Rising anti-Semitism? One in eight Americans think Jews use Holocaust to get sympathy

[Lucy Hamilton]

If one says, why in general are the Chair and/or Vice-Chair of the Federal Reserve or US Treasury Secretary nearly always Jewish....this is construed as "anti-Semitic"

I can guarantee you if someone asked, "Why are the President and the Vice President of the United States always Christian?" it would set of a firestorm of outrage on this forum, and all the usual suspects would perceive it as part of the "war on Christianity"

What is the implication behind both of those questions? They are obviously tainted with a bias against the religion in question.

The Obama Administration must be the most anti-Christian Administration in American history, Obama himself is very anti-Christian and seemingly very pro-Islam.

Truer words were never spoken!

Well it's just the truth! There are tons of Obama's anti-Christian and pro-Islam quotes out there....here's one of his most infamous of the latter:

 

[skye]

If one says, why in general are the Chair and/or Vice-Chair of the Federal Reserve or US Treasury Secretary nearly always Jewish....this is construed as "anti-Semitic"

I can guarantee you if someone asked, "Why are the President and the Vice President of the United States always Christian?" it would set of a firestorm of outrage on this forum, and all the usual suspects would perceive it as part of the "war on Christianity"

What is the implication behind both of those questions? They are obviously tainted with a bias against the religion in question.

The Obama Administration must be the most anti-Christian Administration in American history, Obama himself is very anti-Christian and seemingly very pro-Islam.

Truer words were never spoken!

Well it's just the truth! There are tons of Obama's anti-Christian and pro-Islam quotes out there....here's one of his most infamous of the latter:

View attachment 55441

You are preaching to the converted.

Barack Hussein is as Islamic as they come.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

We are seeing more anti semitism here than I can remember (born 1962). Never mind Europe.
People will say and do things today that would have been unthinkable in the 1970s. Sure there were anti semites then. But they were a marginalized bunch of idiots in the boobdocks somewhere. Today university professors openly profess anti semitism, usually disguised as anti zionism. This will only get worse.
Halakha psuka hi: Eisav soneh es Yaakov.

When it comes to political platforms: Do Democrats strongly support Israel, or does their rhetoric align itself more towards a need for the United States to separate ourselves from them and be less sympathetic to their needs? Has their favorable view of Isreal been on the decline?

I think with Obama, Hillary and Kerry there's a disturbing level of support towards the Muslim world. This is not only dangerous for America and the Western world, but also for Israel.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

If one says, why in general are the Chair and/or Vice-Chair of the Federal Reserve or US Treasury Secretary nearly always Jewish....this is construed as "anti-Semitic"

I can guarantee you if someone asked, "Why are the President and the Vice President of the United States always Christian?" it would set of a firestorm of outrage on this forum, and all the usual suspects would perceive it as part of the "war on Christianity"

What is the implication behind both of those questions? They are obviously tainted with a bias against the religion in question.

The Obama Administration must be the most anti-Christian Administration in American history, Obama himself is very anti-Christian and seemingly very pro-Islam.

Truer words were never spoken!

Well it's just the truth! There are tons of Obama's anti-Christian and pro-Islam quotes out there....here's one of his most infamous of the latter:

View attachment 55441

You are preaching to the converted.

Barack Hussein is as Islamic as they come.

I feel that Obama is perhaps an actual Muslim, possibly of the Radical type, hence his support for the Muslim Brotherhood and also his having numerous Muslim Brotherhood people within his actual Administration:

 

[skye]

I agree ^^^^

 

[Skylar]

HUH?

Well, NOT in Palestine.

Read the Palestinian Mandate, then, and only then, repost



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Did you miss the intro or was it intentional?
The Council of the League of Nations:
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people

AND IN 1939 THE UK CLARIFIED THAT A "NATIONAL HOME FOR JEWISH PEOPLE " MEANT A 100 x 100 SF LOT SOMEWHERE IN PALESTINE .


.

Where is this mentioned in the source you're citing? I wasn't able to find any of it.

""Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.' His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated .... the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the (Balfour) Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."


SHORTLY THEREAFTER MENACHEM BEGIN AND THE IRGUN ZIONUT GANG BEGAN TERRORIZING THE BRITS , FOR EXAMPLE, THE UK MILITARY HEADQUARTERS AT THE KING DAVID HOTEL.


.The King David Hotel bombing was a terrorist attack[1] carried out on Monday July 22, 1946 by the militant Zionist underground organization Irgun on the British administrative headquarters for Palestine, which was housed in the southern wing[2] of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.[3][4][5] 91 people of various nationalities were killed and 46 were injured.[6]

That happened the bombing of the King David Hotel, it was a terrorist attack and the Irgun was a terrorist group. To admit these things isn't anti-Semitic, as they are actual facts, means they're truth and truth itself cannot be considered anti-Semitic.

That would be the ultimate in sheer hysteria and also denying the truth.

Nor would mentioning the USS Liberty incident. But dwelling on them as defining the Israeli character could be problematic.

