The essential utility of Trump's falsehoods.

If you'd like to see the bond market's reaction to the debate click on the link and then click on the 5 day chart.


See the spike in yields on the 20 year? That is the bond market saying inflation will return in a Trump admin.

Sixteen Nobel Prize-winning economists warn a second Trump term would ‘reignite’ inflation​

Inflation hasn’t left in a xiden admin
 
1. Those being prosecuted have committed crimes. Like assaulting law enforcement officers and destruction of government property

2. Biden’s bank records show nothing of the kind.

3. Stupid comment

4. None of that has anything to do with JOE Biden
This moronic post was completely refuted by the post it quoted.
 
Ok. I see. Denial of objective truth is a prerequisite to be a Trump cultist. Which is the theme of the thread. Thanks for the confirmation the premise is correct.
How does it feel to be part of the minority who calls the majority of Americans "cultist" ? It's getting to be that your "cultist" framework is coming apart at the seams.

 
I was going to write a post making a comparison between what we can expect from another Biden admin or Trump admin. Because it is top of mind for the country I was going to make the point an advantage to another Biden admin is we do not have to concern ourselves with him using the DoJ to go after who he perceives to be his enemies as Trump has promised to do........and did when he was prez.

Justice Department pressured former US attorney to bring cases against Trump enemies, Geoffrey Berman says
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/jus...n, who served 2,Secretary of State John Kerry.

Obviously, I know what the reflexive reply from The Following will be. They will allege, without credible evidence, the votes of four grand juries to indict Trump and his co-conspirators was a deep state plot hatched by Joe. It is, at its core, a ludicrous argument to make. But it serves two essential purposes. 1. Allows The Following to dismiss Don's criminal behavior as him being persecuted. 2. Removes, in their minds, a fundamental difference between what we can expect from the two admins.

From that perspective it's easy to see why Trump uses so many false accusations. It disarms the opposition while creating a deceitful construct for his base to believe in. Like claiming Joe, absent evidence that holds up to scrutiny, has taken bribe money from foreign countries. It's utility, obfuscating Trump's established record of criminal activity including a conviction. Not to mention.........

WASHINGTON — Former President Donald Trump received at least $7.8 million in payments from foreign governments during two of his four years in the White House, according to a report released Thursday by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee.

Twenty foreign governments made the payments to Trump's businesses during the two-year period that the committee was able to review. The information in the report was first reported by The New York Times and CNN.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/co...oreign-governments-president-repor-rcna132276

The replies from defenders of all things Trump will prove how effective his strategy has been.
:puhleeze: Name ONE Trump "falsehood" :rolleyes:
 
Trump claimed credit for the $35 cap on insulin

False

President Trump Announces Lower Out of Pocket Insulin Costs for Medicare’s Seniors


May 26, 2020


Today, under President Trump’s leadership, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced that over 1,750 standalone Medicare Part D prescription drug plans and Medicare Advantage plans with prescription drug coverage have applied to offer lower insulin costs through the Part D Senior Savings Model for the 2021 plan year. Across the nation, participating enhanced Part D prescription drug plans will provide Medicare beneficiaries access to a broad set of insulins at a maximum $35 copay for a month’s supply, from the beginning of the year through the Part D coverage gap. The model follows on the Trump Administration’s previously announced 13.5 percent decline in the average monthly basic Part D premium since 2017 to the lowest level in seven years.

Currently, Part D sponsors may offer prescription drug plans that provide lower cost-sharing in the coverage gap; however, when they do, the Part D sponsor accrues costs that pharmaceutical manufacturers would normally pay. These costs are then passed on to beneficiaries in the form of higher premiums. The new insulin model directly addresses this disincentive by doing two things: 1) allowing manufacturers to continue paying their full coverage gap discount for their products, even when a plan offers lower cost-sharing; and 2) requiring participating Part D sponsors’ plans, in part through applying manufacturer rebates, to lowering cost-sharing to no more than $35 for a month’s supply for a broad set of insulins.

 

Forum List

Back
Top