Moonglow
Diamond Member
Don't work in retail.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You people don’t want cops until something happens to you or yours.
Didn't they?The cost of running a store that has lots of theft is the reason, without a profit no point of being open. Walmarts, Walgreens, Rite-Aid , Target did not close stores in lower crime areas, odd isn’t it?
Agreed; California is plagued now, having traded lower crime for lower incarceration.Crime is down but in many areas certainly good news but in areas where shoplifting is not prosecuted for lower amounts, it is a problem.
Source?The government owned store in Chicago is in a high crime area because regular stores closed up because of crime rates at their locations.
They may be one issue, but there are many; please don't pretend and deny that there are not.You can pretend and deny all you want but these stores are citing specifically high crime rates as an issue.
So crime is down, and cops are patrolling - good things, right?Portland Oregon is now trying to get people back to the downtown area which is being done by more patrols, people are not going and high crime is the issue.
I won't go in a store that searches me.How long can this go on? Local jurisdictions don’t have the resources to prosecute shoplifting. Flash mob grab and go is on the rise. What should retailers do?
I would start draconian measures. Incentivize shoppers to do more online (shopping and pickup). Beef up premium security personnel; preferably armed. Let shoppers know that if they choose to enter the store, they are subject to random searches while in the store. If they fail to comply, they will be removed from the store, by force, if necessary.
I have no idea who "you people" are.You people don’t want cops until something happens to you or yours.
Don’t go. Order online or don’t support them at all.I won't go in a store that searches me.
you haven’t won anything. If you have, put up empirical data to back it up.I have no idea who "you people" are.
Sounds like a straw man and/or projection to me.
But irrelevant and fallacious nonetheless; I accept your surrender.
Didn't they?
Source?
Agreed; California is plagued now, having traded lower crime for lower incarceration.
Source?
They may be one issue, but there are many; please don't pretend and deny that there are not.
These corporations use crime as a catch-all explanation for decisions based in numerous criteria, including bad planning on their parts.
So crime is down, and cops are patrolling - good things, right?
you haven’t won anything.
Yes, you should.If you have, put up empirical data to back it up.
I must confess that I have no idea what you're trying to say above, yes.My look ast post I said I was gll lol ad crime is down in so areas, I t seems you lack reading comprehension.
They opened a store as I recall, or planned to do so?The story of the Chicago government is common knowledge, for informed people.
Yup - you're poorly informed, and don't want that to change.I disagree with you on why stores closed.
Stores closed for many reasons.. Lots of hard evidence but you have no interest in reading post let alone have facts.
Did they?Unless you have facts showing why Walmarts, Walgreens, Rite-Aid, Targets and other closed in crime ridden areas
They closed for many reasons, but used crime as a catch-all as noted.closed for other reasons you have nothing and we will disagree.
I already did.
Yes, you should.
But yeah - crime is down, inflation is down, cops are protecting us, and shitcons are furious about all of that.
Weird, right?
![]()
Why do you feel the need to lie about me. I admit crime is going down in many areas and there are areas where it is rising but overall down, I am happy about that but you continue to distort and lie.I must confess that I have no idea what you're trying to say above, yes.
They opened a store as I recall, or planned to do so?
Yup - you're poorly informed, and don't want that to change.
Stores closed for many reasons.
In some instances, crime may have been one factor.
Did they?
For that reason alone?
I think not.
They closed for many reasons, but used crime as a catch-all as noted.
Crime = Down
Inflation = Down
Cops = Doing their jobs
Shitcons = Enraged by these things
Go figure.
![]()
That's because mintrut is a troll. I placed it on ignore. Stop feeding it and it will die.MinTrut keeps claiming that people are upset that crime is lower, who is upset that crime is lower? So far no one on the left or right would be upset if crime was lower, it is just another lie from a nut.
True that, he just likes to argue is perception, not reality. Sad he Is so incredibly shallow and ignorant.That's because mintrut is a troll. I placed it on ignore. Stop feeding it and it will die.
So, IOW, no one you can name. You just know they're out there, somewhere. You just know it.
From the post you quoted:
Crime is dropping; conservatives are enraged.
You shitcons...
But yeah, crime is dropping, and conservatives can't cope.
Massively triggered.
Y'all aint right in the head.
Things are looking better all over.I already did.
![]()
Retail Theft Losses Mount. Blame Organized Crime
Flash mob smash-and-grabs are just part of a $100 billion-plus problem. No end is in sight.www.investors.com
Retail Crime is not down.
Wha?Why do you feel the need to lie about me.
Great!I admit crime is going down in many areas and there are areas where it is rising but overall down, I am happy about that
I do?but you continue to distort and lie.
Numerous reasons, and in many areas.So far you have no facts as to why stores closed down
Including those areas as well I believe.in high crime areas.
No.Of course there are other factors but the main driving force was high shoplifting and crime.
You first.Go ahead post a backed up fact.
The OP.MinTrut keeps claiming that people are upset that crime is lower, who is upset that crime is lower?
See above.So far no one on the left or right would be upset if crime was lower, it is just another lie from a nut.
Projection.True that, he just likes to argue is perception, not reality.
See above.Sad he Is so incredibly shallow and ignorant.
The OP among numerous others.So, IOW, no one you can name. You just know they're out there, somewhere. You just know it.