 

[Skylar]

I can guarantee you if someone asked, "Why are the President and the Vice President of the United States always Christian?" it would set of a firestorm of outrage on this forum, and all the usual suspects would perceive it as part of the "war on Christianity"

What is the implication behind both of those questions? They are obviously tainted with a bias against the religion in question.

The Obama Administration must be the most anti-Christian Administration in American history, Obama himself is very anti-Christian and seemingly very pro-Islam.

Truer words were never spoken!

Well it's just the truth! There are tons of Obama's anti-Christian and pro-Islam quotes out there....here's one of his most infamous of the latter:

View attachment 55441

You are preaching to the converted.

Barack Hussein is as Islamic as they come.

I feel that Obama is perhaps an actual Muslim, possibly of the Radical type, hence his support for the Muslim Brotherhood and also his having numerous Muslim Brotherhood people within his actual Administration:

View attachment 55442

Who says these are Muslim Brotherhood?

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Nearly half of Americans hold anti-Semitic views, a survey has revealed. It also found that one in eight US citizens surveyed (13 percent) thought Jews used talking about the Holocaust to get sympathy.

A "Gallup" asked 3,411 US adults about their attitudes toward USA Jewish citizens. It found that 45 percent polled believed at least one anti-Semitic view presented to them was “definitely or probably true.”

Many found clichés and stereotypes about Jews to be true. One in four believed Jewish people “chase money more than others,” while one in six people felt Jews thought they were better than other people and had too much power in the media.

The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAA), which commissioned the study, said America was at a“tipping point” in its Annual Anti-Semitism Barometer report.

Around 6,768,855 Jewish people live in the USA, or 2.2 percent of the American population, according to CAA.

The survey also found that one in 10 people (11 percent) claimed Jews were not as honest in business as other people, while one in five believed their loyalty to Israel made US Jewish citizens less loyal to the US, and 10 percent of all surveyed said they would be unhappy if a relative married a Jewish person.

Last year, police recorded a record number of anti-Semitic attacks.

I do think The Holocaust is often used to gain sympathy and it's outrageous. It's completely disrespectful to the memory of those who perished in The Holocaust, they who use this should be absolutely ashamed of themselves, it's the lowest of the low.

The ADL also are one of the most hateful organisations ever created, I have zero respect for ADL.

In general the whole anti-Semitic tag is often just used to shut people up, it's very much a bullying tactic. It has been used many times to just ensure there's no criticism about absolutely anything and frankly it's all getting a bit tedious now the way it's whipped out even for the most trivial reasons sometimes.

 

[Contumacious]

HUH?

Well, NOT in Palestine.

Read the Palestinian Mandate, then, and only then, repost



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Who mentioned 'Palestine'? The country in question is Israel. And the territories its occupying aren't part of Israel. Says who? Says the Israeli Supreme Court, recognizing them instead as occupied territories.

And Geneva Conventions recognize transferring your civilian population into occupied territories as a war crime.

And yet Israel does it flagrantly. Either international law matters...in which case Israel's right to exist is legally protected. Or international law doesn't matter.....in which case we have no reason to be involved there.

LEGALLY PROTECTED?


BY WHAT? WHOM?

WHEN WAS THE MATTER REFERRED TO INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE?


SCUMBAG TRUMAN ACCEPTED 2 MILLION DOLLARS FROM BEN GURION IN ORDER FOR THE US TO RECOGNIZE THE JEWISH STATE.


FROM THE ZIONUTS STANDPOINT US RECOGNITION IS ALL THEY NEED.

PALESTINE ---IN ITS ENTIRETY -- IS OCCUPIED TERRITORY.


IN ITS ENTIRETY.


.

Alas, its not. Israel's boundaries are recognized by the UN and the overwhelming majority of the international community.

BULLSHIT


IDENTIFY THE UN RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING/RECOGNIZING ISRAEL'S BORDERS



.

83% of UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independance.

With the UN recognizing Israel as a member state:

United Nations member States - Information Sources

UN Security Council Resolution 69 was affirmed 9 to 1 recommending Israeli admission as a UN member state.

UN General Assembly resolution 273 affirmed Israel as a member state was adopted on May 11th 1949 by more than the 2/3rd vote necessary for passage.

"The President stated that since every Member of the United Nations was present and voting, the requirement of the Charter for two-thirds majority was satisfied. He therefore formally declared Israel admitted to membership in the United Nations."

Pg 331, 11 May 1949
UN 267th Plenary Meeting

United Nations Official Document

But you'll ignore it anyway, pretending it doesn't exist. Which is why your personal opinion is so gloriously irrelevant to actual law.

THE ONLY ENTITY WITH THE AUTHORITY TO DECIDE WHO ARE THE LAWFUL INHABITANTS OF PALESTINE THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

HUH?

Well, NOT in Palestine.

