Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In one thread they say republicans are rich in another thread they claim republicans are welfare hicks....tax cuts for the rich...
i get the impression you leftards feeeeel only Republicans are the rich, if we take half of the wealth from rich demorats, starting with G.Soros, we could pay down the national debt by half, after all it is the demoscum who have put America so far in debt it will take centuries to become debt free.
Their tax cuts over the last thirty five years have pumped trillions of borrowed dollars into the pockets of millionaires and (THE) left...
you somehow missed the near tripling of the debt by that illegal alien mulatto muslime scumbag president..., how did you miss that.., and you even got two (2) agrees from similar brain dead posters.
lord have mercy!! as my GrandMother always said.
I thought it was Reagan who tripled the debt. That man and Geenspan did us in.
The top 1 percent own half of the country's stocks. So when the stock market crashes, they suffer the most. When the stock market climbs, they profit the most.
What you are looking at in that chart is a stock market bubble. I notice it stops in 2007. I bet if you extended it out to 2009, the top 1 percent's wealth would not be so impressive, which is probably why the person who made that graphic stopped at 2007.
Propaganda is all about framing the picture the way you want it to be perceived.
Ah. See?
Extend the chart out to 2009 and look, they revert back to the trend line:
If you look at the graphic in my last post, the top one percent earned $232,581 in 1986.
If you plug that figure into an inflation calculator, that income is equal to $462,734 in 2009 dollars. And yet they only earned $343,927 in 2009, way below the inflation rate.
Their entire political campaigns are designed to cause poor people to show up at the polls and vote against their own best interests. After considering that everything the party has done beginning with Reagan, who slashed rates to 50 year lows has stood for corporations and tax cuts for the rich how could any average citizen with average means show up and vote for them? Their tax cuts over the last thirty five years have pumped trillions of borrowed dollars into the pockets of millionaires and left ordinary American's incomes flat or worse after adjustment for inflation:
View attachment 53401
..........................Total U S Debt...........................
09/30/2014 $17,824,071,380,733.82
09/30/2013 $16,738,183,526,697.32
09/30/2012 $16,066,241,407,385.89
09/30/2011 $14,790,340,328,557.15
09/30/2010 $13,561,623,030,891.79
09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)
09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 (Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)(Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00
In one thread they say republicans are rich in another thread they claim republicans are welfare hicks....tax cuts for the rich...
i get the impression you leftards feeeeel only Republicans are the rich, if we take half of the wealth from rich demorats, starting with G.Soros, we could pay down the national debt by half, after all it is the demoscum who have put America so far in debt it will take centuries to become debt free.
Maybe you should take a look at where the real money is and see who is putting in.
Lobbying Spending Database | OpenSecrets
Maybe you should take a look at where the real money is and see who is putting in.
Lobbying Spending Database | OpenSecrets
maybe you should stop being a partisan lemming douche and say where most of that money is going?? yes even the corporate money.
In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing ...
Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis...campaign...democ...
The Washington Post
Loading...
Oct 15, 2015 - In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans ... After helping scoop up more than $100 million for his allied super PAC before declaring his ... Explore the largest donors to 2016 presidential candidates ... The totals raised on each side by the candidate-aligned super PACs are unclear, ...
Maybe you should take a look at where the real money is and see who is putting in.
Lobbying Spending Database | OpenSecrets
maybe you should stop being a partisan lemming douche and say where most of that money is going?? yes even the corporate money.
In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing ...
Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis...campaign...democ...
The Washington Post
Loading...
Oct 15, 2015 - In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans ... After helping scoop up more than $100 million for his allied super PAC before declaring his ... Explore the largest donors to 2016 presidential candidates ... The totals raised on each side by the candidate-aligned super PACs are unclear, ...
You really have a problem reading, don't you?
The article is basically stating that the Democrats are winning with small donors. However PAC money (large obscene amounts of cash) is a different story. As of mid year the GOP has made $234 million combined among all 15 candidates w/PAC money to the Democrats $17 million between 6 candidates. Let's divide that per candidate, shall we?
GOP = 15.6 million per candidate
DNC = 2.83 million per candidate
I'm all for publicly funded federal elections, are you?
YES
Maybe you should take a look at where the real money is and see who is putting in.
Lobbying Spending Database | OpenSecrets
maybe you should stop being a partisan lemming douche and say where most of that money is going?? yes even the corporate money.
In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing ...
Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis...campaign...democ...
The Washington Post
Loading...
