EdwardBaiamonte
Platinum Member
- Nov 23, 2011
- 34,612
- 2,153
- 1,100
The question is how will this end. .
exactly like the wheel ended of course. Notice how you cant address the subject so try to change the subject hoping no one will notice. Sad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The question is how will this end. .
I am really wondering how robots will reshape the cyclic economic model.
.
dear, a wheel is, in effect, a robot. Now do you understand? I pride myself on making things simple enough for even a liberal to understand.
At this point self-driving cars are the tip of the iceberg, !
Actually EdAt this point self-driving cars are the tip of the iceberg, !
so dear, when are self-driving cars going to replace as many people as the wheel and farm equipment? You do science fiction because you cant do economics.
1) The wheel didn't take any jobs. None.
Farm equipment
Ah , indeed, there was a rather nasty period that lasted 50 years in which wages stagnated in spite of productivity rise.
So you're probably thinking : let's just wait 50 years until the market adjusts.
So you're probably thinking : let's just wait 50 years until the market adjusts.
Ideally, all human labor would be replaced by technology and humans would be free to explore arts, humanities, culture, science, and other liberal arts. Living wages would be distributed from the productivity of robotic labor.
In reality, human labor will continue to be displaced by technology as a few of the greediest humans (the ones that seek identity through wealth accumulation) accumulate most of the fruits of production. Eventually a worldwide revolution will sweep the globe--with horrible outcomes.
dear stupid liberal, if the earth has 10 billion people the labor supply is 10 billion people. How is that little labor supply? You say the 10 billion won't need consumer goods like food?? As usual you seem 100% stupid and liberal.. And yet , with little labour supply households will have little bargaining power. Even worse, there will be no need to produce those consumer goods.
This is exactly what I would like to discuss. Goods will still be scarce , so we will still need trade and markets. And yet , with little labour supply households will have little bargaining power. Even worse, there will be no need to produce those consumer goods.Ideally, all human labor would be replaced by technology and humans would be free to explore arts, humanities, culture, science, and other liberal arts. Living wages would be distributed from the productivity of robotic labor.
In reality, human labor will continue to be displaced by technology as a few of the greediest humans (the ones that seek identity through wealth accumulation) accumulate most of the fruits of production. Eventually a worldwide revolution will sweep the globe--with horrible outcomes.
One possible solution would be wealth re distribution through taxation, increasing the importance of corporate taxes, relative to the importance of individual income taxes.
How do you suggest we distribute these goods and services that unemployed people can't afford because they are jobless?All corporations care about is productivity. Robots are the perfect tool to get the most out of the hours of work...
I am simply saying that we the people should benefit from this productivity in eliminating hunger and giving everyone their basic needs. I think robots can be a very good thing but we must not allow the pure capitalist bs to drive our society into great poverty.
How do you suggest we distribute these goods and services that unemployed people can't afford because they are jobless?All corporations care about is productivity. Robots are the perfect tool to get the most out of the hours of work...
I am simply saying that we the people should benefit from this productivity in eliminating hunger and giving everyone their basic needs. I think robots can be a very good thing but we must not allow the pure capitalist bs to drive our society into great poverty.
Bingo, universal minimum wage is a proposed idea.How do you suggest we distribute these goods and services that unemployed people can't afford because they are jobless?All corporations care about is productivity. Robots are the perfect tool to get the most out of the hours of work...
I am simply saying that we the people should benefit from this productivity in eliminating hunger and giving everyone their basic needs. I think robots can be a very good thing but we must not allow the pure capitalist bs to drive our society into great poverty.
Everyone will get basic income of around 1,200-1,500 per month to survive. They then will have the ability to get a education and focus towards a real job.
We provide public education, roads, weather warnings and much more...There's no reason why we shouldn't be able to focus some of this productivity towards societies advantage.
Let's say for the right to have the efficiency of robotics a business would need to pay a tax of 3-5% more. This would go towards this basic income! Maybe there'd be a federal income for everyone with over 50g's to pay 2-3% more towards this.
dear stupid liberal, if the earth has 10 billion people the labor supply is 10 billion people. How is that little labor supply? You say the 10 billion won't need consumer goods like food?? As usual you seem 100% stupid and liberal.. And yet , with little labour supply households will have little bargaining power. Even worse, there will be no need to produce those consumer goods.
He means "little labor demand".
With demand for labor decreased by massive robotic development, in a society where wealth redistribution is dependent upon work, how do we survive?
The answer is we don't.
tax them for making a profit.
a guaranteed minimum ownership of capital to all households or individuals not in a households.