Read the Palestinian Mandate, then, and only then, repost



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Who mentioned 'Palestine'? The country in question is Israel. And the territories its occupying aren't part of Israel. Says who? Says the Israeli Supreme Court, recognizing them instead as occupied territories.

And Geneva Conventions recognize transferring your civilian population into occupied territories as a war crime.

And yet Israel does it flagrantly. Either international law matters...in which case Israel's right to exist is legally protected. Or international law doesn't matter.....in which case we have no reason to be involved there.

LEGALLY PROTECTED?


BY WHAT? WHOM?

WHEN WAS THE MATTER REFERRED TO INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE?


SCUMBAG TRUMAN ACCEPTED 2 MILLION DOLLARS FROM BEN GURION IN ORDER FOR THE US TO RECOGNIZE THE JEWISH STATE.


FROM THE ZIONUTS STANDPOINT US RECOGNITION IS ALL THEY NEED.

PALESTINE ---IN ITS ENTIRETY -- IS OCCUPIED TERRITORY.


IN ITS ENTIRETY.


.

Alas, its not. Israel's boundaries are recognized by the UN and the overwhelming majority of the international community.

BULLSHIT


IDENTIFY THE UN RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING/RECOGNIZING ISRAEL'S BORDERS



.

83% of UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independance.

With the UN recognizing Israel as a member state:

United Nations member States - Information Sources

UN Security Council Resolution 69 was affirmed 9 to 1 recommending Israeli admission as a UN member state.

UN General Assembly resolution 273 affirmed Israel as a member state was adopted on May 11th 1949 by more than the 2/3rd vote necessary for passage.

"The President stated that since every Member of the United Nations was present and voting, the requirement of the Charter for two-thirds majority was satisfied. He therefore formally declared Israel admitted to membership in the United Nations."

Pg 331, 11 May 1949
UN 267th Plenary Meeting

United Nations Official Document

But you'll ignore it anyway, pretending it doesn't exist. Which is why your personal opinion is so gloriously irrelevant to actual law.

ARE YOU TELLING ME THAT THE UNSC CAN SUMMARILY DISMISSED THE PALESTINIANS CLAIMS AS IF THOSE PEOPLE DO NOT EXIST?


IT IS THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE WHICH HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE PALESTINIANS CLAIMS?

A COUNTRY AND ITS PEOPLE CAN NOT BE MADE TO ARBITRARILY DISAPPEAR?


BULLSHIT.

 

[Skylar]

Why? And of course, its a war crime to transfer your civilian population to territory you occupy. So the only delay seems to be to allow Israel to continue to commit this war crime.

If international law is our basis, then Israel has every right to exist. If this is just a battle royale in which international law does not apply.....then why are we involved? Either international law affirms BOTH Israel's right to exist and the criminality of civilian settlements in the occupied territories. Or it affirms neither.

I argue it affirms both. With the upholding of international law being a valid reason for the US to be involved. And a a valid reason to condemn Israeli action in colonizing the west bank.

HUH?

Well, NOT in Palestine.

Read the Palestinian Mandate, then, and only then, repost



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Did you miss the intro or was it intentional?
The Council of the League of Nations:
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people

AND IN 1939 THE UK CLARIFIED THAT A "NATIONAL HOME FOR JEWISH PEOPLE " MEANT A 100 x 100 SF LOT SOMEWHERE IN PALESTINE .


.

Where is this mentioned in the source you're citing? I wasn't able to find any of it.

""Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.' His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated .... the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the (Balfour) Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."


SHORTLY THEREAFTER MENACHEM BEGIN AND THE IRGUN ZIONUT GANG BEGAN TERRORIZING THE BRITS , FOR EXAMPLE, THE UK MILITARY HEADQUARTERS AT THE KING DAVID HOTEL.


.The King David Hotel bombing was a terrorist attack[1] carried out on Monday July 22, 1946 by the militant Zionist underground organization Irgun on the British administrative headquarters for Palestine, which was housed in the southern wing[2] of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.[3][4][5] 91 people of various nationalities were killed and 46 were injured.[6]

And where is this statement mentioned?

AND IN 1939 THE UK CLARIFIED THAT A "NATIONAL HOME FOR JEWISH PEOPLE " MEANT A 100 x 100 SF LOT SOMEWHERE IN PALESTINE .

I don't see a single mention of it anywhere in your source or anything you quoted.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Did you miss the intro or was it intentional?
The Council of the League of Nations:
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people

AND IN 1939 THE UK CLARIFIED THAT A "NATIONAL HOME FOR JEWISH PEOPLE " MEANT A 100 x 100 SF LOT SOMEWHERE IN PALESTINE .


.

Where is this mentioned in the source you're citing? I wasn't able to find any of it.

""Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.' His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated .... the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the (Balfour) Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."


SHORTLY THEREAFTER MENACHEM BEGIN AND THE IRGUN ZIONUT GANG BEGAN TERRORIZING THE BRITS , FOR EXAMPLE, THE UK MILITARY HEADQUARTERS AT THE KING DAVID HOTEL.


