Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is there any espionage you don't condone to further your political agenda?That would be influencing the election, dumbass.
OMG! The truth influenced the election.
Better hide the truth, right? Moron.
Definition of espionage
So now the DNC is a foreign government or competing company of Russia? Really?
- : the practice of spying or using spies to obtain information about the plans and activities especially of a foreign government or a competing company
You're not very familiar with the meaning of many words are ya, back to ESL for you.
Like a political candidate working with a foreign govt to expose his opponent's weakness in order to gain an advantage?Definition of espionage
- : the practice of spying or using spies to obtain information about the plans and activities especially of a foreign government or a competing company
Then yes. I agree.
Oh boy, the peanut gallery chimes in. Slpain this to me child, the email release covered from Jan 2015 to May 2016. Trump didn't get the nomination till Aug 2016. So the only opponent the hildabitch had during that time was Sanders. So where's the advantage for Trump and how would he collude against his opponent when his opponents during that time were all republicans. Maybe you should be asking Sanders about his Russian contacts.
Exactly whatever for whomever the investigations find to be culpable.
Obama has already taken actions against Russia. The individual players still need to be sorted.
"Culpable" for what? How is the US government going to punish any Russians?
It's already happening, dope.
It is? Who is being punished?
You dopes really should be done for tonight.
obama sanctions russia - Google Search
We can add that to the long list of questions you don't want to answer.
I do, but it's already been posted in this thread and I prefer to watch you stew in your own ignorance instead.Rightard.... those aren't the only hacked emails. There were more even after May 25th.Obviously, you have little knowledge of this matter and I'm not here to educate you. Feel free to do your own homework, catch up, and then try again.Which of course, has nothing to do with what I said. The Russians have been hacking us even before 2015. I'm specifically speaking of their hacking during the election, which was against the DNC and benefited Trump.
Everything I saw dealt with the commiecrat primary and the DNC dirty dealing, what was released dealing with the general election?
OK CHILD, the wikileaks DNC emails covered this time frame, Jan 2015 to May 25, 2016.
The emails cover the period from January last year until 25 May this year.
WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database
Now tell me, what part of that time frame covered the general election?
Like I said, but apparently need to repeat... Obviously, you have little knowledge of this matter and I'm not here to educate you. Feel free to do your own homework, catch up, and then try again.
Then you have a link, RIGHT? All I have is what wikileaks says, they were the ones that released them after all. I think you're the one making shit up.
Obviously, you have little knowledge of this matter and I'm not here to educate you. Feel free to do your own homework, catch up, and then try again.Which of course, has nothing to do with what I said. The Russians have been hacking us even before 2015. I'm specifically speaking of their hacking during the election, which was against the DNC and benefited Trump.Child the Russians were hacking the DNC back in Mar 2015, 5 months before Trump even announced and a full year before he was nominated.
Everything I saw dealt with the commiecrat primary and the DNC dirty dealing, what was released dealing with the general election?
OK CHILD, the wikileaks DNC emails covered this time frame, Jan 2015 to May 25, 2016.
The emails cover the period from January last year until 25 May this year.
WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database
Now tell me, what part of that time frame covered the general election?
The emails were from that period, Idiot.
What date were they first released by WL?
Damn you.Is there any espionage you don't condone to further your political agenda?OMG! The truth influenced the election.
Better hide the truth, right? Moron.
Definition of espionage
So now the DNC is a foreign government or competing company of Russia? Really?
- : the practice of spying or using spies to obtain information about the plans and activities especially of a foreign government or a competing company
You're not very familiar with the meaning of many words are ya, back to ESL for you.
Like a political candidate working with a foreign govt to expose his opponent's weakness in order to gain an advantage?Definition of espionage
- : the practice of spying or using spies to obtain information about the plans and activities especially of a foreign government or a competing company
Then yes. I agree.
Oh boy, the peanut gallery chimes in. Slpain this to me child, the email release covered from Jan 2015 to May 2016. Trump didn't get the nomination till Aug 2016. So the only opponent the hildabitch had during that time was Sanders. So where's the advantage for Trump and how would he collude against his opponent when his opponents during that time were all republicans. Maybe you should be asking Sanders about his Russian contacts.
WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database
Starting on Friday 22 July 2016 at 10:30am EDT, WikiLeaks released over 2 publications 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments from the top of the US Democratic National Committee -- part one of our new Hillary Leaks series. The leaks come from the accounts of seven key figures in the DNC:
Dope.
LOLOLThat is what I said. Somehow, your defective brain translated that into md claiming they personally conducted forensic analysis on the DNC servers.Aww, you poor thing, bless your heart. What a cute strawman. When did I say they conducted such analyses?Tell me child, what federal agency conducted the forensic analysis of the DNC servers?
Strawman, hardly. You said the intel community wouldn't make a claim without proof. I'm just asking which agency got the proof.
Hence, strawman.
So there was no proof? Forensic analysis is the only way to prove a server was hacked and by whom.
Dayam, you're one thick-as-brick conservative.
I never said there was no proof nor did I say there was no forensic analysis performed.
You really suck at this.
Speaking of which, have you finally figured out that Guccifer 2.0 and Russian intelligence is one and the same? Or do you still think you've stumbled upon a glaring "distinction" in that article where no such distinction exists?
Obviously, you have little knowledge of this matter and I'm not here to educate you. Feel free to do your own homework, catch up, and then try again.Which of course, has nothing to do with what I said. The Russians have been hacking us even before 2015. I'm specifically speaking of their hacking during the election, which was against the DNC and benefited Trump.
Everything I saw dealt with the commiecrat primary and the DNC dirty dealing, what was released dealing with the general election?
OK CHILD, the wikileaks DNC emails covered this time frame, Jan 2015 to May 25, 2016.
The emails cover the period from January last year until 25 May this year.
WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database
Now tell me, what part of that time frame covered the general election?
The emails were from that period, Idiot.
What date were they first released by WL?
What the fuck difference does that make, the hildabitch wasn't Trumps opponent during the period covered by the emails. His knowing who the DNC was backstabbing during the primaries and before gave him no tactical advantage. You're just pissed they showed your party for the gigantic pieces of shit they are.
His knowing who the DNC was backstabbing during the primaries and before gave him no tactical advantage. You're just pissed they showed your party for the gigantic pieces of shit they are.
Damn you.Is there any espionage you don't condone to further your political agenda?
Definition of espionage
So now the DNC is a foreign government or competing company of Russia? Really?
- : the practice of spying or using spies to obtain information about the plans and activities especially of a foreign government or a competing company
You're not very familiar with the meaning of many words are ya, back to ESL for you.
Like a political candidate working with a foreign govt to expose his opponent's weakness in order to gain an advantage?Definition of espionage
- : the practice of spying or using spies to obtain information about the plans and activities especially of a foreign government or a competing company
Then yes. I agree.
Oh boy, the peanut gallery chimes in. Slpain this to me child, the email release covered from Jan 2015 to May 2016. Trump didn't get the nomination till Aug 2016. So the only opponent the hildabitch had during that time was Sanders. So where's the advantage for Trump and how would he collude against his opponent when his opponents during that time were all republicans. Maybe you should be asking Sanders about his Russian contacts.
WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database
Starting on Friday 22 July 2016 at 10:30am EDT, WikiLeaks released over 2 publications 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments from the top of the US Democratic National Committee -- part one of our new Hillary Leaks series. The leaks come from the accounts of seven key figures in the DNC:
Dope.
I wanted to watch that idiot parade his ignorance for a while before cluing him in.
But I thought the Trump administration was colluding with the Russians. How are they going to be punished?"Culpable" for what? How is the US government going to punish any Russians?
It's already happening, dope.
It is? Who is being punished?
You dopes really should be done for tonight.
obama sanctions russia - Google Search
We can add that to the long list of questions you don't want to answer.
I gave you pages of answers, dope.
Is there any espionage you don't condone to further your political agenda?OMG! The truth influenced the election.
Better hide the truth, right? Moron.
Definition of espionage
So now the DNC is a foreign government or competing company of Russia? Really?
