Rifle used by couple to stop democrat party terrorists confiscated....expect to see the protestors attack...

[Faun]

Considering THEY DIDN'T USE LETHAL FORCE.

They kind of did. Pointing a gun right at someone is application of deadly force, which is why they might be in trouble.

Negative... They threatened lethal force. They did not USE lethal force. They were trespassing. They are allowed to threaten anything they want. Get off their property.

They may have committed a 4th degree assault...

​

Assault in the fourth degree.

​

1. A person commits the offense of assault in the fourth degree if: ​

​

(3) The person purposely places another person in apprehension of immediate physical injury;​

​

​

ON THEIR OWN PROPERTY? *laughs*

Oh wait... Are you talking about the "protesters" ... That makes sense.

The protesters were not on their property.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Considering THEY DIDN'T USE LETHAL FORCE.

They kind of did. Pointing a gun right at someone is application of deadly force, which is why they might be in trouble.

Negative... They threatened lethal force. They did not USE lethal force. They were trespassing. They are allowed to threaten anything they want. Get off their property.

They may have committed a 4th degree assault...

​

Assault in the fourth degree.

​

1. A person commits the offense of assault in the fourth degree if: ​

​

(3) The person purposely places another person in apprehension of immediate physical injury;​

​

​

ON THEIR OWN PROPERTY? *laughs*

Oh wait... Are you talking about the "protesters" ... That makes sense.

The protesters were not on their property.

 

[Faun]

Considering THEY DIDN'T USE LETHAL FORCE.

They kind of did. Pointing a gun right at someone is application of deadly force, which is why they might be in trouble.

Negative... They threatened lethal force. They did not USE lethal force. They were trespassing. They are allowed to threaten anything they want. Get off their property.

They may have committed a 4th degree assault...

​

Assault in the fourth degree.

​

1. A person commits the offense of assault in the fourth degree if: ​

​

(3) The person purposely places another person in apprehension of immediate physical injury;​

​

​

Yes the looters did just that.

Oh? What did the protesters do to the home owners to cause 'apprehension of immediate physical injury?'

 

[Mac-7]

They were NOT on that couple's property, and YES you are not supposed to point a loaded gun with your finger on the trigger unless there is an immediate lethal threat.

You are just making up stuff to fit your argument

the couple have every right to brandish weapons to protect their home from looters

and yes, a mob of thugs is a threat

 

[Faun]

Considering THEY DIDN'T USE LETHAL FORCE.

They kind of did. Pointing a gun right at someone is application of deadly force, which is why they might be in trouble.

Negative... They threatened lethal force. They did not USE lethal force. They were trespassing. They are allowed to threaten anything they want. Get off their property.

They may have committed a 4th degree assault...

​

Assault in the fourth degree.

​

1. A person commits the offense of assault in the fourth degree if: ​

​

(3) The person purposely places another person in apprehension of immediate physical injury;​

​

​

ON THEIR OWN PROPERTY? *laughs*

Oh wait... Are you talking about the "protesters" ... That makes sense.

The protesters were not on their property.

View attachment 362146

Private "street." That street is not that home owner's property.

 

[protectionist]

That couple sounds a bit nuts frankly. There were 6 protestors, they stayed on the sidewalk, none were armed, they were peaceful. None were Antifa.

Protest organizers say there was no reason for homeowners to come outside with guns

“For them to come out there with their guns drawn, there was absolutely no reason at all,” Reverend Darryl Gray said

www.ksdk.com

Even their neighbors thought they went overboard.

Neighbors condemn couple who pulled guns on protesters

The McCloskeys say they were just defending their home against protesters who they claim were armed and doing damage to private property

www.ksdk.com

Video shows about 100's of protestors, and McCloskey publicly stated that. Tucker Carlson said there were 300. Some reports said protested broke an iron gate to get in ans were on the McCloskey's property.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Considering THEY DIDN'T USE LETHAL FORCE.

They kind of did. Pointing a gun right at someone is application of deadly force, which is why they might be in trouble.

Negative... They threatened lethal force. They did not USE lethal force. They were trespassing. They are allowed to threaten anything they want. Get off their property.

They may have committed a 4th degree assault...

​

Assault in the fourth degree.

​

1. A person commits the offense of assault in the fourth degree if: ​

​

(3) The person purposely places another person in apprehension of immediate physical injury;​

​

​

Yes the looters did just that.

Oh? What did the protesters do to the home owners to cause 'apprehension of immediate physical injury?'

They came onto private property.

 

[Faun]

That couple sounds a bit nuts frankly. There were 6 protestors, they stayed on the sidewalk, none were armed, they were peaceful. None were Antifa.

Protest organizers say there was no reason for homeowners to come outside with guns

“For them to come out there with their guns drawn, there was absolutely no reason at all,” Reverend Darryl Gray said

www.ksdk.com

Even their neighbors thought they went overboard.