.The King David Hotel bombing was a terrorist attack[1] carried out on Monday July 22, 1946 by the militant Zionist underground organization Irgun on the British administrative headquarters for Palestine, which was housed in the southern wing[2] of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.[3][4][5] 91 people of various nationalities were killed and 46 were injured.[6]

That happened the bombing of the King David Hotel, it was a terrorist attack and the Irgun was a terrorist group. To admit these things isn't anti-Semitic, as they are actual facts, means they're truth and truth itself cannot be considered anti-Semitic.

That would be the ultimate in sheer hysteria and also denying the truth.

Nor would mentioning the USS Liberty incident. But dwelling on them as defining the Israeli character could be problematic.

Well nobody is defining the Israeli character from the King David Bombing and the Irgun, but I know people have been called "anti-Semitic" for mentioning both.

 

[Skylar]

Who mentioned 'Palestine'? The country in question is Israel. And the territories its occupying aren't part of Israel. Says who? Says the Israeli Supreme Court, recognizing them instead as occupied territories.

And Geneva Conventions recognize transferring your civilian population into occupied territories as a war crime.

And yet Israel does it flagrantly. Either international law matters...in which case Israel's right to exist is legally protected. Or international law doesn't matter.....in which case we have no reason to be involved there.

LEGALLY PROTECTED?


BY WHAT? WHOM?

WHEN WAS THE MATTER REFERRED TO INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE?


SCUMBAG TRUMAN ACCEPTED 2 MILLION DOLLARS FROM BEN GURION IN ORDER FOR THE US TO RECOGNIZE THE JEWISH STATE.


FROM THE ZIONUTS STANDPOINT US RECOGNITION IS ALL THEY NEED.

PALESTINE ---IN ITS ENTIRETY -- IS OCCUPIED TERRITORY.


IN ITS ENTIRETY.


.

Alas, its not. Israel's boundaries are recognized by the UN and the overwhelming majority of the international community.

BULLSHIT


IDENTIFY THE UN RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING/RECOGNIZING ISRAEL'S BORDERS



.

83% of UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independance.

With the UN recognizing Israel as a member state:

United Nations member States - Information Sources

UN Security Council Resolution 69 was affirmed 9 to 1 recommending Israeli admission as a UN member state.

UN General Assembly resolution 273 affirmed Israel as a member state was adopted on May 11th 1949 by more than the 2/3rd vote necessary for passage.

"The President stated that since every Member of the United Nations was present and voting, the requirement of the Charter for two-thirds majority was satisfied. He therefore formally declared Israel admitted to membership in the United Nations."

Pg 331, 11 May 1949
UN 267th Plenary Meeting

United Nations Official Document

But you'll ignore it anyway, pretending it doesn't exist. Which is why your personal opinion is so gloriously irrelevant to actual law.

THE ONLY ENTITY WITH THE AUTHORITY TO DECIDE WHO ARE THE LAWFUL INHABITANTS OF PALESTINE THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

Who mentioned 'Palestine'? The country in question is Israel. And the territories its occupying aren't part of Israel. Says who? Says the Israeli Supreme Court, recognizing them instead as occupied territories.

And Geneva Conventions recognize transferring your civilian population into occupied territories as a war crime.

And yet Israel does it flagrantly. Either international law matters...in which case Israel's right to exist is legally protected. Or international law doesn't matter.....in which case we have no reason to be involved there.

LEGALLY PROTECTED?


BY WHAT? WHOM?

WHEN WAS THE MATTER REFERRED TO INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE?


SCUMBAG TRUMAN ACCEPTED 2 MILLION DOLLARS FROM BEN GURION IN ORDER FOR THE US TO RECOGNIZE THE JEWISH STATE.


FROM THE ZIONUTS STANDPOINT US RECOGNITION IS ALL THEY NEED.

PALESTINE ---IN ITS ENTIRETY -- IS OCCUPIED TERRITORY.


IN ITS ENTIRETY.


.

Alas, its not. Israel's boundaries are recognized by the UN and the overwhelming majority of the international community.

BULLSHIT


IDENTIFY THE UN RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING/RECOGNIZING ISRAEL'S BORDERS



.

83% of UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independance.

With the UN recognizing Israel as a member state:

United Nations member States - Information Sources

UN Security Council Resolution 69 was affirmed 9 to 1 recommending Israeli admission as a UN member state.

UN General Assembly resolution 273 affirmed Israel as a member state was adopted on May 11th 1949 by more than the 2/3rd vote necessary for passage.

"The President stated that since every Member of the United Nations was present and voting, the requirement of the Charter for two-thirds majority was satisfied. He therefore formally declared Israel admitted to membership in the United Nations."

Pg 331, 11 May 1949
UN 267th Plenary Meeting

United Nations Official Document

But you'll ignore it anyway, pretending it doesn't exist. Which is why your personal opinion is so gloriously irrelevant to actual law.

