spine, you moron.

I can agree with that, but that isn't physical evidence the babies were alive and breathing, is it?

How can a jury convict someone of murder when there was no physical evidence to suggest the babies were breathing at the time the spines were snipped?

Its a simple question that should be answered.

To answer your question, it looks at though it was eyewitness testimony which proved the babies were still alive. Can't find any medical proof though.

Former clinic employees testified that Gosnell routinely performed illegal late-term abortions past Pennsylvania's 24-week limit, that he delivered babies who were still moving, whimpering or breathing, and that he and his assistants "snipped" the newborns' spines, as he referred to it.
Read more: Doctor Kermit Gosnell found guilty of murdering infants in late-term abortions | Fox News
 
Last edited:
One witness testified that a baby was dropped into a toilet and was swimming around, trying to survive, and Gosnell pulled it out and snipped it's spine.
 
You haven't posted any facts. A study perpetuated by a company dedicated to bringing 2nd term abortions to the cultural capitol of Islam that maintains that abortion is safe!

Nope, don't see no problem with that study, lol.

You're a fucking ghoul. Face it, own it, revel in it. Have a party, spray some fetal blood on yourself and caper about naked in front of the underaged girl mannekins you have chained in your basement. Cut a video so you can revisit the moment over and over.

Wow, you get more and more hysterical every day, because you can't sell your dogma to people.

I got subjected to the Fetus porn by the nuns every day growing up in Catholic school, and so did most of my peers. And those girls all got abortions in their 20's when they unexectedly got knocked up because they didn't take birth control pills because the nuns told them that was a sin, too.

Besides this weirdness about Uzbekistan being the "cultural capital of Islam" (really?) and your bizarre use of the word "Second term abortion". (Pssst, when you have an abortion, the pregnancy never comes to "term".)

Facts are these...

Abortion will never be illegal in this country.
Women will get abortions no matter what the law is.
Women will get them because that's THEIR CHOICE.

Women will not stop having sex because you say so.

Now, all those FACTS in evidence, there are ways to reduce the number of abortions- better sex education, universal health care, economic equality. But being a RUBE, you'll keep voting against those things. And wondering why poor women are getting abortions.
 
If the baby was already dead, there would be no reason to snip the spine, you moron.

I can agree with that, but that isn't physical evidence the babies were alive and breathing, is it?

How can a jury convict someone of murder when there was no physical evidence to suggest the babies were breathing at the time the spines were snipped?

Its a simple question that should be answered.
You may very well be the dumbest person on this board. Others who worked there gave sworn testimony. People were cross-examined and evidence was presented to the jury, and the jury gave their decision. That's what trials are for. You are either dumb or you are struggling to defend your pro abortion position. But I guess the two are intertwined.

Except those people were all co-conspirators who were threatened with prosecution unless they gave evidence...

Accomplice testimony is useless without corroboration.
 

Forum List

Back
Top