Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
]Agreed, but that is exactly the logic the Left is using to ban/restrict guns.
The logic to restrict guns is that we should't sell them to minors and crazies and we shouldn't sell those that make mass killings easy.
I don't see a single reason why this should be legal to obtain:
Why not? Do you see a single reason why drugs or alcohol should be legal to obtain? Both kill more people than "assault weapons" in this country.]Agreed, but that is exactly the logic the Left is using to ban/restrict guns.
The logic to restrict guns is that we should't sell them to minors and crazies and we shouldn't sell those that make mass killings easy.
I don't see a single reason why this should be legal to obtain:
No doubt it will come to that point. First they'll come for the "high capacity magazines" (more than 10 rounds) then, after a few years, if limiting magazines to 10 rounds was a good idea, why not limit them to 5 rounds and make only non-removable magazines legal? A few years later, if 5 rounds was a good idea, then why not go back to single shot?]Agreed, but that is exactly the logic the Left is using to ban/restrict guns.
The logic to restrict guns is that we should't sell them to minors and crazies and we shouldn't sell those that make mass killings easy.
I don't see a single reason why this should be legal to obtain:
How about this one? Ban it also?
Why not? Do you see a single reason why drugs or alcohol should be legal to obtain? Both kill more people than "assault weapons" in this country.
How about cars more powerful than a Smartcar? What is the logic in having a car with 500+ HP and capable of up to 200MPH in a country where the maximum speed is 70MPH.
Of course, none of those things are an enumerated right yet I have no doubt you support our right to them.
OTOH, I have no problem preventing mentally ill gay homophobic Islamic extremists from obtaining any guns, not even a musket. Let's work on that one together. Deal?
By "the fire" you mean a policy of banning immigration from Muslim countries. Yes, I am adding fuel to that fire.
Using the word "extremist" is the sign of a demagogue. Truth is often extreme. Please explain why we should import a single one of these bloodthirsty savages. What do we have to gain? We already know we have plenty to lose.
A standard LW anti-gun meme. I have a few semi-automatic, magazine-fed rifles and none have ever killed anyone. All are of new manufacture for the civilian market.I don't see how it is at all comparable. These are machines designed for very narrow purpose of quickly killing sht. I just don't have any sympathies for their aficionados. Sorry. How about picking up golf or maybe skydiving?
True. But at least she'll have a great view of the essence of liberalism.The O. P. has a choice to make....whether she will get her head out of her ass long enough to realize that something must be done about Murderous Muslim Terrorism, or leave it in, and continue to look like a damn fool.
A standard LW anti-gun meme. I have a few semi-automatic, magazine-fed rifles and none have ever killed anyone. All are of new manufacture for the civilian market.I don't see how it is at all comparable. These are machines designed for very narrow purpose of quickly killing sht. I just don't have any sympathies for their aficionados. Sorry. How about picking up golf or maybe skydiving?
In fact, the only "military" rifles I have are bolt action with a limit of 5 rounds in an internal magazine. Do you want to ban those "military" rifles too?
When you embark on a road of "You need to justify exercising a Constitutional right", then you are on a path to limiting one's rights. Did you support the Patriot Act after 9/11? Do you think limiting Constitutional rights makes us safer? I'm not talking about limiting (however temporary) the rights of the mentally ill and criminals, but all law-biding citizens as you are suggesting.So that begs the question - what do you have those guns for? Ornamentation? Sporting? Neither makes me think -"yea I could see how that's worth making it easy for people with bad intent acquiring them"
I'm open to any reasonable conversation on the limits, but when your position is that everything is slippery slope all the way to up nuclear weapons, it's a non-starter.
Trump should drop out if he can't use the words "universal background checks."
Ding Ding Ding! You're wrong! You Lose!
I can get a much better and more intelligent response from my dog.
Well, I surmise your dog would debate you under the rug.
You do know that the scary black gun in your picture is no different than this not so scary ranch rifle other than cosmetically don't you?]Agreed, but that is exactly the logic the Left is using to ban/restrict guns.
The logic to restrict guns is that we should't sell them to minors and crazies and we shouldn't sell those that make mass killings easy.
I don't see a single reason why this should be legal to obtain:
Are you at all aware that there about 1.8 billion muslims in the world, about 25% of population? What you say is straight up insane and adds nothing but fuel to the fire. Yea some muslims are backward, some are extremists and handful are violent...but what say is ALSO extremist.
What exactly is your fix for "Islam issue"? Online flame fests because some reject crazy snaps and shoots up the club?
When you embark on a road of "You need to justify exercising a Constitutional right", then you are on a path to limiting one's rights. Did you support the Patriot Act after 9/11? Do you think limiting Constitutional rights makes us safer? I'm not talking about limiting (however temporary) the rights of the mentally ill and criminals, but all law-biding citizens as you are suggesting.
The LW "nuclear weapons" meme is silly but it's standard LW bullshit. By your logic, we need to license Facebook users because a few are cyberbullies.
When you embark on a road of "You need to justify exercising a Constitutional right", then you are on a path to limiting one's rights. Did you support the Patriot Act after 9/11? Do you think limiting Constitutional rights makes us safer? I'm not talking about limiting (however temporary) the rights of the mentally ill and criminals, but all law-biding citizens as you are suggesting.
The LW "nuclear weapons" meme is silly but it's standard LW bullshit. By your logic, we need to license Facebook users because a few are cyberbullies.
I don't see it to be silly. Seems like a valid point based on reducto ad absurdum reasoning.
Does constitution give you the right to buy nuclear arms? Surely a ridiculous position, although all it says is that you can own arms for some clearly outdated purposes of "maintaining well trained militia". In other words Constitution makes barely any sane comment on gun ownership and from there it's just a matter of interpreting in that picasso whateveryoujudge wants.
You do know that the scary black gun in your picture is no different than this not so scary ranch rifle other than cosmetically don't you?
You do know that the scary black gun in your picture is no different than this not so scary ranch rifle other than cosmetically don't you?
We could have some standards based on consistent,objective qualifying measures on how deadly a weapon is.
The framers wanted to allow citizens to form a militia on their own if they felt the need and not to be prevented in doing so by the government