ARE YOU TELLING ME THAT THE UNSC CAN SUMMARILY DISMISSED THE PALESTINIANS CLAIMS AS IF THOSE PEOPLE DO NOT EXIST?

I'm telling you what I told you: that Israel is recognized by the UN with its May 11th 1949 borders. And that 83% (160 out of 192) UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independence.

Simply obliterating your claim that 'Palestine' in its entirety is 'occupied territory'. You simply don't know what you're talking about. But then you rarely do.

IT IS THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE WHICH HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE PALESTINIANS CLAIMS?

A COUNTRY AND ITS PEOPLE CAN NOT BE MADE TO ARBITRARILY DISAPPEAR?


BULLSHIT.

"Palestine" was never recognized as either a League of Nations or UN member state. It still isn't.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

The Obama Administration must be the most anti-Christian Administration in American history, Obama himself is very anti-Christian and seemingly very pro-Islam.

Truer words were never spoken!

Well it's just the truth! There are tons of Obama's anti-Christian and pro-Islam quotes out there....here's one of his most infamous of the latter:

View attachment 55441

You are preaching to the converted.

Barack Hussein is as Islamic as they come.

I feel that Obama is perhaps an actual Muslim, possibly of the Radical type, hence his support for the Muslim Brotherhood and also his having numerous Muslim Brotherhood people within his actual Administration:

View attachment 55442

Who says these are Muslim Brotherhood?

Can you read?

 

[Skylar]

Truer words were never spoken!

Well it's just the truth! There are tons of Obama's anti-Christian and pro-Islam quotes out there....here's one of his most infamous of the latter:

View attachment 55441

You are preaching to the converted.

Barack Hussein is as Islamic as they come.

I feel that Obama is perhaps an actual Muslim, possibly of the Radical type, hence his support for the Muslim Brotherhood and also his having numerous Muslim Brotherhood people within his actual Administration:

View attachment 55442

Who says these are Muslim Brotherhood?

Can you read?

A website isn't a who. Its a what. Who says that these are Muslim Brotherhood? And backed with what evidence?

The who is Steven Emerson. This Steven Emerson,

Steven Emerson told the channel that in London "Muslim religious police" beat "anyone who doesn't dress according to Muslim, religious Muslim attire".

He later issued an apology for his "terrible error".

His comments have come in for ridicule, with the hashtag #FoxNewsFacts trending on Twitter.

Mr Emerson, who founded a group called The Investigative Project on Terrorism, was giving his perspective on the terror attacks in France to Fox presenter Jeanine Pirro.

Apology for 'Muslim Birmingham' Fox News claim - BBC News

The same guy who blamed the Oklahoma City bombing on Muslims. And insisted that the prime suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings was a Saudi national.

Not exactly what you call a stellar source.

 

[Contumacious]

LEGALLY PROTECTED?


BY WHAT? WHOM?

WHEN WAS THE MATTER REFERRED TO INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE?


SCUMBAG TRUMAN ACCEPTED 2 MILLION DOLLARS FROM BEN GURION IN ORDER FOR THE US TO RECOGNIZE THE JEWISH STATE.


FROM THE ZIONUTS STANDPOINT US RECOGNITION IS ALL THEY NEED.

PALESTINE ---IN ITS ENTIRETY -- IS OCCUPIED TERRITORY.


IN ITS ENTIRETY.


.

Alas, its not. Israel's boundaries are recognized by the UN and the overwhelming majority of the international community.

BULLSHIT


IDENTIFY THE UN RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING/RECOGNIZING ISRAEL'S BORDERS



.

83% of UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independance.

With the UN recognizing Israel as a member state:

United Nations member States - Information Sources

UN Security Council Resolution 69 was affirmed 9 to 1 recommending Israeli admission as a UN member state.

UN General Assembly resolution 273 affirmed Israel as a member state was adopted on May 11th 1949 by more than the 2/3rd vote necessary for passage.

"The President stated that since every Member of the United Nations was present and voting, the requirement of the Charter for two-thirds majority was satisfied. He therefore formally declared Israel admitted to membership in the United Nations."

Pg 331, 11 May 1949
UN 267th Plenary Meeting

United Nations Official Document

But you'll ignore it anyway, pretending it doesn't exist. Which is why your personal opinion is so gloriously irrelevant to actual law.

THE ONLY ENTITY WITH THE AUTHORITY TO DECIDE WHO ARE THE LAWFUL INHABITANTS OF PALESTINE THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

LEGALLY PROTECTED?


BY WHAT? WHOM?

WHEN WAS THE MATTER REFERRED TO INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE?


SCUMBAG TRUMAN ACCEPTED 2 MILLION DOLLARS FROM BEN GURION IN ORDER FOR THE US TO RECOGNIZE THE JEWISH STATE.


FROM THE ZIONUTS STANDPOINT US RECOGNITION IS ALL THEY NEED.

PALESTINE ---IN ITS ENTIRETY -- IS OCCUPIED TERRITORY.


IN ITS ENTIRETY.


.

