Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh..and:
7. No more citizen's united. Money shouldn't buy power.
Money does not buy power, if it did Microsoft would never have been prosecuted as a monopoly.
Microsoft got most of the decisions against it reversed during the Bush administration.
Please..
Bullshit.
Wanna bet? Obama has military operations targeting terrorists in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, and a couple of other places I can't remember off the top of my head. Not to mention Libya.
These aren't declarations of war..and in fact, small covert operations.
And if you think this hasn't been ongoing since WWII..I've a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.
Cheap.
In addition to Mitt's other faults, he has expressed eagerness to invade Iran. Well, that would really be a stupid idea for several reasons - including this one:
Iraq-Iran Ties Grow Stronger As Iraq Rises From The Ashes
You're not getting it.
You'd do well to travel..to maybe get a sense of why many enterpreneurs move out of third world countries to set up shop in the US or Europe.
I don't get it? How is pointing out that entrepreneurs come to the US proof that we need to end patents? Patents are worldwide now, not just in the US.
Because the very things I pointed out in the post..are why businesses flourish.
That ain't cheap.
And what you guys are trying to do..is the bankrupt the very system that allows people to be successful.
Kind of like killing the goose that lays golden eggs..for a fine goose dinner.
Obama should listen to a smart Democrat. Ed Rendell Team Obama went a little bit too far with the felony business | Power Line
He absolutely should not.
When the other guy brings a gun to the game..you find yourself a rocket launcher.
Why the war over a seemingly simple line on Romney’s resume? The answer is actually critical: A heap of attack ads are based on deals Bain made during that gray period, 1999-2002, when Romney was in Salt Lake City.
I don't see how Romney stands any chance of beating Obama in November without releasing more of his income tax returns - especially for years 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002. To date, Romney says 2010 and 2011 are all we get. Voters need to see those critical years - 1999 thru 2002.
Obama should listen to a smart Democrat. Ed Rendell Team Obama went a little bit too far with the felony business | Power Line
He absolutely should not.
When the other guy brings a gun to the game..you find yourself a rocket launcher.
Let's see if the totally ripe idea of whipping out tax returns gets off the ground!
Be reasonable, white Obamney-fans. By now, we ALL have to see those returns. It's simple. No excuses. What's on those fucking returns? They are the next media step.
CBS Newss Jan Crawford asked Romney that even if he wasnt involved in day-to-day operations at Bain, as the listed owner of the company, Doesnt the buck stop with you? Romney insisted he should not be politically liable for anything that happened after 1999.
Romney told the Massachusetts Ballot Law Commission in 2002 that he attended meetings with some companies where he sat on the board, including Staples, where Bain was an early investor, and LifeLike, a company in which Bain was still invested.
I don't see how Romney stands any chance of beating Obama in November without releasing more of his income tax returns - especially for years 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002. To date, Romney says 2010 and 2011 are all we get. Voters need to see those critical years - 1999 thru 2002.
would it change your vote asshole?
I don't see how Romney stands any chance of beating Obama in November without releasing more of his income tax returns - especially for years 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002. To date, Romney says 2010 and 2011 are all we get. Voters need to see those critical years - 1999 thru 2002.
would it change your vote asshole?
You should be concerned about all those Independents who are ultimately likely to conclude that Romney is lying and, because of that, he's keeping his returns a secret.
would it change your vote asshole?
You should be concerned about all those Independents who are ultimately likely to conclude that Romney is lying and, because of that, he's keeping his returns a secret.
I really don't think the unemployed ones really give a flying shit.
You should be concerned about all those Independents who are ultimately likely to conclude that Romney is lying and, because of that, he's keeping his returns a secret.
I really don't think the unemployed ones really give a flying shit.
You don't think so? Well, try to extrapolate what an average working (or nonworking) stiff might conclude."If Romney is lying about this, how can I believe anything he says about what he's going to do for average folks once in office. And why should I believe that he cares one bit about average people at all."These self same people could easily conclude that at least Obama knows the struggles of ordinary people and is fighting for them as a group whereas Romney has a long history of screwing average workers in order to make money for wealthy investors.
I really don't think the unemployed ones really give a flying shit.
You don't think so? Well, try to extrapolate what an average working (or nonworking) stiff might conclude."If Romney is lying about this, how can I believe anything he says about what he's going to do for average folks once in office. And why should I believe that he cares one bit about average people at all."These self same people could easily conclude that at least Obama knows the struggles of ordinary people and is fighting for them as a group whereas Romney has a long history of screwing average workers in order to make money for wealthy investors.
That's a good one.
You Libs still can't admit that Obama's spoon is only slightly less silver than Romney's.
How's this for a hypothetical statement from you imaginary Indie:
"If Obama hasn't improved conditions that would help me in finding a job in 4 years, why would I want to wait four more years for him to figure it out?"
You don't think so? Well, try to extrapolate what an average working (or nonworking) stiff might conclude."If Romney is lying about this, how can I believe anything he says about what he's going to do for average folks once in office. And why should I believe that he cares one bit about average people at all."These self same people could easily conclude that at least Obama knows the struggles of ordinary people and is fighting for them as a group whereas Romney has a long history of screwing average workers in order to make money for wealthy investors.
That's a good one.
You Libs still can't admit that Obama's spoon is only slightly less silver than Romney's.
How's this for a hypothetical statement from you imaginary Indie:
"If Obama hasn't improved conditions that would help me in finding a job in 4 years, why would I want to wait four more years for him to figure it out?"
You're the ones who mocked Obama's stint as a community organizer. Obama got down in the trenches when he could have gone straight to Wall St after graduation.
He does if he buys stuff.
That's a good one.
You Libs still can't admit that Obama's spoon is only slightly less silver than Romney's.
How's this for a hypothetical statement from you imaginary Indie:
"If Obama hasn't improved conditions that would help me in finding a job in 4 years, why would I want to wait four more years for him to figure it out?"
You're the ones who mocked Obama's stint as a community organizer. Obama got down in the trenches when he could have gone straight to Wall St after graduation.
An Agitator/Protest organizer doesn't create jobs.