- : the practice of spying or using spies to obtain information about the plans and activities especially of a foreign government or a competing company
You're not very familiar with the meaning of many words are ya, back to ESL for you.
Like a political candidate working with a foreign govt to expose his opponent's weakness in order to gain an advantage?Definition of espionage
- : the practice of spying or using spies to obtain information about the plans and activities especially of a foreign government or a competing company
Then yes. I agree.
Oh boy, the peanut gallery chimes in. Slpain this to me child, the email release covered from Jan 2015 to May 2016. Trump didn't get the nomination till Aug 2016. So the only opponent the hildabitch had during that time was Sanders. So where's the advantage for Trump and how would he collude against his opponent when his opponents during that time were all republicans. Maybe you should be asking Sanders about his Russian contacts.
WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database
Starting on Friday 22 July 2016 at 10:30am EDT, WikiLeaks released over 2 publications 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments from the top of the US Democratic National Committee -- part one of our new Hillary Leaks series. The leaks come from the accounts of seven key figures in the DNC:
Dope.
Obviously, you have little knowledge of this matter and I'm not here to educate you. Feel free to do your own homework, catch up, and then try again.Everything I saw dealt with the commiecrat primary and the DNC dirty dealing, what was released dealing with the general election?
OK CHILD, the wikileaks DNC emails covered this time frame, Jan 2015 to May 25, 2016.
The emails cover the period from January last year until 25 May this year.
WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database
Now tell me, what part of that time frame covered the general election?
The emails were from that period, Idiot.
What date were they first released by WL?
What the fuck difference does that make, the hildabitch wasn't Trumps opponent during the period covered by the emails. His knowing who the DNC was backstabbing during the primaries and before gave him no tactical advantage. You're just pissed they showed your party for the gigantic pieces of shit they are.His knowing who the DNC was backstabbing during the primaries and before gave him no tactical advantage. You're just pissed they showed your party for the gigantic pieces of shit they are.
Which is it?
It gave Trump no tactical advantage?
Or...
It showed the Dems to be the "pieces of shit they are"?
Sadly, I have to repeat myself because you apparently didn't understand this the first time I said it -- I never said the government conducted forensic analyses. So what exactly does your deformed brain tell you I'm refusing to answer to questions about things I never claimed?LOLOLThat is what I said. Somehow, your defective brain translated that into md claiming they personally conducted forensic analysis on the DNC servers.Aww, you poor thing, bless your heart. What a cute strawman. When did I say they conducted such analyses?
Strawman, hardly. You said the intel community wouldn't make a claim without proof. I'm just asking which agency got the proof.
Hence, strawman.
So there was no proof? Forensic analysis is the only way to prove a server was hacked and by whom.
Dayam, you're one thick-as-brick conservative.
I never said there was no proof nor did I say there was no forensic analysis performed.
You really suck at this.
Speaking of which, have you finally figured out that Guccifer 2.0 and Russian intelligence is one and the same? Or do you still think you've stumbled upon a glaring "distinction" in that article where no such distinction exists?
Yet you refuse to answer the simple question of which government agency performed the forensic analysis and garnered this so called proof.
Nope, the author clearly points out that our intelligence community believes Guccifer 2.0 is Russian intelligence. So the author of the article using the two interchangeably is not casting a distinction between the two; but exposes your dementia in believing there is a distinction even though the author points out the two are the same.Also the author of the article drew the distinction, not me.
Why are you ignoring the fact that you claimed the leaks ceased on May 25th of last year even though they continued beyond that date? Don't you think you should apologize to the forum for being such a dumb fuck?Is there any espionage you don't condone to further your political agenda?
Definition of espionage
So now the DNC is a foreign government or competing company of Russia? Really?
- : the practice of spying or using spies to obtain information about the plans and activities especially of a foreign government or a competing company
You're not very familiar with the meaning of many words are ya, back to ESL for you.
Like a political candidate working with a foreign govt to expose his opponent's weakness in order to gain an advantage?Definition of espionage
- : the practice of spying or using spies to obtain information about the plans and activities especially of a foreign government or a competing company
Then yes. I agree.