Alas, its not. Israel's boundaries are recognized by the UN and the overwhelming majority of the international community.

BULLSHIT


IDENTIFY THE UN RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING/RECOGNIZING ISRAEL'S BORDERS



.

83% of UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independance.

With the UN recognizing Israel as a member state:

United Nations member States - Information Sources

UN Security Council Resolution 69 was affirmed 9 to 1 recommending Israeli admission as a UN member state.

UN General Assembly resolution 273 affirmed Israel as a member state was adopted on May 11th 1949 by more than the 2/3rd vote necessary for passage.

"The President stated that since every Member of the United Nations was present and voting, the requirement of the Charter for two-thirds majority was satisfied. He therefore formally declared Israel admitted to membership in the United Nations."

Pg 331, 11 May 1949
UN 267th Plenary Meeting

United Nations Official Document

But you'll ignore it anyway, pretending it doesn't exist. Which is why your personal opinion is so gloriously irrelevant to actual law.

ARE YOU TELLING ME THAT THE UNSC CAN SUMMARILY DISMISSED THE PALESTINIANS CLAIMS AS IF THOSE PEOPLE DO NOT EXIST?

I'm telling you what I told you: that Israel is recognized by the UN with its May 11th 1949 borders. And that 83% (160 out of 192) UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independence.

Simply obliterating your claim that 'Palestine' in its entirety is 'occupied territory'. You simply don't know what you're talking about. But then you rarely do.

IT IS THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE WHICH HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE PALESTINIANS CLAIMS?

A COUNTRY AND ITS PEOPLE CAN NOT BE MADE TO ARBITRARILY DISAPPEAR?


BULLSHIT.

"Palestine" was never recognized as either a League of Nations or UN member state. It still isn't.

Well , to many people your baseless position is an invitation to violence


What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't

 

[Skylar]

Alas, its not. Israel's boundaries are recognized by the UN and the overwhelming majority of the international community.

BULLSHIT


IDENTIFY THE UN RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING/RECOGNIZING ISRAEL'S BORDERS



.

83% of UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independance.

With the UN recognizing Israel as a member state:

United Nations member States - Information Sources

UN Security Council Resolution 69 was affirmed 9 to 1 recommending Israeli admission as a UN member state.

UN General Assembly resolution 273 affirmed Israel as a member state was adopted on May 11th 1949 by more than the 2/3rd vote necessary for passage.

"The President stated that since every Member of the United Nations was present and voting, the requirement of the Charter for two-thirds majority was satisfied. He therefore formally declared Israel admitted to membership in the United Nations."

Pg 331, 11 May 1949
UN 267th Plenary Meeting

United Nations Official Document

But you'll ignore it anyway, pretending it doesn't exist. Which is why your personal opinion is so gloriously irrelevant to actual law.

THE ONLY ENTITY WITH THE AUTHORITY TO DECIDE WHO ARE THE LAWFUL INHABITANTS OF PALESTINE THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

Alas, its not. Israel's boundaries are recognized by the UN and the overwhelming majority of the international community.

BULLSHIT


IDENTIFY THE UN RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING/RECOGNIZING ISRAEL'S BORDERS



.

83% of UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independance.

With the UN recognizing Israel as a member state:

United Nations member States - Information Sources

UN Security Council Resolution 69 was affirmed 9 to 1 recommending Israeli admission as a UN member state.

UN General Assembly resolution 273 affirmed Israel as a member state was adopted on May 11th 1949 by more than the 2/3rd vote necessary for passage.

"The President stated that since every Member of the United Nations was present and voting, the requirement of the Charter for two-thirds majority was satisfied. He therefore formally declared Israel admitted to membership in the United Nations."

Pg 331, 11 May 1949
UN 267th Plenary Meeting

United Nations Official Document

But you'll ignore it anyway, pretending it doesn't exist. Which is why your personal opinion is so gloriously irrelevant to actual law.

ARE YOU TELLING ME THAT THE UNSC CAN SUMMARILY DISMISSED THE PALESTINIANS CLAIMS AS IF THOSE PEOPLE DO NOT EXIST?

I'm telling you what I told you: that Israel is recognized by the UN with its May 11th 1949 borders. And that 83% (160 out of 192) UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independence.

Simply obliterating your claim that 'Palestine' in its entirety is 'occupied territory'. You simply don't know what you're talking about. But then you rarely do.

IT IS THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE WHICH HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE PALESTINIANS CLAIMS?

A COUNTRY AND ITS PEOPLE CAN NOT BE MADE TO ARBITRARILY DISAPPEAR?


BULLSHIT.

"Palestine" was never recognized as either a League of Nations or UN member state. It still isn't.

Well , to many people your baseless position is an invitation to violence


What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't

I don't think 'baseless' means what you think it means. As my claims are backed by multiple UN resolutions, internatnioal law and more than 60 years of recognition by the UN as a member state.

While 'palestine' isn't recognized as such. Nor ever has been.

You can't get around any of that.

