Rubio Attacks Obama

[idb]

In Syria Christian children are being crucified, their mothers raped and sold into white slavery, the fathers are killed. These people need refuge and can be vetted in their own country by their priest and their church. Why doesn't our President or Press talk about this or the suffering of these Syrians?

ISIS is killing more Muslims than Christians.

There is a true persecution of Christians going on over there. The numbers of Christians being killed is the greatest since the Crusades. And you are correct when you say they are bullying and killing the other Muslims in great numbers.

My point is the President and the press never mention the suffering of the Christians or try to help them. He helps and talks about only Muslims.

Is your point that Christians lives are not as valuable as those of Muslims because you think they are killing more Muslims than Christians?

Obama's opponents are saying worse. Both Jeb Bush and Ted Cruz have taken positions of strict preference of Christian refugees.

Ted Cruz' new bill would prevent Christian refugees from Syria.

Sen. Cruz Introduces the Terrorist Refugee Infiltration Prevention Act | Ted Cruz | U.S. Senator for Texas

 

[Iceweasel]

Sen. Marco Rubio told Fox News tonight that President Obama’s stance on America’s refugee program is driven by “radical ideology”,"hatred of white Christians" and “political correctness.” Do you agree?

Funny. ISIS is killing more Muslims than Christians. Our Constitution protects Christians and Muslims EQUALLY. Rubio is a blight on humanity.

Our constitution protects citizens. Not everybody on Earth. Religious persecution is a legitimate claim, where's the evidence ISIS is killing Syrians because they are Muslim?

 

[Timmy]

What' was Rubios stance when Obama wanted to send a missile up Assads ass?

"We've been begging Obama ... ". Please .

 

[idb]

The US doesn't get to select the refugees it admits for vetting.
They are referred by the UNHCR.

 

[Avatar4321]

Nothing with a hint of anti-Islam will come out of this White House. To admit Christian's persecution is to admit there is a problem.

ISIS is killing more Muslims than Christians.

And yet only one of the two groups is being targeted for genocide

 

[Iceweasel]

What' was Rubios stance when Obama wanted to send a missile up Assads ass?

"We've been begging Obama ... ". Please .

When did that happen? Assad crossed the red line in the sand and obama folded up like a cheap suit.

 

[my2¢]

Rubio Attacks Obama

Oh, I was hoping physically.

 

[HenryBHough]

Assad crossed the red line in the sand and obama folded up like a cheap suit.

Please, you're giving an unfairly bad name to actual cheap suits worldwide!

 

[Timmy]

Guess you a forget how congress cries about how they need to be consulted . And when they were it was like "not our business !"

 

[sarahgop]

Im surprised he didnt attack Obama for not letting in more illegals.

 

[ChiChi2]

Is your point that Christians lives are not as valuable as those of Muslims because you think they are killing more Muslims than Christians?[/QUOTE]

Obama's opponents are saying worse. Both Jeb Bush and Ted Cruz have taken positions of strict preference of Christian refugees.[/QUOTE]

Ted Cruz' new bill would prevent Christian refugees from Syria.

Sen. Cruz Introduces the Terrorist Refugee Infiltration Prevention Act | Ted Cruz | U.S. Senator for Texas[/QUOTE]

This does not answer my question :

Is your point that Christians lives are not as valuable as those of Muslims because you think they are killing more Muslims than Christians?

 

[ChiChi2]

The US doesn't get to select the refugees it admits for vetting.
They are referred by the UNHCR.

Why is the US giving up this right to the UNHCR? Why are we allowing the decisions that belong to our country to be given to and decided by an international entity?

If we give up this right, then what other rights will we give to international powers to decide for us?

Does anyone recognize that this is our being controlled by people we as citizens have not voted for and who do not understand the American culture?

 

[ChiChi2]

We give over one right to an international body, then we give up others because it doesn't seem like it harms anything at that time, and so we give up more rights after that, and that will lead to totalitarianism, dictatorship, and communism where we will have no rights and be completely controlled by those in the elite class who are The wealthiest 1% of the people in the entire world. That is their goal and what having a NEW WORLD ORDER means. They have been working hard to produce a new world order since the early 1900s.

