Top five moments from Secret Service director's hours-long grilling after Trump assassination attempt

One of the Congressmembers asked

If you can’t stop a 20 year old with no tactical experience, what makes you think you could stop a professional assassin?
 
Coverup of what?

Do you think SS conspired with Crooks?
Yep.
There is NFW the SS could let a protectee be exposed that much by accident.

The evidence is overwhelming. I just hope there is a real investigation and not a coverup.
 
Yep.
There is NFW the SS could let a protectee be exposed that much by accident.

The evidence is overwhelming. I just hope there is a real investigation and not a coverup.

So, your question idea is the Secret Service would choose to align itself with a 20 year old geek with no experience instead of a professional assassin
 
From her history she most likely was qualified. She had a major screw up under her leadership though and should have been fired.

Again, it's sad, people see a female or minority working above a menial role and simply can't accept they are qualified.

They kind of thinking must be rough on the knuckles.
She guard Doritos you simp, not even close to being the same, and her sex has nothing to do with it, neither does race.
 
Cheatle has provided no reason why she should remain on the job.
Her lack of knowledge about what happened after nine days is inexcusable
She was a Jill Biden diversity hire, DEI should be done away with, quotas do not work, get the most qualified for anything, every time.
 
I think it is outrageous when a highly-placed executive is publicly called on the carpet, and the executive has no answers for questions that were 100% predictable.

It is a sign of stupidity, a lack of courage, and disrespect for the audience.

This applies to political debates, Congressional hearings, and press conferences. "I'll have to get back to you,..." is satisfactory for unexpected questions, or for questions where details are not readily available, but for questions that the witness knows are coming, it is not acceptable.
It is akin to Hillary saying, what difference does it make!
 
So, your idea is the Secret Service would choose to align itself with a 20 year old geek with no experience instead of a professional assassin
No. The kid was a useful idiot, a "patsy". The kid couldn't setup the SS protection plan for murder.

One theory is that the "patsy" was setup on the roof in clear sight of the SS cover snipers, who were ordered not to fire unless the "patsy" fired first. The patsy was told to only fire after he heard the 1st shot.
The roof was cleared by design, no one was allowed on it (but the patsy)
The real sniper, the assassin with a good gun and a scope was on the 1st floor.
At some signal the sniper fired the kill shot at Trump, which only missed by the grace of God when Trump moved his head at the same time the bullet was fired. Then the kid started firing, and was shot by the cover sniper.

The real sniper only had one shot, or else the multiple shot timing would be off.
The kid and his dad were shooting at the range the day before, so one shell casing from the kid's gun had to be picked up to place with the others on the roof.

This "theory" only works if the 1st shot was the odd shot from an acoustic analysis.

A real investigation finds out who the snipers were on the 1st floor(SS, State, Local, or ______)
A polygraph would be useful to track down the conspiracy participants.

Cheadle just resigned. Will a good cop be put in there to clean the mess up?
Or will the coverup continue?
 

Forum List

Back
Top