 

[Contumacious]

HUH?

Well, NOT in Palestine.

Read the Palestinian Mandate, then, and only then, repost



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Did you miss the intro or was it intentional?
The Council of the League of Nations:
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people

AND IN 1939 THE UK CLARIFIED THAT A "NATIONAL HOME FOR JEWISH PEOPLE " MEANT A 100 x 100 SF LOT SOMEWHERE IN PALESTINE .


.

Where is this mentioned in the source you're citing? I wasn't able to find any of it.

""Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.' His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated .... the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the (Balfour) Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."


SHORTLY THEREAFTER MENACHEM BEGIN AND THE IRGUN ZIONUT GANG BEGAN TERRORIZING THE BRITS , FOR EXAMPLE, THE UK MILITARY HEADQUARTERS AT THE KING DAVID HOTEL.


.The King David Hotel bombing was a terrorist attack[1] carried out on Monday July 22, 1946 by the militant Zionist underground organization Irgun on the British administrative headquarters for Palestine, which was housed in the southern wing[2] of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.[3][4][5] 91 people of various nationalities were killed and 46 were injured.[6]

And where is this statement mentioned?

AND IN 1939 THE UK CLARIFIED THAT A "NATIONAL HOME FOR JEWISH PEOPLE " MEANT A 100 x 100 SF LOT SOMEWHERE IN PALESTINE .

I don't see a single mention of it anywhere in your source or anything you quoted.

Interesting, a "liberal" who pretends not to notice when a minority group is being victimized.........


Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm


That means that you are conflicted by interested . You are a ZIONUT.

 

[Contumacious]

BULLSHIT


IDENTIFY THE UN RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING/RECOGNIZING ISRAEL'S BORDERS



.

83% of UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independance.

With the UN recognizing Israel as a member state:

United Nations member States - Information Sources

UN Security Council Resolution 69 was affirmed 9 to 1 recommending Israeli admission as a UN member state.

UN General Assembly resolution 273 affirmed Israel as a member state was adopted on May 11th 1949 by more than the 2/3rd vote necessary for passage.

"The President stated that since every Member of the United Nations was present and voting, the requirement of the Charter for two-thirds majority was satisfied. He therefore formally declared Israel admitted to membership in the United Nations."

Pg 331, 11 May 1949
UN 267th Plenary Meeting

United Nations Official Document

But you'll ignore it anyway, pretending it doesn't exist. Which is why your personal opinion is so gloriously irrelevant to actual law.

THE ONLY ENTITY WITH THE AUTHORITY TO DECIDE WHO ARE THE LAWFUL INHABITANTS OF PALESTINE THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

BULLSHIT


IDENTIFY THE UN RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING/RECOGNIZING ISRAEL'S BORDERS



.

83% of UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independance.

With the UN recognizing Israel as a member state:

United Nations member States - Information Sources

UN Security Council Resolution 69 was affirmed 9 to 1 recommending Israeli admission as a UN member state.

UN General Assembly resolution 273 affirmed Israel as a member state was adopted on May 11th 1949 by more than the 2/3rd vote necessary for passage.

"The President stated that since every Member of the United Nations was present and voting, the requirement of the Charter for two-thirds majority was satisfied. He therefore formally declared Israel admitted to membership in the United Nations."

Pg 331, 11 May 1949
UN 267th Plenary Meeting

United Nations Official Document

But you'll ignore it anyway, pretending it doesn't exist. Which is why your personal opinion is so gloriously irrelevant to actual law.

ARE YOU TELLING ME THAT THE UNSC CAN SUMMARILY DISMISSED THE PALESTINIANS CLAIMS AS IF THOSE PEOPLE DO NOT EXIST?

I'm telling you what I told you: that Israel is recognized by the UN with its May 11th 1949 borders. And that 83% (160 out of 192) UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independence.

Simply obliterating your claim that 'Palestine' in its entirety is 'occupied territory'. You simply don't know what you're talking about. But then you rarely do.

IT IS THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE WHICH HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE PALESTINIANS CLAIMS?

A COUNTRY AND ITS PEOPLE CAN NOT BE MADE TO ARBITRARILY DISAPPEAR?


BULLSHIT.

"Palestine" was never recognized as either a League of Nations or UN member state. It still isn't.

Well , to many people your baseless position is an invitation to violence


What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't

I don't think 'baseless' means what you think it means. As my claims are backed by multiple UN resolutions, internatnioal law and more than 60 years of recognition by the UN as a member state.

While 'palestine' isn't recognized as such. Nor ever has been.

You can't get around any of that.

LISTEN YOU STUPID FUCK


THERE ARE 66 UN RESOLUTIONS THAT ISRAHELL IGNORES.


THERE IS ONE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE ORDER DEMANDING THAT ISRAHELL DISMANTLE THE WALL WHICH ISRAHELL IGNORES.


THE UN RESOLUTIONS YOU ZIONUTS LIKE YOU BRAG ABOUT.

THE OTHER ARE IGNORED.


