Democrats Warn: Immunity Decision Will Let Presidents Go After Political Opponents

[Rawley]

Elections are the constitutional method by which we chose the president.

Did anyone in the DoJ tell you that they heard this random line from a press conference and say that they acted on it?

Yes, Garland phoned me that day. Are there any ways in which you will not debase yourself for Biden?

 

[Rogue AI]

SCOTUS just said that the president is perfectly immune from legal consequences of going after political rivals.

So what are you complaining about?

Presidents have certainly levels of immunity, as mostly delineated by the Court. Those who act on the president's behalf do not. This isn't nearly as broad as people are whining about.

 

[Marener]

Yes, Garland phoned me that day. Are there any ways in which you will not debase yourself for Biden?

Your narrative is basis and defies all logic.

Do you think the DoJ watches all of Biden’s press to see if he gives them orders?

 

[Marener]

Presindents have certainly levels of immunity, as mostly delineated by the Court. Those who act on the president's behalf do not. This isn't nearly as broad as people are whining about.

Of course they would. It would be completely illogical and unworkable if those under the president can be prosecuted for carrying out the policies of the president for which he has been given immunity.

 

[struth]

Your narrative is basis and defies all logic.

Do you think the DoJ watches all of Biden’s press to see if he gives them orders?

No, do you think xiden just doesn’t have a phone and can call the DOJ? Why in the world would he simply just give the DOJ orders during press conferences??

How weird

 

[Rawley]

Your narrative is basis and defies all logic.

Do you think the DoJ watches all of Biden’s press to see if he gives them orders?

It would be very odd if they didn't pay attention to the President's public statements. They rest of the world took notice and it was widely reported.

Biden suggests Trump will ‘not take power’ again if he runs in 2024

President Biden on Wednesday suggested that if former President Trump opts to run in 2024, he would not make it to the White House for a second term. Biden’s comments come just two days after Trump…

thehill.com

 

[Marener]

No, do you think xiden just doesn’t have a phone and can call the DOJ? Why in the world would he simply just give the DOJ orders during press conferences??

How weird

So you’re making that up too.

Not weird. Totally expected from you.

 

[struth]

So you’re making that up too.

Not weird. Totally expected from you.

No I really honestly believe the president has a phone and the DOJ has one too. I honestly believe the president speaks to his cabinet, including the AG. Hopefully a lot

 

[Marener]

It would be very odd if they didn't pay attention to the President's public statements. They rest of the world took notice and it was widely reported.

The only ones that seem to think this was some signal to the DoJ are the fringe conservatives like yourself, whom are wedded to this narrative.

 

[Marener]

No I really honestly believe the president has a phone and the DOJ has one too. I honestly believe the president speaks to his cabinet, including the AG. Hopefully a lot

Could do something and did do something are very different to normal people.

But not to you. Your brain is broken.

 

[whitehall]

You mean like what democrats are doing today?

 

[Rogue AI]

Of course they would. It would be completely illogical and unworkable if those under the president can be prosecuted for carrying out the policies of the president for which he has been given immunity.

No it wouldn't. You seem to ignore the whole impeachment and removal aspect of the Constitution. The fearmongering silliness liberals have been spouting ignore entire bodies of law that are still in effect that still apply to everyone else. Any president who tried to use federal agencies or the military to commit an act that was illegal yesterday are still bound by those laws today. The extreme fantasies of liberals were never realistic.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Tell me who told the DoJ to go after Trump. Tell me when they said it. Tell me what they said.

Or admit you made it up.

We'll find out when Garland tells us under oath sometime in 2025....

 

[struth]

Could do something and did do something are very different to normal people.

But not to you. Your brain is broken.

Wait are you really suggesting xiden doesn’t speak to his AG? Wow…well that could explain why he’s been so lawless, maybe garland would of told him prosecuting his polltical rivals is an abuse of power.

 

[Rawley]

The only ones that seem to think this was some signal to the DoJ are the fringe conservatives like yourself, whom are wedded to this narrative.

And yet, your explanation is tortured and warped. Oh well

Have a blessed day.

 

[berg80]

In arguing that Trump — or any other president — could pursue his opponents legally, Democrats appeared to concede that Biden had been doing so illegally

Horseshit. They followed standard legal practices every step of the way. The inescapable fact you folks spent a lot of time obfuscating is that grand juries voted to indict Trump and his co-defendants based on the evidence they were presented.

Trial juries have found him guilty of falsifying documents, found him financially liable for defamation in a rape case, and found him guilty of tax fraud.

 

[konradv]

Democrats Warn: Immunity Decision Will Let Presidents Go After Political Opponents​

Democrats Warn: Immunity Decision Will Let Presidents Go After Political Opponents

Democrats implied Monday that former President Donald Trump could pursue his political opponents, legally, if he returns to the White House.

www.breitbart.com

1 Jul 2024 ~~ By Joel B. Pollak

Democrats implied Monday that former President Donald Trump could pursue his political opponents, legally, if he returns to the White House, following the Supreme Court’s decision on presidential immunity in Trump v. U.S.

**********

**********
​

In arguing that Trump — or any other president — could pursue his opponents legally, Democrats appeared to concede that Biden had been doing so illegally, at least according to the Supreme Court, which also ruled last week that prosecutors had abused a federal statute to pursue some participants in the Capitol riot of January 6, 2021.




Commentary:
Democrat-neo-Marxists are in a frenzy because they believe that their vile persecution of Conservatives and Donald Trump will be turned against them because of the latest SCOTUS decision.
They know that the convictions of hundreds of Americans that attended the Jan 6th rally and were swept up in the false flag opeartion have been wrongly convicted especially when thousands have been released after doing billions in dameges.
Democrat neo- Marxists had no problem when Obama and Biden went after their opponents like journalist Rosen, terrorist al-Awlaki and Republicans supporting Trump or when setting antii-American traitors free like Bergdahl and Manning. Democrats love a two-tier justice system only so long as they're in power.
You reap what you sow.. Democrats are now fearful of the reprecussions that they will suffer for their nefarious acts.

Now it’s ominous?!?

#WAKEUP

 

[berg80]

The Brits must be asking themselves if those who left England to come to America to escape the monarchy and religious intolerance long ago made a mistake.

 

[Marener]

No it wouldn't. You seem to ignore the whole impeachment and removal aspect of the Constitution. The fearmongering silliness liberals have been spouting ignore entire bodies of law that are still in effect that still apply to everyone else. Any president who tried to use federal agencies or the military to commit an act that was illegal yesterday are still bound by those laws today. The extreme fantasies of liberals were never realistic.

Everyone appointed in the administration can be impeached and removed. To think this is a suitable mechanism to deal with illegal activity is absurd. We all know how that plays out in Congress.

The president is no longer bound to these laws as long as they operating under their broad scope of “official duties”.

We don’t need to engage in fantasies. The president can now direct the DoJ to pursue investigations and prosecutions of their political enemies without legal repercussions.

 

[Marener]

And yet, your explanation is tortured and warped. Oh well

Have a blessed day.

Your certainly reflects your need for it to be true. Everyone else sees an ambiguous statement with no distinct meaning. To think this represents corruption is absurd unless you have anything else to use as corroborating evidence.

But you don’t.