Divine Wind
Platinum Member
Since you clearly aren't interested in answering questions nor apologizing for lying, clearly there is nothing to move forward.
I answered your question and explained to you exactly what the slippery slope has to do with as to your comments.
Now, if at some point you would care to address it and set some sort of reasonable limit on it, we have a way forward. There has to be SOME sort of arms where you draw line when it comes to constitutional rights to arms.
You're not only a liar, but an unrepentant liar. You're lying about answering my questions and you are lying about me.
Example: I made this post
Such as cars that don't weigh more than 500 pounds, have feather-pillow bumpers and are limited to one horsepower per seat?We could have some standards based on consistent,objective qualifying measures on how deadly a weapon is.
Yet, in reply, you inserted Skull Pilot's post and claim it was mine. Why the lie?
The point is they do not have to be part of a militia to own a weapon. The right to own arms precedes the membership in a militia
And I'll argue that I am a militia of one tasked with the protection of my wife and property
I'll argue that you are stretching badly and that preceding constitution is not a constitutional make.
The point is they do not have to be part of a militia to own a weapon. The right to own arms precedes the membership in a militia
And I'll argue that I am a militia of one tasked with the protection of my wife and property