 

[ChiChi2]

....where's the evidence ISIS is killing Syrians because they are Muslim?[/QUOTE]

They are killing them if they don't agree to join ISIS, but not because they are Muslim. This is still butchery, and those Muslims who do not agree with ISIS could help create a more stable Middle East.... If that's ever possible.

 

[idb]

The US doesn't get to select the refugees it admits for vetting.
They are referred by the UNHCR.

Why is the US giving up this right to the UNHCR? Why are we allowing the decisions that belong to our country to be given to and decided by an international entity?

If we give up this right, then what other rights will we give to international powers to decide for us?

Does anyone recognize that this is our being controlled by people we as citizens have not voted for and who do not understand the American culture?

The US still vets them.
There's no giving up of rights.
Refugees turn up in whatever country they turn up in, apply for refugee status, the UN accepts them or not under that status then refers them to different countries to go through their own immigration process.

 

[Iceweasel]

The US doesn't get to select the refugees it admits for vetting.
They are referred by the UNHCR.

Why is the US giving up this right to the UNHCR? Why are we allowing the decisions that belong to our country to be given to and decided by an international entity?

If we give up this right, then what other rights will we give to international powers to decide for us?

Does anyone recognize that this is our being controlled by people we as citizens have not voted for and who do not understand the American culture?

The US still vets them.
There's no giving up of rights.
Refugees turn up in whatever country they turn up in, apply for refugee status, the UN accepts them or not under that status then refers them to different countries to go through their own immigration process.

Explain how the UN vets them with no background information. They call up Assad and ask him to email the info?

 

[ChiChi2]

The US doesn't get to select the refugees it admits for vetting.
They are referred by the UNHCR.

Why is the US giving up this right to the UNHCR? Why are we allowing the decisions that belong to our country to be given to and decided by an international entity?

If we give up this right, then what other rights will we give to international powers to decide for us?

Does anyone recognize that this is our being controlled by people we as citizens have not voted for and who do not understand the American culture?

The US still vets them.
There's no giving up of rights.
Refugees turn up in whatever country they turn up in, apply for refugee status, the UN accepts them or not under that status then refers them to different countries to go through their own immigration process.

We have given up the right to make the decision whether to accept them or not into the US and we have given this right to the UN. We should say if we agree to have them or not and not the UN.

I don't want to be under the UN's control and that's exactly what the last 5 presidents have worked towards making happen, so we all can come together and be ruled, not governed, by the New World Order aka Communism.

 

[idb]

The US doesn't get to select the refugees it admits for vetting.
They are referred by the UNHCR.

Why is the US giving up this right to the UNHCR? Why are we allowing the decisions that belong to our country to be given to and decided by an international entity?

If we give up this right, then what other rights will we give to international powers to decide for us?

Does anyone recognize that this is our being controlled by people we as citizens have not voted for and who do not understand the American culture?

The US still vets them.
There's no giving up of rights.
Refugees turn up in whatever country they turn up in, apply for refugee status, the UN accepts them or not under that status then refers them to different countries to go through their own immigration process.

We have given up the right to make the decision whether to accept them or not into the US and we have given this right to the UN. We should say if we agree to have them or not and not the UN.

I don't want to be under the UN's control and that's exactly what the last 5 presidents have worked towards making happen, so we all can come together and be ruled, not governed, by the New World Order aka Communism.

You can stop worrying because you're wrong.
Feel better now?

 

[idb]

The US doesn't get to select the refugees it admits for vetting.
They are referred by the UNHCR.

Why is the US giving up this right to the UNHCR? Why are we allowing the decisions that belong to our country to be given to and decided by an international entity?

If we give up this right, then what other rights will we give to international powers to decide for us?

Does anyone recognize that this is our being controlled by people we as citizens have not voted for and who do not understand the American culture?

The US still vets them.
There's no giving up of rights.
Refugees turn up in whatever country they turn up in, apply for refugee status, the UN accepts them or not under that status then refers them to different countries to go through their own immigration process.

Explain how the UN vets them with no background information. They call up Assad and ask him to email the info?

I would have thought you could look it up yourself.

How a Syrian refugee gets to the US - BBC News

Refugee screening process in US - Business Insider

 

[ChiChi2]

Wrong about what? The responses I have recd are not relevant to what I stated. Americans should make the decision to accept & then vet refugees coming to our shores....Other nations might want the right to do that too instead of having huge groups of people pushed on them without their agreement by the UN.