Oct 15, 2015 - In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans ... After helping scoop up more than $100 million for his allied super PAC before declaring his ... Explore the largest donors to 2016 presidential candidates ... The totals raised on each side by the candidate-aligned super PACs are unclear, ...
I'm all for publicly funded federal elections, are you?
Maybe you should take a look at where the real money is and see who is putting in.
Lobbying Spending Database | OpenSecrets
maybe you should stop being a partisan lemming douche and say where most of that money is going?? yes even the corporate money.
In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing ...
Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis...campaign...democ...
The Washington Post
Loading...
Oct 15, 2015 - In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans ... After helping scoop up more than $100 million for his allied super PAC before declaring his ... Explore the largest donors to 2016 presidential candidates ... The totals raised on each side by the candidate-aligned super PACs are unclear, ...
You really have a problem reading, don't you?
The article is basically stating that the Democrats are winning with small donors. However PAC money (large obscene amounts of cash) is a different story. As of mid year the GOP has made $234 million combined among all 15 candidates w/PAC money to the Democrats $17 million between 6 candidates. Let's divide that per candidate, shall we?
GOP = 15.6 million per candidate
DNC = 2.83 million per candidate
I'm all for publicly funded federal elections, are you?
no of course not leftard. we have a $20 trillion national debt
Maybe you should take a look at where the real money is and see who is putting in.
Lobbying Spending Database | OpenSecrets
maybe you should stop being a partisan lemming douche and say where most of that money is going?? yes even the corporate money.
In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing ...
Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis...campaign...democ...
The Washington Post
Loading...
Oct 15, 2015 - In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans ... After helping scoop up more than $100 million for his allied super PAC before declaring his ... Explore the largest donors to 2016 presidential candidates ... The totals raised on each side by the candidate-aligned super PACs are unclear, ...
You really have a problem reading, don't you?
The article is basically stating that the Democrats are winning with small donors. However PAC money (large obscene amounts of cash) is a different story. As of mid year the GOP has made $234 million combined among all 15 candidates w/PAC money to the Democrats $17 million between 6 candidates. Let's divide that per candidate, shall we?
GOP = 15.6 million per candidate
DNC = 2.83 million per candidate
I'm all for publicly funded federal elections, are you?
no of course not leftard. we have a $20 trillion national debt
I agree, let's pretend you totally didn't understand your own source.
Maybe you should take a look at where the real money is and see who is putting in.
Lobbying Spending Database | OpenSecrets
maybe you should stop being a partisan lemming douche and say where most of that money is going?? yes even the corporate money.
In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing ...
Washington Post: Breaking News, World, US, DC News & Analysis...campaign...democ...
The Washington Post
Loading...
Oct 15, 2015 - In campaign money race, Democrats vastly outpacing Republicans ... After helping scoop up more than $100 million for his allied super PAC before declaring his ... Explore the largest donors to 2016 presidential candidates ... The totals raised on each side by the candidate-aligned super PACs are unclear, ...
You really have a problem reading, don't you?
The article is basically stating that the Democrats are winning with small donors. However PAC money (large obscene amounts of cash) is a different story. As of mid year the GOP has made $234 million combined among all 15 candidates w/PAC money to the Democrats $17 million between 6 candidates. Let's divide that per candidate, shall we?
GOP = 15.6 million per candidate
DNC = 2.83 million per candidate
I'm all for publicly funded federal elections, are you?
no of course not leftard. we have a $20 trillion national debt
I agree, let's pretend you totally didn't understand your own source.
yawn
i understand it idiot. i'm saying so the eff what??
did you ever hear of bundling? where small contributions are solicited (demanded) from individuals to make it appear they came willingly from normal folks when in fact they were solitited by Big Labor?
or soft money contributions??
Their tax cuts over the last thirty five years have pumped trillions of borrowed dollars into the pockets of millionaires and (THE) left...
you somehow missed the near tripling of the debt by that illegal alien mulatto muslime scumbag president..., how did you miss that.., and you even got two (2) agrees from similar brain dead posters.
lord have mercy!! as my GrandMother always said.
I thought it was Reagan who tripled the debt. That man and Geenspan did us in.
"Since World War II the federal budget deficit has risen almost continually, regardless of which political party has occupied the White House, and regardless of which party has held a majority of seats in the House of Representatives or Senate. As table 1 indicates, in each of the last four decades, the average size of the federal budget deficit relative to GNP has approximately doubled. Due to the extraordinary string of budget deficits, the national debt is now equivalent to over forty thousand dollars for every family in the United States.
Federal Budget, by John F. Cogan: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty
