Rising anti-Semitism? One in eight Americans think Jews use Holocaust to get sympathy

[The Great Goose]

Having only one citizenship is hardly "throwing caution to the wind".

If these so called "liberal" Jews are really pro muslim they would denounce their israeli citizenship and stay loyal to their Western country.

I won't reply again.

Why is that necessary?

It's necessary if you want the original inabitants to have homes and a life again.

Original inhabitants. LOL. The land was Ottoman territory for the last 700 years and then fell under the control of the British, after WWI. It hasn't been Arab land for about 800 years.

my country has been in the control of the British for 200 years but we are not the ORIGINAL INHABITANTS.

Do you really get this emotional about it or are you deliberately being a jerk?

Arabs aren't the original inhabitants of ancient Israel. Arabs = People from the Arabian peninsula who invaded and conquered lands and forced Islam upon the inhabitants. The land has been Jewish holy land for the last 4,000 years. But, let us know when America has been handed back to the native Americans. LOL

The Americans have been there for 500 years and they have been magnanimous to the indigenous.

The Jews have only occupied Palestine for 60 years and they are genociding the indigenous semitic peoples.many people alive today were personally made homeless by the Jewish invasion. Real live people.

The point is, what imperial powers did hundreds of years ago is outdated now. You are a criminal state and you can easily return to your western or Eurasian countries.

 

[The Great Goose]

Nearly half of Americans hold anti-Semitic views, a survey has revealed. It also found that one in eight US citizens surveyed (13 percent) thought Jews used talking about the Holocaust to get sympathy.

A "Gallup" asked 3,411 US adults about their attitudes toward USA Jewish citizens. It found that 45 percent polled believed at least one anti-Semitic view presented to them was “definitely or probably true.”

Many found clichés and stereotypes about Jews to be true. One in four believed Jewish people “chase money more than others,” while one in six people felt Jews thought they were better than other people and had too much power in the media.

The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAA), which commissioned the study, said America was at a“tipping point” in its Annual Anti-Semitism Barometer report.

Around 6,768,855 Jewish people live in the USA, or 2.2 percent of the American population, according to CAA.

The survey also found that one in 10 people (11 percent) claimed Jews were not as honest in business as other people, while one in five believed their loyalty to Israel made US Jewish citizens less loyal to the US, and 10 percent of all surveyed said they would be unhappy if a relative married a Jewish person.

Last year, police recorded a record number of anti-Semitic attacks.

What's the difference in Jews using the holocaust and blacks using slavery?

The only ones bringing up and using the holocaust are antisemites like you.

Did you not read the title of this thread?

"Rising anti-Semitism? One in eight Americans think Jews use Holocaust to get sympathy"

Seems I'm not the one who brought up the holocaust, MORON!!!

They are savages. Remember this.

 

[Contumacious]

Jews aren't criticizing "Zionism" which is whether or not the Jewish state has a right to exist.

That is not the definition. However, it is all the evidence one needs to illustrate how you have no credibility on this subject.

I think Israel has every right to exist. What I (and international law) aren't simpatico with is Israel occupying territory that isn't its own. And then colonizing it.

Either annex the territory or leave. But colonizing the territory is a war crime. And utterly inconsistent with the legal basis of Israel's right to exist.

The annexing of the West Bank (which Israel has every right to) is inevitable however it will take time, we are talking about decades.

Why? And of course, its a war crime to transfer your civilian population to territory you occupy. So the only delay seems to be to allow Israel to continue to commit this war crime.

If international law is our basis, then Israel has every right to exist. If this is just a battle royale in which international law does not apply.....then why are we involved? Either international law affirms BOTH Israel's right to exist and the criminality of civilian settlements in the occupied territories. Or it affirms neither.

I argue it affirms both. With the upholding of international law being a valid reason for the US to be involved. And a a valid reason to condemn Israeli action in colonizing the west bank.

HUH?

Well, NOT in Palestine.

Read the Palestinian Mandate, then, and only then, repost



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

 

[Contumacious]

Token in favour of muslims. Not exceeding.

Exceedingly irrational.
When it comes to human rights, Liberal Jews throw caution to the wind to lend a helping hand.