Oh boy, the peanut gallery chimes in. Slpain this to me child, the email release covered from Jan 2015 to May 2016. Trump didn't get the nomination till Aug 2016. So the only opponent the hildabitch had during that time was Sanders. So where's the advantage for Trump and how would he collude against his opponent when his opponents during that time were all republicans. Maybe you should be asking Sanders about his Russian contacts.
WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database
Starting on Friday 22 July 2016 at 10:30am EDT, WikiLeaks released over 2 publications 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments from the top of the US Democratic National Committee -- part one of our new Hillary Leaks series. The leaks come from the accounts of seven key figures in the DNC:
Dope.
Once again, before Trump got the nomination and disclosed information before and during the dem primaries. Nothing that covered the general election.
what corruption was finally exposed? PLEASE be specific.That would be influencing the election, dumbass.
OMG! The truth influenced the election.
Better hide the truth, right? Moron.
Russia influenced our election, dumbass.
You dopes were too dumb to even know that you admitted it. Now you're trying to play it off like everyone didn't see it.
You think Hillary's corruption should remain hidden. Just say it.
You know you want to.......
At the expense of our national integrity?
No.
Obviously you have no qualms with selling out for a cheap win.
At the expense of our national integrity?
I agree, President Hillary would have ruined our national integrity.
Her corruption was thankfully exposed.
you may not know this, but the FBI and other 3 letter agencies, OFTEN USE outside private cyber security firms to gather forensic evidence for them that the govt agencies use to prosecute 'the bad guys'...LOLOLThat is what I said. Somehow, your defective brain translated that into md claiming they personally conducted forensic analysis on the DNC servers.Aww, you poor thing, bless your heart. What a cute strawman. When did I say they conducted such analyses?
Strawman, hardly. You said the intel community wouldn't make a claim without proof. I'm just asking which agency got the proof.
Hence, strawman.
So there was no proof? Forensic analysis is the only way to prove a server was hacked and by whom.
Dayam, you're one thick-as-brick conservative.
I never said there was no proof nor did I say there was no forensic analysis performed.
You really suck at this.
Speaking of which, have you finally figured out that Guccifer 2.0 and Russian intelligence is one and the same? Or do you still think you've stumbled upon a glaring "distinction" in that article where no such distinction exists?
Yet you refuse to answer the simple question of which government agency performed the forensic analysis and garnered this so called proof. Also the author of the article drew the distinction, not me.
Why are you ignoring the fact that you claimed the leaks ceased on May 25th of last year even though they continued beyond that date? Don't you think you should apologize to the forum for being such a dumb fuck?Definition of espionage
So now the DNC is a foreign government or competing company of Russia? Really?
- : the practice of spying or using spies to obtain information about the plans and activities especially of a foreign government or a competing company
You're not very familiar with the meaning of many words are ya, back to ESL for you.
Like a political candidate working with a foreign govt to expose his opponent's weakness in order to gain an advantage?Definition of espionage
- : the practice of spying or using spies to obtain information about the plans and activities especially of a foreign government or a competing company
Then yes. I agree.
Oh boy, the peanut gallery chimes in. Slpain this to me child, the email release covered from Jan 2015 to May 2016. Trump didn't get the nomination till Aug 2016. So the only opponent the hildabitch had during that time was Sanders. So where's the advantage for Trump and how would he collude against his opponent when his opponents during that time were all republicans. Maybe you should be asking Sanders about his Russian contacts.
WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database
Starting on Friday 22 July 2016 at 10:30am EDT, WikiLeaks released over 2 publications 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments from the top of the US Democratic National Committee -- part one of our new Hillary Leaks series. The leaks come from the accounts of seven key figures in the DNC:
Dope.
Once again, before Trump got the nomination and disclosed information before and during the dem primaries. Nothing that covered the general election.
Everything I saw dealt with the commiecrat primary and the DNC dirty dealing, what was released dealing with the general election?