Neighbors condemn couple who pulled guns on protesters

The McCloskeys say they were just defending their home against protesters who they claim were armed and doing damage to private property

www.ksdk.com

Um after you bust through a gate into private property you are no longer considered peaceful. 1, 10 or 100. Doesn't matter. How many people does it take to kill you and burn your house to the ground?

This is fucking crazy and these people need to file a lawsuit NOW.

According to this, they did not bust through the gate or damage any property.

Video shows gate was intact when St. Louis couple pointed guns at protesters

Videos and photographs show the couple pacing on their Portland Place property, periodically pointing the weapons at the crowd

www.ksdk.com

Dumbasss they opened a closed gate with a sign that says do not enter private property

True. But there sure are a lot of contradictions if not outright lies from tbe gun toting couple, including they broke down the gate.

They did break down the gate.
And there's the possibility that they didnt see the gate until after the looters left. In fact thats likely what occurred. I sure as hell wouldnt have been wandering around until the looters were gone.

Prove they broke it down...

 

[Faun]

Considering THEY DIDN'T USE LETHAL FORCE.

They kind of did. Pointing a gun right at someone is application of deadly force, which is why they might be in trouble.

Negative... They threatened lethal force. They did not USE lethal force. They were trespassing. They are allowed to threaten anything they want. Get off their property.

They may have committed a 4th degree assault...

​

Assault in the fourth degree.

​

1. A person commits the offense of assault in the fourth degree if: ​

​

(3) The person purposely places another person in apprehension of immediate physical injury;​

​

​

Yes the looters did just that.

Oh? What did the protesters do to the home owners to cause 'apprehension of immediate physical injury?'

They came onto private property.

But not the property of that homeowner. Post a link to the Missouri law which allows a homeowner to threaten lethal force to protect someone else's property...

 

[protectionist]

Private "street." That street is not that home owner's property.

Protestors were trespassing on the McCloskey's private property, and broke an iron gate to get in.

 

[Mac-7]

Oh? What did the protesters do to the home owners to cause 'apprehension of immediate physical injury?'

They were close enough to do whatever they wanted including set the house on fire

the blame for this incident belongs to the rioters and to the democrat mayor who failed to protect the city

 

[irosie91]

Regularly? Yeah... you are going to have to show stats because that is totally untrue.

Are you kidding?

the lib mobs have been setting fires in democrat cities across America for weeks

according to the virtual BLM manifesto----
burning, looting and bombing is an expression
of justified aggrievement ----mayor billy joe stalin is a cowriter

Link to manifesto?

try again, coyote----I wrote VIRTUAL MANIFESTO

 

[protectionist]

Prove they broke it down...

You prove they didn't.

 

[Quasar44]

The democrat party Circuit Attorney in St. Louis ordered the police to take the guns from the couple who stood up to the terrorists of the democrat party.......antifa and black lives matter....

This is how they did it in Germany in the 1930s....

The question to ask? Did the democrat party Circuit Attorney call the black lives matter and antifa terrorists herself, to let them know the couple is without guns....or did she use a cut out to do it....?

Law enforcement officials in St. Louis have allegedly served a warrant on the St. Louis couple who recently defended their home when a large mob of angry demonstrators allegedly trespassed onto their private property.

Fox News host Shannon Bream tweeted: “BREAKING: Warrant reportedly served on St. Louis couple who stood outside their home with weapons as protesters approached. We’re told weapon(s) seized. We’ve got the warrant and pictures for you at 11p – PLUS, Missouri @AGEricSchmitt joins us LIVE…”

Warrant Served On St. Louis Couple Who Defended Private Property, Rifle Confiscated | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

The thugs will return to burn the house down and won’t care if anyone’s Inside

 

[Faun]

They were NOT on that couple's property, and YES you are not supposed to point a loaded gun with your finger on the trigger unless there is an immediate lethal threat.

You are just making up stuff to fit your argument

the couple have every right to brandish weapons to protect their home from looters

and yes, a mob of thugs is a threat

A "thug" is a "violent person," especially a criminal.

What violence did those protesters commit...?

 

[Quasar44]

I am BLM is going back with torches

 

[Faun]

Prove they broke it down...

You prove they didn't.

I don't have to. Someone else made the claim they broke it down. The onus to prove a claim falls upon the person making the claim, not the person challenging that claim be proven.

You never learn, do ya, gramps?

 

[protectionist]

But not the property of that homeowner. Post a link to the Missouri law which allows a homeowner to threaten lethal force to protect someone else's property...

Thy were on the property of the homeowners (the McCloskeys)

 

[Quasar44]

They were NOT on that couple's property, and YES you are not supposed to point a loaded gun with your finger on the trigger unless there is an immediate lethal threat.

You are just making up stuff to fit your argument

the couple have every right to brandish weapons to protect their home from looters

and yes, a mob of thugs is a threat

A "thug" is a "violent person," especially a criminal.

What violence did those protesters commit...?

Destroying property

 

[Faun]

But not the property of that homeowner. Post a link to the Missouri law which allows a homeowner to threaten lethal force to protect someone else's property...

Thy were on the property of the homeowners (the McCloskeys)

Nope, they were on the sidewalk and in the street.