Having only one citizenship is hardly "throwing caution to the wind".

If these so called "liberal" Jews are really pro muslim they would denounce their israeli citizenship and stay loyal to their Western country.

I won't reply again.

Why is that necessary?

It's necessary if you want the original inabitants to have homes and a life again.

Original inhabitants. LOL. The land was Ottoman territory for the last 700 years and then fell under the control of the British, after WWI. It hasn't been Arab land for about 800 years.

And you are under Bibi's spell.


.

 

[Skylar]

Jews aren't criticizing "Zionism" which is whether or not the Jewish state has a right to exist.

That is not the definition. However, it is all the evidence one needs to illustrate how you have no credibility on this subject.

I think Israel has every right to exist. What I (and international law) aren't simpatico with is Israel occupying territory that isn't its own. And then colonizing it.

Either annex the territory or leave. But colonizing the territory is a war crime. And utterly inconsistent with the legal basis of Israel's right to exist.

The annexing of the West Bank (which Israel has every right to) is inevitable however it will take time, we are talking about decades.

Why? And of course, its a war crime to transfer your civilian population to territory you occupy. So the only delay seems to be to allow Israel to continue to commit this war crime.

If international law is our basis, then Israel has every right to exist. If this is just a battle royale in which international law does not apply.....then why are we involved? Either international law affirms BOTH Israel's right to exist and the criminality of civilian settlements in the occupied territories. Or it affirms neither.

I argue it affirms both. With the upholding of international law being a valid reason for the US to be involved. And a a valid reason to condemn Israeli action in colonizing the west bank.

HUH?

Well, NOT in Palestine.

Read the Palestinian Mandate, then, and only then, repost



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Who mentioned 'Palestine'? The country in question is Israel. And the territories its occupying aren't part of Israel. Says who? Says the Israeli Supreme Court, recognizing them instead as occupied territories.

And Geneva Conventions recognize transferring your civilian population into occupied territories as a war crime.

And yet Israel does it flagrantly. Either international law matters...in which case Israel's right to exist is legally protected. Or international law doesn't matter.....in which case we have no reason to be involved there.

 

[Roudy]

Exceedingly irrational.
When it comes to human rights, Liberal Jews throw caution to the wind to lend a helping hand.

Having only one citizenship is hardly "throwing caution to the wind".

If these so called "liberal" Jews are really pro muslim they would denounce their israeli citizenship and stay loyal to their Western country.

I won't reply again.

Why is that necessary?

It's necessary if you want the original inabitants to have homes and a life again.

Original inhabitants. LOL. The land was Ottoman territory for the last 700 years and then fell under the control of the British, after WWI. It hasn't been Arab land for about 800 years.

And you are under Bibi's spell.


.

Wow, nice whiny comeback! But, did it disprove what I said? No.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

WWII is over. Time to move on

I agree, WWII ended 70 years ago, it was time to move on 20 years ago already.

 

[Roudy]

Why is that necessary?

It's necessary if you want the original inabitants to have homes and a life again.

Original inhabitants. LOL. The land was Ottoman territory for the last 700 years and then fell under the control of the British, after WWI. It hasn't been Arab land for about 800 years.

my country has been in the control of the British for 200 years but we are not the ORIGINAL INHABITANTS.

Do you really get this emotional about it or are you deliberately being a jerk?

Arabs aren't the original inhabitants of ancient Israel. Arabs = People from the Arabian peninsula who invaded and conquered lands and forced Islam upon the inhabitants. The land has been Jewish holy land for the last 4,000 years. But, let us know when America has been handed back to the native Americans. LOL

The Americans have been there for 500 years and they have been magnanimous to the indigenous.

The Jews have only occupied Palestine for 60 years and they are genociding the indigenous semitic peoples.many people alive today were personally made homeless by the Jewish invasion. Real live people.

The point is, what imperial powers did hundreds of years ago is outdated now. You are a criminal state and you can easily return to your western or Eurasian countries.

Bzzzz wrong, Jews never actually stopped migrating back. The Ottomans actually invited them to go there after the captured it from the crusaders. You guys need to look at the facts and not the propaganda.

 

[Contumacious]

That is not the definition. However, it is all the evidence one needs to illustrate how you have no credibility on this subject.

I think Israel has every right to exist. What I (and international law) aren't simpatico with is Israel occupying territory that isn't its own. And then colonizing it.

Either annex the territory or leave. But colonizing the territory is a war crime. And utterly inconsistent with the legal basis of Israel's right to exist.

The annexing of the West Bank (which Israel has every right to) is inevitable however it will take time, we are talking about decades.

Why? And of course, its a war crime to transfer your civilian population to territory you occupy. So the only delay seems to be to allow Israel to continue to commit this war crime.

If international law is our basis, then Israel has every right to exist. If this is just a battle royale in which international law does not apply.....then why are we involved? Either international law affirms BOTH Israel's right to exist and the criminality of civilian settlements in the occupied territories. Or it affirms neither.

I argue it affirms both. With the upholding of international law being a valid reason for the US to be involved. And a a valid reason to condemn Israeli action in colonizing the west bank.

HUH?

Well, NOT in Palestine.

Read the Palestinian Mandate, then, and only then, repost



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Who mentioned 'Palestine'? The country in question is Israel. And the territories its occupying aren't part of Israel. Says who? Says the Israeli Supreme Court, recognizing them instead as occupied territories.

And Geneva Conventions recognize transferring your civilian population into occupied territories as a war crime.

And yet Israel does it flagrantly. Either international law matters...in which case Israel's right to exist is legally protected. Or international law doesn't matter.....in which case we have no reason to be involved there.

LEGALLY PROTECTED?


BY WHAT? WHOM?

WHEN WAS THE MATTER REFERRED TO INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE?


SCUMBAG TRUMAN ACCEPTED 2 MILLION DOLLARS FROM BEN GURION IN ORDER FOR THE US TO RECOGNIZE THE JEWISH STATE.


FROM THE ZIONUTS STANDPOINT US RECOGNITION IS ALL THEY NEED.

PALESTINE ---IN ITS ENTIRETY -- IS OCCUPIED TERRITORY.


IN ITS ENTIRETY.


.

 

[Roudy]

Jews aren't criticizing "Zionism" which is whether or not the Jewish state has a right to exist.

That is not the definition. However, it is all the evidence one needs to illustrate how you have no credibility on this subject.

I think Israel has every right to exist. What I (and international law) aren't simpatico with is Israel occupying territory that isn't its own. And then colonizing it.

Either annex the territory or leave. But colonizing the territory is a war crime. And utterly inconsistent with the legal basis of Israel's right to exist.

The annexing of the West Bank (which Israel has every right to) is inevitable however it will take time, we are talking about decades.

Why? And of course, its a war crime to transfer your civilian population to territory you occupy. So the only delay seems to be to allow Israel to continue to commit this war crime.

If international law is our basis, then Israel has every right to exist. If this is just a battle royale in which international law does not apply.....then why are we involved? Either international law affirms BOTH Israel's right to exist and the criminality of civilian settlements in the occupied territories. Or it affirms neither.

I argue it affirms both. With the upholding of international law being a valid reason for the US to be involved. And a a valid reason to condemn Israeli action in colonizing the west bank.

HUH?

Well, NOT in Palestine.

Read the Palestinian Mandate, then, and only then, repost



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Did you miss the intro or was it intentional?
The Council of the League of Nations:
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people

 

[Contumacious]

It's necessary if you want the original inabitants to have homes and a life again.

Original inhabitants. LOL. The land was Ottoman territory for the last 700 years and then fell under the control of the British, after WWI. It hasn't been Arab land for about 800 years.

my country has been in the control of the British for 200 years but we are not the ORIGINAL INHABITANTS.

Do you really get this emotional about it or are you deliberately being a jerk?

Arabs aren't the original inhabitants of ancient Israel. Arabs = People from the Arabian peninsula who invaded and conquered lands and forced Islam upon the inhabitants. The land has been Jewish holy land for the last 4,000 years. But, let us know when America has been handed back to the native Americans. LOL

The Americans have been there for 500 years and they have been magnanimous to the indigenous.