SHUT THE FUCK UP.


.

 

[Skylar]

Did you miss the intro or was it intentional?
The Council of the League of Nations:
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people

AND IN 1939 THE UK CLARIFIED THAT A "NATIONAL HOME FOR JEWISH PEOPLE " MEANT A 100 x 100 SF LOT SOMEWHERE IN PALESTINE .


.

Where is this mentioned in the source you're citing? I wasn't able to find any of it.

""Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as England is English.' His Majesty's Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated .... the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the (Balfour) Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."


SHORTLY THEREAFTER MENACHEM BEGIN AND THE IRGUN ZIONUT GANG BEGAN TERRORIZING THE BRITS , FOR EXAMPLE, THE UK MILITARY HEADQUARTERS AT THE KING DAVID HOTEL.


.The King David Hotel bombing was a terrorist attack[1] carried out on Monday July 22, 1946 by the militant Zionist underground organization Irgun on the British administrative headquarters for Palestine, which was housed in the southern wing[2] of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.[3][4][5] 91 people of various nationalities were killed and 46 were injured.[6]

And where is this statement mentioned?

AND IN 1939 THE UK CLARIFIED THAT A "NATIONAL HOME FOR JEWISH PEOPLE " MEANT A 100 x 100 SF LOT SOMEWHERE IN PALESTINE .

I don't see a single mention of it anywhere in your source or anything you quoted.

Interesting, a "liberal" who pretends not to notice when a minority group is being victimized.........


Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm


That means that you are conflicted by interested . You are a ZIONUT.

And predictably, when all of your hapless nonsense has been debunked by the UN resolutions you insist didn't exist, the lack of any of the recognition you insist did exist, 60 years of recognition of Israel as a nation by the UN, and 83% of UN member states recognizing Israel's Declaration of Independence....

.......you flee to personal insults and random name calling.

You're done, kiddo. I gave you your chance at the adult table. You just weren't ready.

 

[Skylar]

83% of UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independance.

With the UN recognizing Israel as a member state:

United Nations member States - Information Sources

UN Security Council Resolution 69 was affirmed 9 to 1 recommending Israeli admission as a UN member state.

UN General Assembly resolution 273 affirmed Israel as a member state was adopted on May 11th 1949 by more than the 2/3rd vote necessary for passage.

But you'll ignore it anyway, pretending it doesn't exist. Which is why your personal opinion is so gloriously irrelevant to actual law.

THE ONLY ENTITY WITH THE AUTHORITY TO DECIDE WHO ARE THE LAWFUL INHABITANTS OF PALESTINE THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

83% of UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independance.

With the UN recognizing Israel as a member state:

United Nations member States - Information Sources

UN Security Council Resolution 69 was affirmed 9 to 1 recommending Israeli admission as a UN member state.

UN General Assembly resolution 273 affirmed Israel as a member state was adopted on May 11th 1949 by more than the 2/3rd vote necessary for passage.

But you'll ignore it anyway, pretending it doesn't exist. Which is why your personal opinion is so gloriously irrelevant to actual law.

ARE YOU TELLING ME THAT THE UNSC CAN SUMMARILY DISMISSED THE PALESTINIANS CLAIMS AS IF THOSE PEOPLE DO NOT EXIST?

I'm telling you what I told you: that Israel is recognized by the UN with its May 11th 1949 borders. And that 83% (160 out of 192) UN member states recognize the Israeli Declaration of Independence.

Simply obliterating your claim that 'Palestine' in its entirety is 'occupied territory'. You simply don't know what you're talking about. But then you rarely do.

IT IS THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE WHICH HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE PALESTINIANS CLAIMS?

A COUNTRY AND ITS PEOPLE CAN NOT BE MADE TO ARBITRARILY DISAPPEAR?


BULLSHIT.

"Palestine" was never recognized as either a League of Nations or UN member state. It still isn't.

Well , to many people your baseless position is an invitation to violence


What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't

I don't think 'baseless' means what you think it means. As my claims are backed by multiple UN resolutions, internatnioal law and more than 60 years of recognition by the UN as a member state.

While 'palestine' isn't recognized as such. Nor ever has been.

You can't get around any of that.

LISTEN YOU STUPID FUCK


THERE ARE 66 UN RESOLUTIONS THAT ISRAHELL IGNORES.


THERE IS ONE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE ORDER DEMANDING THAT ISRAHELL DISMANTLE THE WALL WHICH ISRAHELL IGNORES.


THE UN RESOLUTIONS YOU ZIONUTS LIKE YOU BRAG ABOUT.

THE OTHER ARE IGNORED.


SHUT THE FUCK UP.


.

The UN resolution you insisted didn't exist.....the one admitting Israel as a UN member state?

The resolution debunking your entire argument that 'the entirety of Palestine is occupied territory'?

The same 'Palestine' that has never been recognized as a member state by either the League of Nations nor the UN?

I just want to be sure we're talking about the same things as you verbally vomit all over the thread.