rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 285,346
- 158,375
Coverup of what?Not "lack of knowledge" participating in a coverup.
Do you think SS conspired with Crooks?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Coverup of what?Not "lack of knowledge" participating in a coverup.
Indicted for perjuryShe should be fired.
Yep.Coverup of what?
Do you think SS conspired with Crooks?
Yep.
There is NFW the SS could let a protectee be exposed that much by accident.
The evidence is overwhelming. I just hope there is a real investigation and not a coverup.
She guard Doritos you simp, not even close to being the same, and her sex has nothing to do with it, neither does race.From her history she most likely was qualified. She had a major screw up under her leadership though and should have been fired.
Again, it's sad, people see a female or minority working above a menial role and simply can't accept they are qualified.
They kind of thinking must be rough on the knuckles.
Someone did, and anyone with half a brain can see he was the fall guy!Coverup of what?
Do you think SS conspired with Crooks?
They knew he brought in a range finder.She also attempted to explain to the committee that her agency was unaware of a suspicious threat during the rally, despite the public pointing to a man on a roof minutes before former President Trump was shot.
View attachment 982332
~S~
She was a Jill Biden diversity hire, DEI should be done away with, quotas do not work, get the most qualified for anything, every time.Cheatle has provided no reason why she should remain on the job.
Her lack of knowledge about what happened after nine days is inexcusable
Locals were in charge of Traffic control that is it!Which would have been a localized thing, rather than a whole secret service thing.
It is akin to Hillary saying, what difference does it make!I think it is outrageous when a highly-placed executive is publicly called on the carpet, and the executive has no answers for questions that were 100% predictable.
It is a sign of stupidity, a lack of courage, and disrespect for the audience.
This applies to political debates, Congressional hearings, and press conferences. "I'll have to get back to you,..." is satisfactory for unexpected questions, or for questions where details are not readily available, but for questions that the witness knows are coming, it is not acceptable.
What EXACTLY from the assassination attempt can be connected to DEI?She was a Jill Biden diversity hire, DEI should be done away with, quotas do not work, get the most qualified for anything, every time.
No. The kid was a useful idiot, a "patsy". The kid couldn't setup the SS protection plan for murder.So, your idea is the Secret Service would choose to align itself with a 20 year old geek with no experience instead of a professional assassin