The Jews have only occupied Palestine for 60 years and they are genociding the indigenous semitic peoples.many people alive today were personally made homeless by the Jewish invasion. Real live people.

The point is, what imperial powers did hundreds of years ago is outdated now. You are a criminal state and you can easily return to your western or Eurasian countries.

Bzzzz wrong, Jews never actually stopped migrating back. The Ottomans actually invited them to go there after the captured it from the crusaders. You guys need to look at the facts and not the propaganda.

BULLSHIT


LINK


AND EVEN IF TRUE , THE AGREEMENT ENDED WHEN PALESTINE OBTAINED ITS INDEPENDENCE.


.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Nearly half of Americans hold anti-Semitic views, a survey has revealed. It also found that one in eight US citizens surveyed (13 percent) thought Jews used talking about the Holocaust to get sympathy.

A "Gallup" asked 3,411 US adults about their attitudes toward USA Jewish citizens. It found that 45 percent polled believed at least one anti-Semitic view presented to them was “definitely or probably true.”

Many found clichés and stereotypes about Jews to be true. One in four believed Jewish people “chase money more than others,” while one in six people felt Jews thought they were better than other people and had too much power in the media.

The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAA), which commissioned the study, said America was at a“tipping point” in its Annual Anti-Semitism Barometer report.

Around 6,768,855 Jewish people live in the USA, or 2.2 percent of the American population, according to CAA.

The survey also found that one in 10 people (11 percent) claimed Jews were not as honest in business as other people, while one in five believed their loyalty to Israel made US Jewish citizens less loyal to the US, and 10 percent of all surveyed said they would be unhappy if a relative married a Jewish person.

Last year, police recorded a record number of anti-Semitic attacks.

Would the perception that jews use the holocast for sympathy be anti-semetic?

The whole anti-Semitic thing has reached absurd proportions. I mean even mentioning that someone is Jewish causes a fit.

If one says, why in general are the Chair and/or Vice-Chair of the Federal Reserve or US Treasury Secretary nearly always Jewish....this is construed as "anti-Semitic"

Completely ridiculous. They are legitimate questions and in a Free Speech society are perfectly reasonable.

 

[Roudy]

I think Israel has every right to exist. What I (and international law) aren't simpatico with is Israel occupying territory that isn't its own. And then colonizing it.

Either annex the territory or leave. But colonizing the territory is a war crime. And utterly inconsistent with the legal basis of Israel's right to exist.

The annexing of the West Bank (which Israel has every right to) is inevitable however it will take time, we are talking about decades.

Why? And of course, its a war crime to transfer your civilian population to territory you occupy. So the only delay seems to be to allow Israel to continue to commit this war crime.

If international law is our basis, then Israel has every right to exist. If this is just a battle royale in which international law does not apply.....then why are we involved? Either international law affirms BOTH Israel's right to exist and the criminality of civilian settlements in the occupied territories. Or it affirms neither.

I argue it affirms both. With the upholding of international law being a valid reason for the US to be involved. And a a valid reason to condemn Israeli action in colonizing the west bank.

HUH?

Well, NOT in Palestine.

Read the Palestinian Mandate, then, and only then, repost



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Who mentioned 'Palestine'? The country in question is Israel. And the territories its occupying aren't part of Israel. Says who? Says the Israeli Supreme Court, recognizing them instead as occupied territories.

And Geneva Conventions recognize transferring your civilian population into occupied territories as a war crime.

And yet Israel does it flagrantly. Either international law matters...in which case Israel's right to exist is legally protected. Or international law doesn't matter.....in which case we have no reason to be involved there.

LEGALLY PROTECTED?


BY WHAT? WHOM?

WHEN WAS THE MATTER REFERRED TO INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE?


SCUMBAG TRUMAN ACCEPTED 2 MILLION DOLLARS FROM BEN GURION IN ORDER FOR THE US TO RECOGNIZE THE JEWISH STATE.


FROM THE ZIONUTS STANDPOINT US RECOGNITION IS ALL THEY NEED.

