Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
Not perjury. It's forgery.Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.
And when one part of the evidence has been tampered with they throw the whole thing out.Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.
There is no "tampering".And when one part of the evidence has been tampered with they throw the whole thing out.Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.
Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.
So what, she wrote the damn date down. That changes nothing. It's still his handwriting and still him claiming that he never knew her. Are all of you completely brain dead?Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.
No, they are different signatures. One has his assistant's abbreviations at the end.Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.
She didn't forge the date, the handwriting where is clearly different from her and Moore's.
That's just utterly idiotic. Look at the two pieces of writing, they are the same, by the same person. A child could see that and they could also see in the first one that more than one person wrote part of it, the top part versus the bottom part. You are so far from grasping at straws that you can't even see the Dairy Queen on the horizon anymore.No, they are different signatures. One has his assistant's abbreviations at the end.Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
Counterfeit Money: How to Spot Fake Bills
Moore wrote the top, she wrote the bottom. How much more obvious does this need to be for you people?Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.
She didn't forge the date, the handwriting where is clearly different from her and Moore's.
So who wrote it?
Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
How do you reconcile the fact that the woman has admitted she "modified" the yearbook by adding the date? She has now admitted to criminal wrongdoing, and in a Court of Law that is tantamount to perjury.
She didn't forge the date, the handwriting where is clearly different from her and Moore's.
So who wrote it?
But there is no initials D.A. at the end...That's just utterly idiotic. Look at the two pieces of writing, they are the same, by the same person. A child could see that and they could also see in the first one that more than one person wrote part of it, the top part versus the bottom part. You are so far from grasping at straws that you can't even see the Dairy Queen on the horizon anymore.No, they are different signatures. One has his assistant's abbreviations at the end.Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
Counterfeit Money: How to Spot Fake Bills
So? What the hell difference does that make? None. It's his writing, his Roy Moore.But there is no initials D.A. at the end...That's just utterly idiotic. Look at the two pieces of writing, they are the same, by the same person. A child could see that and they could also see in the first one that more than one person wrote part of it, the top part versus the bottom part. You are so far from grasping at straws that you can't even see the Dairy Queen on the horizon anymore.No, they are different signatures. One has his assistant's abbreviations at the end.Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
Counterfeit Money: How to Spot Fake Bills
OK. Here's an obvious question. How is it proof of "chasing after teenage girls" to wish one Happy Graduation and Merry Christmas?Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
OK. Here's an obvious question. How is it proof of "chasing" teenage girls to wish one Happy Graduation and Merry Christmas?Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
That's just utterly idiotic. Look at the two pieces of writing, they are the same, by the same person. A child could see that and they could also see in the first one that more than one person wrote part of it, the top part versus the bottom part. You are so far from grasping at straws that you can't even see the Dairy Queen on the horizon anymore.No, they are different signatures. One has his assistant's abbreviations at the end.Can we get past the obvious please? That Moore chased after teenage girls and wrote notes to them?
View attachment 164967
View attachment 164968
Both by the same person and both to teenage girls.
Counterfeit Money: How to Spot Fake Bills