Obviously, you have little knowledge of this matter and I'm not here to educate you. Feel free to do your own homework, catch up, and then try again.Everything I saw dealt with the commiecrat primary and the DNC dirty dealing, what was released dealing with the general election?Which of course, has nothing to do with what I said. The Russians have been hacking us even before 2015. I'm specifically speaking of their hacking during the election, which was against the DNC and benefited Trump.
OK CHILD, the wikileaks DNC emails covered this time frame, Jan 2015 to May 25, 2016.
The emails cover the period from January last year until 25 May this year.
WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database
Now tell me, what part of that time frame covered the general election?
The emails were from that period, Idiot.
What date were they first released by WL?
What the fuck difference does that make, the hildabitch wasn't Trumps opponent during the period covered by the emails. His knowing who the DNC was backstabbing during the primaries and before gave him no tactical advantage. You're just pissed they showed your party for the gigantic pieces of shit they are.
what corruption was finally exposed? PLEASE be specific.OMG! The truth influenced the election.
Better hide the truth, right? Moron.
Russia influenced our election, dumbass.
You dopes were too dumb to even know that you admitted it. Now you're trying to play it off like everyone didn't see it.
You think Hillary's corruption should remain hidden. Just say it.
You know you want to.......
At the expense of our national integrity?
No.
Obviously you have no qualms with selling out for a cheap win.
At the expense of our national integrity?
I agree, President Hillary would have ruined our national integrity.
Her corruption was thankfully exposed.
You're too fucking deranged, i.e., a typical conservative.Why are you ignoring the fact that you claimed the leaks ceased on May 25th of last year even though they continued beyond that date? Don't you think you should apologize to the forum for being such a dumb fuck?Like a political candidate working with a foreign govt to expose his opponent's weakness in order to gain an advantage?
Then yes. I agree.
Oh boy, the peanut gallery chimes in. Slpain this to me child, the email release covered from Jan 2015 to May 2016. Trump didn't get the nomination till Aug 2016. So the only opponent the hildabitch had during that time was Sanders. So where's the advantage for Trump and how would he collude against his opponent when his opponents during that time were all republicans. Maybe you should be asking Sanders about his Russian contacts.
WikiLeaks - Search the DNC email database
Starting on Friday 22 July 2016 at 10:30am EDT, WikiLeaks released over 2 publications 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments from the top of the US Democratic National Committee -- part one of our new Hillary Leaks series. The leaks come from the accounts of seven key figures in the DNC:
Dope.
Once again, before Trump got the nomination and disclosed information before and during the dem primaries. Nothing that covered the general election.
I didn't say that, I said the emails that were leaked didn't deal with the time of the general election when the hildabitch was trumps opponent, and it didn't.
Here's exactly what I said:
Everything I saw dealt with the commiecrat primary and the DNC dirty dealing, what was released dealing with the general election?
Sadly, I have to repeat myself because you apparently didn't understand this the first time I said it -- I never said the government conducted forensic analyses. So what exactly does your deformed brain tell you I'm refusing to answer to questions about things I never claimed?LOLOLThat is what I said. Somehow, your defective brain translated that into md claiming they personally conducted forensic analysis on the DNC servers.Strawman, hardly. You said the intel community wouldn't make a claim without proof. I'm just asking which agency got the proof.
Hence, strawman.
So there was no proof? Forensic analysis is the only way to prove a server was hacked and by whom.
Dayam, you're one thick-as-brick conservative.
I never said there was no proof nor did I say there was no forensic analysis performed.
You really suck at this.
Speaking of which, have you finally figured out that Guccifer 2.0 and Russian intelligence is one and the same? Or do you still think you've stumbled upon a glaring "distinction" in that article where no such distinction exists?
Yet you refuse to answer the simple question of which government agency performed the forensic analysis and garnered this so called proof.
Nope, the author clearly points out that our intelligence community believes Guccifer 2.0 is Russian intelligence. So the author of the article using the two interchangeably is not casting a distinction between the two; but exposes your dementia in believing there is a distinction even though the author points out the two are the same.Also the author of the article drew the distinction, not me.
"Reports from the intelligence community said Guccifer 2.0 was used to publicly release the data from hacks, but that the hacks themselves were conducted by Russia."