PALESTINE ---IN ITS ENTIRETY -- IS OCCUPIED TERRITORY.


IN ITS ENTIRETY.


.

Who controlled this "occupied" Palestine? This is gonna be good. Ha ha ha.

 

[Roudy]

Original inhabitants. LOL. The land was Ottoman territory for the last 700 years and then fell under the control of the British, after WWI. It hasn't been Arab land for about 800 years.

my country has been in the control of the British for 200 years but we are not the ORIGINAL INHABITANTS.

Do you really get this emotional about it or are you deliberately being a jerk?

Arabs aren't the original inhabitants of ancient Israel. Arabs = People from the Arabian peninsula who invaded and conquered lands and forced Islam upon the inhabitants. The land has been Jewish holy land for the last 4,000 years. But, let us know when America has been handed back to the native Americans. LOL

The Americans have been there for 500 years and they have been magnanimous to the indigenous.

The Jews have only occupied Palestine for 60 years and they are genociding the indigenous semitic peoples.many people alive today were personally made homeless by the Jewish invasion. Real live people.

The point is, what imperial powers did hundreds of years ago is outdated now. You are a criminal state and you can easily return to your western or Eurasian countries.

Bzzzz wrong, Jews never actually stopped migrating back. The Ottomans actually invited them to go there after the captured it from the crusaders. You guys need to look at the facts and not the propaganda.

BULLSHIT


LINK


AND EVEN IF TRUE , THE AGREEMENT ENDED WHEN PALESTINE OBTAINED ITS INDEPENDENCE.


.

Yes, Palestine (British mandate of, that is) which is actually a European name, as the Ottomans didn't call it by that name for 700 years, became ISRAEL in 1948. The Arabs attacked, and the rest is history. Deal with it.

 

[Skylar]

I think Israel has every right to exist. What I (and international law) aren't simpatico with is Israel occupying territory that isn't its own. And then colonizing it.

Either annex the territory or leave. But colonizing the territory is a war crime. And utterly inconsistent with the legal basis of Israel's right to exist.

The annexing of the West Bank (which Israel has every right to) is inevitable however it will take time, we are talking about decades.

Why? And of course, its a war crime to transfer your civilian population to territory you occupy. So the only delay seems to be to allow Israel to continue to commit this war crime.

If international law is our basis, then Israel has every right to exist. If this is just a battle royale in which international law does not apply.....then why are we involved? Either international law affirms BOTH Israel's right to exist and the criminality of civilian settlements in the occupied territories. Or it affirms neither.

I argue it affirms both. With the upholding of international law being a valid reason for the US to be involved. And a a valid reason to condemn Israeli action in colonizing the west bank.

HUH?

Well, NOT in Palestine.

Read the Palestinian Mandate, then, and only then, repost



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Who mentioned 'Palestine'? The country in question is Israel. And the territories its occupying aren't part of Israel. Says who? Says the Israeli Supreme Court, recognizing them instead as occupied territories.

And Geneva Conventions recognize transferring your civilian population into occupied territories as a war crime.

And yet Israel does it flagrantly. Either international law matters...in which case Israel's right to exist is legally protected. Or international law doesn't matter.....in which case we have no reason to be involved there.

LEGALLY PROTECTED?


BY WHAT? WHOM?

WHEN WAS THE MATTER REFERRED TO INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE?


SCUMBAG TRUMAN ACCEPTED 2 MILLION DOLLARS FROM BEN GURION IN ORDER FOR THE US TO RECOGNIZE THE JEWISH STATE.


FROM THE ZIONUTS STANDPOINT US RECOGNITION IS ALL THEY NEED.

PALESTINE ---IN ITS ENTIRETY -- IS OCCUPIED TERRITORY.


IN ITS ENTIRETY.


.

Alas, its not. Israel's boundaries are recognized by the UN and the overwhelming majority of the international community.

 

[Roudy]

Nearly half of Americans hold anti-Semitic views, a survey has revealed. It also found that one in eight US citizens surveyed (13 percent) thought Jews used talking about the Holocaust to get sympathy.

A "Gallup" asked 3,411 US adults about their attitudes toward USA Jewish citizens. It found that 45 percent polled believed at least one anti-Semitic view presented to them was “definitely or probably true.”

Many found clichés and stereotypes about Jews to be true. One in four believed Jewish people “chase money more than others,” while one in six people felt Jews thought they were better than other people and had too much power in the media.

The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAA), which commissioned the study, said America was at a“tipping point” in its Annual Anti-Semitism Barometer report.

Around 6,768,855 Jewish people live in the USA, or 2.2 percent of the American population, according to CAA.

The survey also found that one in 10 people (11 percent) claimed Jews were not as honest in business as other people, while one in five believed their loyalty to Israel made US Jewish citizens less loyal to the US, and 10 percent of all surveyed said they would be unhappy if a relative married a Jewish person.

Last year, police recorded a record number of anti-Semitic attacks.

Would the perception that jews use the holocast for sympathy be anti-semetic?

The whole anti-Semitic thing has reached absurd proportions. I mean even mentioning that someone is Jewish causes a fit.

If one says, why in general are the Chair and/or Vice-Chair of the Federal Reserve or US Treasury Secretary nearly always Jewish....this is construed as "anti-Semitic"

Completely ridiculous. They are legitimate questions and in a Free Speech society are perfectly reasonable.

And these are the same people who can't say "Islamic terrorist" or "Islamist" or even "radical Islamist"?

 

[Contumacious]

That is not the definition. However, it is all the evidence one needs to illustrate how you have no credibility on this subject.

I think Israel has every right to exist. What I (and international law) aren't simpatico with is Israel occupying territory that isn't its own. And then colonizing it.

Either annex the territory or leave. But colonizing the territory is a war crime. And utterly inconsistent with the legal basis of Israel's right to exist.

The annexing of the West Bank (which Israel has every right to) is inevitable however it will take time, we are talking about decades.

Why? And of course, its a war crime to transfer your civilian population to territory you occupy. So the only delay seems to be to allow Israel to continue to commit this war crime.

If international law is our basis, then Israel has every right to exist. If this is just a battle royale in which international law does not apply.....then why are we involved? Either international law affirms BOTH Israel's right to exist and the criminality of civilian settlements in the occupied territories. Or it affirms neither.

I argue it affirms both. With the upholding of international law being a valid reason for the US to be involved. And a a valid reason to condemn Israeli action in colonizing the west bank.

HUH?

Well, NOT in Palestine.

Read the Palestinian Mandate, then, and only then, repost



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Did you miss the intro or was it intentional?
The Council of the League of Nations:
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and

Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people

AND IN 1939 THE UK CLARIFIED THAT A "NATIONAL HOME FOR JEWISH PEOPLE " MEANT A 100 x 100 SF LOT SOMEWHERE IN PALESTINE .


.

 

[Skylar]

Nearly half of Americans hold anti-Semitic views, a survey has revealed. It also found that one in eight US citizens surveyed (13 percent) thought Jews used talking about the Holocaust to get sympathy.

A "Gallup" asked 3,411 US adults about their attitudes toward USA Jewish citizens. It found that 45 percent polled believed at least one anti-Semitic view presented to them was “definitely or probably true.”

Many found clichés and stereotypes about Jews to be true. One in four believed Jewish people “chase money more than others,” while one in six people felt Jews thought they were better than other people and had too much power in the media.

The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAA), which commissioned the study, said America was at a“tipping point” in its Annual Anti-Semitism Barometer report.

Around 6,768,855 Jewish people live in the USA, or 2.2 percent of the American population, according to CAA.

The survey also found that one in 10 people (11 percent) claimed Jews were not as honest in business as other people, while one in five believed their loyalty to Israel made US Jewish citizens less loyal to the US, and 10 percent of all surveyed said they would be unhappy if a relative married a Jewish person.

Last year, police recorded a record number of anti-Semitic attacks.

Would the perception that jews use the holocast for sympathy be anti-semetic?

The whole anti-Semitic thing has reached absurd proportions. I mean even mentioning that someone is Jewish causes a fit.

If one says, why in general are the Chair and/or Vice-Chair of the Federal Reserve or US Treasury Secretary nearly always Jewish....this is construed as "anti-Semitic"

Completely ridiculous. They are legitimate questions and in a Free Speech society are perfectly reasonable.

That's not my quote.

 

[Contumacious]

The annexing of the West Bank (which Israel has every right to) is inevitable however it will take time, we are talking about decades.

Why? And of course, its a war crime to transfer your civilian population to territory you occupy. So the only delay seems to be to allow Israel to continue to commit this war crime.

If international law is our basis, then Israel has every right to exist. If this is just a battle royale in which international law does not apply.....then why are we involved? Either international law affirms BOTH Israel's right to exist and the criminality of civilian settlements in the occupied territories. Or it affirms neither.

I argue it affirms both. With the upholding of international law being a valid reason for the US to be involved. And a a valid reason to condemn Israeli action in colonizing the west bank.

HUH?

Well, NOT in Palestine.

Read the Palestinian Mandate, then, and only then, repost



ART. 7.

The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.

Who mentioned 'Palestine'? The country in question is Israel. And the territories its occupying aren't part of Israel. Says who? Says the Israeli Supreme Court, recognizing them instead as occupied territories.

And Geneva Conventions recognize transferring your civilian population into occupied territories as a war crime.

And yet Israel does it flagrantly. Either international law matters...in which case Israel's right to exist is legally protected. Or international law doesn't matter.....in which case we have no reason to be involved there.

LEGALLY PROTECTED?


BY WHAT? WHOM?

WHEN WAS THE MATTER REFERRED TO INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE?


SCUMBAG TRUMAN ACCEPTED 2 MILLION DOLLARS FROM BEN GURION IN ORDER FOR THE US TO RECOGNIZE THE JEWISH STATE.


FROM THE ZIONUTS STANDPOINT US RECOGNITION IS ALL THEY NEED.

PALESTINE ---IN ITS ENTIRETY -- IS OCCUPIED TERRITORY.


IN ITS ENTIRETY.


.

Alas, its not. Israel's boundaries are recognized by the UN and the overwhelming majority of the international community.

BULLSHIT


IDENTIFY THE UN RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING/RECOGNIZING ISRAEL'S BORDERS



.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Nearly half of Americans hold anti-Semitic views, a survey has revealed. It also found that one in eight US citizens surveyed (13 percent) thought Jews used talking about the Holocaust to get sympathy.

A "Gallup" asked 3,411 US adults about their attitudes toward USA Jewish citizens. It found that 45 percent polled believed at least one anti-Semitic view presented to them was “definitely or probably true.”

Many found clichés and stereotypes about Jews to be true. One in four believed Jewish people “chase money more than others,” while one in six people felt Jews thought they were better than other people and had too much power in the media.

The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAA), which commissioned the study, said America was at a“tipping point” in its Annual Anti-Semitism Barometer report.

Around 6,768,855 Jewish people live in the USA, or 2.2 percent of the American population, according to CAA.

The survey also found that one in 10 people (11 percent) claimed Jews were not as honest in business as other people, while one in five believed their loyalty to Israel made US Jewish citizens less loyal to the US, and 10 percent of all surveyed said they would be unhappy if a relative married a Jewish person.

Last year, police recorded a record number of anti-Semitic attacks.

Would the perception that jews use the holocast for sympathy be anti-semetic?

The whole anti-Semitic thing has reached absurd proportions. I mean even mentioning that someone is Jewish causes a fit.

If one says, why in general are the Chair and/or Vice-Chair of the Federal Reserve or US Treasury Secretary nearly always Jewish....this is construed as "anti-Semitic"

Completely ridiculous. They are legitimate questions and in a Free Speech society are perfectly reasonable.

And these are the same people who can't say "Islamic terrorist" or "Islamist" or even "radical Islamist"?

Well unfortunately we're now getting into a similar situation. If one even says anything pertaining to Muslims or Islam, they are given the label "Islamaphobe" or usually just "racist"

So it's an equally rididulous situation. I think criticism should be allowed, be it of Muslims or Jews, just in the same way that any and all criticism of Christians is actually accepted. We can't have one rule for one group and another rule for another group and/or groups.